Margaret Schenkman1, Charity G Moore2, Wendy M Kohrt3,4, Deborah A Hall5, Anthony Delitto6, Cynthia L Comella5, Deborah A Josbeno2, Cory L Christiansen1,4, Brian D Berman7, Benzi M Kluger7, Edward L Melanson4,8, Samay Jain9, Julie A Robichaud10, Cynthia Poon11, Daniel M Corcos12. 1. Physical Therapy Program, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora. 2. Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 3. Division of Geriatric Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora. 4. Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver. 5. Department of Neurology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois. 6. Office of the Dean, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 7. Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical, Campus, Aurora. 8. Division of Endocrinology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora. 9. Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 10. Department of Rehabilitation Services, University of Illinois Hospital Health Sciences System, Chicago. 11. Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. 12. Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract
Importance: Parkinson disease is a progressive neurologic disorder. Limited evidence suggests endurance exercise modifies disease severity, particularly high-intensity exercise. Objectives: To examine the feasibility and safety of high-intensity treadmill exercise in patients with de novo Parkinson disease who are not taking medication and whether the effect on motor symptoms warrants a phase 3 trial. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Study in Parkinson Disease of Exercise (SPARX) was a phase 2, multicenter randomized clinical trial with 3 groups and masked assessors. Individuals from outpatient and community-based clinics were enrolled from May 1, 2012, through November 30, 2015, with the primary end point at 6 months. Individuals with idiopathic Parkinson disease (Hoehn and Yahr stages 1 or 2) aged 40 to 80 years within 5 years of diagnosis who were not exercising at moderate intensity greater than 3 times per week and not expected to need dopaminergic medication within 6 months participated in this study. A total of 384 volunteers were screened by telephone; 128 were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups (high-intensity exercise, moderate-intensity exercise, or control). Interventions: High-intensity treadmill exercise (4 days per week, 80%-85% maximum heart rate [n = 43]), moderate-intensity treadmill exercise (4 days per week, 60%-65% maximum heart rate [n = 45]), or wait-list control (n = 40) for 6 months. Main Outcomes and Measures: Feasibility measures were adherence to prescribed heart rate and exercise frequency of 3 days per week and safety. The clinical outcome was 6-month change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor score. Results:A total of 128 patients were included in the study (mean [SD] age, 64 [9] years; age range, 40-80 years; 73 [57.0%] male; and 108 [84.4%] non-Hispanic white). Exercise rates were 2.8 (95% CI, 2.4-3.2) days per week at 80.2% (95% CI, 78.8%-81.7%) maximum heart rate in the high-intensity group and 3.2 (95% CI, 2.8-3.6; P = .13) days per week at 65.9% (95% CI, 64.2%-67.7%) maximum heart rate in the moderate-intensity group (P < .001). The mean change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor score in the high-intensity group was 0.3 (95% CI, -1.7 to 2.3) compared with 3.2 (95% CI, 1.4 to 5.1) in the usual care group (P = .03). The high-intensity group, but not the moderate-intensity group, reached the predefined nonfutility threshold compared with the control group. Anticipated adverse musculoskeletal events were not severe. Conclusions and Relevance: High-intensity treadmill exercise may be feasible and prescribed safely for patients with Parkinson disease. An efficacy trial is warranted to determine whether high-intensity treadmill exercise produces meaningful clinical benefits in de novo Parkinson disease. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01506479.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Parkinson disease is a progressive neurologic disorder. Limited evidence suggests endurance exercise modifies disease severity, particularly high-intensity exercise. Objectives: To examine the feasibility and safety of high-intensity treadmill exercise in patients with de novo Parkinson disease who are not taking medication and whether the effect on motor symptoms warrants a phase 3 trial. