Literature DB >> 29233664

Performance of a Prostate Cancer Genomic Classifier in Predicting Metastasis in Men with Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence Postprostatectomy.

Daniel E Spratt1, Darlene L Y Dai2, Robert B Den3, Patricia Troncoso4, Kasra Yousefi2, Ashley E Ross5, Edward M Schaeffer6, Zaid Haddad2, Elai Davicioni2, Rohit Mehra7, Todd M Morgan8, Walter Rayford9, Firas Abdollah10, Edouard Trabulsi11, Mary Achim12, Elsa Li Ning Tapia12, Mireya Guerrero12, Robert Jeffrey Karnes13, Adam P Dicker3, Mark A Hurwitz3, Paul L Nguyen14, Felix F Y Feng15, Stephen J Freedland16, John W Davis12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer patients who have a detectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) postprostatectomy may harbor pre-existing metastatic disease. To our knowledge, none of the commercially available genomic biomarkers have been investigated in such men.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if a 22-gene genomic classifier can independently predict development of metastasis in men with PSA persistence postoperatively. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A multi-institutional study of 477 men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) between 1990 and 2015 from three academic centers. Patients were categorized as detectable PSA (n=150) or undetectable (n=327) based on post-RP PSA nadir ≥0.1 ng/ml. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISITICAL ANALYSIS: Cumulative incidence curves for metastasis were constructed using Fine-Gray competing risks analysis. Penalized Cox univariable and multivariable (MVA) proportional hazards models were performed to evaluate the association of the genomic classifier with metastasis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The median follow-up for censored patients was 57 mo. The median time from RP to first postoperative PSA was 1.4 mo. Detectable PSA patients were more likely to have higher adverse pathologic features compared with undetectable PSA patients. On MVA, only genomic high-risk (hazard ratio [HR]: 5.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.02-19.41, p=0.001), detectable PSA (HR: 4.26, 95% CI: 1.16-21.8, p=0.03), and lymph node invasion (HR: 12.2, 95% CI: 2.46-70.7, p=0.003) remained prognostic factors for metastasis. Among detectable PSA patients, the 5-yr metastasis rate was 0.90% for genomic low/intermediate and 18% for genomic high risk (p<0.001). Genomic high risk remained independently prognostic on MVA (HR: 5.61, 95% CI: 1.48-22.7, p=0.01) among detectable PSA patients. C-index for Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Postsurgical score, Gandaglia nomogram, and the genomic classifier plus either Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Postsurgical score or Gandaglia were 0.69, 0.68, and 0.82 or 0.81, respectively. Sample size was a limitation.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite patients with a detectable PSA harboring significantly higher rates of aggressive clinicopathologic features, Decipher independently predicts for metastasis. Prospective validation of these findings is warranted and will be collected as part of the ongoing randomized trial NRG GU-002. PATIENT
SUMMARY: Decipher independently predicted metastasis for patients with detectable prostate-specific antigen after prostatectomy.
Copyright © 2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarker; Decipher; Detectable PSA; Genomic classifier; PSA; Persistent PSA; Prostate cancer; Prostatectomy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29233664      PMCID: PMC6582359          DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.11.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  24 in total

1.  Time-dependent ROC curves for censored survival data and a diagnostic marker.

Authors:  P J Heagerty; T Lumley; M S Pepe
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Genomic classifier identifies men with adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy who benefit from adjuvant radiation therapy.

Authors:  Robert B Den; Kasra Yousefi; Edouard J Trabulsi; Firas Abdollah; Voleak Choeurng; Felix Y Feng; Adam P Dicker; Costas D Lallas; Leonard G Gomella; Elai Davicioni; R Jeffrey Karnes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Guidelines for reporting of statistics in European Urology.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Daniel D Sjoberg
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Prostate-specific antigen persistence after radical prostatectomy as a predictive factor of clinical relapse-free survival and overall survival: 10-year data of the ARO 96-02 trial.

Authors:  Thomas Wiegel; Detlef Bartkowiak; Dirk Bottke; Reinhard Thamm; Axel Hinke; Michael Stöckle; Christian Rübe; Axel Semjonow; Manfred Wirth; Stephan Störkel; Reinhard Golz; Rita Engenhart-Cabillic; Rainer Hofmann; Horst-Jürgen Feldmann; Tilman Kälble; Alessandra Siegmann; Wolfgang Hinkelbein; Ursula Steiner; Kurt Miller
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Tissue-based Genomics Augments Post-prostatectomy Risk Stratification in a Natural History Cohort of Intermediate- and High-Risk Men.

