Literature DB >> 29227247

Stress-induced Cdk5 activity enhances cytoprotective basal autophagy in Drosophila melanogaster by phosphorylating acinus at serine437.

Nilay Nandi1, Lauren K Tyra1, Drew Stenesen1, Helmut Krämer1,2.   

Abstract

Cdk5 is a post-mitotic kinase with complex roles in maintaining neuronal health. The various mechanisms by which Cdk5 inhibits and promotes neurodegeneration are still poorly understood. Here, we show that in Drosophila melanogaster Cdk5 regulates basal autophagy, a key mechanism suppressing neurodegeneration. In a targeted screen, Cdk5 genetically interacted with Acinus (Acn), a primarily nuclear protein, which promotes starvation-independent, basal autophagy. Loss of Cdk5, or its required cofactor p35, reduces S437-Acn phosphorylation, whereas Cdk5 gain-of-function increases pS437-Acn levels. The phospho-mimetic S437D mutation stabilizes Acn and promotes basal autophagy. In p35 mutants, basal autophagy and lifespan are reduced, but restored to near wild-type levels in the presence of stabilized AcnS437D. Expression of aggregation-prone polyQ-containing proteins or the Amyloid-β42 peptide, but not alpha-Synuclein, enhances Cdk5-dependent phosphorylation of S437-Acn. Our data indicate that Cdk5 is required to maintain the protective role of basal autophagy in the initial responses to a subset of neurodegenerative challenges.

Entities:  

Keywords:  D. melanogaster; Drosophila; autophagy; cell biology; compound eye; fat body; neurodegeneration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29227247      PMCID: PMC5760206          DOI: 10.7554/eLife.30760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN: 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.140


Introduction

Cdk5 shares strong homology with other members of the family of cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks), but it is distinct in its modes of regulation and function (Dhavan and Tsai, 2001; Pozo and Bibb, 2016). Unlike other Cdks, Cdk5 is best known for its function in post-mitotic cells rather than cell cycle regulation (Dhariwala and Rajadhyaksha, 2008). In post-mitotic cells, Cdk5 is regulated by binding to its obligatory membrane-associated p35 or p39 co-activators (Tsai et al., 1994; Tang et al., 1995). These co-activators are highly expressed in the brain and loss of Cdk5 activity in mice or flies has been associated with defects in neurite outgrowth (Su and Tsai, 2011; Trunova et al., 2011), neuronal migration (Nishimura et al., 2014), pre- and post-synaptic functions (Bibb et al., 1999; Li et al., 2001), the maintenance of synaptic plasticity (Hawasli et al., 2007), retinal degeneration (Kang et al., 2012), and neurodegeneration in aging brains (Trunova and Giniger, 2012; Shah and Lahiri, 2017). Accordingly, dysregulation of Cdk5 has been observed in numerous brain diseases, including schizophrenia and epilepsy (Patel et al., 2004; Engmann et al., 2011) and neurodegenerative disorders, including Huntington’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) (Cheung and Ip, 2012). Cdk5 substrates regulating microtubule-based transport (Klinman and Holzbaur, 2015) and synaptic function (Tan et al., 2003; Lai and Ip, 2015), have been identified, but the long-term neuroprotective function of Cdk5 activity remains poorly understood (McLinden et al., 2012; Meyer et al., 2014). Autophagy, here short for macroautophagy, is a key cellular process for maintaining the health of neurons (Menzies et al., 2015). Cytoprotective functions of autophagosomes in neurons include the engulfment and lysosomal delivery of aggregates of misfolded proteins and the disposal of dysfunctional mitochondria (Green and Levine, 2014). This protective role of basal autophagy was demonstrated by neuron-specific mutations in autophagy core components: neuronal loss of Atg5 or Atg7 yields rapid neurodegeneration (Hara et al., 2006; Komatsu et al., 2006; Juhász et al., 2007). These findings are consistent with results in mouse and Drosophila models of Huntington’s disease or spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3) in which elevated autophagy corresponded to reduced loads of aggregated Huntingtin (Htt) protein and ameliorated neuronal phenotypes (Ravikumar et al., 2004; Bilen and Bonini, 2007; Sarkar et al., 2007; Zheng et al., 2010; Jaiswal et al., 2012; Menzies et al., 2015). Although the rapid induction of autophagy in response to glucose or amino-acid deprivation is well described (Galluzzi et al., 2014), little is known about the modulation of basal levels of autophagy in response to stress caused by protein aggregates (Ashkenazi et al., 2017). We have previously identified Acinus (Acn) as a novel regulator of basal autophagy in Drosophila (Haberman et al., 2010; Nandi et al., 2014). Mammalian Acn had originally been identified as a caspase target aiding in chromatin modifications in apoptotic cells (Sahara et al., 1999; Joselin et al., 2006). In mammalian and Drosophila cells, Acn is highly enriched in the nucleus where, together with its binding partners Sap18 and RNPS1, it forms the ASAP complex (Schwerk et al., 2003; Murachelli et al., 2012). ASAP interacts with the exon junction complex (Tange et al., 2005) and participates in the regulation of alternative splicing (Schwerk et al., 2003; Jang et al., 2008; Hayashi et al., 2014; Malone et al., 2014). Antagonistic activities of Akt1 kinase and caspase-3 homologs regulate Acn levels (Hu et al., 2005) and genetic manipulations that prevent the caspase-mediated cleavage of endogenous Acn in Drosophila can elevate its levels in a cell type-specific manner (Nandi et al., 2014). An unexpected consequence of such elevated Acn was an increase in basal, starvation-independent autophagy. High-level Acn overexpression by the Gal4/UAS system triggers autophagy-dependent death in Drosophila (Haberman et al., 2010). By contrast, Acn levels were modestly increased by the AcnD527A mutation that interferes with its Caspase-mediated cleavage or by phospho-mimetic mutations in two AKT1 target sites that reduce this cleavage (Nandi et al., 2014). Such mildly elevated Acn levels yielded elevated basal autophagy with beneficial outcomes including enhanced starvation resistance, prolonged life span and reduced loads of polyQ aggregates in a Drosophila model of Huntington’s disease (Nandi et al., 2014). Here, we show that similar benefits are gained by phosphorylation of Acn at serine 437. We identify Cdk5 as the kinase which mediates this phosphorylation and show that Cdk5 activity is enhanced in the presence of multiple aggregation-prone proteins, including Huntingtin-Q93 (Htt.Q93), SCA3.Q78, and Amyloid-beta peptide 42 (Aβ42). These findings offer new insights into the complex mechanisms balancing the effects of loss and gain-of-function of Cdk5 on neurodegenerative diseases.