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Study in Parkinson Disease of Exercise (SPARX) was a phase 2, multicenter randomized clinical trial with 3 groups and masked assessors. Individuals from outpatient and community-based clinics were enrolled from May 1, 2012, through November 30, 2015, with the primary end point at 6 months. Individuals with idiopathic Parkinson disease (Hoehn and Yahr stages 1 or 2) aged 40 to 80 years within 5 years of diagnosis who were not exercising at moderate intensity greater than 3 times per week and not expected to need dopaminergic medication within 6 months participated in this study. A total of 384 volunteers were screened by telephone; 128 were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups (high-intensity exercise, moderate-intensity exercise, or control). Interventions: High-intensity treadmill exercise (4 days per week, 80%-85% maximum heart rate [n = 43]), moderate-intensity treadmill exercise (4 days per week, 60%-65% maximum heart rate [n = 45]), or wait-list control (n = 40) for 6 months. Main Outcomes and Measures: Feasibility measures were adherence to prescribed heart rate and exercise frequency of 3 days per week and safety. The clinical outcome was 6-month change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor score. Results: A total of 128 patients were included in the study (mean [SD] age, 64 [9] years; age range, 40-80 years; 73 [57.0%] male; and 108 [84.4%] non-Hispanic white). Exercise rates were 2.8 (95% CI, 2.4-3.2) days per week at 80.2% (95% CI, 78.8%-81.7%) maximum heart rate in the high-intensity group and 3.2 (95% CI, 2.8-3.6; P = .13) days per week at 65.9% (95% CI, 64.2%-67.7%) maximum heart rate in the moderate-intensity group (P < .001). The mean change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor score in the high-intensity group was 0.3 (95% CI, -1.7 to 2.3) compared with 3.2 (95% CI, 1.4 to 5.1) in the usual care group (P = .03). The high-intensity group, but not the moderate-intensity group, reached the predefined nonfutility threshold compared with the control group. Anticipated adverse musculoskeletal events were not severe. Conclusions and Relevance: High-intensity treadmill exercise may be feasible and prescribed safely for patients with Parkinson disease. An efficacy trial is warranted to determine whether high-intensity treadmill exercise produces meaningful clinical benefits in de novo Parkinson disease. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01506479.
Authors: Christopher G Goetz; Werner Poewe; Olivier Rascol; Cristina Sampaio; Glenn T Stebbins; Carl Counsell; Nir Giladi; Robert G Holloway; Charity G Moore; Gregor K Wenning; Melvin D Yahr; Lisa Seidl Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Carl E Clarke; Smitaa Patel; Natalie Ives; Caroline E Rick; Francis Dowling; Rebecca Woolley; Keith Wheatley; Marion F Walker; Catherine M Sackley Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Talita Tuon; Priscila S Souza; Marcela F Santos; Fernanda T Pereira; Giulia S Pedroso; Thais F Luciano; Claudio T De Souza; Rafael C Dutra; Paulo C L Silveira; Ricardo A Pinho Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev Date: 2015-09-10 Impact factor: 6.543
Authors: Kerri S Rawson; Marie E McNeely; Ryan P Duncan; Kristen A Pickett; Joel S Perlmutter; Gammon M Earhart Journal: J Neurol Phys Ther Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Rodolfo Savica; Pierpaolo Turcano; James H Bower; J Eric Ahlskog; Michelle M Mielke Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2019-08-09 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Marzieh M Ardestani; Christopher E Henderson; Seyed H Salehi; Gordhan B Mahtani; Brian D Schmit; T George Hornby Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Terry D Ellis; Cristina Colón-Semenza; Tamara R DeAngelis; Cathi A Thomas; Marie-Hélène Saint Hilaire; Gammon M Earhart; Leland E Dibble Journal: Semin Neurol Date: 2021-03-19 Impact factor: 3.420
Authors: Rebekah L S Summers; Miriam R Rafferty; Michael J Howell; Colum D MacKinnon Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2021-05-12 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Amy W Amara; Kimberly H Wood; Allen Joop; Raima A Memon; Jennifer Pilkington; S Craig Tuggle; John Reams; Matthew J Barrett; David A Edwards; Arthur L Weltman; Christopher P Hurt; Gary Cutter; Marcas M Bamman Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2020-02-24 Impact factor: 10.338