Literature DB >> 29232268

Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Using the Uphold Vaginal Support System: 5-Year Follow-Up.

Päivi Rahkola-Soisalo, Tomi S Mikkola, Daniel Altman, Christian Falconer1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the long-term (5 years) outcomes of the Uphold Vaginal Support System for symptomatic vaginal apical prolapse with or without anterior colporraphy.
METHODS: In total, 164 (81.2%) of 202 women operated on in 24 centers were reached for follow-up. Outcomes were assessed by using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification, the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20, and the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire questionnaires. Pain on pelvic area was evaluated using a visual analog scale. Adverse events and secondary procedures were recorded.
RESULTS: An optimal outcome at the apical compartment (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage <2) was achieved in 83.3% of patients (94% at 1 year). Quality of life improved in 78.8% of the women, with a significant decrease of bother in all domains (pelvic organ prolapse, rectoanal, urinary) compared with that preoperatively. Overall sexual satisfaction improved after 1 year, but the number of sexually active women was low. In total, 19.7% of patients had undergone repeat pelvic surgery during follow-up, most common of these were midurethral sling (38.4%), followed by prolapse-related operations. Mesh removal due to pain was performed in 3 women. Number of women with any pain decreased overall from 1 to 5 years, but 3 women had persistent severe pain despite treatment efforts (visual analog scale ≥7).
CONCLUSIONS: Apical objective and subjective outcomes were sustained after 5 years in women operated on for apical compartment prolapse by the Uphold Vaginal Support System.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29232268     DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 2151-8378            Impact factor:   2.091


  11 in total

1.  FPMRS challenges on behalf of the Collaborative Research in Pelvic Surgery Consortium (CoRPS): managing complicated cases : Series 3: Challenging recurrent prolapse in a medically complicated patient.

Authors:  Danielle D Antosh; Ladin A Yurteri-Kaplan; David Shveiky; Madalena Liu; Chris Heisler; Aparna Hegde; Cara L Grimes
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Full-thickness vascularized vaginal flap as the fixation point in the surgical treatment of vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  Dmitry Shkarupa; Nikita Kubin; Olga Staroseltseva
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Joint report on terminology for surgical procedures to treat pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Hysterectomy with uterosacral suspension or Uphold™ hysteropexy in women with apical prolapse: a parallel cohort study.

Authors:  Mugdha Kulkarni; Natharnia Young; Joseph Lee; Anna Rosamilia
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  A long-term comparative study of Uphold™ transvaginal mesh kit against anterior colporrhaphy.

Authors:  Moshe Gillor; Susanne Langer; Hans Peter Dietz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Changes in Sexual Function Following Uphold Transvaginal mesh Surgery for the Treatment of Urogenital Prolapse.

Authors:  Tsun-Wen Hsiao; Chin-Ru Ker; Kun-Ling Lin; Yung-Shun Juan; Ming-Ping Wu; Yi-Yin Liu; Cheng-Yu Long
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Predictors of Clinical Outcome in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Who Underwent Transvaginal Mesh Reconstruction Surgery.

Authors:  Ting-Hsuan Lin; Fung-Chao Tu; Ho-Hsiung Lin; Sheng-Mou Hsiao
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.430

8.  The clinical and urodynamic outcomes of single-incision mesh surgery using the Uphold system for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Pei-Chi Wu; Chin-Hu Wu; Yiyin Liu; Zixi Loo; Kun-Ling Lin; Cheng-Yu Long
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Long-term outcomes of pelvic organ prolapse repair using a mesh-capturing device when comparing single- versus multicenter use.

Authors:  Christian Falconer; Daniel Altman; Georgios Poutakidis; Päivi Rahkola-Soisalo; Tomi Mikkola; Edward Morcos
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.344

10.  Association between surgical volumes and real-world healthcare cost when using a mesh capturing device for pelvic organ prolapse: A 5-years comparison between single- versus multicenter use.

Authors:  Edward Morcos; Christian Falconer; Emilie Toresson Grip; Kirk Geale; Katarina Hellgren; Georgios Poutakidis; Daniel Altman
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.