| Literature DB >> 29234441 |
Seung-Wook Lee1, Hyun-Young Na1, Mi Hyeon Seol1, Mia Kim2, Byung-Cheol Lee1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Obesity is a main cause of insulin resistance (IR), metabolic syndrome, and fatty liver diseases. This study evaluated Euphorbia kansui radix (Euphorbia) as a potential treatment option for obesity and obesity-induced IR in obese human and high-fat diet- (HFD-) induced obese mice.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29234441 PMCID: PMC5646343 DOI: 10.1155/2017/9058956
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Comparison of outcome measures in an obese human study.
| Before | After |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| BW (kg) | 65.37 ± 3.53 | 64.10 ± 3.49 | 0.02 |
| BMI | 24.93 ± 0.65 | 24.28 ± 0.58 | 0.047 |
| Waist-hip ratio | 0.90 ± 0.01 | 0.90 ± 0.01 | 0.79 |
| Percent body fat (%) | 29.71 ± 1.44 | 29.56 ± 1.39 | 0.58 |
| BUN (mg/dl) | 15.28 ± 1.32 | 14.52 ± 1.14 | 0.44 |
| Creatinine (mg/dl) | 0.72 ± 0.39 | 0.72 ± 0.42 | 0.75 |
| eGFR | 97.38 ± 6.71 | 93.58 ± 4.94 | 0.36 |
| AST (U/L) | 32.42 ± 6.96 | 27.04 ± 2.53 | 0.51 |
| ALT (U/L) | 35.25 ± 13.56 | 25.96 ± 5.40 | 0.28 |
| GGT (U/L) | 44.91 ± 13.53 | 43.04 ± 13.49 | 0.77 |
| Protein (g/dl) | 6.98 ± 0.53 | 6.79 ± 0.55 | 0.21 |
| Albumin (g/dl) | 3.99 ± 0.32 | 3.98 ± 0.48 | 0.97 |
| Fasting glucose (mg/dl) | 94.5 ± 5.6 | 88.3 ± 9.99 | 0.12 |
| HbA1c (%) | 6.11 ± 0.58 | 5.97 ± 0.56 | 0.28 |
“Before” and “after” indicate before Euphorbia administration and after Euphorbia administration, respectively. Data are presented as mean ± SE. For p value, the results are from paired t-test to examine within-group effects. BW: body weight; BMI: body mass index; BUN: blood urea nitrogen; eGFR: CockCroft-Gault estimated glomerular filtration rate; AST: aspartic aminotransferase; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; GGT: gamma glutamyltranspeptidase.
Figure 1Main results of the in vivo study. (a) Fasting body weight (FBW), epididymal fat weight, fasting blood glucose (FBG), fasting insulin (FI), HOMA-IR of normal chow NC, HFD, and Euphorbia groups. (b) Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and area under curve (AUC) of the three groups. (c) Expression of CD68, TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-6 genes in the three groups. p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, HFD compared with NC; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, and ###p < 0.001, Euphorbia compared with HFD. NC: NC group; HFD: HFD group; Euphorbia: Euphorbia group.
Figure 3Immunohistochemical staining (F4/80) of liver and immunofluorescence staining of stromal vascular cells. Arrow indicates F4/80 positive Kupffer cells. NC: NC group; HFD: HFD group; Euphorbia: Euphorbia group.
Figure 2(a) ATM infiltration rate; (b) CD206- and CD11c-positive ATMs. NC: NC group; HFD: HFD group; Euphorbia: Euphorbia group. p < 0.01; p < 0.001 versus NC group. ##p < 0.01 versus HFD group.