Literature DB >> 29231991

Combination of TNM staging and pathway based risk score models in patients with gastric cancer.

Yang-Yang Zhou1, Yan-Ting Kang2, Chao Chen1, Fan-Fan Xu1, Hao-Nan Wang3, Rong Jin1,4.   

Abstract

Due to the complexity and heterogeneity of gastric cancer (GC) in individual patient, current staging system is inadequate for predicting outcome of GC. Comprehensive computational and bioinformatics approach may triumph for the prediction. In this study, GC patients were devided according to stage and treatment: curative surgery plus chemoradiotherapy in stage II, curative surgery plus chemoradiotherapy in stages III, and IV, unresectable metastatic gastric cancer. The training sets were downloaded from GEO datasets (GSE26253 and GSE14208). Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed to explore enriched difference between recurrence and nonrecurrence. The core enrichment genes of enriched pathways significantly associated with recurrence or progression were identified using Cox proportional hazards analysis. Thereafter, the risk score models were externally validated in independent datasets-GSE15081 and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We generated respective risk score models of patients in different stages and treatment. A five-gene signature comprising FARP1, SGCE, SGCA, LAMA4, and COL9A2 was strongly associated with recurrence of patients with curative surgery plus chemoradiotherapy in stage II. A six-gene signature consisting of SHH, NF1, AP4B1, COMP, MATN3, and CCL8 was correlated with recurrence of patients with curative surgery plus chemoradiotherapy in stages III and IV. And a four-gene signature composing of ABCC2, AHNAK2, RNF43, and GSPT2 was highly related to progression of patients with unresectable metastatic GC. Taking into consideration TNM stage and gene signature reflecting recurrence or progression, the risk score models significantly improved the accuracy in predicting outcome of GC.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cox; GEO; Kaplan-Meier; TCGA; gastric cancer; risk score model

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29231991     DOI: 10.1002/jcb.26563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biochem        ISSN: 0730-2312            Impact factor:   4.429


  13 in total

1.  Integrative Proteo-Genomic Analysis for Recurrent Survival Prognosis in Colon Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  FeiYan Ai; Wenhao Wang; Shaojun Liu; Decai Zhang; Zhenyu Yang; Fen Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 5.738

2.  Immunohistochemical classification of gastric cancer based on new molecular biomarkers: a potential predictor of survival.

Authors:  Cristina Díaz Del Arco; Lourdes Estrada Muñoz; Elena Molina Roldán; Mª Ángeles Cerón Nieto; Luis Ortega Medina; Soledad García Gómez de Las Heras; Mª Jesús Fernández Aceñero
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  A validated survival nomogram for early-onset diffuse gastric cancer.

Authors:  Fei Liao; Xufeng Guo; Xiaohong Lu; Weiguo Dong
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 5.682

4.  FARP1 boosts CDC42 activity from integrin αvβ5 signaling and correlates with poor prognosis of advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Takuro Hirano; Yoshinari Shinsato; Kan Tanabe; Nayuta Higa; Muhammad Kamil; Kohichi Kawahara; Masatatsu Yamamoto; Kentaro Minami; Michiko Shimokawa; Takaaki Arigami; Shigehiro Yanagita; Daisuke Matushita; Yoshikazu Uenosono; Sumiya Ishigami; Yuko Kijima; Kosei Maemura; Ikumi Kitazono; Akihide Tanimoto; Tatsuhiko Furukawa; Shoji Natsugoe
Journal:  Oncogenesis       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 7.485

5.  AHNAK2 Is Associated with Poor Prognosis and Cell Migration in Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Shusen Zhang; Yuanyuan Lu; Lei Qi; Hongyan Wang; Zhihua Wang; Zhigang Cai
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  A Novel RNA-Binding Protein-Based Nomogram for Predicting Survival of Patients with Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Maoshu Zhu; Jiading Cai; Yulong Wu; Xinhong Wu; Lianghua Feng; Zhijiang Yin
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2021-01-20

7.  Development and external validation of a prognostic nomogram for patients with gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy.

Authors:  Xi'e Hu; Zhenyu Yang; Songhao Chen; Jingyi Xue; Sensen Duan; Lin Yang; Ping Yang; Shujia Peng; Yanming Dong; Lijuan Yuan; Xianli He; Guoqiang Bao
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-12

8.  Deimination Protein Profiles in Alligator mississippiensis Reveal Plasma and Extracellular Vesicle-Specific Signatures Relating to Immunity, Metabolic Function, and Gene Regulation.

Authors:  Michael F Criscitiello; Igor Kraev; Lene H Petersen; Sigrun Lange
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 7.561

9.  Personalized four-category staging for predicting prognosis in patients with small bowel Adenocarcinoma: an international development and validation study.

Authors:  Zi-Hao Dai; Qi-Wen Wang; Qing-Wei Zhang; Xia-Lin Yan; Thomas Aparicio; Yang-Yang Zhou; Huan Wang; Chi-Hao Zhang; Aziz Zaanan; Pauline Afchain; Yan Zhang; Hui-Min Chen; Yun-Jie Gao; Zhi-Zheng Ge
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 8.143

10.  Identification of an EMT-Related Gene Signature for Predicting Overall Survival in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Weiyu Dai; Yizhi Xiao; Weimei Tang; Jiaying Li; Linjie Hong; Jieming Zhang; Miaomiao Pei; Jianjiao Lin; Side Liu; Xiaosheng Wu; Li Xiang; Jide Wang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.