Literature DB >> 29234649

Total bilateral ruptures of the knee extensor apparatus.

Diogo Lino Moura1, José Pedro Marques2, João Páscoa Pinheiro3, Fernando Fonseca1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Bilateral extensor tendon ruptures of the knee are rare and have only been published in the form of case reports or small series.
METHODS: Seven patients corresponding to 14 extensor tendon ruptures of the knee were evaluated by the same examiner after a minimum one year post-surgery. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed; for statistical analysis, the level of significance was set at 0.05.
RESULTS: The most common injury was patellar tendon rupture (n = 9; 64.29%) followed by quadriceps tendon rupture (n = 5, 35.71%). The intrasubstance was the most affected location (57.15%), followed by the myotendinous junction (21.43%) and the patellar bone insertions (21.43%). Quadriceps tendon ruptures were more prevalent in patients older than 50 years, while patellar tendon ruptures tended to occur in younger individuals. All but one patient had recognized risk factors for tendinous degeneration and rupture: 75% of the cases suffered from diseases, 50% had history of drug use and/or abuse, and 37.5% had both disease and drug use history. Mean attained values for flexion ROM were 124.64° ± 9.43 (110-140°) and 89.57 ± 6.02 (78-94) for Kujala score. More than half of the patients complained of residual pain and quadriceps muscular weakness. Mean age was younger in the individuals who complained of residual pain.
CONCLUSION: Bilateral tendon ruptures of the knee extensor apparatus ruptures are rare and serious injuries, mostly associated with risk factors. Early surgical repair and intensive rehabilitation program for bilateral extensor tendon ruptures of the knee may warrant satisfactory functional outcomes in the medium to long term, despite non-negligible levels of residual pain, quadriceps muscle weakness, and atrophy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Knee joint; Patellar ligament/injuries; Rupture; Tendon injuries

Year:  2016        PMID: 29234649      PMCID: PMC5720844          DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2016.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop        ISSN: 2255-4971


Introduction

The knee extensor apparatus encompasses two tendons, quadriceps and patelar, and the patellar bone. Unilateral ruptures are quite common, as opposed to the rare bilateral knee extensor ruptures. This is highlighted by the fact that the latter have only been published in the form of case reports or small series. Bilateral knee tendon extensor apparatus ruptures are serious and disabling injuries, mostly associated with risk factors. They are frequently reported as difficult to treat injuries, demanding long recovery periods.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 This paper reports on our centre's experience treating patients with bilateral knee tendon extensor ruptures and represents the largest series published to date. The aim of this study is to provide information regarding prognosis on various clinical outcomes of these patients, increasing our understanding of the natural history of this rare clinical presentation. Also we hope our results may help clinicians identifying patients at risk, leading to the introduction of preventive measures.

Methods

Medical records were retrospectively reviewed and 7 patients were identified and included in our study. They had all been previously submitted to surgery due to total bilateral knee tendon extensor rupture (time between surgery and clinical evaluation – average: 5.29 years; range 1–8 years). All patients were summoned and evaluated by the same examiner after a minimum of 1-year post-surgery. Clinical examination included range of motion (ROM) assessment and the application of Kujala score. Additionally a satisfaction index (scale 0–5: 0 – insatisfied to 5 – totally satisfied), the presence of residual symptoms and its characterization were assessed. Radiographic evaluation aimed at detecting the presence of patellofemoral arthritis using Merchant patellar view and measuring patellar height with Insall–Salvati ratio.12, 13 For statistical analysis we used SPSS (version23, IBM Corp, Armonk, New York) with the level of significance set at 0.05. Quantitative measures are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD; minimum value–maximum value) and qualitative measures with total number (n) or percent (%). We used Mann–Whitney test for comparing quantitative and Chi-square test for qualitative data. To study the association between quantitative outcomes we used Spearman correlation test.

