Literature DB >> 29229779

Subtle changes at the variable domain interface of the T-cell receptor can strongly increase affinity.

Preeti Sharma1, David M Kranz2.   

Abstract

Most affinity-maturation campaigns for antibodies and T-cell receptors (TCRs) operate on the residues at the binding site, located within the loops known as complementarity-determining regions (CDRs). Accordingly, mutations in contact residues, or so-called "second shell" residues, that increase affinity are typically identified by directed evolution involving combinatorial libraries. To determine the impact of residues located at a distance from the binding site, here we used single-codon libraries of both CDR and non-CDR residues to generate a deep mutational scan of a human TCR against the cancer antigen MART-1·HLA-A2. Non-CDR residues included those at the interface of the TCR variable domains (Vα and Vβ) and surface-exposed framework residues. Mutational analyses showed that both Vα/Vβ interface and CDR residues were important in maintaining binding to MART-1·HLA-A2, probably due to either structural requirements for proper Vα/Vβ association or direct contact with the ligand. More surprisingly, many Vα/Vβ interface substitutions yielded improved binding to MART-1·HLA-A2. To further explore this finding, we constructed interface libraries and selected them for improved stability or affinity. Among the variants identified, one conservative substitution (F45βY) was most prevalent. Further analysis of F45βY showed that it enhanced thermostability and increased affinity by 60-fold. Thus, introducing a single hydroxyl group at the Vα/Vβ interface, at a significant distance from the TCR·peptide·MHC-binding site, remarkably affected ligand binding. The variant retained a high degree of specificity for MART-1·HLA-A2, indicating that our approach provides a general strategy for engineering improvements in either soluble or cell-based TCRs for therapeutic purposes.
© 2018 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  T-cell receptor (TCR); deep sequencing; directed evolution; major histocompatibility complex (MHC); protein engineering; protein-protein interaction; single-codon libraries; yeast display

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29229779      PMCID: PMC5798310          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M117.814152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  75 in total

1.  Specificity and degeneracy in antigen recognition: yin and yang in the immune system.

Authors:  H N Eisen
Journal:  Annu Rev Immunol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 28.527

2.  TCRs with high affinity for foreign pMHC show self-reactivity.

Authors:  Phillip D Holler; Lukasz K Chlewicki; David M Kranz
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2002-12-09       Impact factor: 25.606

3.  Long-range cooperative binding effects in a T cell receptor variable domain.

Authors:  Beenu Moza; Rebecca A Buonpane; Penny Zhu; Christine A Herfst; A K M Nur-ur Rahman; John K McCormick; David M Kranz; Eric J Sundberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Generation of peptide-MHC class I complexes through UV-mediated ligand exchange.

Authors:  Boris Rodenko; Mireille Toebes; Sine Reker Hadrup; Wim J E van Esch; Annemieke M Molenaar; Ton N M Schumacher; Huib Ovaa
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  Class II-restricted T cell receptor engineered in vitro for higher affinity retains peptide specificity and function.

Authors:  K Scott Weber; David L Donermeyer; Paul M Allen; David M Kranz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  'Knobs-into-holes' engineering of antibody CH3 domains for heavy chain heterodimerization.

Authors:  J B Ridgway; L G Presta; P Carter
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1996-07

7.  Somatic mutations of the immunoglobulin framework are generally required for broad and potent HIV-1 neutralization.

Authors:  Florian Klein; Ron Diskin; Johannes F Scheid; Christian Gaebler; Hugo Mouquet; Ivelin S Georgiev; Marie Pancera; Tongqing Zhou; Reha-Baris Incesu; Brooks Zhongzheng Fu; Priyanthi N P Gnanapragasam; Thiago Y Oliveira; Michael S Seaman; Peter D Kwong; Pamela J Bjorkman; Michel C Nussenzweig
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  The spatial architecture of protein function and adaptation.

Authors:  Richard N McLaughlin; Frank J Poelwijk; Arjun Raman; Walraj S Gosal; Rama Ranganathan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-10-07       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  T-cell receptor binding affinities and kinetics: impact on T-cell activity and specificity.

Authors:  Jennifer D Stone; Adam S Chervin; David M Kranz
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 7.397

Review 10.  Molecular mechanisms of antibody somatic hypermutation.

Authors:  Javier M Di Noia; Michael S Neuberger
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 23.643

View more
  12 in total

1.  An Engineered T Cell Receptor Variant Realizes the Limits of Functional Binding Modes.

Authors:  Nishant K Singh; Jesus A Alonso; Daniel T Harris; Scott D Anderson; Jiaqi Ma; Lance M Hellman; Aaron M Rosenberg; Elizabeth M Kolawole; Brian D Evavold; David M Kranz; Brian M Baker
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  High-Throughput Stability Screening of Neoantigen/HLA Complexes Improves Immunogenicity Predictions.

Authors:  Dylan T Blaha; Scott D Anderson; Daniel M Yoakum; Marlies V Hager; Yuanyuan Zha; Thomas F Gajewski; David M Kranz
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 11.151

Review 3.  T-cell receptor affinity in the age of cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Michele M Hoffmann; Jill E Slansky
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 4.784

Review 4.  Engineering the T cell receptor for fun and profit: Uncovering complex biology, interrogating the immune system, and targeting disease.

Authors:  Aaron M Rosenberg; Brian M Baker
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 7.786

5.  Engineering Proteins by Combining Deep Mutational Scanning and Yeast Display.

Authors:  Preeti Sharma; Erik Procko; David M Kranz
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

6.  T-cell Receptors Engineered De Novo for Peptide Specificity Can Mediate Optimal T-cell Activity without Self Cross-Reactivity.

Authors:  Preeti Sharma; Daniel T Harris; Jennifer D Stone; David M Kranz
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 11.151

7.  Structure-guided engineering of the affinity and specificity of CARs against Tn-glycopeptides.

Authors:  Preeti Sharma; Venkata V V R Marada; Qi Cai; Monika Kizerwetter; Yanran He; Steven P Wolf; Karin Schreiber; Henrik Clausen; Hans Schreiber; David M Kranz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Avidity optimization of a MAGE-A1-specific TCR with somatic hypermutation.

Authors:  David Bassan; Yosi Meir Gozlan; Adi Sharbi-Yunger; Esther Tzehoval; Erez Greenstein; Lidor Bitan; Nir Friedman; Lea Eisenbach
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 5.532

9.  Stabilization of soluble high-affinity T-cell receptor with de novo disulfide bonds.

Authors:  Flávio Sádio; Gerhard Stadlmayr; Katharina Stadlbauer; Maximilian Gräf; Agnes Scharrer; Florian Rüker; Gordana Wozniak-Knopp
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 3.864

10.  Preferential HLA-B27 Allorecognition Displayed by Multiple Cross-Reactive Antiviral CD8+ T Cell Receptors.

Authors:  Louise C Rowntree; Heleen van den Heuvel; Jessica Sun; Lloyd J D'Orsogna; Thi H O Nguyen; Frans H J Claas; Jamie Rossjohn; Tom C Kotsimbos; Anthony W Purcell; Nicole A Mifsud
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.