Results

Phosphorylation of conserved serine 437 stabilizes Acn

Phosphorylation of conserved C-terminal Akt1-target sites (Figure 1A) regulates Acn levels in flies and mammalian cells (Hu et al., 2005; Nandi et al., 2014). This motivated us to investigate the functional consequences of phosphorylation of another highly conserved residue of Acn, namely serine 437 (Figure 1B). Phosphorylated S437 has been detected by phosphoproteomics approaches in mammalian cancer cells (Patwa et al., 2008; Francavilla et al., 2017) and Drosophila (Bodenmiller et al., 2007).
Figure 1.

Acn protein is stabilized by phosphorylation at Serine 437.

(A) Cartoon shows regulatory elements of Acn. Genomic Acn transgenes are Myc-tagged and expressed from the endogenous acnP promoter in the background of acn1 and acn27 null alleles. Green boxes indicate the RRM domain and regions that bind to AAC11 (Rigou et al., 2009) or SAP18/RNPS1 (Murachelli et al., 2012). Phosphorylation at the AKT1 target sites S641 and S731 reduces Dcp-1-mediated cleavage at D527 (Nandi et al., 2014). (B) Serine S437 is conserved from humans to insects. Sequences shown: Homo sapiens NP_055792.1; Mus musculus AAF89661.1; Danio rerio AAI16537.1; Culex quinquefasciatus XP_001846490.1; Aedes aegypti XP_001664312.1; Apis mellifera XP_006570961.1; Drosophila virilis XP_015028002.1; Drosophila persimilis XP_002014510.1; Drosophila melanogaster NP_609935.1. (C–E) Projections of confocal micrographs of eye discs from AcnWT (C,E) or AcnS437A (D) larvae stained for pS437-Acn and Myc. Strong staining for pS437-Acn is dominated by cone cells (CC) in posterior regions of eye discs, and by photoreceptors cells (PR) closer to the furrow (arrowhead). Staining for pS437-Acn, but not Myc, is reduced to background level in AcnS437A eye discs (D) or after calf intestinal phosphatase (CIP) treatment of AcnWT (E). (F–H) Micrographs focusing on early photoreceptor clusters in eye disc stained for Acn and DNA. Compared to AcnWT (F), Acn levels are reduced for AcnS437A and increased for the phosphomimetic AcnS437D. (I,J) Western blots of larval lysates show elevated levels of AcnS437D compared to AcnWT or AcnS437A. An Acn cleavage product (arrow) removing the N-terminal Myc tag is stable in AcnS437D, but not AcnWT or AcnS437A. (J) Acn levels relative to the Actin loading control are quantified from three blots from biological repeats. (K) RT-qPCR reveals equal expression for Acn transgenes controlled by the endogenous acnP promoter relative to ribosomal protein RP49. Bar graphs show mean ±SD. ns, not significant; ****p<0.0001; each compared to wild-type Acn control. Scale bar in E is 50 µm in C-E, scale bar in F is 10 µm in F-H. Detailed genotypes are listed in Supplementary file 3.

Micrographs of AcnWT (A), AcnS437A (B), or AcnS437D (C) larval eye discs stained for Boss and Acn. In eye discs that completely lack acn function, the Boss ligand cannot be detected in R7 cells (Haberman et al., 2010). Similar to other regulatory mutants altering the level of Acn protein (Nandi et al., 2014), AcnS437A and AcnS437D mutants displayed no change in the uptake of the Boss ligand from the R8 surface (yellow arrowheads) into the stereotypical Boss-positive endosomes within R7 cells (arrows). Scale bar: 5 µm.

Acn protein is stabilized by phosphorylation at Serine 437.

(A) Cartoon shows regulatory elements of Acn. Genomic Acn transgenes are Myc-tagged and expressed from the endogenous acnP promoter in the background of acn1 and acn27 null alleles. Green boxes indicate the RRM domain and regions that bind to AAC11 (Rigou et al., 2009) or SAP18/RNPS1 (Murachelli et al., 2012). Phosphorylation at the AKT1 target sites S641 and S731 reduces Dcp-1-mediated cleavage at D527 (Nandi et al., 2014). (B) Serine S437 is conserved from humans to insects. Sequences shown: Homo sapiens NP_055792.1; Mus musculus AAF89661.1; Danio rerio AAI16537.1; Culex quinquefasciatus XP_001846490.1; Aedes aegypti XP_001664312.1; Apis mellifera XP_006570961.1; Drosophila virilis XP_015028002.1; Drosophila persimilis XP_002014510.1; Drosophila melanogaster NP_609935.1. (C–E) Projections of confocal micrographs of eye discs from AcnWT (C,E) or AcnS437A (D) larvae stained for pS437-Acn and Myc. Strong staining for pS437-Acn is dominated by cone cells (CC) in posterior regions of eye discs, and by photoreceptors cells (PR) closer to the furrow (arrowhead). Staining for pS437-Acn, but not Myc, is reduced to background level in AcnS437A eye discs (D) or after calf intestinal phosphatase (CIP) treatment of AcnWT (E). (F–H) Micrographs focusing on early photoreceptor clusters in eye disc stained for Acn and DNA. Compared to AcnWT (F), Acn levels are reduced for AcnS437A and increased for the phosphomimetic AcnS437D. (I,J) Western blots of larval lysates show elevated levels of AcnS437D compared to AcnWT or AcnS437A. An Acn cleavage product (arrow) removing the N-terminal Myc tag is stable in AcnS437D, but not AcnWT or AcnS437A. (J) Acn levels relative to the Actin loading control are quantified from three blots from biological repeats. (K) RT-qPCR reveals equal expression for Acn transgenes controlled by the endogenous acnP promoter relative to ribosomal protein RP49. Bar graphs show mean ±SD. ns, not significant; ****p<0.0001; each compared to wild-type Acn control. Scale bar in E is 50 µm in C-E, scale bar in F is 10 µm in F-H. Detailed genotypes are listed in Supplementary file 3.

