Literature DB >> 29232172

HALO 202: Randomized Phase II Study of PEGPH20 Plus Nab-Paclitaxel/Gemcitabine Versus Nab-Paclitaxel/Gemcitabine in Patients With Untreated, Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Sunil R Hingorani1, Lei Zheng1, Andrea J Bullock1, Tara E Seery1, William P Harris1, Darren S Sigal1, Fadi Braiteh1, Paul S Ritch1, Mark M Zalupski1, Nathan Bahary1, Paul E Oberstein1, Andrea Wang-Gillam1, Wilson Wu1, Dimitrios Chondros1, Ping Jiang1, Sihem Khelifa1, Jie Pu1, Carrie Aldrich1, Andrew E Hendifar1.   

Abstract

Purpose Metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is characterized by excessive hyaluronan (HA) accumulation in the tumor microenvironment, elevating interstitial pressure and impairing perfusion. Preclinical studies demonstrated pegvorhyaluronidase alfa (PEGPH20) degrades HA, thereby increasing drug delivery. Patients and Methods Patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to treatment with PEGPH20 plus nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (PAG) or nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (AG). Tumor HA levels were measured retrospectively using a novel affinity histochemistry assay. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS; overall) and thromboembolic (TE) event rate. Secondary end points included overall survival, PFS by HA level, and objective response rate. An early imbalance in TE events in the PAG arm led to a clinical hold; thereafter, patients with TE events were excluded and enoxaparin prophylaxis was initiated. Results A total of 279 patients were randomly assigned; 246 had HA data; 231 were evaluable for efficacy; 84 (34%) had HA-high tumors (ie, extracellular matrix HA staining ≥ 50% of tumor surface at any intensity). PFS was significantly improved with PAG treatment overall (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53 to 1.00; P = .049) and for patients with HA-high tumors (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.26 to 1.00; P = .048). In patients with HA-high tumors (PAG v AG), the objective response rate was 45% versus 31%, and median overall survival was 11.5 versus 8.5 months (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.61). The most common treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events with significant differences between arms (PAG v AG) included muscle spasms (13% v 1%), neutropenia (29% v 18%), and myalgia (5% v 0%). TE events were comparable after enoxaparin initiation (14% PAG v 10% AG). Conclusion This study met its primary end points of PFS and TE event rate. The largest improvement in PFS was observed in patients with HA-high tumors who received PAG. A similar TE event rate was observed between the treatment groups in stage 2 of the trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29232172     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.9564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  137 in total

Review 1.  The State-of-the-Art of Phase II/III Clinical Trials for Targeted Pancreatic Cancer Therapies.

Authors:  Andres Garcia-Sampedro; Gabriella Gaggia; Alexander Ney; Ismahan Mahamed; Pilar Acedo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 2.  Understanding Disease Biology and Informing the Management of Pancreas Cancer With Preclinical Model Systems.

Authors:  Martin C Whittle; Sunil R Hingorani
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.360

Review 3.  Tailor-Made Nanomaterials for Diagnosis and Therapy of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Xi Hu; Fan Xia; Jiyoung Lee; Fangyuan Li; Xiaoyang Lu; Xiaozhen Zhuo; Guangjun Nie; Daishun Ling
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 16.806

4.  Antifibrotic Therapy Disrupts Stromal Barriers and Modulates the Immune Landscape in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Kianna Y Elahi-Gedwillo; Marjorie Carlson; Jon Zettervall; Paolo P Provenzano
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  [Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma].

Authors:  E Gallmeier; T M Gress
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 0.743

6.  The Art of War and oncology: applying the principles of strategy and tactics to greater effect in the era of targeted therapy.

Authors:  Emil Lou
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-05

Review 7.  Current and emerging therapies for patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a bright future.

Authors:  Eric S Christenson; Elizabeth Jaffee; Nilofer S Azad
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Therapies Targeting the Tumor Stroma and the VEGF/VEGFR Axis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zipeng Lu; Maximilian Weniger; Kuirong Jiang; Stefan Boeck; Kai Zhang; Alexander Bazhin; Yi Miao; Jens Werner; Jan G D'Haese
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.493

9.  Hyaluronidase-Expressing Salmonella Effectively Targets Tumor-Associated Hyaluronic Acid in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Nancy D Ebelt; Edith Zuniga; Kevin B Passi; Lukas J Sobocinski; Edwin R Manuel
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 10.  Tumor cross-talk networks promote growth and support immune evasion in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Christopher J Halbrook; Marina Pasca di Magliano; Costas A Lyssiotis
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 4.052

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.