Daichi Fujimoto1, Yuki Sato2, Keiichiro Uehara3, Kaori Ishida4, Junya Fukuoka4, Takeshi Morimoto5, Hayato Kawachi2, Ryobu Mori2, Munehiro Ito2, Shunsuke Teraoka2, Kazuma Nagata2, Atsushi Nakagawa2, Kojiro Otsuka2, Yukihiro Imai3, Keisuke Tomii2. 1. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan. Electronic address: daichi@kcho.jp. 2. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan. 3. Department of Clinical Pathology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan. 4. Department of Pathology, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan. 5. Clinical Research Center, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Nivolumab has demonstrated efficacy against metastatic NSCLC. Four programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay systems are available for identification of responders among patients with NSCLC, and these assays show some differing characteristics. Accordingly, in this study, we evaluated the ability of these assays to identify responders to nivolumab therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC, who received nivolumab between January 2016 and September 2016. Specimens were stained using four PD-L1 IHC assays (28-8, 22C3, SP142, and SP263). We classified patients as having test results that were strongly positive (tumor proportion score [TPS] ≥50%), weakly positive (TPS 1%-49%), or negative (TPS <1%). RESULTS: A total of 40 patients with NSCLC and their specimens were analyzed. Analytical comparisons demonstrated good concordance of PD-L1-stained tumor cells among the 28-8, 22C3, and SP263 assays (weighted κ coefficient 0.64-0.71), whereas the SP142 assay showed lower concordance with other assays (weighted κ coefficient 0.39-0.55). Progression-free survival in patients showing strongly positive PD-L1 staining classified by 28-8, 22C3, and SP263 assays was significantly longer than that in patients with a negative result for PD-L1 staining. Predictive performance of response to nivolumab, as assessed by receiver operating characteristic analysis, was also equivalent among the 28-8, 22C3, and SP263 assays (area under the curve 0.75-0.82), whereas the SP142 assay exhibited lower predictive performance (area under the curve 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: The 28-8, 22C3, and SP263 PD-L1 IHC assays showed equivalent predictive performance, whereas the SP142 assay showed lower predictive performance.
INTRODUCTION:Nivolumab has demonstrated efficacy against metastatic NSCLC. Four programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay systems are available for identification of responders among patients with NSCLC, and these assays show some differing characteristics. Accordingly, in this study, we evaluated the ability of these assays to identify responders to nivolumab therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC, who received nivolumab between January 2016 and September 2016. Specimens were stained using four PD-L1 IHC assays (28-8, 22C3, SP142, and SP263). We classified patients as having test results that were strongly positive (tumor proportion score [TPS] ≥50%), weakly positive (TPS 1%-49%), or negative (TPS <1%). RESULTS: A total of 40 patients with NSCLC and their specimens were analyzed. Analytical comparisons demonstrated good concordance of PD-L1-stained tumor cells among the 28-8, 22C3, and SP263 assays (weighted κ coefficient 0.64-0.71), whereas the SP142 assay showed lower concordance with other assays (weighted κ coefficient 0.39-0.55). Progression-free survival in patients showing strongly positive PD-L1 staining classified by 28-8, 22C3, and SP263 assays was significantly longer than that in patients with a negative result for PD-L1 staining. Predictive performance of response to nivolumab, as assessed by receiver operating characteristic analysis, was also equivalent among the 28-8, 22C3, and SP263 assays (area under the curve 0.75-0.82), whereas the SP142 assay exhibited lower predictive performance (area under the curve 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: The 28-8, 22C3, and SP263 PD-L1 IHC assays showed equivalent predictive performance, whereas the SP142 assay showed lower predictive performance.
Authors: Mari Mino-Kenudson; Nolwenn Le Stang; Jillian B Daigneault; Andrew G Nicholson; Wendy A Cooper; Anja C Roden; Andre L Moreira; Erik Thunnissen; Mauro Papotti; Giuseppe Pelosi; Noriko Motoi; Claudia Poleri; Elisabeth Brambilla; Mary Redman; Deepali Jain; Sanja Dacic; Yasushi Yatabe; Ming Sound Tsao; Fernando Lopez-Rios; Johan Botling; Gang Chen; Teh-Ying Chou; Fred R Hirsch; Mary Beth Beasley; Alain Borczuk; Lukas Bubendorf; Jin-Haeng Chung; David Hwang; Dongmei Lin; John Longshore; Masayuki Noguchi; Natasha Rekhtman; Lynette Sholl; William Travis; Akihiko Yoshida; Murry W Wynes; Ignacio I Wistuba; Keith M Kerr; Sylvie Lantuejoul Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2021-03-02 Impact factor: 20.121
Authors: Carol C Cheung; Penny Barnes; Gilbert Bigras; Scott Boerner; Jagdish Butany; Fiorella Calabrese; Christian Couture; Jean Deschenes; Hala El-Zimaity; Gabor Fischer; Pierre O Fiset; John Garratt; Laurette Geldenhuys; C Blake Gilks; Marius Ilie; Diana Ionescu; Hyun J Lim; Lisa Manning; Adnan Mansoor; Robert Riddell; Catherine Ross; Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri; Alan Spatz; Paul E Swanson; Victor A Tron; Ming-Sound Tsao; Hangjun Wang; Zhaolin Xu; Emina E Torlakovic Journal: Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol Date: 2019 Nov/Dec