AcnS437A and AcnS437D support normal Sevenless-mediated Boss endocytosis.

Micrographs of AcnWT (A), AcnS437A (B), or AcnS437D (C) larval eye discs stained for Boss and Acn. In eye discs that completely lack acn function, the Boss ligand cannot be detected in R7 cells (Haberman et al., 2010). Similar to other regulatory mutants altering the level of Acn protein (Nandi et al., 2014), AcnS437A and AcnS437D mutants displayed no change in the uptake of the Boss ligand from the R8 surface (yellow arrowheads) into the stereotypical Boss-positive endosomes within R7 cells (arrows). Scale bar: 5 µm. To explore phosphorylation of this residue in vivo, we raised an antibody that specifically recognizes Acn phosphorylated at serine 437. To assess its specificity for S437-phosphorylated Acn (pS437-Acn), we generated flies in which endogenous Acn was replaced by N-terminally Myc-tagged AcnWT or AcnS437A (Figure 1A). Expression of these transgenes was under control of the endogenous acn promoter and enhancers within a 4 kb acn genomic region (Nandi et al., 2014). All genomic acn transgenes were inserted at 96F3 to avoid insertion site-specific differences in expression levels (Figure 1K). The previously observed lethality, developmental defects and endocytic trafficking defects of acn-null alleles were rescued by both transgenes and also a corresponding phospho-mimetic AcnS437D (Figure 1—figure supplement 1). From here on, we will refer to these rescued flies that, in an acn-null background exclusively express transgenic forms of Acn as AcnWT, AcnS437D or AcnS437A flies. Full genotypes for each experiment are listed in Supplementary file 3.
Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

AcnS437A and AcnS437D support normal Sevenless-mediated Boss endocytosis.

Micrographs of AcnWT (A), AcnS437A (B), or AcnS437D (C) larval eye discs stained for Boss and Acn. In eye discs that completely lack acn function, the Boss ligand cannot be detected in R7 cells (Haberman et al., 2010). Similar to other regulatory mutants altering the level of Acn protein (Nandi et al., 2014), AcnS437A and AcnS437D mutants displayed no change in the uptake of the Boss ligand from the R8 surface (yellow arrowheads) into the stereotypical Boss-positive endosomes within R7 cells (arrows). Scale bar: 5 µm.

Staining of AcnWT larval eye discs with the phospho-specific pS437-Acn antibody revealed a dynamic expression pattern consistent with staining for the Myc epitope tag (Figure 1C) and the previously described distribution of Acn in retinal cells (Haberman et al., 2010; Nandi et al., 2014). Two approaches were used to assess specificity for pS437-Acn. First, staining with pS437-Acn antibody of AcnS437A eye discs was reduced to background level (Figure 1D). Second, treatment of AcnWT eye discs with Calf Intestinal Phosphatase (CIP) reduced staining for pS437-Acn but not the Myc epitope (Figure 1E), demonstrating the specificity of the pS437-Acn antibody and the high level of Acn phosphorylation at S437 in developing eye discs. To test the effect of S437 phosphorylation on Acn levels, we stained the larval eye disc with Acn antibody. Acn levels were slightly reduced in AcnS437A eye discs compared to AcnWT (Figure 1F,G). The small difference between AcnWT and AcnS437A levels in western blots of larval lysates (Figure 1I) may reflect the contribution of other tissues with low levels of S437 phosphorylation of AcnWT or with AcnS437A stabilized by alternative mechanisms. By contrast, Acn levels were further enhanced in flies expressing only the phospho-mimetic AcnS437D (Figure 1H). This was consistent with changes in Acn levels when compared by western blot analysis of larval lysates: AcnS437D levels were elevated compared to AcnWT or phospho-inert AcnS437A (Figure 1I,J). Moreover, we detected a smaller form of Acn that lost the N-terminal Myc-epitope (arrow in Figure 1I). This likely represents a cleaved form of Acn that was stabilized for phospho-mimetic AcnS437D but degraded for AcnWT or AcnS437A (Figure 1I). Proteolytic cleavage of Acn close to the S437 residue has previously been observed for Drosophila and mammalian Acn proteins (Sahara et al., 1999; Hu et al., 2005; Nandi et al., 2014). Together, these data indicate that Acn S437 is phosphorylated in developing tissues and plays a critical role in regulating Acn levels.

Stabilized Acn elevates basal autophagy

As altering Acn levels can modulate the level of basal autophagy (Nandi et al., 2014), we tested whether the stabilized AcnS437D mutant exhibited elevated levels of autophagy. First, we analyzed endogenous Atg8a in eye discs of fed wandering third instar larvae. Atg8a punctae mark autophagosomes and early autolysosomal structures (Klionsky et al., 2016). The number of Atg8a-positive punctae was higher for phosho-mimetic AcnS437D eye discs compared to AcnWT or phospho-inert AcnS437A, indicating elevated levels of autophagy (Figure 2A–D). Another tissue with highly regulated autophagy are larval fat bodies (Rusten et al., 2004; Scott et al., 2004). When we examined fat bodies of fed 96 hr larvae, Atg8a punctae were rare in AcnWT or AcnS437A larvae, but numerous and brightly stained in fed AcnS437D larval fat bodies (Figure 2E–H, Figure 2—figure supplement 1A). Importantly, a 4-hr amino acid starvation further increased the accumulation of Atg8a punctae in all three genotypes (Figure 2I–L, Figure 2—figure supplement 1).
Figure 2.

Stabilized AcnS437D enhances basal autophagy.

