Melissa P Mitchell1, Jamie Wagner2, James Butterworth3. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas. Electronic address: mmitchell2@kumc.edu. 2. Department of Surgery, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas. 3. Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Abstract
PURPOSE: A growing trend in breast reconstruction has been placement of tissue expanders in the pre pectoral space. This is a change from the practice of placement under the pectoralis major with or without an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) sling. The move toward pre pectoral placement with an ADM wrap has the intent of decreasing post-operative pain and decreasing animation deformities. The cosmesis of pre pectoral reconstructions in the setting of post mastectomy radiation has also appeared improved in our early experience, when compared to submuscular reconstructions. We sought to review the risks and benefits of this technique in the setting of post mastectomy radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Cases of ADM wrapped prepectoral tissue expander breast reconstructions in patients needing postmastectomy radiation therapy were reviewed in a single institution. RESULTS: Thirty patients were treated with ADM wrapped prepectoral tissue expanders. On review of radiation plans, there were patients with anatomical variations, for whom standard dosimetric criteria were not met with partially wide tangent fields. Use of a medial electron field matched to steep photon tangents was not advised due to undercoverage of the tumor bed related to implant placement. Boost treatment was also omitted as a result of concerns regarding the implant location. CONCLUSIONS: While new advances in plastic surgery may improve on cosmetic outcomes for breast cancer patients, increased discussion with radiation oncologists is needed to appropriately select candidates for these procedures. Prospective trials are necessary to ensure that these new techniques do not compromise oncologic outcomes.
PURPOSE: A growing trend in breast reconstruction has been placement of tissue expanders in the pre pectoral space. This is a change from the practice of placement under the pectoralis major with or without an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) sling. The move toward pre pectoral placement with an ADM wrap has the intent of decreasing post-operative pain and decreasing animation deformities. The cosmesis of pre pectoral reconstructions in the setting of post mastectomy radiation has also appeared improved in our early experience, when compared to submuscular reconstructions. We sought to review the risks and benefits of this technique in the setting of post mastectomy radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Cases of ADM wrapped prepectoral tissue expander breast reconstructions in patients needing postmastectomy radiation therapy were reviewed in a single institution. RESULTS: Thirty patients were treated with ADM wrapped prepectoral tissue expanders. On review of radiation plans, there were patients with anatomical variations, for whom standard dosimetric criteria were not met with partially wide tangent fields. Use of a medial electron field matched to steep photon tangents was not advised due to undercoverage of the tumor bed related to implant placement. Boost treatment was also omitted as a result of concerns regarding the implant location. CONCLUSIONS: While new advances in plastic surgery may improve on cosmetic outcomes for breast cancerpatients, increased discussion with radiation oncologists is needed to appropriately select candidates for these procedures. Prospective trials are necessary to ensure that these new techniques do not compromise oncologic outcomes.