Literature DB >> 29234891

Geometry optimization of zirconium sulfophenylphosphonate layers by molecular simulation methods.

Jakub Škoda1, Miroslav Pospíšil2, Petr Kovář1, Klára Melánová3,4, Jan Svoboda5,6, Ludvík Beneš4,5, Vítězslav Zima3,4.   

Abstract

Classical molecular simulation methods were used for a detailed structural description of zirconium 4-sulfophenylphosphonate and zirconium phenylphosphonate 4-sulfophenylphosphonates with general formula Zr(HO3SC6H4PO3) x (C6H5PO3)2-x ·yH2O (x = 0.7-2; y = 0 or 2). First, models describing the structure of zirconium 4-sulfophenylphosphonate (x = 2) were calculated for the hydrated (y = 2) and dehydrated (y = 0) compounds. Subsequently, models for two mixed zirconium phenylphosphonate 4-sulfophenylphosphonates (x = 1.3 and 0.7) were calculated. Optimized models suggest that the presence of water molecules between sulfo groups creates a water-sulfonate layer with a system of hydrogen bonds. We suppose that this arrangement is the reason for a higher proton conductivity of the hydrated samples compared to dehydrated samples. When the water molecules are removed, a small decrease in the basal spacing (around 0.06 Å) is observed. This behavior is confirmed by the simulated models, where no significant changes in the structure on dehydration were observed except the absence of the water molecules and a lower number of hydrogen bonds between two adjacent sulfonate sheets. Due to the good crystallinity of the samples and the presence of sharp non-basal peaks in their X-ray diffraction patterns, Miller indices of the non-basal peaks in the diffraction patterns calculated from the models can be compared with those found in the experimental data. This allowed us to precisely describe for example (15 5-2) planes, from which mutual distances of the phenyl rings were determined to be 2.62 Å. Graphical Abstract Detailed ball and stick view into the interlayer structure of ZrSPhP1.3.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intercalation; Layered material; Molecular simulation; Zirconium sulfophenylphosphonate

Year:  2017        PMID: 29234891     DOI: 10.1007/s00894-017-3549-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Model        ISSN: 0948-5023            Impact factor:   1.810


  2 in total

1.  Ewald Summation for Molecular Simulations.

Authors:  Brad A Wells; Alan L Chaffee
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  A three-dimensional tin(II) phosphonatobenzenesulfonate with Sn4O12 clusters.

Authors:  Palanikumar Maniam; Norbert Stock
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 1.172

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.