(A–C) Micrographs of fed AcnWT, AcnS437A or AcnS437D larval eye discs stained for Atg8a. Scale bar: 40 µm in A-O. (D) Quantification of Atg8a punctae in eye discs from five larvae. (E–G, I–K, M–O) Micrographs of AcnWT, AcnS437A or AcnS437D larval fat bodies encompassing 6 to 8 cells from 96 hr fed or starved size-matched larvae (as indicated) stained for ATG8a (E–G, I–K) or with Lysotracker (M–O). For panels E’-G’ and I’-K’ lysosomal degradation was inhibited with chloroquine to visualize autophagic flux. (H,L,P) Quantification of Atg8a intensity (H,L) or Lysotracker punctae (P) in fat bodies averaged from six to eight cells from four to five larvae from one representative experiment out of three repeats. (Q,R) TEMs of fed AcnWT or AcnS437D fat bodies. Smaller panels show higher magnification examples of dense lysosomes (arrowheads), membrane-enriched autolysosomes (arrows) and mitochondria (m). Scale bars are 2 µm. (S) Quantification of diameters of at least 100 lysosomes and autolysosomes per genotype. (T) Quantification of percentage of autolysosomal area averaged from 25 images per genotype. Bar graphs show mean ± SD. **p<0.01; ****p<0.0001; ns, not significant; each compared to corresponding fed or starved wild-type Acn control. For each genotype, starved and fed were significantly different (p<0.01). Significant differences between untreated and chloroquine-treated larvae are indicated (##p<0.01; ###p<0.001, ####p<0.0001). Detailed genotypes are listed in Supplementary file 3.

Quantification of Atg8a punctae in eye discs.

Quantification of integrated intensity of Atg8a punctae in fat bodies from fed and starved larvae with or without Chloroquine treatment.

Quantification of lysotracker punctae in fat bodies from fed and starved larvae.

Quantification of Atg8a punctae in fed (A) or starved (B) fat bodies averaged from six to eight cells from four to five larvae from one representative experiment out of three repeats.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

Quantification of Atg8a punctae in fat bodies.

Quantification of Atg8a punctae in fed (A) or starved (B) fat bodies averaged from six to eight cells from four to five larvae from one representative experiment out of three repeats.

Stabilized AcnS437D enhances basal autophagy.

(A–C) Micrographs of fed AcnWT, AcnS437A or AcnS437D larval eye discs stained for Atg8a. Scale bar: 40 µm in A-O. (D) Quantification of Atg8a punctae in eye discs from five larvae. (E–G, I–K, M–O) Micrographs of AcnWT, AcnS437A or AcnS437D larval fat bodies encompassing 6 to 8 cells from 96 hr fed or starved size-matched larvae (as indicated) stained for ATG8a (E–G, I–K) or with Lysotracker (M–O). For panels E’-G’ and I’-K’ lysosomal degradation was inhibited with chloroquine to visualize autophagic flux. (H,L,P) Quantification of Atg8a intensity (H,L) or Lysotracker punctae (P) in fat bodies averaged from six to eight cells from four to five larvae from one representative experiment out of three repeats. (Q,R) TEMs of fed AcnWT or AcnS437D fat bodies. Smaller panels show higher magnification examples of dense lysosomes (arrowheads), membrane-enriched autolysosomes (arrows) and mitochondria (m). Scale bars are 2 µm. (S) Quantification of diameters of at least 100 lysosomes and autolysosomes per genotype. (T) Quantification of percentage of autolysosomal area averaged from 25 images per genotype. Bar graphs show mean ± SD. **p<0.01; ****p<0.0001; ns, not significant; each compared to corresponding fed or starved wild-type Acn control. For each genotype, starved and fed were significantly different (p<0.01). Significant differences between untreated and chloroquine-treated larvae are indicated (##p<0.01; ###p<0.001, ####p<0.0001). Detailed genotypes are listed in Supplementary file 3.

Relates to Figure 2D.

Quantification of Atg8a punctae in eye discs.

Relates to Figure 2H and L.

Quantification of integrated intensity of Atg8a punctae in fat bodies from fed and starved larvae with or without Chloroquine treatment.

Relates to Figure 2P.

Quantification of lysotracker punctae in fat bodies from fed and starved larvae.

Quantification of Atg8a punctae in fat bodies.

Quantification of Atg8a punctae in fed (A) or starved (B) fat bodies averaged from six to eight cells from four to five larvae from one representative experiment out of three repeats. We used three approaches to distinguish whether the elevated levels of Atg8a punctae in fed AcnS437D larvae represent an accumulation of stalled autophagosomes, or elevated flux through the pathway. First, we inhibited lysosomal acidification and degradation with chloroquine to reveal Atg8a that has been delivered to autophagosomes and otherwise would be degraded (Lőw et al., 2013; Mauvezin et al., 2014). For AcnWT, AcnS437A and AcnS437D fat bodies, chloroquine treatment resulted in further elevation of ATG8a staining after starvation, consistent with elevated flux in these starved tissues (Figure 2I’–L, Figure 2—figure supplement 1). Chloroquine treatment also significantly enhanced ATG8a staining in fed AcnS437D fat bodies consistent with elevated autophagic flux (Figure 2G’, H, Figure 2—figure supplement 1). Second, we used LysoTracker to evaluate acidification of autolysosomes and lysosomes (DeVorkin and Gorski, 2014a). Under fed conditions, few LysoTracker-positive punctae were detected in AcnWT or AcnS437A fat bodies, and their number increased upon amino acid starvation (Figure 2M–P), consistent with previous reports of starvation-induced autophagic flux in larval fat bodies (Rusten et al., 2004; Scott et al., 2004). AcnS437D larval fat bodies, however, displayed numerous LysoTracker-positive structures even in fed 96 hr larvae (Figure 2O,P) and their number further significantly increased after a 4 hr amino acid starvation (Figure 2O’,P). Third, we analyzed these changes on the ultrastructural level using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Previous work has shown that fat bodies from fed wild-type larvae contain predominately lysosomes smaller than 400 µm, while starved fat bodies contain lysosomes and autolysosomes larger than 1 µm (e.g. Scott et al., 2004; Takáts et al., 2013; Takáts et al., 2014). When we analyzed fat bodies of fed 96 hr AcnS437D larvae, we observed significantly larger and more abundant lysosomes and autolysosomes compared to AcnWT (Figure 2Q,R). The mean diameter of lysosomal/autolysosomal structures is increased more than eight-fold from 250 ± 20 nm in AcnWT to 2044 +/−135 nm in AcnS437D larvae (Figure 2—figure supplement 2S) and the mean area they occupied was increased almost 65-fold (Figure 2T). We previously observed that increased levels of Acn exert a concentration-dependent physiological response. Mild elevation, for example by preventing caspases-mediated cleavage of Acn, enhanced starvation resistance and extended life span of well-fed flies (Nandi et al., 2014). By contrast, da-Gal4-driven expression at higher levels caused autophagy-mediated lethality (Haberman et al., 2010). Therefore, we explored the physiological consequences of elevated autophagy in AcnS437D flies. When challenged with starvation stress, AcnS437D flies survived significantly longer than AcnWT or AcnS437A flies (Figure 3A). Furthermore, AcnS437D life span under well-fed conditions was significantly extended, whereas the phospho-inert AcnS437A mutants died somewhat faster compared to AcnWT (Figure 3B). The median life expectancy for the stabilized AcnS437D mutant was extended by about 50% to 57 days compared to 38 days for AcnWT. Together, our data indicate that stabilized phospho-mimetic AcnS437D elevates basal autophagy leading to beneficial outcomes under standard growth conditions.
Figure 3.

