Literature DB >> 29230087

Nest design in a changing world: great tit Parus major nests from a Mediterranean city environment as a case study.

Marcel M Lambrechts1, Anne Charmantier1, Virginie Demeyrier1, Annick Lucas1, Samuel Perret1, Matthieu Abouladzé2, Michel Bonnet3, Coline Canonne1, Virginie Faucon2, Stéphanie Grosset3, Gaëlle le Prado2, Frédéric Lidon2, Thierry Noell4, Pascal Pagano3, Vincent Perret2, Stéphane Pouplard3, Rémy Spitaliéry3, Cyril Bernard1, Philippe Perret1, Jacques Blondel1, Arnaud Grégoire1,4.   

Abstract

Investigations of urbanization effects on birds have focused mainly on breeding traits expressed after the nest-building stage (e.g. first-egg date, clutch size, breeding success, and offspring characteristics). Urban studies largely ignored how and why the aspects of nest building might be associated with the degree of urbanization. As urban environments are expected to present novel environmental changes relative to rural environments, it is important to evaluate how nest-building behavior is impacted by vegetation modifications associated with urbanization. To examine nest design in a Mediterranean city environment, we allowed urban great tits (Parus major) to breed in nest boxes in areas that differed in local vegetation cover. We found that different measures of nest size or mass were not associated with vegetation cover. In particular, nests located adjacent to streets with lower vegetation cover were not smaller or lighter than nests in parks with higher vegetation cover. Nests adjacent to streets contained more pine needles than nests in parks. In addition, in nests adjacent to streets, nests from boxes attached to pine trees contained more pine needles than nests from boxes attached to other trees. We suggest that urban-related alterations in vegetation cover do not directly impose physical limits on nest size in species that are opportunistic in the selection of nesting material. However, nest composition as reflected in the use of pine needles was clearly affected by habitat type and the planted tree species present, which implies that rapid habitat change impacts nest composition. We do not exclude that urbanization might impact other aspects of nest building behaviour not covered in our study (e.g. costs of searching for nest material), and that the strengths of the associations between urbanization and nest structures might differ among study populations or species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Great Tit; Nest design; Parus major; nest-box design; urban habitat

Year:  2017        PMID: 29230087      PMCID: PMC5722198          DOI: 10.1007/s11252-017-0670-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urban Ecosyst        ISSN: 1083-8155            Impact factor:   3.005


  6 in total

1.  Perspective: seven reasons (not) to neglect niche construction.

Authors:  Kevin N Laland; Kim Sterelny
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 2.  Extended phenotypes as signals.

Authors:  Franziska C Schaedelin; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2009-05

3.  Experiments on clutch size and nest size in passerine birds.

Authors:  Tore Slagsvold
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Incorporation of cigarette butts into nests reduces nest ectoparasite load in urban birds: new ingredients for an old recipe?

Authors:  Monserrat Suárez-Rodríguez; Isabel López-Rull; Constantino Macías Garcia
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 5.  The design and function of birds' nests.

Authors:  Mark C Mainwaring; Ian R Hartley; Marcel M Lambrechts; D Charles Deeming
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Variation in clutch size in relation to nest size in birds.

Authors:  Anders P Møller; Frank Adriaensen; Alexandr Artemyev; Jerzy Bańbura; Emilio Barba; Clotilde Biard; Jacques Blondel; Zihad Bouslama; Jean-Charles Bouvier; Jordi Camprodon; Francesco Cecere; Anne Charmantier; Motti Charter; Mariusz Cichoń; Camillo Cusimano; Dorota Czeszczewik; Virginie Demeyrier; Blandine Doligez; Claire Doutrelant; Anna Dubiec; Marcel Eens; Tapio Eeva; Bruno Faivre; Peter N Ferns; Jukka T Forsman; Eduardo García-Del-Rey; Aya Goldshtein; Anne E Goodenough; Andrew G Gosler; Iga Góźdź; Arnaud Grégoire; Lars Gustafsson; Ian R Hartley; Philipp Heeb; Shelley A Hinsley; Paul Isenmann; Staffan Jacob; Antero Järvinen; Rimvydas Juškaitis; Erkki Korpimäki; Indrikis Krams; Toni Laaksonen; Bernard Leclercq; Esa Lehikoinen; Olli Loukola; Arne Lundberg; Mark C Mainwaring; Raivo Mänd; Bruno Massa; Tomasz D Mazgajski; Santiago Merino; Cezary Mitrus; Mikko Mönkkönen; Judith Morales-Fernaz; Xavier Morin; Ruedi G Nager; Jan-Åke Nilsson; Sven G Nilsson; Ana C Norte; Markku Orell; Philippe Perret; Carla S Pimentel; Rianne Pinxten; Ilze Priedniece; Marie-Claude Quidoz; Vladimir Remeš; Heinz Richner; Hugo Robles; Seppo Rytkönen; Juan Carlos Senar; Janne T Seppänen; Luís P da Silva; Tore Slagsvold; Tapio Solonen; Alberto Sorace; Martyn J Stenning; János Török; Piotr Tryjanowski; Arie J van Noordwijk; Mikael von Numers; Wiesław Walankiewicz; Marcel M Lambrechts
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 2.912

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Nest size is predicted by female identity and the local environment in the blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus), but is not related to the nest size of the genetic or foster mother.

Authors:  Louis G O'Neill; Timothy H Parker; Simon C Griffith
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.963

2.  Dynamics of Gut Microbiota Diversity During the Early Development of an Avian Host: Evidence From a Cross-Foster Experiment.

Authors:  Aimeric Teyssier; Luc Lens; Erik Matthysen; Joël White
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 5.640

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.