| Literature DB >> 29233142 |
Mohamed Raâfet Ben Khedher1, Houda Bouhajja2, Samia Haj Ahmed3, Mohamed Abid2, Kamel Jamoussi4, Mohamed Hammami3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vasculogenic erectile dysfunction (VED) is considered as a common complication among people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). We tested whether changes in fatty acid (FAs) classes measured in erythrocytes are associated with increased risk of diabetic VED along with related risk factors.Entities:
Keywords: Diabetic erectile dysfunction; Fatty acids; Inflammation; Insulin resistance; Type 2 diabetes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29233142 PMCID: PMC5727868 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-017-0637-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Clinical and biochemical characteristics of the study participants
| Characteristics | Patients with VED ( | Patients w/o VED | Controls |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical profile | |||
| Age (years) | 57.7 ± 5.1 | 58.8 ± 4.8 | 55.9 ± 7.0 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.75 ± 4.8 | 27.43 ± 3.2 | 25.15 ± 3.8 |
| Duration of T2D (years) | 10.95 ± 7.1 | 8.25 ± 5.4 | __ |
| Duration of ED (years) | 3.30 ± 2.9 | __ | __ |
| Biochemical profile | |||
| Fasting Glucose (mmoL/L) | 9.87 ± 3.7** | 8.36 ± 2.1** | 5.27 ± 0.9 |
| HbA1c (mmoL/mol) | 95** | 77** | 38 |
| Insulin (μIU/mL) | 5.62 ± 3.6* | 4.93 ± 2.7* | 3.56 ± 2.4 |
| HOMA IR | 2.39 ± 1.7** | 1.83 ± 1.1** | 0.83 ± 0.4 |
| NO (ng/L) | 1.43 ± 1.18*** | 3.09 ± 1.85 | 3.30 ± 2.92 |
| Serum lipid profile (mmoL/L) | |||
| Total cholesterol | 4.54 ± 0.8* | 4.43 ± 0.8* | 4.06 ± 0.9 |
| Triglycerides | 1.60 ± 0.9 | 1.77 ± 0.7* | 1.37 ± 0.5 |
| LDLc | 2.70 ± 0.94* | 2.68 ± 0.9* | 2.27 ± 1,02 |
| HDLc | 1.03 ± 0.3 | 0.94 ± 0.4 | 1.1 ± 0.4 |
| Serum Hepatic profile (IU/L) | |||
| AST | 23.19 ± 7.5 | 21.5 ± 8.4* | 24.28 ± 8.9 |
| ALT | 20.26 ± 11.6* | 21.36 ± 10.4* | 25.01 ± 12.3 |
Values are given as mean ± standard error
BMI Body mass index, HbA1c glycated hemoglobin, HOMA IR homeostatic index of insulin resistance, LDLc low density lipoprotein-cholesterol, HDLc High density lipoprotein-cholesterol, AST aspartate aminotransferase, ALT alanine aminotransférase, w/o without
*P < 0.05 and **P < 0.001 compared to controls
Specific clinical characteristics of studied subjects
| Characteristics | Patients with VED | Patients w/o ED | Controls |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inflammatory Cytokines | |||
| IL-6 (pg/mL) | 0.86 ± 0.5** | 0.51 ± 0.2 | 0.44 ± 0.3 |
| TNF-α (pg/mL) | 3.3 ± 2.9** | 2.9 ± 1.9** | 1.43 ± 1.2 |
| Lipid peroxidation | |||
| MDA (μM) | 23.9 ± 4.5** | 18.7 ± 5.3 | 17.11 ± 5.9 |
| Conjugated diene (μM) | 139.16 ± 68.4 | 141.76 ± 34.5 | 122.4 ± 55.9 |
| Serum Hormones | |||