Stabilized AcnS437D enhances life span.

(A) Starvation-induced mortality of flies expressing the indicated Acn proteins. In parenthesis shown are numbers of initial flies in a single representative experiment out of three. (B) Survival curves of flies expressing the indicated Acn proteins. In parenthesis shown are numbers of initial flies in a single representative experiment out of three. Log-rank comparisons revealed significant differences between survival curves: *p<0.05; ****p<0.0001.

Stabilized AcnS437D enhances life span.

(A) Starvation-induced mortality of flies expressing the indicated Acn proteins. In parenthesis shown are numbers of initial flies in a single representative experiment out of three. (B) Survival curves of flies expressing the indicated Acn proteins. In parenthesis shown are numbers of initial flies in a single representative experiment out of three. Log-rank comparisons revealed significant differences between survival curves: *p<0.05; ****p<0.0001.

Cdk5 phosphorylates Acn at serine 437

To identify the kinase responsible for phosphorylating Acn at serine 437, we performed a targeted RNAi screen. We screened a pre-selected subset of kinases based on hits in software packages [GPS3.0; http://gps.biocuckoo.org (Xue et al., 2008) and NetPhosK http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetPhosK/ (Miller and Blom, 2009). To test the ability of these kinases to modify Acn function, we used a sensitized genetic system. Eye-specific GMR-Gal4-driven expression of UAS-AcnWT at 28°C yields a rough-eye phenotype that is susceptible to enhancement or suppression by modifiers of Acn levels (Nandi et al., 2014). We reasoned that reduced activity of any kinase responsible for phosphorylating and stabilizing Acn should at least partially suppress the roughness induced by UAS-AcnWT. Among the kinases tested, RNAi lines targeting Cdk5 and the MAP kinase p38b exhibited more than 50% suppression of Acn-induced eye roughness (Figure 4, Figure 4—figure supplement 1, Supplementary file 1). Moreover, expression of UAS-Cdk5-RNAi and UAS-p38b RNAi transgenes by themselves did not result in visible phenotypes in the eye (Figure 4F,M and Supplementary file 1).
Figure 4.

Acn genetically interacts with p38b MAP kinase and Cdk5/p35.

SEM images of eye expressing the indicated transgenes under GMR-Gal4 control at 28°C. (A) Expression of UAS-AcnWT causes a rough eye. This eye-roughness is suppressed by knockdown of p38b MAPK (B) or co-expression of dominant-negative p38b MAPKK53R (C). By contrast, co-expression of wild-type p38b MAPK enhances the roughness (D). Expression of Gal4 (E) or the indicated p38b MAPK transgenes in the absence of UAS-AcnWT (F–H) causes little or no changes in eye morphology. Eye-roughness induced by UAS-AcnWT is suppressed by knockdown of Cdk5 (I) or co-expression of dominant-negative Cdk5K33A (J). By contrast, co-expression of wild-type Cdk5 (K) or the required cofactor p35 (L) enhance AcnWT-induced roughness. Expression of the indicated Cdk5 and p35 transgene in the absence of UAS-AcnWT (M–P) causes little or no changes in eye morphology. Scale bar in A-P: 50 µm. Quantification of genetic interactions is shown in Supplementary files 1 and 2. Detailed genotypes are listed in Supplementary file 3.

Quantification of efficiency of RNAi-mediated Kinase knockdowns.

Indicated UAS-RNAi transgenes were expressed using Da-Gal4 or Arm-Gal4 drivers in adult flies. Transcript levels for the indicated genes were determined using RT-qPCR relative to the ribosomal protein RP49 and normalized to wild-type OreR flies. Bar graphs show mean ±SD from three biological replicas.

FLAG-tagged dominant negative mutant Cdk5 or p38b kinases as used in Figure 4 were expressed in eye discs under control of the GMR-Gal4 driver and detected with anti-FLAG antibodies. Scale bar: 50 µm.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

Knockdown efficiency of p38b MAPK, Cdk5 and p35 RNAi UAS-transgenes.

Indicated UAS-RNAi transgenes were expressed using Da-Gal4 or Arm-Gal4 drivers in adult flies. Transcript levels for the indicated genes were determined using RT-qPCR relative to the ribosomal protein RP49 and normalized to wild-type OreR flies. Bar graphs show mean ±SD from three biological replicas.

Acn genetically interacts with p38b MAP kinase and Cdk5/p35.

SEM images of eye expressing the indicated transgenes under GMR-Gal4 control at 28°C. (A) Expression of UAS-AcnWT causes a rough eye. This eye-roughness is suppressed by knockdown of p38b MAPK (B) or co-expression of dominant-negative p38b MAPKK53R (C). By contrast, co-expression of wild-type p38b MAPK enhances the roughness (D). Expression of Gal4 (E) or the indicated p38b MAPK transgenes in the absence of UAS-AcnWT (F–H) causes little or no changes in eye morphology. Eye-roughness induced by UAS-AcnWT is suppressed by knockdown of Cdk5 (I) or co-expression of dominant-negative Cdk5K33A (J). By contrast, co-expression of wild-type Cdk5 (K) or the required cofactor p35 (L) enhance AcnWT-induced roughness. Expression of the indicated Cdk5 and p35 transgene in the absence of UAS-AcnWT (M–P) causes little or no changes in eye morphology. Scale bar in A-P: 50 µm. Quantification of genetic interactions is shown in Supplementary files 1 and 2. Detailed genotypes are listed in Supplementary file 3.