Authors:  Ashley E Ross; Michael H Johnson; Kasra Yousefi; Elai Davicioni; George J Netto; Luigi Marchionni; Helen L Fedor; Stephanie Glavaris; Voleak Choeurng; Christine Buerki; Nicholas Erho; Lucia L Lam; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Sheila Faraj; Stephania M Bezerra; Misop Han; Alan W Partin; Bruce J Trock; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Validation of a cell-cycle progression gene panel to improve risk stratification in a contemporary prostatectomy cohort.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Jeffry P Simko; Janet E Cowan; Julia E Reid; Azita Djalilvand; Satish Bhatnagar; Alexander Gutin; Jerry S Lanchbury; Gregory P Swanson; Steven Stone; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological T3N0M0 prostate cancer significantly reduces risk of metastases and improves survival: long-term followup of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Catherine M Tangen; Jorge Paradelo; M Scott Lucia; Gary Miller; Dean Troyer; Edward Messing; Jeffrey Forman; Joseph Chin; Gregory Swanson; Edith Canby-Hagino; E David Crawford
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Discovery and validation of a prostate cancer genomic classifier that predicts early metastasis following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nicholas Erho; Anamaria Crisan; Ismael A Vergara; Anirban P Mitra; Mercedeh Ghadessi; Christine Buerki; Eric J Bergstralh; Thomas Kollmeyer; Stephanie Fink; Zaid Haddad; Benedikt Zimmermann; Thomas Sierocinski; Karla V Ballman; Timothy J Triche; Peter C Black; R Jeffrey Karnes; George Klee; Elai Davicioni; Robert B Jenkins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A 17-gene assay to predict prostate cancer aggressiveness in the context of Gleason grade heterogeneity, tumor multifocality, and biopsy undersampling.

Authors:  Eric A Klein; Matthew R Cooperberg; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; Jeffry P Simko; Sara M Falzarano; Tara Maddala; June M Chan; Jianbo Li; Janet E Cowan; Athanasios C Tsiatis; Diana B Cherbavaz; Robert J Pelham; Imelda Tenggara-Hunter; Frederick L Baehner; Dejan Knezevic; Phillip G Febbo; Steven Shak; Michael W Kattan; Mark Lee; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Angel M Cronin; Elena B Elkin; Mithat Gonen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  15 in total

1.  Ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen level as a predictor of biochemical progression after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Towards risk adapted follow-up.

Authors:  Nikolaos Grivas; Daan de Bruin; Kurdo Barwari; Erik van Muilekom; Corinne Tillier; Pim J van Leeuwen; Esther Wit; Wouter Kroese; Henk van der Poel
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 2.  Conceptual review of key themes in treating prostate cancer in older adults.

Authors:  Ramy Sedhom; Arjun Gupta
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.599

3.  Prostate cancer: Predicting risk of metastasis after prostatectomy.

Authors:  Clemens Thoma
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Correlation between MRI phenotypes and a genomic classifier of prostate cancer: preliminary findings.

Authors:  Andrei S Purysko; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; Omar Y Mian; Sarah Sittenfeld; Elai Davicioni; Marguerite du Plessis; Christine Buerki; Jennifer Bullen; Lin Li; Anant Madabhushi; Andrew Stephenson; Eric A Klein
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  The docetaxel debate: impact of chemotherapy in high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mark D Hurwitz
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-07

6.  Does post prostatectomy decipher score predict biochemical recurrence and impact care?

Authors:  Christine White; Ilene Staff; Tara McLaughlin; Joseph Tortora; Kevin Pinto; Akshay Gangakhedkar; Alison Champagne; Joseph Wagner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Chemotherapy and radiation for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mark David Hurwitz
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-06

Review 8.  Salvage therapy for prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Jeremie Calais; Stefano Fanti; Derya Tilki; Tanya Dorff; Daniel E Spratt; Amar U Kishan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 9.  The past, present, and future of urological quality improvement collaboratives.

Authors:  Adam C Reese; Serge Ginzburg
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-05

Review 10.  Radiation Therapy After Radical Prostatectomy: What Has Changed Over Time?

Authors:  Fabio Zattoni; Isabel Heidegger; Veeru Kasivisvanathan; Alexander Kretschmer; Giancarlo Marra; Alessandro Magli; Felix Preisser; Derya Tilki; Igor Tsaur; Massimo Valerio; Roderick van den Bergh; Claudia Kesch; Francesco Ceci; Christian Fankhauser; Giorgio Gandaglia
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-07-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.