| Literature DB >> 29233184 |
Shun Lyu1, Bin Ji1, Wenwu Gao1, Xianqi Chen1, Xiaotao Xie1, Junjie Zhou2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a common orthopedics disease and its pathological changes at early stage are the damage and loss of articular cartilage. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) prescription contains multiple components and has the unique advantages of the diversity of targets.We compared the traditional Chinese medical formulae (Angelicae Pubescentis and Loranthi decotion, APLD, or Duhuo Jisheng) with a western medicine (glucosamine sulfate, GS) to treat the rat arthritis models, and tracked the outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: Angelicae Pubescentis and Loranthi decotion; Chondrocyte; Duhuo; Knee osteoarthritis; Serum
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29233184 PMCID: PMC5727648 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-017-0679-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Fig. 1The X-ray images of the right hind leg of rats from each group were taken at 6, 10 and 14 weeks, respectively. A, E, I belong to group A (blank, control group, no surgery and no drug treatment); B, F, J belong to group B (the SIA model control without drug treatment); C, G, K belong to group C (the SIA model + APLD treatment); D, H, L belong to group D (the SIA model + GS treatment)
Primer sequence of RT-PCR
| Primer name | Base sequence 5-3 | Gene order |
|---|---|---|
| Collagen II | F:GAGGGCAACAGCAGGTTCAC | NM_012929.1 |
| R:GCCCTATGTCCACACCAAATTC | ||
| Collagen II | F:CATGCCGTGACCTCAAGATG | NM_053304.1 |
| R:TCCATCGGTCATGCTCTCTC | ||
| Aggrecan | F:TGGCATTGAGGACAGCGAAG | NM_022190.1 |
| R:TCCAGTGTGTAGCGTGTGGAAATAG | ||
| β-actin | F:TTCAACACCCCAGCCATGTA | NM_031144.3 |
| R:CAGGAAGGAAGGCTGGAAGA | ||
| SOX-9 | F:GAAAGACCACCCCGATTACAAG | XM_003750950.3 |
Fig. 2Right knee articular cartilage of histological imaging with staining of H&E, toluidine blue, and collagen II immunohistochemistry at weeks 10 and 14, which meant after medicine gavage treatment (4 and 8 weeks, respectively). A–H with H&E staining; I-P with toluidine blue staining; and Q–X with collagen II immunohistochemistry staining. Scale bar was 100 μm. Blank: group A; saline: group B; APLD: group C; and GS: group D
Expressions of Collagen II and aggrecan genes from groups at 10th week (n = 3)
| Gene | Group |
|
|---|---|---|
| Collagen II | A | 1.04 ± 0.27 |
| Collagen II | B | 5.11 ± 0.38a |
| Collagen II | C | 7.51 ± 1.73a,b |
| Collagen II | D | 10.86 ± 0.07a,b,c |
| Aggrecan | A | 1.00 ± 0.02 |
| Aggrecan | B | 3.36 ± 0.11a |
| Aggrecan | C | 3.93 ± 0.27a,b |
| Aggrecan | D | 5.51 ± 0.39a,b,c |
All P < 0.01
aCompared with group A
bCompared with group B
cCompared with group C
Expressions of Collagen II and aggrecan genes from the four groups at 14th week (n = 3)
| Gene | Group |
|
|---|---|---|
| Collagen II | A | 0.59 ± 0.23 |
| Collagen II | B | 0.39 ± 0.01 |
| Collagen II | C | 2.41 ± 0.50a,b |
| Collagen II | D | 3.26 ± 1.75a,b |
| Aggrecan | A | 0.62 ± 0.26 |
| Aggrecan | B | 0.15 ± 0.08 |
| Aggrecan | C | 2.08 ± 0.32a,b |
| Aggrecan | D | 5.80 ± 0.61a,b,c |
All P < 0.05
aCompared with group A
bCompared with group B
cCompared with group C
CCK8 results of Statistical analyses (n = 3, ± s)
| 20% | 10% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group C | Group D | Group C | Group D | |
| 1 day | 1.29 ± 0.42 | 1.16 ± 0.61 | 0.77 ± 0.15a | 0.62 ± 0.14a |
| 2 days | 1.28 ± 0.14a, b | 0.85 ± 0.29b | 0.92 ± 0.19 | 0.96 ± 0.25 |
| 3 days | 1.39 ± 0.08a, b | 1.15 ± 0.27b | 1.28 ± 0.12a | 1.28 ± 0.06a |
| 4 days | 1.06 ± 0.06a | 1.08 ± 0.04a | 1.15 ± 0.02a | 1.18 ± 0.02a |
Note: The value of Group B (SIA model control + saline) was considered as “1.” When the value of group C or D was more than “1,” it meant proliferation; when less than “1,” it meant suppression. It was clear that CCK8 value of the 10% was increased with the increased days in both groups, but no statistical significance between two groups
All P < 0.05
aCompared with group B
bCompared with group C