| Literature DB >> 29235395 |
D Singh1, B Jayashankar1, K P Mishra1, H Tanwar1, S N Madhusudana2, A Y Belludi2, R Tulsawani1, S B Singh1, L Ganju1.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Hippophae rhamnoides L. (Elaeagnaceae), commonly known as seabuckthorn (SBT), is known for its medicinal and nutritional properties.Entities:
Keywords: Seabuckthorn; antibody response; cytotoxic T cells; memory T cells
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29235395 PMCID: PMC6130554 DOI: 10.1080/13880209.2017.1413662
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharm Biol ISSN: 1388-0209 Impact factor: 3.503
Figure 1.HPLC profile of SBTE. Identification of compounds was done on the basis of the retention time, co-injections and spectral matching with standard.
Figure 2.Hemolytic activity of SBTE. Hemolytic activity of different concentrations of SBTE (1000–7.8 mg/L) was measured in blood samples collected from healthy volunteers (n = 4). The graph represents the mean values of % hemolysis ± SD. Saline was used as negative control which shows minimum hemolysis and double distilled water (DDW) was used as positive control showing maximum hemolysis. One-way ANOVA Dunett’s T3 test was applied to calculate significance between the hemolytic activity of different concentrations of SBTE and positive control. p value <0.05 was considered as significant.
Figure 3.Rabies virus neutralizing antibody titers in mice sera. Sera samples were collected on (A) day 0 (pre-immunization); (B) days 7 and 14 (pooled); (C) days 21 and 28 (pooled); (D) day 35. PBS: mice immunized with PBS (n = 10); SBTE + Rb: mice immunized with SBTE + Rb antigen (n = 20); Al + Rb: mice immunized with algel + rabies antigen (n = 20). Experiments were done thrice. Booster was administered on day 14. Horizontal lines indicate the median values. Non-parametric Wilcoxon’s signed ranks test was applied for comparing different groups. p < 0.05 was considered to be significant; ns = not significant. Protective neutralization antibody titer limit was considered >0.5 IU/mL. Mice immunized with Rb antigen alone (n = 4) showed no protective RVNA titers (data not shown).
Figure 4.RVNA titers in mice sera from SBTE + Al + Rb immunized mice. Sera samples from immunized mice (n = 10) collected on (A) day 0 (pre-immunization); (B) days 7 and 14 (pooled); (C) days 21 and 28 (pooled); (D) day 35. Horizontal lines indicate the median values. Non-parametric Wilcoxon’s signed ranks test was applied for comparing antibody titers of pre-immunized group with post-immunized group. p < 0.05 was considered to be significant.
Figure 5.RVNA titers in mice sera from isorhamnetin + Rb immunized mice. Sera samples from immunized mice (n = 4) collected on (A) day 0 (pre-immunization); (B) days 7 and 14 (pooled); (C) days 21 and 28 (pooled). Horizontal lines indicate the median values. Mice immunized with Rb antigen alone (n = 4) showed no protective RVNA titers (data not shown).
Figure 6.CTL response by SBTE. Bar graph showing the mean ± SEM (n = 3) of % CD8+ Gr B+ cell population in gated peripheral blood lymphocytes of different groups immunized with Rb antigen, SBTE + Rb antigen and algel + Rb antigen. Independent-samples t-test was applied for calculating significance between the immunized groups. *p value <0.05 vs. Rb.
Percent memory T cells, plasma cells and DCs in SBTE + Rb immunized mice.
| Groups immunized with | % CD44+CD62L+ memory T cells (mean ± SEM) ( | %CD138+ plasma cells(mean ± SEM) ( | %CD11c+ dendritic cells(mean ± SEM) ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rb | 20.3 ± 8.5 | 11.37 ± 2.8 | 9.45 ± 3.1 |
| SBTE + Rb | 27.9 ± 10.4 | 15.96 ± 4.5 | 25.86 ± 14.0 |
Figure 7.IL-1β production by peritoneal lavage cells in response to SBTE. Peritoneal cells were isolated from different groups of immunized mice (n = 3) as indicated: Rb: rabies antigen immunized; SBTE + Rb: SBTE + Rb antigen immunized and were cultured with or without LPS. Cells supernatants after 48 h were assayed for IL-1β. Values in bracket indicate the fold increase IL-1β production in comparison to the Rb antigen immunized group.