| Literature DB >> 29234458 |
Srinivas Belide1, Thomas Vanhercke1, James Robertson Petrie1, Surinder Pal Singh1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) is one of the world's most important cereal crops grown for multiple applications and has been identified as a potential biofuel crop. Despite several decades of study, sorghum has been widely considered as a recalcitrant major crop for transformation due to accumulation of phenolic compounds, lack of model genotypes, low regeneration frequency and loss of regeneration potential through sub-cultures. Among different explants used for genetic transformation of sorghum, immature embryos are ideal over other explants. However, the continuous supply of quality immature embryos for transformation is labour intensive and expensive. In addition, transformation efficiencies are also influenced by environmental conditions (light and temperature). Despite these challenges, immature embryos remain the predominant choice because of their success rate and also due to non-availability of other dependable explants without compromising the transformation efficiency.Entities:
Keywords: Flow cytometry; Geneticin; Lipoic acid; Nodular structures; Particle bombardment; Ploidy analysis
Year: 2017 PMID: 29234458 PMCID: PMC5723044 DOI: 10.1186/s13007-017-0260-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Methods ISSN: 1746-4811 Impact factor: 4.993
Fig. 1Generation of DEC tissue and plant regeneration from immature embryos of sorghum. a Callus initiation from embryo (4 week old), b embryogenic callus with nodular structures (at least 8 weeks old), c, d shoot induction without and with LA in SIM and SRM respectively
Comparison of DEC tissue induction frequency and quality with and without LA in callus induction medium (CIM)
| Immature embryo size (mm) | Parameter | Medium | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CIM | CIM +1 mg/l LA | ||
| 1.4–2 | DEC tissue induction frequency | 61.3 ± 3.2 | 79.0 ± 6.5* |
| DEC tissue quality | Average quality | High qualitya | |
| > 2 | DEC tissue induction frequency | 52.3 ± 3.1 | 59.0 ± 5.5** |
| DEC tissue quality | Low quality | Good quality | |
Values are the means with standard deviation (SD)
* Significant at P < 0.013
** Not significant
aRefer text for more description
Effect of lipoic acid on regeneration frequency and number of shoots from DEC tissue
| DEC tissue age in months (from immature embryo isolation) | Regeneration frequency (%) | Number of shoots/callus | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No LA in SIM and SRM | LA in SIM and SRM | No LA in SIM and SRM | LA in SIM and SRM | |
| 2 | 92.3 ± 3.05 | 97.6 ± 2.5 | 22.0 ± 3.6a | 40.0 ± 4.5b |
| 4 | 86.0 ± 2.0* | 97.0 ± 2.6* | 16.0 ± 2.0c | 40.0 ± 1.5d |
| 6 | 81.0 ± 1.0** | 94.3 ± 2.0** | 14 .0 ± 2.0e | 33.0 ± 2.5f |
Values are the means with standard deviation (SD). Different letters in the row, in calculation of number of shoots/calli is significant (P < 0.050)
* Significant at P = 0.004
** Significant at P ≤ 0.001
Fig. 2Selection and regeneration transgenic sorghum plants. a Non-transformed (control) calli on CIM + G25, b Transformed calli on CIM + G25, c shoot regeneration from transformed callus, d putative transgenic shoot in root induction media, e PCR confirmed 2~ months old transgenic plants in plant growth chamber
Transformation efficiency of sorghum (Tx430) DEC tissues derived from immature embryos
| Number of DEC tissues originally bombarded | Method of selection and subculture | Total number of independent transgenic events regenerated | Transformation efficiency (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 150 | Tissues split into two equal parts, totalling 300 callus pieces | 140 | 46.6 |
| 180 | Tissues cultured as it is (no split), totalling of 180 pieces | 49 | 27.2 |
Fig. 3Molecular confirmation of stable T0 transformants. a PCR detection of nptII transgene in randomly selected lines. Lanes from left to right: M = 1 kb plus DNA ladder, 2–18 transgenic lines, P plasmid DNA, Wt WT Tx430 DNA, NC water control, b copy number of nptII gene in 30 independent T0 transgenic plants analysed by digital droplet PCR (Error bar represents standard error in reading the copy number)
Transgene (nptII) segregation analysis of T1 plants
| Line ID | Total plants analysed | T1 segregation (positives:negatives) | Chi square value | Copy number by dPCR in T0 plants |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tx197-4 | 24 | 17:7 | 0.12 | 2 |
| Tx197-6 | 24 | 18:6 | 0.50 | 3.9 |
| Tx197-18 | 24 | 16:8 | 0.03 | 2 |
| Tx197-20 | 24 | 21:3 | 3.12* | 2 |
| Tx197-21 | 21 | 18:3 | 2.28* | 2.6 |
* Event with significant difference from 3:1 segregation ratio