Literature DB >> 29233579

Why do certain primary health care teams respond better to intimate partner violence than others? A multiple case study.

Isabel Goicolea1, Bruno Marchal2, Anna-Karin Hurtig3, Carmen Vives-Cases4, Erica Briones-Vozmediano5, Miguel San Sebastián3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyse how team level conditions influenced health care professionals' responses to intimate partner violence.
METHODS: We used a multiple embedded case study. The cases were four primary health care teams located in a southern region of Spain; two of them considered "good" and two s "average". The two teams considered good had scored highest in practice issues for intimate partner violence, measured via a questionnaire (PREMIS - Physicians Readiness to Respond to Intimate Partner Violence Survey) applied to professionals working in the four primary health care teams. In each case quantitative and qualitative data were collected using a social network questionnaire, interviews and observations.
RESULTS: The two "good" cases showed dynamics and structures that promoted team working and team learning on intimate partner violence, had committed social workers and an enabling environment for their work, and had put into practice explicit strategies to implement a women-centred approach.
CONCLUSIONS: Better individual responses to intimate partner violence were implemented in the teams which: 1) had social workers who were knowledgeable and motivated to engage with others; 2) sustained a structure of regular meetings during which issues of violence were discussed; 3) encouraged a friendly team climate; and 4) implemented concrete actions towards women-centred care.
Copyright © 2017 SESPAS. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Análisis de redes sociales; Atención centrada en la mujer; Case study; Equipos de atención primaria; Estudio de caso; Intimate partner violence; Primary health care team; Social network analysis; Violencia de compañero íntimo; Women-centred care

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29233579     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gac Sanit        ISSN: 0213-9111            Impact factor:   2.139


  3 in total

Review 1.  Intimate partner violence in Saudi Arabia: A topic of growing interest.

Authors:  Sarah AlJuhani; Mohammed AlAteeq
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-02-28

2.  Reaching everyone in general practice? Feasibility of an integrated domestic violence training and support intervention in primary care.

Authors:  Eszter Szilassy; Jessica Roy; Emma Williamson; Katherine Pitt; Mei-See Man; Gene Feder
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 2.497

3.  Knowledge, attitude, and preparedness toward IPV care provision among nurses and midwives in Tanzania.

Authors:  Joel Seme Ambikile; Sebalda Leshabari; Mayumi Ohnishi
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2020-08-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.