| FSH (mIU/mL) | 7.22 ± 4.9 | 6.83 ± 2.6 | 6.32 ± 2.4 |
| LH (mIU/mL) | 5.67 ± 3.4 | 6.14 ± 3.6 | 6.07 ± 2.1 |
| PRL (ng/mL) | 12.16 ± 5.1 | 12.83 ± 4.4 | 11.19 ± 2.9 |
| Testosterone (ng/mL) | 5.35 ± 1.5 | 6.12 ± 2.8 | 5.89 ± 2.1 |
| FT4 (pmoL/L) | 13.92 ± 1.5 | 12.53 ± 2.6 | 13.64 ± 2.3 |
| hsTSH (μIU/mL) | 1.95 ± 0.9 | 1.76 ± 0.7 | 1.83 ± 0.9 |
Values are given as mean ± standard error
NO nitric oxide, TNF-α tumor necrosis factor alpha, IL-6 interleukine 6, MDA malondialdehyde, FSH follicle-stimulating hormone, LH luteinizing hormone, PRL prolactin, FT4 Free thyroxine 4, hsTSH high sensitive thyroid-stimulating hormone, w/o without
*P < 0.05 and **P < 0.001 compared to controls
Univariate correlation of malondialdehyde with inflammatory cytokines levels among the study population
| Inflammatory Cytokines | Studied Subjects | Correlation with MDA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| r |
| ||
| IL-6 | Patients with VED | 0.884 | 0.016* |
| Patients w/o VED | −0.184 | 0.497 | |
| Controls | −0.121 | 0.312 | |
| TNF-α | Patients with VED | 0.753 | 0.035* |
| Patients w/o VED | 0.497 | 0.078 | |
| Controls | −0.116 | 0.333 | |
IL-6 interleukine 6, TNF-α tumor necrosis factor alpha, MDA malondialdehyde, r correlation coefficients, w/o without
*P < 0.05
Erythrocytes fatty acid profiles of the study population determined by gas chromatography
| Fatty Acids | Name | Patients with VED (%) ( | Patients w/o VED (%) ( | Controls (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C12: 0 | Lauric acid | 0.21 ± 0.12 | 0.19 ± 0.11 | 0.21 ± 0.13 |
| C13: 0 | Tridecylic acid | 0.79 ± 0.53** | 0.47 ± 0.45 | 0.53 ± 0.35 |
| C14: 0 | Myristic acid | 4.12 ± 2.50*** | 3.03 ± 2.09* | 2.57 ± 2.30 |
| C15: 0 | Pentadecylic acid | 1.07 ± 0.69*** | 0.75 ± 0.45* | 0.63 ± 0.51 |
| C16: 0 | Palmitic acid | 28.82 ± 5.75** | 29. 25 ± 6.66** | 25.87 ± 4.16 |
| C18: 0 | Stearic acid | 11.93 ± 5.82*** | 13.29 ± 5.18* | 14.88 ± 5.15 |
| C20: 0 | Arachidic acid | 0.24 ± 0.32 | 0.23 ± 0.13* | 0.26 ± 0.31 |
| C22: 0 | Behenic acid | 0.43 ± 0.41*** | 0.35 ± 0.16** | 0.27 ± 0.21 |
| C23: 0 | Tricosylic acid | 0.59 ± 0.42 | 0.44 ± 0.28 | 0.60 ± 0.79 |
| C24: 0 | Lignoceric acid | 2.06 ± 0.83** | 1.75 ± 1.14 | 1.42 ± 1.19 |
| C26: 0 | Cerotic acid | 5.47 ± 2.28*** | 3.21 ± 3.05** | 3.72 ± 2.81 |
| Σ SFA | 55.70 ± 9.4** | 52.84 ± 7.1 | 51,01 ± 8.7 | |
| C14:1 cis-9 (n-5) | Myristoleic acid | 1.33 ± 0.71** | 0.98 ± 0.44*** | 1.60 ± 0.56 |
| C16:1 cis-9 (n-7) | Palmitoleic acid | 0.56 ± 0.51 | 0.60 ± 0.54 | 0.57 ± 0.47 |
| C18:1 cis-9 (n-9) | Oleic acid | 10.96 ± 4.18*** | 13.14 ± 3.31* | 14.53 ± 3.65 |
| C18:1 cis 11(n-7) | Vaccenic acid | 1.31 ± 0.30 | 1.39 ± 0.38 | 1.47 ± 0.49 |
| C20:1 cis11 (n-9) | Eicosenoic acid | 0.16 ± 0.13*** | 0.22 ± 0.18* | 0.26 ± 0.17 |
