Martin Bouchard1, Sadaf Hashimi2, Kristen Tsai3, Hugh Lampkin4, Ehsan Jozaghi5. 1. School of Criminology, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada. Electronic address: mbouchard@sfu.ca. 2. Rutgers University, Center for Law and Justice, 123 Washington Street, Newark, NJ, 07102-309, United States. 3. School of Criminology, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada. 4. Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users, 380 East Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC, V6A 1P4, Canada. 5. School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2329 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada; BC Centre for Disease Control, 655 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4R4, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Injecting drugs safely almost always includes the presence of one's social network, especially for the prevention of overdose. Yet, the systematic analysis of users' social networks has yet to be established as a focal method in harm reduction research, and interventions. METHODS: This study draws from 200 interviews with persons who inject drugs recruited from North America's first sanctioned supervised injection facility and a drug user's advocacy group. Respondents were asked about the individuals they personally considered as facilitators of harm reduction, and the relations between them. Collectively, these 200 respondents provided over 900 individuals whom they considered as members of their harm reduction network. The aim was to locate individuals that would potentially make the network denser (harm reduction champions) and users that were situated in the "periphery" of the network, and in practice, further away from the harm reduction core. RESULTS: Of the 1135 network members, 63 individuals formed the "core" of the harm reduction network, collectively reaching approximately 70% of individuals in the network. We also uncovered 31 individuals that acted as "articulation points"- these individuals were not as connected, but were more effective at reaching peripheral individuals. CONCLUSION: Former or current injecting drug users that were sampled were surrounded by a relatively rich harm reduction network, but the network approach showed that only a minority of individuals were true harm reduction "champions". Recruitment of a combination of well-connected harm reduction champions, and strategically connected articulation points, would be most effective in planning network interventions that encourage harm reduction behaviors among this population.
BACKGROUND: Injecting drugs safely almost always includes the presence of one's social network, especially for the prevention of overdose. Yet, the systematic analysis of users' social networks has yet to be established as a focal method in harm reduction research, and interventions. METHODS: This study draws from 200 interviews with persons who inject drugs recruited from North America's first sanctioned supervised injection facility and a drug user's advocacy group. Respondents were asked about the individuals they personally considered as facilitators of harm reduction, and the relations between them. Collectively, these 200 respondents provided over 900 individuals whom they considered as members of their harm reduction network. The aim was to locate individuals that would potentially make the network denser (harm reduction champions) and users that were situated in the "periphery" of the network, and in practice, further away from the harm reduction core. RESULTS: Of the 1135 network members, 63 individuals formed the "core" of the harm reduction network, collectively reaching approximately 70% of individuals in the network. We also uncovered 31 individuals that acted as "articulation points"- these individuals were not as connected, but were more effective at reaching peripheral individuals. CONCLUSION: Former or current injecting drug users that were sampled were surrounded by a relatively rich harm reduction network, but the network approach showed that only a minority of individuals were true harm reduction "champions". Recruitment of a combination of well-connected harm reduction champions, and strategically connected articulation points, would be most effective in planning network interventions that encourage harm reduction behaviors among this population.
Authors: Pedro Mateu-Gelabert; H Guarino; K Quinn; P Meylakhs; S Campos; A Meylakhs; D Berbesi; D Toro-Tobón; E Goodbody; D C Ompad; S R Friedman Journal: Curr HIV/AIDS Rep Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 5.071
Authors: Fiona Mercer; Joanna Astrid Miler; Bernie Pauly; Hannah Carver; Kristina Hnízdilová; Rebecca Foster; Tessa Parkes Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-17 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Cho-Hee Shrader; Annick Borquez; Tetyana I Vasylyeva; Antoine Chaillon; Irina Artamanova; Alicia Harvey-Vera; Carlos F Vera; Gudelia Rangel; Steffanie A Strathdee; Britt Skaathun Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2022-08-08