Literature DB >> 29230237

RNA-Seq of Plant-Parasitic Nematode Meloidogyne incognita at Various Stages of Its Development.

Inchan Choi1, Parthiban Subramanian1, Donghwan Shim2, Byung-Ju Oh1, Bum-Soo Hahn1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  RNA-Seq; developmental stages; plant parasite; root-knot nematode; transcriptome

Year:  2017        PMID: 29230237      PMCID: PMC5711784          DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2017.00190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Genet        ISSN: 1664-8021            Impact factor:   4.599


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

Meloidogyne incognita is a plant-parasitic nematode which attacks a diverse variety of plants (Mitkowski and Abawi, 2003). The life cycle of this nematode is comprised of five stages namely eggs, J2, J3, and J4 juveniles and adults. Female adults are important in the life cycle as they produce eggs which hatch into infective J2 that travels and attaches to plant roots for continuation of its infective cycle. Among the stages of its life cycle, the J3, J4, and female are sedentary and occur after the motile J2 infects a plant root. It is an obligate plant-parasite and possesses a wide host range of over 100 plants including cotton, tobacco, legumes, vegetable crops, spices, and coffee. It also is one of the most widely spread plant pest and has been reported from Asia, Africa, North, Central and South America, the Caribbean, Europe and Oceania (CABI Data Report; CABI, 2017). Hitherto employed methods have made use of nematicides that can lead to environmental pollution and their use has been banned in developed countries (Collange et al., 2011). Molecular studies on the nematode can help us understand the development and physiology of nematode which can be used to develop control strategies in the future. There have been earlier reports on the transcriptome from egg and J2 juveniles of M. incognita and from infected plant tissues (McCarter et al., 2003; Neveu et al., 2003; Dubreuil et al., 2007; Schaff et al., 2007). The present report was aimed at expanding the currently available information on transcriptome of M. incognita. We aimed to study RNA-Seq data independently for the endophytic J3, J4, and female stages, as well as exophytic egg and J2 stages of the nematode. M. incognita is a notorious plant parasite causing huge economic loss in agricultural crops. Five morphologically distinct developmental stages of the nematode were selected to collect samples and respective transcriptomes were sequenced. The present data can be used to compare and confirm previously reported partial transcriptome of M. incognita as well be a useful resource to study the stage-wise changes occurring in the nematode.

Data

We used RNA-Seq to compare the transcriptomes of five stages namely eggs, J2, J3, J4, and female of the root-knot nematode. Samples were collected, RNA isolated using LiCl2 method and RNA sequencing was carried out using HiSeq2500 platform from Illumina Inc. RNA integrity number (RIN) for the samples were >7 (8.5, 9, 9.4, 9.4, 7.8 for egg, J2, J3, J4, and female stages respectively). stage consisted of the highest number of clean reads at 56,902,902 and J2, J3, J4, and female stages consisted of 50,762,456; 40,968,532; 47,309,223, and 51,730,234 clean reads, respectively (Table 1). Three runs were performed for each stage and raw sequences were submitted to Sequence Read Archive (SRA). Contigs were obtained by assembly using TRINITY software and data deposited to the NABIC sever (http://nabic.rda.go.kr/) maintained by Rural Development Administration, Korea (Seol et al., 2016). We were able to identify 48,024 contigs in egg stage followed by 61,315 in J2 stage, 60,697 in J3; 48,398 contigs in J4 and 41,489 contigs in female stage. The accession numbers and other related statistics are given in Table 1. The raw data was submitted to NCBI SRA portal and the accession number for egg stage are SRR5684407, SRR5684403, and SRR5684417; J2 stage—SRR5684416, SRR5684412, and SRR5684414; J3 stage—SRR5684413, SRR5684415, and SRR5684404; J4 stage—SRR5684408, SRR5684406, and SRR5684405; female stage—SRR5684410, SRR5684409, and SRR5684411.
Table 1

Summary of sequencing, process, assembly, and submission of M. incognita transcriptome at its developmental stages.

AttributesEggJ2J3J4FemaleCombined
PRE-ASSEMBLY
Raw reads70,310,94361,150,82751,342,12758,016,94864,618,511
Clean reads56,902,90250,762,45640,968,53247,309,22351,730,234
NCBI bioproject IDPRJNA390559PRJNA390559PRJNA390559PRJNA390559PRJNA390559
NCBI biosample IDsSAMN07174878SAMN07174879SAMN07174880SAMN07174881SAMN07174882SAMN07174883SAMN07174884SAMN07174885SAMN07174886SAMN07174965SAMN07174966SAMN07174967SAMN07174968SAMN07174969SAMN07174970
Number of cleaned reads mapped to genome27,285,23625,208,09219,962,67224,502,21926,329,321
Total bases of cleaned reads mapped to genome5,510,011,7165,090,859,8424,031,018,3844,276,893,1535,317,234,914
POST-ASSEMBLY
NABIC accession numberNN-3882-000001NN-3881-000001NN-3883-000001NN-3884-000001NN-3885-000001
Number of contigs48,02461,31560,69748,39841,489113,421
N50 (bp)9009737801,1421,0231,338
Number of contigs mapped to genome37,33045,98141,51540,19032,531197,514
Summary of sequencing, process, assembly, and submission of M. incognita transcriptome at its developmental stages.

