Literature DB >> 29227727

A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing the ELLIPTA and HandiHaler Dry Powder Inhalers in Patients With COPD: Inhaler-Specific Attributes and Overall Patient Preference.

Kathryn A Collison1, Pinal Patel2, Andrew F Preece2, Richard H Stanford3, Raj K Sharma4, Gregory Feldman5.   

Abstract

This randomised, open-label, cross-over, placebo-containing inhaler study assessed patient preference indicators for ELLIPTA and HandiHaler dry powder inhalers in patients with COPD (NCT02786927; GSK identifier: 204983). The primary objective of this study was to assess patient preference between ELLIPTA and HandiHaler based on the number of steps needed to use the inhaler. Eligible patients ≥40 years of age with COPD were randomised 1:1 to receive their current COPD medication plus a placebo-containing ELLIPTA or HandiHaler inhaler once daily for 7 ± 2 days (treatment period 1); this was followed by a 7 ± 2-day placebo treatment with the alternative inhaler. A 5-item questionnaire assessed inhaler-related patient preferences. A total of 212 patients (mean age, 65.1 years) were enrolled at 22 US sites; 73% had a COPD duration ≥5 years. Median (range) exposure was 8 ( 5 , 13 ) days for ELLIPTA and 8 ( 1 , 16) days for HandiHaler. Significantly more patients preferred ELLIPTA to HandiHaler in terms of the number of steps to use and all secondary attributes (size, comfort of the mouthpiece, remaining doses, and ease of use of the two inhalers; all p < 0.001). Similar results were observed irrespective of the order of inhaler use. Eighteen patients (8%) reported at least one AE and two (<1%) patients reported four non-fatal SAEs; none were related to the study treatment. Patient attitude toward a particular inhaler and their experiences in using it can affect adherence to therapy, which can in turn strongly influence effectiveness of inhaled medications. This study uses a robust methodology to assess patient preference.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; inhaler attributes; patient adherence; patient preference

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29227727     DOI: 10.1080/15412555.2017.1400000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  COPD        ISSN: 1541-2563            Impact factor:   2.409


  5 in total

1.  Patient Experience Data for Medical Product Development: Opportunity Beyond Obligation.

Authors:  Robyn T Carson
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  ELLIPTA Versus DISKUS plus HandiHaler in COPD: A Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Study in a Clinical Trial Setting.

Authors:  Edward M Kerwin; Selwyn Spangenthal; Michael Zvarich; Valerie Millar; Renu Jain; Kathryn Collison; Raj Sharma
Journal:  Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis       Date:  2020-04

Review 3.  Patient considerations in the treatment of COPD: focus on the new combination inhaler fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol.

Authors:  Antonio Molino; Giovanna Calabrese; Mauro Maniscalco
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 4.  Evidence-based review of data on the combination inhaler umeclidinium/vilanterol in patients with COPD.

Authors:  Timothy E Albertson; Willis S Bowman; Richart W Harper; Regina M Godbout; Susan Murin
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2019-06-06

5.  Opportunities and challenges for the inclusion of patient preferences in the medical product life cycle: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rosanne Janssens; Isabelle Huys; Eline van Overbeeke; Chiara Whichello; Sarah Harding; Jürgen Kübler; Juhaeri Juhaeri; Antonio Ciaglia; Steven Simoens; Hilde Stevens; Meredith Smith; Bennett Levitan; Irina Cleemput; Esther de Bekker-Grob; Jorien Veldwijk
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 2.796

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.