| Literature DB >> 29228229 |
Anastasia Kottara, James P J Hall, Ellie Harrison, Michael A Brockhurst.
Abstract
Mobile genetic elements (MGE) such as plasmids and transposons mobilise genes within and between species, playing a crucial role in bacterial evolution via horizontal gene transfer (HGT). Currently, we lack data on variation in MGE dynamics across bacterial host species. We tracked the dynamics of a large conjugative plasmid, pQBR103, and its Tn5042 mercury resistance transposon, in five diverse Pseudomonas species in environments with and without mercury selection. Plasmid fitness effects and stability varied extensively between host species and environments, as did the propensity for chromosomal capture of the Tn5042 mercury resistance transposon associated with loss of the plasmid. Whereas Pseudomonas fluorescens and Pseudomonas savastanoi stably maintained the plasmid in both environments, the plasmid was highly unstable in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas putida, where plasmid-free genotypes with Tn5042 captured to the chromosome invaded to higher frequency under mercury selection. These data confirm that plasmid stability is dependent upon the specific genetic interaction of the plasmid and host chromosome rather than being a property of plasmids alone, and moreover imply that MGE dynamics in diverse natural communities are likely to be complex and driven by a subset of species capable of stably maintaining plasmids that would then act as hubs of HGT. © FEMS 2017.Entities:
Keywords: bacteria-plasmid coevolution; conjugative plasmids; experimental evolution; horizontal gene transfer; mobile genetic elements
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29228229 PMCID: PMC5812508 DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fix172
Source DB: PubMed Journal: FEMS Microbiol Ecol ISSN: 0168-6496 Impact factor: 4.194
Figure 1.Fitness of Pseudomonas species carrying the plasmid measured as selection rate in a mercury regime ranging from 0–60 μΜ mercury (II) chloride. Solid circle (•): each clonal population carrying the plasmid and competing with the isogenic wild-type strain; solid line (-): curve fitting mercury as a quadratic term for each species; dashed line (–): selection rate 0 indicates no difference between test and reference strains; shaded area: confidence interval of fitting curve.
Figure 2.Frequency of mercury resistance in the parallel evolving clonal populations in absence (blue dashed lines) and presence (50 μM) of mercury (yellow lines) throughout the selection experiment. Each line represents a clonal population evolving during the evolution experiment.
Figure 3.Population density and tracked mercury resistance transposon, Tn5042 and plasmid density. (A–F) clonal populations evolving in absence of mercury; (G–L) clonal population evolving in presence of 50 μΜ mercury. Population density (grey line); tracked mercury transposon in presence of the plasmid (brown density plot area); tracked mercury transposon when the plasmid was not detected (green density plot area).