Literature DB >> 29233487

Genetic counselling, patient education, and informed decision-making in the genomic era.

Sylvia A Metcalfe1.   

Abstract

Genomic technologies are now being applied to reproductive genetic screening. Circulating cell-free DNA testing in pregnancy for fetal chromosomal abnormalities is becoming more widely used as a screening test, and expanded carrier screening for autosomal and X-linked recessive conditions for more than a hundred conditions is available to couples for testing before and during pregnancy. These are most typically available as a commercial test. The purpose of reproductive genetic screening is to facilitate autonomous reproductive choices. Previous studies would suggest that many women do not make informed decisions about prenatal genetic screening, and the introduction of genomic technologies has generally added to the ethical debate. Appropriate pre-test genetic counselling is recommended, and healthcare providers should include information that is balanced, accurate and up-to-date, comprising written and/or e-learning tools, as well as providing psychosocial support so that couples consider the pros and cons of being tested and can make informed decisions.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell-free DNA; Genetic counselling; Informed decision-making; Non-invasive prenatal testing; Prenatal testing; Reproductive genetic screening

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29233487     DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2017.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1744-165X            Impact factor:   3.926


  10 in total

Review 1.  The future of cystic fibrosis care: a global perspective.

Authors:  Scott C Bell; Marcus A Mall; Hector Gutierrez; Milan Macek; Susan Madge; Jane C Davies; Pierre-Régis Burgel; Elizabeth Tullis; Claudio Castaños; Carlo Castellani; Catherine A Byrnes; Fiona Cathcart; Sanjay H Chotirmall; Rebecca Cosgriff; Irmgard Eichler; Isabelle Fajac; Christopher H Goss; Pavel Drevinek; Philip M Farrell; Anna M Gravelle; Trudy Havermans; Nicole Mayer-Hamblett; Nataliya Kashirskaya; Eitan Kerem; Joseph L Mathew; Edward F McKone; Lutz Naehrlich; Samya Z Nasr; Gabriela R Oates; Ciaran O'Neill; Ulrike Pypops; Karen S Raraigh; Steven M Rowe; Kevin W Southern; Sheila Sivam; Anne L Stephenson; Marco Zampoli; Felix Ratjen
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 30.700

2.  Recommendations for neonatologists and pediatricians working in first level birthing centers on the first communication of genetic disease and malformation syndrome diagnosis: consensus issued by 6 Italian scientific societies and 4 parents' associations.

Authors:  Gregorio Serra; Luigi Memo; Alessandra Coscia; Mario Giuffré; Ambra Iuculano; Mariano Lanna; Diletta Valentini; Anna Contardi; Sauro Filippeschi; Tiziana Frusca; Fabio Mosca; Luca A Ramenghi; Corrado Romano; Annalisa Scopinaro; Alberto Villani; Giuseppe Zampino; Giovanni Corsello
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 2.638

Review 3.  Should All Individuals Be Screened for Genetic Predisposition to Cancer?

Authors:  Sarah Wedderburn; Terri P McVeigh
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Knowledge of Prenatal Screening, Down Syndrome, Amniocentesis, and Related Factors among Iranian Pregnant Women: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Maryam Rabiee; Zahra Jouhari; Ashraf Pirasteh
Journal:  Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery       Date:  2019-04

Review 5.  Genomics Education in the Era of Personal Genomics: Academic, Professional, and Public Considerations.

Authors:  Kiara V Whitley; Josie A Tueller; K Scott Weber
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Decision-making factors in prenatal testing: A systematic review.

Authors:  Valentina Di Mattei; Federica Ferrari; Gaia Perego; Valentina Tobia; Fabio Mauro; Massimo Candiani
Journal:  Health Psychol Open       Date:  2021-01-13

7.  Psychometric Assessment of the Mandarin Version of the Decisional Conflict Scale with Pregnant Women Making Prenatal Test Decisions.

Authors:  Jia-Ming Xiang; Ke Sun; Qian Zhao; Han-Bing Li; Ling-Ling Gao
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 2.711

8.  Beyond the clinical context: the process of losing oneself living with Huntington's disease.

Authors:  Luz-Estella Varela; María-Mercedes Arias; María-Antonia Martorell-Poveda; Clara V Giraldo; Rosa A Estrada-Acuña
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 4.303

Review 9.  Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing beyond Trisomies.

Authors:  Ioan Dumitru Suciu; Oana Daniela Toader; Slavyana Galeva; Lucian Pop
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

10.  Couple-based expanded carrier screening provided by general practitioners to couples in the Dutch general population: psychological outcomes and reproductive intentions.

Authors:  Erwin Birnie; Juliette Schuurmans; Mirjam Plantinga; Kristin M Abbott; Angela Fenwick; Anneke Lucassen; Marjolein Y Berger; Irene M van Langen; Adelita V Ranchor
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 8.822

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.