| Literature DB >> 29234438 |
Mingjuan Han1, Yuxiu Sun2, Wei Su3, Shixi Huang4, Sinuo Li5, Mingyue Gao1, Wenyan Wang3, Fang Wang1, Zhaohui Fang6, Hong Zhao1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many previous studies have shown the potential therapeutic effect of acupuncture for metabolic syndrome (MetS). However, most of these studies were limited by short durations of observation and a lack of sham acupuncture as control. We designed a randomized controlled trial, used sham acupuncture as the control, and evaluated the efficacy over 12 weeks of treatment and 12 weeks of follow-up. METHODS/Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29234438 PMCID: PMC5684541 DOI: 10.1155/2017/8598210
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Trial flow diagram.
Baseline characteristics of the randomly assigned participants.
| Variable | Acupuncture ( | Sham acupuncture ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, mean (SD), y | 37.18 (9.36) | 38.5 (13.22) | 0.482 |
| Male | 7 (41.18%) | 5 (31.25%) | 0.723 |
| BMI, mean (SD), (kg/m2) | 30.77 (3.83) | 30.89 (5.15) | 0.651 |
| WC, mean (SD), (cm) | 99.21 (9.62) | 99.44 (11.3) | 0.718 |
| FBG, mean (SD), (mmol/dL) | 5.76 (1.75) | 7.22 (3.06) | 0.538 |
| HbA1c, mean (SD), (%) | 5.59 (0.54) | 6.35 (1.53) | 0.069 |
| TG, mean (SD), (mg/dL) | 2.19 (2.37) | 1.86 (0.89) | 0.319 |
| TC, mean (SD), (mg/dL) | 5.08 (1.07) | 5.23 (1.09) | 0.719 |
| HDL, mean (SD), (mg/dL) | 1.26 (0.3) | 1.33 (0.26) | 0.482 |
| LDL, mean (SD), (mg/dL) | 2.97 (0.84) | 3.1 (0.75) | 0.853 |
| UA, mean (SD), (mmol/dL) | 375.7 (128.53) | 334.27 (76.84) | 0.443 |
| SBP, mean (SD), (mmHg) | 144 (8.72) | 143.55 (10.61) | 0.746 |
| DBP, mean (SD), (mmHg) | 93.1 (7.45) | 92.64 (9.01) | 0.932 |
BMI: body mass index; WC: waist circumference; FBG: fasting blood glucose; HbA1c: glycosylated hemoglobin; TG: triglyceride; TC: total cholesterol; HDL: high density lipoprotein; LDL: low density lipoprotein; UA: uric acid; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure.
Figure 2Variety of weight of participants treated with acupuncture and sham acupuncture.
Figure 3Variety of WC of participants treated with acupuncture and sham acupuncture.
Figure 4Variety of HC of participants treated with acupuncture and sham acupuncture.
Simple parameters of body fat.
| Variable | Group | 2 weeks | 4 weeks | 8 weeks | 12 weeks | 3-month follow-up | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD,P | Mean ± SD,P | Mean ± SD,P | Mean ± SD,P | Mean ± SD,P | |||||||
| WC | Acupuncture | 1.710 ± 1.312 | ≤0.001 | 2.350 ± 1.730 | 0.002 | 3.000 ± 2.475 | 0.001 | 4.000 ± 3.142 | 0.003 | 4.880 ± 3.967 | 0.002 |
| Sham | 0.001 ± 1.155 | 0.690 ± 1.195 | 0.440 ± 1.315 | 0.870 ± 1.746 | 1.630 ± 3.722 | ||||||
| Weight | Acupuncture | 0.91 ± 1.18 | 0.153 | 1.46 ± 1.53 | 0.058 | 2.42 ± 1.87 | 0.002 | 3.03 ± 2.75 | 0.011 | 4.00 ± 3.86 | 0.007 |
| Sham | 0.762 ± 1.751 | 1.088 ± 2.714 | 0.988 ± 3.017 | 1.400 ± 3.524 | 1.638 ± 4.162 | ||||||
| BMI | Acupuncture | 0.24 ± 0.437 | 0.158 | 0.470 ± 0.517 | 0.62 | 0.940 ± 0.748 | 0.001 | 1.060 ± 0.966 | 0.010 | 1.350 ± 1.169 | 0.007 |
| Sham | 0.250 ± 0.775 | 0.380 ± 1.025 | 0.380 ± 1.258 | 0.440 ± 1.315 | 0.560 ± 1.590 | ||||||
| WHR | Acupuncture | 0.010 ± 0.249 | 0.004 | 0.010 ± 0.021 | 0.032 | 0.016 ± 0.028 | 0.028 | 0.028 ± 0.035 | 0.004 | 0.024 ± 0.027 | 0.010 |
| Sham | −0.004 ± 0.021 | 0.001 ± 0.012 | −0.001 ± 0.017 | −0.001 ± 0.021 | 0.001 ± 0.022 | ||||||
| HC | Acupuncture | 0.710 ± 2.365 | 0.384 | 1.240 ± 1.921 | 0.107 | 1.410 ± 2.063 | 0.085 | 1.060 ± 1.952 | 0.118 | 2.410 ± 2.740 | 0.054 |
| Sham | 0.560 ± 1.825 | 0.560 ± 0.727 | 0.630 ± 0.957 | 0.880 ± 1.708 | 1.500 ± 2.221 | ||||||
Within-group P < 0.05 and within-group P < 0.01.
Difference of the biochemical markers of patients with MetS treated with acupuncture and sham acupuncture.
| Variable | Group | 12 week |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| FBG | Acupuncture | 0.090 ± 1.245 | 0.217 |
| Sham | −0.272 ± 0.564 | ||
| HbA1c | Acupuncture | 0.100 ± 0.333 | 0.008 |
| Sham | −1.019 ± 1.046 | ||
| TG | Acupuncture | 0.617 ± 1.164 | 0.046 |
| Sham | −1.076 ± 2.285 | ||
| HDL | Acupuncture | −0.024 ± 0.211 | 0.814 |
| Sham | −0.043 ± 0.162 | ||
| LDL | Acupuncture | 0.021 ± 0.364 | 0.477 |
| Sham | −0.304 ± 0.832 | ||
| TC | Acupuncture | 0.019 ± 0.439 | 0.019 |
| Sham | 0.919 ± 1.321 | ||
| UA | Acupuncture | 48.500 ± 62.388 | 0.059 |
| Sham | −14.450 ± 45.735 | ||
| SBP | Acupuncture | 9.900 ± 4.458 | ≤0.001 |
| Sham | −2.360 ± 5.278 | ||
| DBP | Acupuncture | 6.200 ± 3.425 | ≤0.001 |
| Sham | −1.180 ± 1.940 |
Within-group P < 0.05 andwithin-group P < 0.01.