Literature DB >> 29229396

Albeit nocturnal, rats subjected to traumatic brain injury do not differ in neurobehavioral performance whether tested during the day or night.

Peter J Niesman1, Jiahui Wei1, Megan J LaPorte1, Lauren J Carlson1, Kileigh L Nassau1, Gina C Bao1, Jeffrey P Cheng1, Patricia de la Tremblaye1, Naima Lajud2, Corina O Bondi3, Anthony E Kline4.   

Abstract

Behavioral assessments in rats are overwhelmingly conducted during the day, albeit that is when they are least active. This incongruity may preclude optimal performance. Hence, the goal of this study was to determine if differences in neurobehavior exist in traumatic brain injured (TBI) rats when assessed during the day vs. night. The hypothesis was that the night group would perform better than the day group on all behavioral tasks. Anesthetized adult male rats received either a cortical impact or sham injury and then were randomly assigned to either Day (1:00-3:00p.m.) or Night (7:30-9:30p.m.) testing. Motor function (beam-balance/walk) was conducted on post-operative days 1-5 and cognitive performance (spatial learning) was assessed on days 14-18. Corticosterone (CORT) levels were quantified at 24h and 21days after TBI. No significant differences were revealed between the TBI rats tested during the Day vs. Night for motor or cognition (p's<0.05). CORT levels were higher in the Night-tested TBI and sham groups at 24h (p<0.05), but returned to baseline and were no longer different by day 21 (p>0.05), suggesting an initial, but transient, stress response that did not affect neurobehavioral outcome. These data suggest that the time rats are tested has no noticeable impact on their performance, which does not support the hypothesis. The finding validates the interpretations from numerous studies conducted when rats were tested during the day vs. their natural active period.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beam-walk; CORT; Controlled cortical impact; Functional recovery; Learning and memory; Morris water maze; Traumatic brain injury

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29229396      PMCID: PMC5800978          DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  29 in total

1.  Heightening of the stress response during the first weeks after a mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  G S Griesbach; D A Hovda; D L Tio; A N Taylor
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Abbreviated environmental enrichment enhances neurobehavioral recovery comparably to continuous exposure after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Benjamin Wells de Witt; Kathryn M Ehrenberg; Rose L McAloon; Amanda H Panos; Kaitlyn E Shaw; Priya V Raghavan; Elizabeth R Skidmore; Anthony E Kline
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2010-12-26       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 3.  Prediction of outcome in severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  David K Menon; Cameron Zahed
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.687

4.  Circadian differences in maze performance of C57BI/6 Ola mice.

Authors:  H J Hoffmann; D Balschun
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2002-06-03       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Controlled cortical impact traumatic brain injury acutely disrupts wakefulness and extracellular orexin dynamics as determined by intracerebral microdialysis in mice.

Authors:  Jon T Willie; Miranda M Lim; Rachel E Bennett; Allan A Azarion; Katherine E Schwetye; David L Brody
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Methylprednisolone exacerbates acute critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency associated with traumatic brain injury in rats.

Authors:  Xin Chen; Bin Zhang; Yan Chai; Bo Dong; Ping Lei; Rongcai Jiang; Jianning Zhang
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Refining environmental enrichment to advance rehabilitation based research after experimental traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Hannah L Radabaugh; Megan J LaPorte; Anna M Greene; Corina O Bondi; Naima Lajud; Anthony E Kline
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 5.330

8.  Circadian phase and sex effects on depressive/anxiety-like behaviors and HPA axis responses to acute stress.

Authors:  Pamela Verma; Kim G C Hellemans; Fiona Y Choi; Wayne Yu; Joanne Weinberg
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2009-11-27

Review 9.  Clinical trials in traumatic brain injury: lessons for the future.

Authors:  Egon M R Doppenberg; Sung C Choi; Ross Bullock
Journal:  J Neurosurg Anesthesiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.956

10.  Diurnal fluctuations in HPA and neuropeptide Y-ergic systems underlie differences in vulnerability to traumatic stress responses at different zeitgeber times.

Authors:  Shlomi Cohen; Ella Vainer; Michael A Matar; Nitsan Kozlovsky; Zeev Kaplan; Joseph Zohar; Aleksander A Mathé; Hagit Cohen
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 7.853

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Brain Trauma, Glucocorticoids and Neuroinflammation: Dangerous Liaisons for the Hippocampus.

Authors:  Ilia G Komoltsev; Natalia V Gulyaeva
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-05-15

2.  Early Life Stress Preceding Mild Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Increases Neuroinflammation but Does Not Exacerbate Impairment of Cognitive Flexibility during Adolescence.

Authors:  Naima Lajud; Angélica Roque; Jeffrey P Cheng; Corina O Bondi; Anthony E Kline
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Cognitive function and brain plasticity in a rat model of shift work: role of daily rhythms, sleep and glucocorticoids.

Authors:  Andrea R Marti; Torhild T Pedersen; Jonathan P Wisor; Jelena Mrdalj; Øystein Holmelid; Sudarshan Patil; Peter Meerlo; Clive R Bramham; Janne Grønli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.