Results

Demographic and injury characterization data

The sample includes seven patients, corresponding to a total of 14 ruptures (Table 1). The mean age was 46.43 ± 14.84 years (35–78 y) and 85.71% were male. The most common injury was patellar tendon rupture (n = 9; 64.29%), followed by quadriceps tendon rupture (n = 5; 35.71%) (Fig. 1). With the sole exception of an individual with right patellar tendon and left quadriceps tendon ruptures, all other injuries occurred bilaterally in the same structure. Patients were older in quadriceps tendon ruptures (59.5 ± 17.4; p = 0.004) as well as in ruptures occurring at the myotendinous junction (65.7 ± 21.4; p = 0.021) comparing with patellar tendon (39.2 ± 4) and intrasubstance tendinous ruptures (39.0 ± 4.2). The majority of the bilateral ruptures happened simultaneously (Table 1). There were two exceptions, with isolated unilateral ruptures being separated by a short period of time. Falls were the causative mechanism in 57.14% of the cases. All tendon ruptures were attributed to indirect traumatism: 3 cases of knee flexion coinciding with sudden contraction of the quadriceps; 2 cases of excessive rotational movement of the knee; 2 cases of knee hyperflexion. Regarding the level of the rupture, intrasubstance was more frequent (57.14%), followed by myotendinous junction (21.43%) and patellar bone insertions (21.43%). All intrasubstance ruptures took place in patellar tendons and all myotendinous junction ruptures occurred in quadricep tendons. Risk factor profile evaluation revealed that 85.71% of the sample suffered from diseases that are recognized risk factors for tendinous degeneration and rupture, 57.14% had history of drug use and/or abuse, 42.86% had both disease and drug use history. There was only 1 healthy patient without known risk factors. Corticotheraphy (42.86%) and anabolic steroid use (28.57%) were the main recognized consumptions. Chronic kidney injury undergoing haemodialysis (28.57%), hypercholesterolaemia (28.57%), hyperuricemia (14.29%), rheumatoid arthritis (14.29%), systemic lupus erythematosus (14.29%) and osteogenesis imperfecta (14.29%) were the identified predisposing diseases (Fig. 2). All quadriceps tendon ruptures occurred in patients with known disease. On the other hand, patellar tendon ruptures were more closely related to drug use (66.7% of drug use and/or abuse versus only 40% in quadriceps tendon ruptures).
Table 1

Demographic data of the 8 patients included in the series.

PatientAge at the time of injuryDiagnosisRupture locationRupture timingMechanismPresence of risk factors for rupture of knee tendon extensor apparatus
1M35Right patellar tendon ruptureIntrasubstanceSimultaneousKnee flexion and sudden contraction of the quadricepsYes
Left patellar tendon ruptureIntrasubstanceSimultaneousKnee flexion and sudden contraction of the quadricepsYes
2M40Right patellar tendon ruptureIntrasubstanceSimultaneousKnee flexion and sudden contraction of the quadricepsYes
Left patellar tendon ruptureIntrasubstanceSimultaneousKnee flexion and sudden contraction of the quadricepsYes
3M45Right patellar tendon ruptureIntrasubstanceSimultaneousknee hyperflexionNo
Left patellar tendon ruptureIntrasubstanceSimultaneousknee hyperflexionNo
4M41Right quadriceps tendon ruptureMyotendinous junctionSimultaneousknee hyperflexionYes
Left patellar tendon rupturePatellar bone insertionSimultaneousknee hyperflexionYes
5M78Right quadriceps tendon rupturePatellar bone insertionIsolatedExcessive rotational movement of the kneeYes
Left quadriceps tendon rupturePatellar bone insertionIsolatedExcessive rotational movement of the kneeYes
6F36Right patellar tendon ruptureIntrasubstanceIsolatedExcessive rotational movement of the kneeYes
Left patellar tendon ruptureIntrasubstanceIsolatedExcessive rotational movement of the kneeYes
7M50Right quadriceps tendon ruptureMyotendinous junctionSimultaneousKnee flexion and sudden contraction of the quadricepsYes
Left quadriceps tendon ruptureMyotendinous junctionSimultaneousKnee flexion and sudden contraction of the quadricepsYes

M, male; F, female.

Fig. 1

Level of rupture at knee extensor apparatus.

Fig. 2

Reported risk factors of a case series of bilateral ruptures of the knee tendon extensor apparatus.

Level of rupture at knee extensor apparatus. Reported risk factors of a case series of bilateral ruptures of the knee tendon extensor apparatus. Demographic data of the 8 patients included in the series. M, male; F, female.

Treatment performed

Mean waiting time for surgery was 51.3 hours (5–120 h). Surgical repair was the treatment of choice in all patients (Table 2). Employed techniques were end-to-end suture (50%), transosseous suture (28.57%) and tenodesis with suture anchors (21.43%). Cerclage protection wire was used in 3 patellar tendon ruptures with 7.3 months being the mean time to removal. Mean immobilization time post-surgery was 48.43 days (42–70), followed by rehabilitation program under physiotherapist support, which included initially isometric muscle strengthening and progressive knee flexion and strengthening exercises.
Table 2

Specificities of the treatment performed to each of the 8 patients included in the series.

PatientSurgical repairCerclage protection wireImmobilization time (days)Time between injury and surgery (hours)
1MEnd-to-end sutureYes455
End-to-end sutureYes455
2MEnd-to-end sutureNo4272
End-to-end sutureNo4272
3MEnd-to-end sutureYes5696
End-to-end sutureYes5696
4MEnd-to-end sutureNo42120
Tenodesis with suture anchorsYes42120
5MTenodesis with suture anchorsNo70120
Tenodesis with suture anchorsNo70120
6FEnd-to-end sutureNo4296
End-to-end sutureNo4296
7MEnd-to-end sutureNo426
End-to-end sutureNo426
Specificities of the treatment performed to each of the 8 patients included in the series.

