Haley M Zylberberg1, Benjamin Lebwohl1,2, Arindam RoyChoudhury3, Marcella D Walker4, Peter H R Green5. 1. Celiac Disease Center, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, 10032, USA. 2. Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA. 3. Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA. 4. Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, 10032, USA. 5. Celiac Disease Center, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, 10032, USA. pg11@cumc.columbia.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Low bone density is frequently found in patients newly diagnosed with celiac disease (CD), and improvement is variable. This study was performed to assess changes in bone mineral density (BMD) by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the lumbar spine, hip, and distal one-third radius as well as clinical predictors of BMD changes after the diagnosis and treatment of CD. METHODS: Adult CD patients who had serial DXA at the Celiac Disease Center at Columbia University Medical Center were included (N = 103). We assessed within-person changes in BMD with paired t-tests. Multiple regression was utilized to assess baseline clinical and laboratory predictors of BMD improvement after diagnosis and treatment. RESULTS: The mean age of our sample was 45.6 years (±SD 15.1) and 60% were female. After a median follow-up of 21 months, lumbar spine BMD increased by 1.7 ± 5.5% (p = 0.006) after CD diagnosis. There was a similar trend at the total hip (1.6 ± 6.3%, p = 0.06), but no change at the femoral neck or distal one-third radius. Lower baseline serum calcium predicted a greater increase in lumber spine BMD (ß = -0.0470 g/cm2, p = 0.002). At the hip, higher baseline creatinine clearance (ß = 0.005, p = 0.02) was associated with greater gains in BMD. CONCLUSION: BMD increases at the lumbar spine after the diagnosis of CD and greater BMD improvement is associated with lower baseline serum calcium. This suggests that those with the lowest calcium, which is likely a surrogate for the greatest malabsorption, may have the greatest potential for improvement in skeletal health after treatment of CD.
PURPOSE: Low bone density is frequently found in patients newly diagnosed with celiac disease (CD), and improvement is variable. This study was performed to assess changes in bone mineral density (BMD) by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the lumbar spine, hip, and distal one-third radius as well as clinical predictors of BMD changes after the diagnosis and treatment of CD. METHODS: Adult CDpatients who had serial DXA at the Celiac Disease Center at Columbia University Medical Center were included (N = 103). We assessed within-person changes in BMD with paired t-tests. Multiple regression was utilized to assess baseline clinical and laboratory predictors of BMD improvement after diagnosis and treatment. RESULTS: The mean age of our sample was 45.6 years (±SD 15.1) and 60% were female. After a median follow-up of 21 months, lumbar spine BMD increased by 1.7 ± 5.5% (p = 0.006) after CD diagnosis. There was a similar trend at the total hip (1.6 ± 6.3%, p = 0.06), but no change at the femoral neck or distal one-third radius. Lower baseline serum calcium predicted a greater increase in lumber spine BMD (ß = -0.0470 g/cm2, p = 0.002). At the hip, higher baseline creatinine clearance (ß = 0.005, p = 0.02) was associated with greater gains in BMD. CONCLUSION: BMD increases at the lumbar spine after the diagnosis of CD and greater BMD improvement is associated with lower baseline serum calcium. This suggests that those with the lowest calcium, which is likely a surrogate for the greatest malabsorption, may have the greatest potential for improvement in skeletal health after treatment of CD.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bone mineral density; Calcium; Celiac disease; Predictors
Authors: C E Fiore; P Pennisi; G Ferro; B Ximenes; L Privitelli; R A Mangiafico; F Santoro; N Parisi; T Lombardo Journal: Horm Metab Res Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 2.936
Authors: T Kemppainen; H Kröger; E Janatuinen; I Arnala; C Lamberg-Allardt; M Kärkkäinen; V M Kosma; R Julkunen; J Jurvelin; E Alhava; M Uusitupa Journal: Bone Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: G R Corazza; A Di Sario; L Cecchetti; R A Jorizzo; M Di Stefano; L Minguzzi; G Brusco; M Bernardi; G Gasbarrini Journal: Bone Date: 1996-06 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Philip L Riches; Euan McRorie; William D Fraser; Catherine Determann; Rob van't Hof; Stuart H Ralston Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-10-08 Impact factor: 91.245