| C22:1 cis13(n-9) | Erucic acid | 0.45 ± 0.21 | 0.50 ± 0.21 | 0.54 ± 0.87 |
| C24:1 (n-9) | Nervonic acid | 1.70 ± 0.59*** | 1.61 ± 0.97*** | 3.00 ± 1.31 |
| Σ MUFA | 16.50 ± 4.12*** | 18.43 ± 3.65*** | 21.00 ± 3.88 | |
| Omega 3 family (n-3) | ||||
| C18:3 cis9,12,15 | α-linolenic acid | 0.66 ± 0.34*** | 0.63 ± 0.27*** | 0.51 ± 0.28 |
| C20:3 cis11,14,17 | Eicosatrienoic acid | 1.43 ± 0.48 | 1.80 ± 0.83* | 1.61 ± 0.95 |
| C20:5 EPA | Eicosapentaenoic acid | 0.52 ± 0.26*** | 1.26 ± 1.02 | 1.54 ± 1.92 |
| C22:6 DHA | Docosahexaenoic acid | 2.00 ± 1.39*** | 2.27 ± 1,21*** | 3.13 ± 1.20 |
| Omega 6 family (n-6) | ||||
| C18:2 cis9,12 | Linoleic acid | 12.05 ± 4.46*** | 10.40 ± 3.20** | 9.40 ± 5.21 |
| C18:3 cis6,9,12 | γ-linolenic acid | 0.16 ± 0.17* | 0.19 ± 0.14 | 0.17 ± 0.11 |
| C20:3 cis8,11,14 | Dihomo-γlinolenic acid | 0.18 ± 0.09*** | 0.28 ± 0.16 | 0.38 ± 0.27 |
| C20:4 | Arachidonic acid | 10.75 ± 3.09* | 11.43 ± 2.38*** | 9.25 ± 3.36 |
| Σ PUFA | 27.79 ± 5.06 | 28.42 ± 4.11 | 26.03 ± 5.85 | |
| Σ UFA | 44.30 ± 5.75** | 47.16 ± 6.03 | 47.03 ± 6.75 | |
| Desaturation index | ||||
| C20:4/C20:3 (Δ5D) | 77.03 ± 51.26*** | 54.18 ± 40.75* | 47.99 ± 43.92 | |
| C18:3/C18:2n-6 (Δ6D) | 0.015 ± 0.016** | 0.020 ± 0.015 | 0.023 ± 0.021 | |
| C16:1/C16:0 (Δ9D-16) | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | |
| C18:1/C18:0 (Δ9D-18) | 1.18 ± 0.87 | 1.17 ± 0.66 | 1.17 ± 0.71 | |
| C24:1/C18:1 | 0.18 ± 0.11* | 0.12 ± 0.08*** | 0.22 ± 0.12 | |
| C18:0/C16:0 | 0.41 ± 0.21*** | 0.48 ± 0.21** | 0.57 ± 0.17 | |
Data obtained by GC are expressed as relative values (%): mean % of total FAs ± SD; Σ SFA, sum of saturated fatty acids; Σ MUFA, sum of monounsaturated fatty acids; Σ PUFA, sum of polyunsaturated fatty acids; Σ UFA, sum of unsaturated fatty acids; C20:4/C20:3, Δ5 desaturation index; C18:3/C18:2, Δ6 desaturation index; C16:1/C16:0 and C18:1/C18:0, Δ9 desaturation index; C24:1/C18:1 and C18:0/C16:0, elongation index; w/o, without
*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 compared to controls. The Mann-Whitney test with Bonferroni correction was used
Fig. 1Hypothetical interaction between disturbed FAs metabolism and IR leading to impaired penile erection. SFAs, Saturated Fatty Acids; IR, Insulin Resistance; PI3-kinase, Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase; SREBP, Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein; Akt, Protein kinase B; eNOS, Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase; PGE1, Prostaglandin E1; NO, Nitric Oxide; GPCR, G-Protein-Coupled Receptor; ATP, Adenosine Triphosphate; cAMP, cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate; GTP, Guanosine Triphosphate; cGMP, cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate; Ca2+, Calcium; VSMCs, Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells; (), Increase; (), Decrease