Materials and methods

Nematode propagation and collection

Root-knot nematode M. incognita was maintained in tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum var. Rutgers) under greenhouse conditions (25°C, 16/8 h day/night period). For collection of the nematode at its developmental stages, a new batch of tomato plants were infected. Eggs used for infection were collected by harvesting and treatment of the infected roots with 10% NaClO for 5 min followed by continuous washing over a series of filters 100, 25 μM mesh filter to trap the eggs. Around 1,000 eggs were used to infect each plant and the newly infected plants were continuously monitored to confirm the stage of nematodes in the roots. Sample collection was carried out in the following order. Around 2 and 6 weeks after infection presence of J3, J4, and female stage nematodes was identified by manual inspection of root-knots under a stereo microscope (Discovery v12, Zeiss Germany). Eggs samples were collected from egg masses and purified by sucrose gradient centrifugation (35% sucrose, 1,500 rpm and room temperature). J2 samples were obtained by hatching a portion of the collected eggs. Eggs of the nematodes were suspended in sterile double distilled water at 25°C for five days and hatched J2 were filtered using 5–7 KimWipes® onto clean Petri dish placed on a lab table. Nematodes at J3, J4, and female were collected from infected roots around 2 and 6 weeks after infection using the following protocol. The harvested roots containing root-knots were washed, chopped and treated with 7.7% cellulase and 15.4% pectinase followed by rinsing in running water and filtering through a 75 μM mesh. For every five roots, 15 mL of cellulase and 30 mL of pectinase was used during enzyme treatment. Rinsing of the roots following enzyme treatment was carried out over a filter (75 μM mesh) and nematodes retained on the surface of the filter were suspended in distilled water and handpicked using a pipette under a stereo microscope. Two hundred milligrams of samples for each stage at egg, J2, J3, J4, and female were collected from the roots of tomato plants and were snap frozen using liquid nitrogen followed by storage at −80°C until further processing.

Total RNA extraction, library preparation, and RNA-seq

To obtain high-throughput transcriptome data of M. incognita, we used Illumina-based NGS sequencing. RNA was extracted from nematodes collected at five developmental stages, i.e., egg, J2, J3, J4, and Fe (female) with three technical replicates at each stage. Total RNA from the samples was quantified using Nanodrop spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher Scientific), quality-assessed by RNA 6000 Nano assay kit (Agilent) and Bioanalyser2100 (Agilent). NGS sequencing libraries were generated from one microgram of total RNA using TruSeq RNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina) according to the manufacturer's protocol. In brief, the poly-A containing RNA molecules were purified using poly-T oligo attached magnetic beads. After purification, the total poly (A)+ RNA was fragmented into small pieces using divalent cations under elevated temperature. The cleaved mRNA fragments were reverse transcribed into first strand cDNA using random primers. Short fragments were purified with a QiaQuick PCR extraction kit and resolved with elution buffer for end reparation and addition of poly (A). Following this, the short fragments were connected with sequencing adapters. Each library was separated by adjoining distinct multiplex identifier (MID) tag. The resulting cDNA libraries were then paired-end sequenced (2 × 101 bp) with Illumina HiSeq™ 2500 system.

Preprocess, de novo assembly and mapping

Complete paired-end sequences were obtained as individual fastq files (forward and reverse) from the images by CASAVA v.1.8.2 base calling software with ASCII Q-score (offset 33). Adaptor sequences, minimum length (90 bp), bad fraction (>10%) and low quality bases with PHRED scores (Q) ≤ 20, were removed using CLC genome cell (v.4.0). We cleaned paired-end reads using prinseq-vlite v0.19.3 with parameters (-min_len 50 -min_qual_score 10 -min_qual_mean 20 -derep 14 -trim_qual_left 20 -trim_qual_right 20; Schmieder and Edwards, 2011). De novo transcriptome assembly was carried out using the clean paired-end reads with the Trinity assembly pipeline (Trinity Release v2.0.2) using default parameters (Grabherr et al., 2011). The final outputs from TRINITY assembly were clustered by cd-hit-est as a set of FASTA sequences (contigs) for each stage of the nematode (Fu et al., 2012). The contigs were mapped against the reference of M. incognita genome (ASM18041v1) using Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA) (Li and Durbin, 2009). This was followed by data summarization with bamtools stats option and python script. The summary of the transcriptomes of various stages of M. incognita are listed in Table 1. The assembled transcriptomes can be used for applications such as gene discovery or comparison of M. incognita transcriptome with other plant-parasitic nematodes to understand the molecular origin of their parasitism.

