| Literature DB >> 29234432 |
Hongchun Shen1, Honglian Wang2, Li Wang2, Lu Wang3, Menglian Zhu4, Yao Ming4, Sha Zhao4, Junming Fan5, En Yin Lai6.
Abstract
Liver cancer is the second most lethal cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the primary cancer subgroup. However, the current chemotherapy agents remain ineffective and present wide side effects for advanced HCC patient. In this study, we investigated the antitumor role of ethanol extract of root of peach tree (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch and hereafter designated as TSG in short of its Chinese name), which is an important ingredient in Chinese medicine prescription, in liver cancer cell HepG2. By cell viability assay, we showed that addition of TSG in the culture medium inhibited the cell growth of HepG2 cells in a dose and time-dependent way. Cell cycle analysis indicated that TSG caused sustained M/G2 phase arrest. The expression of mitosis-related protein Cdc25c was impaired upon TSG treatment. Furthermore, wound healing assay demonstrated that TSG treatment notably suppressed the migration of HepG2 cells and the expression of extracellular matrix metalloprotease, MMP3 and MMP9. Most significantly, administration of TSG inhibited in vivo tumor growth in nude mice. Our findings suggested that TSG may serve as a source to isolate anti-HCC therapeutic ingredients.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29234432 PMCID: PMC5660787 DOI: 10.1155/2017/8231936
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1TSG inhibited growth of HepG2 cells. (a) The HepG2 cells were treated with TSG of various concentration for 24 hours followed by determination of total cell viability by viability assay. p < 0.01. p < 0.001. NS: no statistical significance. (b) The dosage and time-dependent growth inhibition rate was calculated based on data from viability assay. ((c)–(h)) Morphological change of HepG2 cells treated with TSG and corresponding vehicle control for 24 hours. (g) and (h) are enlarged image in (e) and (f), respectively.
Figure 2TSG treatment induced G2/M phase arrest of HepG2 cells. (a) Flow cytometry analysis of DNA content of HepG2 cells subjected to indicated treatment. ((b), (c)) Statistical analysis of cell subpopulation ratios for each phase of cell cycle. p < 0.05. p < 0.01. p < 0.001. (d) Western blotting analysis to detect the expression of CDK1 and Cdc25c.
Figure 3TSG suppressed HepG2 cell migration. ((a)–(f)) Representative images of wound healing assay of HepG2 cells treated with 0.34 mg/ml TSG or equal volume of DMSO or blank medium at the time point of 0 and 48 hours. (g) Statistical analysis of wound width of HepG2 cells with indicated treatment at indicated time point. p < 0.001 versus TSG and DMSO group. (h) Western blotting analysis of protein level of MMP-3 and MMP-9.
Figure 4TSG attenuated HepG2-derived in vivo tumor growth. (a) Representative image of isolated tumors from tumor-bearing nude mice treated with TSG or solvent solution. (b) Statistical analysis of weight of isolated tumors. p < 0.05 versus control group.