Relates to Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

Quantification of efficiency of RNAi-mediated Kinase knockdowns.

Knockdown efficiency of p38b MAPK, Cdk5 and p35 RNAi UAS-transgenes.

Indicated UAS-RNAi transgenes were expressed using Da-Gal4 or Arm-Gal4 drivers in adult flies. Transcript levels for the indicated genes were determined using RT-qPCR relative to the ribosomal protein RP49 and normalized to wild-type OreR flies. Bar graphs show mean ±SD from three biological replicas.

Expression of dominant-negative mutant Cdk5 and p38b MAP kinases.

FLAG-tagged dominant negative mutant Cdk5 or p38b kinases as used in Figure 4 were expressed in eye discs under control of the GMR-Gal4 driver and detected with anti-FLAG antibodies. Scale bar: 50 µm. We further investigated these two hits from the RNAi screen by examining interactions of gain-of-function and loss-of-function mutants with Acn. GMR-Gal4-driven co-expression of AcnWT with the dominant-negative kinases p38b MAPKK53R or Cdk5K33A effectively suppressed the rough-eye phenotype (Figure 4C,J, Figure 4—figure supplement 2 and Supplementary file 2). Furthermore, co-expression of AcnWT with p38b MAPK, Cdk5 or its coactivator p35 (Tsai et al., 1994; Connell-Crowley et al., 2000) further enhanced eye roughness (Figure 4D,K,L and Supplementary file 2). By contrast, expression of these indicated Cdk5/p35 and p38b MAPK transgenes by themselves yielded little to no visible eye phenotypes (Figure 4G,H,N–P and Supplementary file 2). These strong genetic interactions with Acn point to Cdk5 and p38b MAPK as two candidate kinases that may phosphorylate Acn and thereby enhance its activity.
Figure 4—figure supplement 2.

Expression of dominant-negative mutant Cdk5 and p38b MAP kinases.

FLAG-tagged dominant negative mutant Cdk5 or p38b kinases as used in Figure 4 were expressed in eye discs under control of the GMR-Gal4 driver and detected with anti-FLAG antibodies. Scale bar: 50 µm.

To test whether genetic interactions reflect modification of Serine 437, we used the phospho-specific pS437-Acn antibody to stain eye tissue from wandering third instar larvae. Larvae with Cdk5 or p35 knocked down, as well as Cdk5 or p35 mutant larvae exhibited a dramatic reduction of Acn phosphorylation at serine 437 compared to wild-type controls (Figure 5A–I). Some brightly pS437-Acn-positive cells remained, however, close to the morphogenetic furrow of Cdk5 or p35 loss-of-function eye discs. In wild-type (Figure 5B,C) and Cdk5 loss-of-function eye discs (Figure 5E,F), the apical position of these pS437-Acn-positive cells and their shape and DNA distribution identified them as mitotic cells (Figure 5C,F). In dividing cells, Acn may be phosphorylated, possibly by mitotically active kinases of the Cdk family with target recognition sequences similar to Cdk5 (Malumbres and Barbacid, 2009). Interestingly, Cdk1 knockdown enhanced the Acn overexpression phenotype in eyes (Supplementary file 1). As AcnS437A or AcnS437D flies are viable and without obvious mitotic defects, we did not further analyze the significance of elevated pS437-Acn levels in mitotic cells.
Figure 5.

Cdk5/p35-mediates phosphorylation of Acinus.

Projections (A, D, G–L) or individual optical sections (B,C,D,E) of confocal micrographs of eye discs stained for pS437-Acn or DNA from wild-type controls (A–C), or from larvae with knockdown for Cdk5 (D–F), mutant for Cdk5 (G) or p35 (H), or with p35 knockdown (I), or Cdk5 mutant larvae rescued with a genomic Cdk5 transgene (J), from larvae overexpressing p35 (K) or mutant for p38b MAP kinase (L). Arrows indicate examples of mitotic cells with high pS437-Acn levels. These are best seen in individual optical sections of wild-type (B,C) or Cdk5-RNAi eye discs (E,F). Scale bar is 50 µm in A, D,E, G-L; 32 µm in B; 10 µm in C; and 15 µm in F.

Cdk5/p35-mediates phosphorylation of Acinus.

Projections (A, D, G–L) or individual optical sections (B,C,D,E) of confocal micrographs of eye discs stained for pS437-Acn or DNA from wild-type controls (A–C), or from larvae with knockdown for Cdk5 (D–F), mutant for Cdk5 (G) or p35 (H), or with p35 knockdown (I), or Cdk5 mutant larvae rescued with a genomic Cdk5 transgene (J), from larvae overexpressing p35 (K) or mutant for p38b MAP kinase (L). Arrows indicate examples of mitotic cells with high pS437-Acn levels. These are best seen in individual optical sections of wild-type (B,C) or Cdk5-RNAi eye discs (E,F). Scale bar is 50 µm in A, D,E, G-L; 32 µm in B; 10 µm in C; and 15 µm in F. Importantly, in Cdk5 mutant larvae, Acn phosphorylation at serine 437 was restored to wild-type levels with a genomic Cdk5 transgene (Figure 5J). Furthermore, overexpression of p35 drastically enhanced Acn-S437 phosphorylation (Figure 5K). By contrast, in p38b mutant larvae pS437-Acn levels were not altered compared to wild type (Figure 5A,L). These data suggest that although both Cdk5 and p38b MAPK genetically interact with Acn, only Cdk5/p35 mediates phosphorylation of Acn-S437. To further test the in vivo importance of S437 phosphorylation by Cdk5, we compared GMR-Gal4-driven co-expression of UAS-p35 or UAS-p38b MAPK with UAS-AcnWT or UAS-AcnS437A, respectively. At 25°C, UAS-AcnWT or UAS-AcnS437A expression yielded mildly rough eyes (Figure 6A,B), and expression of only p35 or p38b MAPK did not alter eye morphology (Figure 6C,D). Notably, co-expression of p35 enhanced UAS-AcnWT-induced roughness significantly more than that of AcnS437A (Figure 6E,F,I; p<0.0001; Chi-square test). By contrast, both UAS-AcnWT and UAS-AcnS437A rough-eye phenotypes were enhanced by p38b MAPK co-expression (Figure 6G,H,I). Furthermore, Acinus S437 phosphorylation by Cdk5 was also observed in vitro, when purified Acinus proteins, either bacterially-expressed GST-Acn402-527 fusion proteins (Figure 6J) or S2 cell-expressed full-length Acinus proteins (Figure 6K) were exposed to purified Cdk5/p35 kinase complex. Together these findings indicate that, unlike for p38b MAPK, Acn S437 is the physiologically relevant residue targeted by the Cdk5/p35 complex.
Figure 6.

