| Literature DB >> 29234317 |
Bei Jiang1, Yinan Wang2, Zihan Feng3, Lei Xu3, Li Tan2, Shuang Zhao3, Yali Gong1, Cheng Zhang1, Xiaoqiang Luo1, Shu Li2, Xiancai Rao2, Yizhi Peng1, Zhao Xie4, Xiaomei Hu2.
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus is the most common cause of the difficult-to-treat osteomyelitis (OM). To better diagnose and manage S. aureus OM, especially for severe and long duration cases, indicators for risk prediction and severity evaluation are needed. Here, 139 clinical S. aureus isolates from orthopedic infections were divided into OM group (60 isolates from 60 OM patients) and non-OM group (79 isolates from 79 non-OM patients). Molecular types, antimicrobial susceptibility, and virulence factor profiles were evaluated and compared between the two groups to identify potential indicators associated with the prevalence of S. aureus OM. Clinical manifestations and laboratory data were analyzed to identify indicators affecting OM duration and severity. We found that some sequence types were specific to OM infection. The pvl, bbp, and ebps genes were associated with S. aureus OM prevalence. The pvl, bbp, and sei genes were associated with relatively longer OM duration. Panton-Valentine leucocidin (PVL)-positive S. aureus OM presented more serious inflammatory responses. Our results emphasize the significance of PVL in affecting the prevalence, duration, and severity of S. aureus OM. Diagnosing and monitoring PVL-related S. aureus OM may help direct better prognosis and treatment of these patients.Entities:
Keywords: Panton-Valentine leucocidin (PVL); Staphylococcus aureus; molecular epidemiology; osteomyelitis; virulence factor
Year: 2017 PMID: 29234317 PMCID: PMC5712352 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02355
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Comparison of molecular typing between osteomyelitis (OM) and non-OM groups.
| OM ( | Non-OM ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| MRSA, | 9 (15.0) | 19 (24.1) | 0.19 |
| Type I, | 2 (3.3) | 12 (15.2) | 0.11 |
| Type IV, | 7 (11.7) | 6 (7.6) | 0.060 |
| Type V, | 0 (0) | 1 (1.3) | 0.68 |
| MLST | |||
| Predominant type ( | ST188 (11,18.3), ST59 (9, 15.0) | ST188 (15,19.0), ST59 (13, 16.5) | 0.92, 0.82 |
| New type ( | ST3538 (1) | ST3539 (1) | |
| Predominant type ( | t189 (10,16.7), t437 (8, 13.3) | t189 (14, 17.7), t437 (12, 15.2) | 0.87, 0.76 |
| New type ( | t16342 (1), t16519 (1), and t16520 (1) | t16521 (1) | |
| Predominant group | |||
| | 18 (30.0) | 8 (10.1) | |
| Predominant clone ( | ST188-t189- | ST188-t189- | 0.97 |
| ST59-t437- | ST59-t437- | 0.92 | |
Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of factors affecting OM prevalence.
| OM ( | Non-OM ( | Univariate analysis OR (95% CI), | Multivariate analysis OR (95% CI), | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, median (range) | 41 (5–72) | 44 (5–75) | 0.984 (0.963–1.006), 0.154 | 0.987 (0.964–1.012), 0.312 |
| Male, | 47 (78.3) | 53 (67.1) | 0.564 (0.560–1.221), 0.146 | 0.509 (0.216–1.197), 0.122 |
| 18 (30.0) | 8 (10.1) | 3.804 (1.522–9.507), | 1.276 (0.377–4.326), 0.695 | |
| 17 (28.3) | 9 (11.4) | 3.075 (1.259–7.509), | 3.021 (1.016–8.984), | |
| 10 (16.7) | 2 (2.5) | 7.700(1.619–36.619), | 2.540 (0.325–19.842), 0.374 | |
| 24 (40.0) | 17 (21.5) | 2.431 (1.155–5.120), | 1.737 (0.702–4.295), 0.232 | |
| 4 (6.7) | 15 (19.0) | 0.305 (0.096–0.972), | 0.298 (0.088–1.009), 0.052 | |
| 55 (91.7) | 79 (100.0) | 0(0), 0.999 | – | |