Literature DB >> 29230008

Positive margin length and highest Gleason grade of tumor at the margin predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.

Brian F Chapin1, Jenny N Nguyen2, Mary F Achim2, Neema Navai2, Stephen B Williams3, Ina N Prokhorova2, Xuemei Wang, Elsa M Li Ning Tapia, John W Davis, Patricia Troncoso.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the pathologic features after radical prostatectomy to determine if the length of positive surgical margin (PSM) and the highest Gleason grade within the tumor at the PSM could risk stratify patients for biochemical recurrence (BCR).
METHODS: We performed a retrospective, matched, cohort study to identify patients with pathologically organ-confined (pT2) tumors and negative nodes (pN0/Nx), receiving no adjuvant therapy. Specimens underwent single pathologist review. BCR-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between subgroups using two-sided log-rank test. Using Classification and Regression Tree analysis (CART), we identified an optimal cutoff for the PSM length which differentiated risk for BCR. Cox proportional hazards regression models were fit to assess the association between variables and BCR-free survival.
RESULTS: Two-hundred PSM patients were matched to 200 patients with negative surgical margins (NSM). Median follow-up was 64 months. 5 year BCR-free survival was 90% (95% CI 84-97%) in the NSM group and 70% (95% CI 63-79%) in the PSM group. There was an increased risk of BCR with any PSM. Multivariable analysis demonstrated an association with length of PSM ( > 1 mm vs. ≤ 1 mm, HR 2.29; 95% CI 1.2-4.5) and having a highest Gleason grade of the cancer focus at the margin ≥ 4 (HR 6.8; 95% CI 1.6-29).
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that patients with pathologic T2 tumors with PSM > 1 mm or a Gleason grade of tumor focus at the margin ≥ 4 are at elevated risk for BCR. However, this study suggests that patients with pT2 tumors with positive surgical margins have a relatively low risk of biochemical recurrence and adjuvant radiation may be over treating this sub population. The subsets at greatest risk for BCR may benefit from more frequent PSA monitoring to direct salvage therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29230008     DOI: 10.1038/s41391-017-0019-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis        ISSN: 1365-7852            Impact factor:   5.554


  7 in total

1.  A Recursive Partitioning Analysis Demonstrating Risk Subsets for 8-Year Biochemical Relapse After Margin-Positive Radical Prostatectomy Without Adjuvant Hormone or Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Steven N Seyedin; John M Watkins; Zachary Mayo; Anthony N Snow; Michael Laszewski; J Kyle Russo; Sarah L Mott; Chad R Tracy; Mark C Smith; John M Buatti; Joseph M Caster
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-08-14

Review 2.  Time management: Improving the timing of post-prostatectomy radiotherapy, clinical trials, and knowledge translation.

Authors:  Kai Yun Ooi; Ian Pereira; Himanshu Nagar; Richard Simcock; Matthew S Katz; Christopher C Parker; Colleen Lawton; Hina Saeed
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-08-06

3.  Width of spared neurovascular bundle after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer: is it a reliable factor for predicting postoperative sexual outcome?

Authors:  Sagnjun Yoo; Bumjin Lim; Se Young Choi; Dalsan You; Choung-Soo Kim
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2020-08-17

4.  Impact of Gleason score of the tumor at the positive surgical margin as a prognostic factor.

Authors:  Hirofumi Kurose; Kosuke Ueda; Naoyuki Ogasawara; Katsuaki Chikui; Makoto Nakiri; Kiyoaki Nishihara; Mitsunori Matsuo; Shigetaka Suekane; Hironori Kusano; Jun Akiba; Hirohisa Yano; Tsukasa Igawa
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-02-10

5.  The Effect of Adverse Surgical Margins on the Risk of Biochemical Recurrence after Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Enric Carbonell; Roger Matheu; Maria Muní; Joan Sureda; Mónica García-Sorroche; María José Ribal; Antonio Alcaraz; Antoni Vilaseca
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-08-07

6.  Clinical utility of subclassifying positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Shawn Dason; Emily A Vertosick; Kazuma Udo; Daniel D Sjoberg; Andrew J Vickers; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Ying-Bei Chen; Anuradha Gopalan; S Joseph Sirintrapun; Satish K Tickoo; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; Victor E Reuter; Samson W Fine
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2021-07-11       Impact factor: 5.969

7.  The value of transperineal apical prostate biopsy in predicting urethral/apical margin status after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jindong Dai; Xingming Zhang; Jinge Zhao; Guangxi Sun; Junru Chen; Jiandong Liu; Ronggui Tao; Hao Zeng; Pengfei Shen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.