Acn-S437 is the critical target site for Cdk5/p35-mediated phosphorylation.

(A–H) SEM images of eyes expressing the indicated transgenes under UAS/GMR-Gal4 control at 25°. Under these conditions, expression of AcnWT (A) or AcnS437A (B) causes a mildly rough eye, but not expression of p35 (C) or p38b MAP kinase (D). Coexpression of p35 with AcnWT (E) causes a severely rough eye, but not p35 coexpression with AcnS437A (F). By contrast, p38b MAP kinase coexpression enhances roughness of both, AcnWT (G) and AcnS437A (H). Quantification of these genetic interactions is shown in panel I. Statistical significance was calculated by Chi square test (****p<0.0001; ns, not significant). (J–K) Western blots of purified wild-type (WT) or S437A mutant (SA) GST-Acn402-527 fusion proteins (J) or full-length Streptag-Myc-Acn proteins (K) that were incubated with the indicated amount of Cdk5/p35 kinase complex. Blots were developed with antibodies against pS437-Acn (1:2000), Myc (1:2000), or total Acn (1:2000) as described (Nandi et al., 2014). Note that the Acn antibody (Haberman et al., 2010) preferentially recognizes a C-terminal Acn epitope that is deleted in some of the partially degraded GST-fusion proteins, which however still contain the Cdk5 target site at S437. Detailed genotypes are listed in Supplementary file 3.

Acn-S437 is the critical target site for Cdk5/p35-mediated phosphorylation.

(A–H) SEM images of eyes expressing the indicated transgenes under UAS/GMR-Gal4 control at 25°. Under these conditions, expression of AcnWT (A) or AcnS437A (B) causes a mildly rough eye, but not expression of p35 (C) or p38b MAP kinase (D). Coexpression of p35 with AcnWT (E) causes a severely rough eye, but not p35 coexpression with AcnS437A (F). By contrast, p38b MAP kinase coexpression enhances roughness of both, AcnWT (G) and AcnS437A (H). Quantification of these genetic interactions is shown in panel I. Statistical significance was calculated by Chi square test (****p<0.0001; ns, not significant). (J–K) Western blots of purified wild-type (WT) or S437A mutant (SA) GST-Acn402-527 fusion proteins (J) or full-length Streptag-Myc-Acn proteins (K) that were incubated with the indicated amount of Cdk5/p35 kinase complex. Blots were developed with antibodies against pS437-Acn (1:2000), Myc (1:2000), or total Acn (1:2000) as described (Nandi et al., 2014). Note that the Acn antibody (Haberman et al., 2010) preferentially recognizes a C-terminal Acn epitope that is deleted in some of the partially degraded GST-fusion proteins, which however still contain the Cdk5 target site at S437. Detailed genotypes are listed in Supplementary file 3.

Acn regulates basal autophagy and life span by Cdk5/p35-dependent phosphorylation

Flies mutant for the Cdk5 co-activator p35 display adult onset neurodegeneration and reduced lifespan (Connell-Crowley et al., 2007; Trunova and Giniger, 2012). To test whether altered basal autophagy contributes to these phenotypes, we first examined the distribution of Atg8a in eye discs from fed 96-hr old larvae. Compared to wild type (Figure 7A), p35 mutant eye discs displayed a significantly reduced number of Atg8a-positive punctae (Figure 7B,K). Basal autophagy in p35 eye discs was restored to wild-type level by expression of phospho-mimetic AcnS437D, but not AcnWT or AcnS437A, under control of the endogenous acn promoter (Figure 7C–E,K). Cellular levels of the autophagy receptor p62 depend on autophagic flux and thus are elevated in cells with impaired basal autophagy (Pircs et al., 2012; DeVorkin and Gorski, 2014b). By immunostaining, p62 levels were significantly elevated in p35 eye discs compared to wild type (Figure 7F,G,L), consistent with impaired basal autophagy. Accumulation of p62 in p35 eye discs was not prevented by expression of AcnWT or AcnS437A (Figure 7H,I,L), whereas AcnS437D expression restored wild-type p62 levels (Figure 7J,L).
Figure 7.

Cdk5/p35-mediated phosphorylation of Acn regulates basal autophagy and longevity.

Projections of confocal micrographs of eye discs stained for Atg8a (A–E) or p62 (F–J) from wild-type controls (A,F), p35 mutant larvae (B,G) or p35 mutant larvae expressing AcnWT (C,H), AcnS437A (D,I) or the phosphomimetic AcnS437D (E,J) under control of the acnP promoter. Scale bar in A is 40 µm in A-J. (K) Quantification of Atg8a punctae from three eye discs each with genotypes as shown in A-E. (L) Quantification of p62 punctae from three eye discs each with genotypes as shown in F-J. Bar graphs show mean ±SD. ns, not significant; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ***p<0.0001; each compared to wild-type Acn control. (M) Survival curves of WT controls or p35 mutants, or p35 mutants expressing the indicated Acn proteins. The initial numbers of flies were 95 (WT), 121 (p35), 116 (p35, AcnWT), 111 (p35, AcnS437A), 90 (p35, AcnS437D). Log rank tests compared to WT control: ns, not significant; ****p<0.0001. Detailed genotypes are listed in Supplementary file 3.

Cdk5/p35-mediated phosphorylation of Acn regulates basal autophagy and longevity.