Author contributions

B-SH and IC conceived and designed the experiments; IC, PS, DS, B-JO, and B-SH performed the experiments; IC, PS, DS, and B-SH analyzed the data; B-SH, DS, and IC contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; PS and B-SH wrote the paper.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  9 in total

1.  Comprehensive transcriptome profiling in tomato reveals a role for glycosyltransferase in Mi-mediated nematode resistance.

Authors:  Jennifer E Schaff; Dahlia M Nielsen; Chris P Smith; Elizabeth H Scholl; David McK Bird
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  A set of genes differentially expressed between avirulent and virulent Meloidogyne incognita near-isogenic lines encode secreted proteins.

Authors:  Cédric Neveu; Stéphanie Jaubert; Pierre Abad; Philippe Castagnone-Sereno
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.171

3.  Transcriptome analysis of root-knot nematode functions induced in the early stages of parasitism.

Authors:  G Dubreuil; M Magliano; E Deleury; P Abad; M N Rosso
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 10.151

4.  Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets.

Authors:  Robert Schmieder; Robert Edwards
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Analysis and functional classification of transcripts from the nematode Meloidogyne incognita.

Authors:  James P McCarter; Makedonka Dautova Mitreva; John Martin; Mike Dante; Todd Wylie; Uma Rao; Deana Pape; Yvette Bowers; Brenda Theising; Claire V Murphy; Andrew P Kloek; Brandi J Chiapelli; Sandra W Clifton; David Mck Bird; Robert H Waterston
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2003-03-31       Impact factor: 13.583

6.  Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome.

Authors:  Manfred G Grabherr; Brian J Haas; Moran Yassour; Joshua Z Levin; Dawn A Thompson; Ido Amit; Xian Adiconis; Lin Fan; Raktima Raychowdhury; Qiandong Zeng; Zehua Chen; Evan Mauceli; Nir Hacohen; Andreas Gnirke; Nicholas Rhind; Federica di Palma; Bruce W Birren; Chad Nusbaum; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh; Nir Friedman; Aviv Regev
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data.

Authors:  Limin Fu; Beifang Niu; Zhengwei Zhu; Sitao Wu; Weizhong Li
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  NABIC: A New Access Portal to Search, Visualize, and Share Agricultural Genomics Data.

Authors:  Young-Joo Seol; Tae-Ho Lee; Dong-Suk Park; Chang-Kug Kim
Journal:  Evol Bioinform Online       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 1.625

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Minc03328 effector gene downregulation severely affects Meloidogyne incognita parasitism in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Valdeir Junio Vaz Moreira; Isabela Tristan Lourenço-Tessutti; Marcos Fernando Basso; Maria Eugênia Lisei-de-Sa; Carolina Vianna Morgante; Bruno Paes-de-Melo; Fabrício Barbosa Monteiro Arraes; Diogo Martins-de-Sa; Maria Cristina Mattar Silva; Janice de Almeida Engler; Maria Fatima Grossi-de-Sa
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.116

2.  Root-knot nematode genetic diversity associated with host compatibility to sweetpotato cultivars.

Authors:  Erika Asamizu; Kenta Shirasawa; Hideki Hirakawa; Hideaki Iwahori
Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 5.663

3.  MiDaf16-like and MiSkn1-like gene families are reliable targets to develop biotechnological tools for the control and management of Meloidogyne incognita.

Authors:  Marcos Fernando Basso; Isabela Tristan Lourenço-Tessutti; Reneida Aparecida Godinho Mendes; Clidia Eduarda Moreira Pinto; Caroline Bournaud; François-Xavier Gillet; Roberto Coiti Togawa; Leonardo Lima Pepino de Macedo; Janice de Almeida Engler; Maria Fatima Grossi-de-Sa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Speciation and adaptive evolution reshape antioxidant enzymatic system diversity across the phylum Nematoda.

Authors:  Lian Xu; Jian Yang; Meng Xu; Dai Shan; Zhongdao Wu; Dongjuan Yuan
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 7.431

5.  Chitin Biosynthesis Inhibition of Meloidogyne incognita by RNAi-Mediated Gene Silencing Increases Resistance to Transgenic Tobacco Plants.

Authors:  Vimalraj Mani; Chinreddy Subramanyam Reddy; Seon-Kyeong Lee; Soyoung Park; Hyoung-Rai Ko; Dong-Gwan Kim; Bum-Soo Hahn
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.