Outcomes

Mean attained values for flexion ROM (Table 3) were 124.64° ± 9.43 (110–140°) and 89.57 ± 6.02 (78–94) in Kujala score. Full extension ROM was observed in all except one of the knees, while the remaining displayed a 5° deficit or less. Concerning the satisfaction index 28.57% chose grade 4 and 71.43% grade 5. Signs of patellofemoral arthritis were not identified in this sample, and there were 2 knees with patella baja in the same patient with patellar tendon ruptures (Insall–Salvati ratio = 1.25 and 1.3). Age demonstrated a significant inverse correlation with knee flexion ROM (rho = −0.60; p = 0.022).
Table 3

Outcomes of each of the 7 patients included in the series.

PatientTime between injury and evaluation (years)Flexion ROM (degrees)Extension lag (degrees)Kujala ScoreInsall–Salvati ratioResidual painQuadriceps weakness feelingQuadriceps atrophySatisfaction index (0–5)
1M1135No941.1YesYesYes4
1135No940.8YesYesYes4
2M8126No881.05YesYesYes4
8134No881.08YesYesYes4
3M7140No780.88NoNoNo5
7130No780.95NoNoNo5
4M4116No941NoNoYes5
4124No941NoNoYes5
5M8110Yes–3940.8YesYesNo5
8110No941.1YesYesNo5
6F4125No851.25YesYesYes5
4120No851.3YesYesYes5
7M5117No940.9NoNoNo5
5123No940.9NoNoNo5
Outcomes of each of the 7 patients included in the series. When comparing quadriceps with patellar tendon ruptures we noticed lower flexion ROM (116° ± 5.5 vs 129.4° ± 6.8) and superior Kujala scores (94 ± 0 vs 87.1 ± 6.3) in patients who suffered from quadriceps tendon ruptures, although the differences were non-significant. Ruptures at the intrasubstance level were associated with lower Kujala score (86.3 ± 6,2; p = 0.039) when compared with ruptures at the myotendinous junction (94 ± 0) or at the bone insertion level (94 ± 0). However, they presented a significantly superior flexion ROM (130.6° ± 6.2; p = 0.006) when compared with ruptures at the myotendinous junction (113.3° ± 5.8). Those who had no predisposing disease attained superior flexion ROM (135° ± 4.1; p = 0.002) compared with the ones who did (115.4° ± 13.4). We found no differences in the functional results achieved with different surgical techniques and different immobilization periods.

Complications

More than half of the patients (57.14%) complained of residual pain and quadriceps weakness, symptoms elicited mainly by long periods of standing or walking, climbing and descending stairs and squatting. Nonetheless all patients denied important functional impairment in daily activities. The prevalence of residual pain was found to be superior in patellar tendon ruptures (66.7%), ruptures at the intrasubstance (75%) and myotendinous junction (66.6%) levels, although not reaching statistical significant differences. Mean age was significantly inferior (47.3 ± 19.1 vs 54.5 ± 17.3; p = 0.038) in the individuals who complained of residual pain. Thigh atrophy auto-perception was claimed in 8 ruptures, corresponding to 7 patellar tendon ruptures and 1 quadriceps tendon rupture.

