| Literature DB >> 29233106 |
N T C Maguga-Phasha1, N S Munyai2, F Mashinya2, M E Makgatho2, E F Mbajiorgu3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis remains a major health problem and knowledge of the diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains in specific geographical regions can contribute to the control of the disease. This study describes the genetic profile of M. tuberculosis in five districts of Limpopo Province.Entities:
Keywords: Genetic diversity; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Spoligotyping
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29233106 PMCID: PMC5727936 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-017-2881-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Fig. 1Geographic location of Limpopo Province, its Districts and neighboring countries. Adapted from Khosa et al.,2013 and https://municipalities.co.za/provinces/view/5/limpopo, modified by Mbajiorgu EF
The Distribution of Spoligotype according to districts in Limpopo Province, South Africa
| Spoligotype family | Total isolates | DISTRICTS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capricorn | Mopani | Sekhukhune | Vhembe | Waterberg | ||
| Beijing | 32 (14.9) | 10 (9.9) | 3(18.8) | 9(23.7) | 7(23.3) | 3(10.0) |
| CAS1_DELHI | 4 (1.9) | 1 (1.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 1(3.3) | 2 (6.7) |
| S | 21(9.8) | 13(6.0) | 1(0.5) | 3(1.4) | 0(0.0) | 4(1.8) |
| X1 | 7(3.2) | 6(5.9) | 0(0.0) | 1(0.5) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) |
| T1 | 33 (15.0) | 15(7.0) | 1(0.47) | 7(3.2) | 5(2.3) | 5(2.3) |
| LAM3-LAM6 | 1(0.5) | 0(0.0) | 1(6.3) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) |
| CAS1_KILI | 3(1.4) | 1(1.0) | 1(6.3) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 1(3.3) |
| LAM3 | 21(9.8) | 16(7.4) | 0(0.0) | 2(0.9) | 2(0.9) | 1(0.5) |
| LAM9 | 10(4.7) | 4(1.9) | 0(0.0) | 2(0.9) | 0(0.0) | 4(1.8) |
| T5 | 1(0.5) | 1(1.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) |
| H3 | 31.4() | 2(0.9) | 0(0.0) | 1(0.5) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) |
| T2 | 2(0.9) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 1(2.6) | 1(3.3) | 0(0.0) |
| MANU2 | 3(1.4) | 2(2.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 1(3.3) | 0(0.0) |
| U | 1(0.5) | 0(0.0) | 1(6.3) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) |
| LAM11_ZWE | 7(3.3) | 3(3.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 4(13.3) | 0(0.0) |
| LAM4 | 8(3.7) | 1(1.0) | 2(12.5) | 0(0.0) | 3(10.0) | 2(6.7) |
| T2-T3 | 3(1.4) | 2(2.0) | 1(6.3) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) |
| BEIJING-LIKE | 2(0.9) | 1(1.0) | 0(0.0) | 1(2.6) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) |
| EAI1_SOM | 4(1.9) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 2(0.9) | 1(0.5) | 1(0.5) |
| X3 | 4(1.9) | 1(1.0) | 0(0.0) | 2(5.3) | 0(0.0) | 1(3.3) |
| CAS | 3(1.4) | 2(0.9) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 1(0.5) | 0(0.0) |
| LAM7 | 2(0.9) | 1(0.5) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 1(0.5) |
| T3 | 1(0.5) | 1(0.5) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) |
| LAM8 | 10(4.7) | 3(1.4) | 3(1.4) | 3(1.4) | 1(1.4) | 0(0.0) |
| T4 | 3(1.4) | 3(1.4) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) |
| X2 | 1(0,5) | 1(0.5) | 0(0.5) | 0(0.5) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) |
| EAI5 | 4(1.9) | 2(0.9) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 1(0.5) | 1(0.5) |
| LAM1 | 1((0.5) | 1(0.5) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) |
| FAMILY 33 | 4(1.9) | 1(0.5) | 2(0.9) | 1(0.5) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) |
| EAI4 | 3(1.4) | 1(0.5) | 2(0.9) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) |
|
| 4(1.9) | 2(0.9) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 1(0.5) | 1(0.5) |
Nnumber of isolates, Data is presented as Number (percentage)
Fig. 2Representation of the Spoligo pattern of different genotypes of M. tuberculosis
The dark and white boxes indicate the presence and absence hybridization, respectively. Abbreviations of Genotypes as examples: CAS=Central Asian; LAM = Latin American-Mediterranean; H=Haarlem; U=Unknown patterns.
Fig. 3The number of genotype families and clusters in each district