Tania Carron1, Pierre-Olivier Bridevaux2, Karin Lörvall3, Rachel Parmentier4, Jean-Bernard Moix4, Vincent Beytrison5, Raymond Pernet6, Constance Rey7, Pierre-Yves Roberfroid8, Prashant N Chhajed9, Thomas Dieterle9, Ladina Joos Zellweger10, Malcolm Kohler11, Sabrina Maier9, David Miedinger9, Robert Thurnheer12, Pascal Urwyler9, Jean-Marie Tschopp13, Emilie Zuercher1, Jörg Daniel Leuppi9, Bernard Burnand1, Isabelle Peytremann-Bridevaux1. 1. Institute of social and preventive medicine (IUMSP), Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland. 2. Division of Pneumology, Hospital of Valais, Sion, Switzerland / Division of Pneumology, University Hospitals of Geneva, Switzerland / Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland. 3. Institute of social and preventive medicine (IUMSP), Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland / Division of Pneumology, Hospital of Valais, Sion, Switzerland / Ligue pulmonaire Valaisanne - Promotion Santé Valais, Sion, Switzerland. 4. Ligue pulmonaire Valaisanne - Promotion Santé Valais, Sion, Switzerland. 5. Pharmacy, Crans-Montana, Switzerland. 6. General Practice, Bramois, Switzerland. 7. General Practice, Saint-Maurice, Switzerland. 8. Division of Physiotherapy, Hôpital du Valais, Montana, Switzerland. 9. University Clinic of Medicine, Kantonsspital Baselland, Liestal, and Medical Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Switzerland. 10. Division of Pneumology, St. Claraspital, Basel, Switzerland. 11. Division of Pneumology, University Hospital Zürich, Switzerland. 12. Division of Pneumology, Kantonsspital Münsterlingen, Switzerland. 13. Centre Valaisan de Pneumologie, Department of Internal Medicine, Montana, Switzerland.
Abstract
QUESTION UNDER STUDY: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of a pilot COPD integrated care programme implemented in Valais, Switzerland. METHODS: The programme was adapted from the self-management programme Living Well with COPD, and included the following elements: self-management patient-education group sessions, telephone and medical follow-ups, multidisciplinary teams, training of healthcare professionals, and evidence-based COPD care. A process and outcome evaluation of the pilot phase of the programme was conducted by means of qualitative and quantitative methods. Reach (coverage, participation rates), dosage (interventions carried out), fidelity (delivered as intended) and stakeholders' acceptance of the programme were evaluated through data monitoring and conduct of focus groups with patients and healthcare professionals. Effectiveness was assessed with pre-post analyses (before and after the intervention). The primary outcome measures were; (1) generic and disease-specific quality of life (36-Item Short Form Health Survey, Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire); and (2) hospitalisations (all-cause and for acute exacerbations) in the past 12 months. Secondary outcomes included self-efficacy, number of exacerbations and exercise capacity. Finally, controlled pre-post comparisons were also made with patients from the Swiss COPD Cohort for three common outcome measures (dyspnoea [mMRC score], number of exacerbations and smoking status). RESULTS: During the first 2 years of the programme, eight series of group-based education sessions were delivered to 57 patients with COPD in three different locations of the canton of Valais. Coverage objectives were achieved and attendance rate at the education sessions was high (83.6%). Patients' and healthcare professionals' reported a high degree of satisfaction, except for multidisciplinarity and transfer of information. Exploration of the effectiveness of this pilot programme suggested positive pre-post results at 12 months, with improvements in terms of health-related quality of life, self-efficacy, exercise capacity, immunisation coverage and Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care score. No other outcome, including the number of hospital admissions, differed significantly after 12 months. We observed no differences from the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of the programme and confirmed the relevance of mixed method process evaluation to adjust and improve programme implementation. The introduction of multidisciplinary teams in a context characterised by fragmentation of care was identified as the main challenge in the programme implementation and could not be achieved as expected. Despite this area for improvement, patients' feedback and early effectiveness results confirmed the benefits of COPD integrated care programmes emphasising self-management education.
QUESTION UNDER STUDY: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of a pilot COPD integrated care programme implemented in Valais, Switzerland. METHODS: The programme was adapted from the self-management programme Living Well with COPD, and included the following elements: self-management patient-education group sessions, telephone and medical follow-ups, multidisciplinary teams, training of healthcare professionals, and evidence-based COPD care. A process and outcome evaluation of the pilot phase of the programme was conducted by means of qualitative and quantitative methods. Reach (coverage, participation rates), dosage (interventions carried out), fidelity (delivered as intended) and stakeholders' acceptance of the programme were evaluated through data monitoring and conduct of focus groups with patients and healthcare professionals. Effectiveness was assessed with pre-post analyses (before and after the intervention). The primary outcome measures were; (1) generic and disease-specific quality of life (36-Item Short Form Health Survey, Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire); and (2) hospitalisations (all-cause and for acute exacerbations) in the past 12 months. Secondary outcomes included self-efficacy, number of exacerbations and exercise capacity. Finally, controlled pre-post comparisons were also made with patients from the Swiss COPD Cohort for three common outcome measures (dyspnoea [mMRC score], number of exacerbations and smoking status). RESULTS: During the first 2 years of the programme, eight series of group-based education sessions were delivered to 57 patients with COPD in three different locations of the canton of Valais. Coverage objectives were achieved and attendance rate at the education sessions was high (83.6%). Patients' and healthcare professionals' reported a high degree of satisfaction, except for multidisciplinarity and transfer of information. Exploration of the effectiveness of this pilot programme suggested positive pre-post results at 12 months, with improvements in terms of health-related quality of life, self-efficacy, exercise capacity, immunisation coverage and Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care score. No other outcome, including the number of hospital admissions, differed significantly after 12 months. We observed no differences from the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of the programme and confirmed the relevance of mixed method process evaluation to adjust and improve programme implementation. The introduction of multidisciplinary teams in a context characterised by fragmentation of care was identified as the main challenge in the programme implementation and could not be achieved as expected. Despite this area for improvement, patients' feedback and early effectiveness results confirmed the benefits of COPD integrated care programmes emphasising self-management education.
Authors: Charlotte C Poot; Eline Meijer; Annemarije L Kruis; Nynke Smidt; Niels H Chavannes; Persijn J Honkoop Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-09-08
Authors: Soumya Gopakumar; Mathew J Valamparampil; M S Manu; Sanjeev Nair; R Kamala; A Raj Atulya; Bipin K Gopal; Veena Babu; K Vijayakumar Journal: J Family Med Prim Care Date: 2020-09-30
Authors: Gabriela Schmid-Mohler; Christian Clarenbach; Gabi Brenner; Malcolm Kohler; Eva Horvath; Marc Spielmanns; Heidi Petry Journal: ERJ Open Res Date: 2020-06-15
Authors: Rebecca Tomaschek; Patricia Lampart; Anke Scheel-Sailer; Armin Gemperli; Christoph Merlo; Stefan Essig Journal: Int J Integr Care Date: 2022-08-08 Impact factor: 2.913