Discussion

It takes a strength that is 17.5 times superior to our own body weight to cause rupture of a healthy patellar tendon. However the majority of the ruptures follow minor trauma or happen spontaneously.14, 15 Kannus and Jozsa reported their findings on 891 patients with spontaneous tendinous rupture emphasizing that all of them had degenerative changes on histopathological examination. Accordingly, most knee extensor apparatus ruptures follow an inflammatory and degenerative process whereby tendon's mechanical properties become severely impaired. This occurs in systemic diseases (rheumatologic diseases, diabetes, chronic kidney injury, hyperparathyroidism, gout, obesity), local diseases (patellar tendinopathy) and drug use (corticotheraphy, anabolic steroids).1, 2, 10, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 Our series demonstrates a strong association between tendinous ruptures and personal history of disease and/or drug consumption, findings that are consistent with the literature.3, 4, 5, 6 Most injuries were due to falls. As reported by other authors, knee flexion coinciding with sudden contraction of the quadriceps was the most common injury mechanism.17, 21, 22, 23 Higher prevalence of ruptures at the intrasubstance tendon level have been reported previously and attributed to its tendency to degeneration under the influence of disease states or drug use. Instead, healthy tendons tend to tear at myotendinous junction or bone insertion level.9, 20, 23 Quadriceps tendon ruptures are more frequent in patients older than 50 years while patellar tendon ruptures tend to occur in younger individuals. Our findings are corroborated by other researchers.1, 2, 14, 21, 24 Early diagnosis and surgical repair are needed to re-establish knee extensor mechanism. Tendon repair, followed by immobilization and rehabilitation have shown good outcomes.1, 2, 19 Cerclage protection wire use in this context is controversial.1, 9, 14, 23, 24 Although it allows early mobilization it also requires a second surgery for removal. Clinical and functional results were satisfactory as reflected by near normal ROM and Kujala score. Similar results were found by Chang et al. in their work reporting on 5 patients with bilateral quadriceps tendon ruptures. Mean ROM levels attained was 129° flexion and no extension deficits were noted. Mean IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee) score was 71.9 (range 34.4–91.6). Moreover, they did not find significant differences when comparing functional outcomes with the control group of unilateral tendon ruptures. Provelegios et al. published the results of a series of 5 patient with spontaneous bilateral quadriceps ruptures. All suffered from CKI and hyperparathyroidism and had excellent functional outcomes. Siwek et al. stated that knee extensor mechanism ruptures must be repaired as soon as possible in order to maximize functional outcomes. They claim that a delay of more than two weeks can seriously compromise primary tendon repair due to retraction. In our series we could not find differences in functional outcomes attributable to different waiting times for surgery. Despite the absence of a healthy contralateral tendon to compare, we only had 14.29% of patellar height abnormal values in the 14 operated knees, assuming Insall–Salvati ratio normal values between 0.8 and 1.2. A significant percentage of our patients complained of residual pain and quadriceps weakness. The comparison between patellar and quadriceps tendon ruptures showed that patellar tendon ruptures are more common in younger patients, tend to occur at the intrasubstance level, have superior residual pain and flexion ROM. Pain and quadriceps weakness and atrophy were more common in younger patients with patellar tendon rupture. Noteworthy this is a subset patients who have higher physical demands and superior auto-perception of pain and functional impairment (when compared with their older counterparts). Quadriceps tendon ruptures are more frequent in older patients, which may explain why they have lower flexion ROM but higher Kujala scores (possibly due to lower residual pain). Present study limitations include its retrospective design, the small size of the sample and a subjective clinical and functional evaluation.

Conclusions

Bilateral knee extensor tendon apparatus ruptures are rare and serious injuries, mostly associated with risk factors. Nevertheless, we and other authors have demonstrated that an early surgical repair and intensive rehabilitation program may warrant satisfactory functional outcomes on medium term, despite non-negligible levels of residual pain, quadriceps muscle weakness and atrophy.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
  24 in total

1.  Spontaneous bilateral patellar tendon rupture: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Biagio Moretti; Angela Notarnicola; Lorenzo Moretti; Raffaele Garofalo; Vittorio Patella
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2008-02-10

2.  Roentgenographic analysis of patellofemoral congruence.

Authors:  A C Merchant; R L Mercer; R H Jacobsen; C R Cool
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  Traumatic bilateral concurrent patellar tendon rupture: an alterative fixation method.

Authors:  Hok-Ming Ho; Wai-Keung Edison Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Bilateral rupture of the patella tendon in an otherwise healthy male patient following minor trauma.

Authors:  L X Webb; E B Toby
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1986-11

5.  Bilateral, spontaneous and simultaneous rupture of the quadriceps tendon in chronic renal failure and secondary hyperparathyroidism. Report of five cases.

Authors:  S Provelegios; P Markakis; G Cambouroglou; G Choumis; E Dounis
Journal:  Arch Anat Cytol Pathol       Date:  1991

6.  Spontaneous disruption of the bilateral knee extensor mechanism: a report of two cases.

Authors:  Chusheng Seng; Yi-Jia Lim; Hee Nee Pang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.118

7.  Scoring of patellofemoral disorders.

Authors:  U M Kujala; L H Jaakkola; S K Koskinen; S Taimela; M Hurme; O Nelimarkka
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Functional results following surgical repair of simultaneous bilateral quadriceps tendon ruptures.

Authors:  Edward S Chang; Christopher C Dodson; Fotios Tjoumakaris; Steven B Cohen; Edward S Chang; Christopher C Dodson; Fotios Tjoumakaris; Steven B Cohen
Journal:  Phys Sportsmed       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 9.  Simultaneous bilateral rupture of quadriceps tendons: analysis of risk factors and associations.

Authors:  Mrugeshkumar K Shah
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 0.954

10.  Spontaneous bilateral rupture of the extensor mechanism of the knee in two patients on chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  W C Lauerman; B G Smith; P I Kenmore
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  1 in total

1.  The outcomes of one-stage treatment for multiple knee ligament injuries combined with extensor apparatus rupture.

Authors:  Daohong Zhao; Zhongde Yang; Changsha Wu; Jia Zhong; Xizong Zhou; Jinghua Li; Yan Li; Yongsheng Lu; Duo Shen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 2.362

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.