Literature DB >> 29227419

Lessons Learned From the Environmental Public Health Tracking Sub-County Data Pilot Project.

Angela K Werner1, Heather Strosnider, Craig Kassinger, Mikyong Shin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Small area data are key to better understanding the complex relationships between environmental health, health outcomes, and risk factors at a local level. In 2014, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Environmental Public Health Tracking Program (Tracking Program) conducted the Sub-County Data Pilot Project with grantees to consider integration of sub-county data into the National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network (Tracking Network).
DESIGN: The Tracking Program and grantees developed sub-county-level data for several data sets during this pilot project, working to standardize processes for submitting data and creating required geographies. Grantees documented challenges they encountered during the pilot project and documented decisions.
RESULTS: This article covers the challenges revealed during the project. It includes insights into geocoding, aggregation, population estimates, and data stability and provides recommendations for moving forward.
CONCLUSION: National standards for generating, analyzing, and sharing sub-county data should be established to build a system of sub-county data that allow for comparison of outcomes, geographies, and time. Increasing the availability and accessibility of small area data will not only enhance the Tracking Network's capabilities but also contribute to an improved understanding of environmental health and informed decision making at a local level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29227419      PMCID: PMC6190570          DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract        ISSN: 1078-4659


  23 in total

Review 1.  Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter?: the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project.

Authors:  Nancy Krieger; Jarvis T Chen; Pamela D Waterman; Mah-Jabeen Soobader; S V Subramanian; Rosa Carson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Editorial comment on Geographical differences in cancer incidence in the Belgian Province of Limburg by Bruntinx and colleagues.

Authors:  L Jarup; N Best
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Comparison of small-area analysis techniques for estimating county-level outcomes.

Authors:  Haomiao Jia; Peter Muennig; Elaine Borawski
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Geographical epidemiology, spatial analysis and geographical information systems: a multidisciplinary glossary.

Authors:  Mohsen Rezaeian; Graham Dunn; Selwyn St Leger; Louis Appleby
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Choosing area based socioeconomic measures to monitor social inequalities in low birth weight and childhood lead poisoning: The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project (US).

Authors:  N Krieger; J T Chen; P D Waterman; M-J Soobader; S V Subramanian; R Carson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  New Directions in the Development of Population Estimates in the United States?

Authors:  David A Swanson; Jerome N McKibben
Journal:  Popul Res Policy Rev       Date:  2009-11-13

7.  A two-stage cluster sampling method using gridded population data, a GIS, and Google Earth(TM) imagery in a population-based mortality survey in Iraq.

Authors:  Lp Galway; Nathaniel Bell; Al Shatari Sae; Amy Hagopian; Gilbert Burnham; Abraham Flaxman; Wiliam M Weiss; Julie Rajaratnam; Tim K Takaro
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.918

8.  On the use of ZIP codes and ZIP code tabulation areas (ZCTAs) for the spatial analysis of epidemiological data.

Authors:  Tony H Grubesic; Timothy C Matisziw
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 3.918

9.  National environmental public health tracking program: bridging the information gap.

Authors:  Michael A McGeehin; Judith R Qualters; Amanda Sue Niskar
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Interpreting posterior relative risk estimates in disease-mapping studies.

Authors:  Sylvia Richardson; Andrew Thomson; Nicky Best; Paul Elliott
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  4 in total

1.  Developing a surveillance system of sub-county data: Finding suitable population thresholds for geographic aggregations.

Authors:  Angela K Werner; Heather M Strosnider
Journal:  Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol       Date:  2020-03-06

2.  COVID-19 Community Incidence and Associated Neighborhood-Level Characteristics in Houston, Texas, USA.

Authors:  Abiodun O Oluyomi; Sarah M Gunter; Lauren M Leining; Kristy O Murray; Chris Amos
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Common and Unique Barriers to the Exchange of Administrative Healthcare Data in Environmental Public Health Tracking Program.

Authors:  Mikyong Shin; Charles Hawley; Heather Strosnider
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Well-Being in the Nation: A Living Library of Measures to Drive Multi-Sector Population Health Improvement and Address Social Determinants.

Authors:  Somava Saha; Bruce B Cohen; Julia Nagy; Marianne E McPHERSON; Robert Phillips
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.911

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.