Projections of confocal micrographs of eye discs stained for Atg8a (A–E) or p62 (F–J) from wild-type controls (A,F), p35 mutant larvae (B,G) or p35 mutant larvae expressing AcnWT (C,H), AcnS437A (D,I) or the phosphomimetic AcnS437D (E,J) under control of the acnP promoter. Scale bar in A is 40 µm in A-J. (K) Quantification of Atg8a punctae from three eye discs each with genotypes as shown in A-E. (L) Quantification of p62 punctae from three eye discs each with genotypes as shown in F-J. Bar graphs show mean ±SD. ns, not significant; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ***p<0.0001; each compared to wild-type Acn control. (M) Survival curves of WT controls or p35 mutants, or p35 mutants expressing the indicated Acn proteins. The initial numbers of flies were 95 (WT), 121 (p35), 116 (p35, AcnWT), 111 (p35, AcnS437A), 90 (p35, AcnS437D). Log rank tests compared to WT control: ns, not significant; ****p<0.0001. Detailed genotypes are listed in Supplementary file 3. Next, we explored the physiological consequences of manipulating levels of basal autophagy in p35 mutants. Consistent with previous reports (Connell-Crowley et al., 2007), p35 mutants had reduced life expectancy compared to wild type (Figure 7M). Near wild-type life span was restored in p35 mutants that express phospho-mimetic AcnS437D, but not AcnS437A or AcnWT (Figure 7M). Together, these data indicate that Acn-S437 is a physiologically relevant target for Cdk5/p35-mediated phosphorylation.

Protein aggregation triggers phosphorylation of Acn S437

To maintain normal life span, autophagy is required in neurons for the suppression of neurodegeneration. To test a possible role of Cdk5-mediated Acn phosphorylation in this context, we used two different Drosophila Huntington’s disease models expressing huntingtin-polyQ polypeptides in the eye, either through GMR-Gal4-driven expression of UAS-Htt.Q93 (Figure 8B,C) or through a direct fusion of Htt-Q120 with the GMR enhancer/promoter region (GMR-Htt.Q120, Figure 8D,E). Compared to wild-type eye discs (Figure 8A), Acn-S437 phosphorylation was elevated in posterior cells of Htt-polyQ expressing eye discs (Figure 8B,D,F). This activation of Acn was dependent on Cdk5/p35 as it was suppressed in eye discs with p35 knocked down (Figure 8C,F) or mutant for p35 (Figure 8E,F).
Figure 8.

Protein-aggregate-induced phosphorylation of Acn S437 depends on Cdk5/p35.

Projections of confocal micrographs of eye discs stained for pS437-Acn (A–E) or polyQ proteins (G–K) and DNA. Compared to a GMR-Gal4 control (A), GMR-Gal4-driven UAS-Htt.Q93 (B) or GMR-Htt.Q120 (D) expression induced elevated S437 phosphorylation, which was suppressed in eye discs with p35 knockdown (C) or mutant for p35 (E). GMR-directed expression initiates at the furrow (arrowhead) and is more developed toward the posterior. (F) Quantification of S437 phosphorylation (F) averaged constant areas containing about 50 ommatidial clusters located at least 6–8 rows posterior to the furrow. Bar graphs show mean ±SD of integrated densities. Values were normalized to GMR-Gal4 controls and were from one representative experiment out of three repeats. ns, not significant; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ***p<0.0001; for indicated comparisons. Early polyQ accumulation was compared between GMR-Gal4 eye discs as controls (G), and eye discs expressing GMR-Htt.Q120 and carrying a copy of the indicated genomic Acn transgene (H–J) or the p35 null allele (K). Compared to AcnWT (H) and AcnS437A (I) eye discs, in AcnS437D (J) polyQ accumulation was reduced until some 7 to 8 rows of ommatidia posterior to the furrow (arrowhead) and enhanced in p35 mutants (H). Scale bar in A: 40 µm in A-N. Posterior is to the left. (L) Quantification of PolyQ accumulation averaged constant areas containing about 100 ommatidial clusters located at least 2–3 rows posterior to the furrow. Bar graphs show mean ± SD of integrated densities. Values were normalized to AcnWT/GMR-Htt.Q120 (L) and were from one representative experiment out of three repeats. ns, not significant; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ***p<0.0001; compared to AcnWT/GMR-Htt.Q120. (M) Quantification of dot blots measuring aggregated polyQ protein in fly heads expressing GMR-Htt.Q120 and the indicated genomic Acn transgenes or in a p35 mutant background. Control OreR flies (+/+) indicate background level of dot blot measurements (n = 3 biological repeats). The scatter plot shows mean and standard deviation from three separate experiments. Detailed genotypes are listed in Supplementary file 3.

Protein-aggregate-induced phosphorylation of Acn S437 depends on Cdk5/p35.

Projections of confocal micrographs of eye discs stained for pS437-Acn (A–E) or polyQ proteins (G–K) and DNA. Compared to a GMR-Gal4 control (A), GMR-Gal4-driven UAS-Htt.Q93 (B) or GMR-Htt.Q120 (D) expression induced elevated S437 phosphorylation, which was suppressed in eye discs with p35 knockdown (C) or mutant for p35 (E). GMR-directed expression initiates at the furrow (arrowhead) and is more developed toward the posterior. (F) Quantification of S437 phosphorylation (F) averaged constant areas containing about 50 ommatidial clusters located at least 6–8 rows posterior to the furrow. Bar graphs show mean ±SD of integrated densities. Values were normalized to GMR-Gal4 controls and were from one representative experiment out of three repeats. ns, not significant; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ***p<0.0001; for indicated comparisons. Early polyQ accumulation was compared between GMR-Gal4 eye discs as controls (G), and eye discs expressing GMR-Htt.Q120 and carrying a copy of the indicated genomic Acn transgene (H–J) or the p35 null allele (K). Compared to AcnWT (H) and AcnS437A (I) eye discs, in AcnS437D (J) polyQ accumulation was reduced until some 7 to 8 rows of ommatidia posterior to the furrow (arrowhead) and enhanced in p35 mutants (H). Scale bar in A: 40 µm in A-N. Posterior is to the left. (L) Quantification of PolyQ accumulation averaged constant areas containing about 100 ommatidial clusters located at least 2–3 rows posterior to the furrow. Bar graphs show mean ± SD of integrated densities. Values were normalized to AcnWT/GMR-Htt.Q120 (L) and were from one representative experiment out of three repeats. ns, not significant; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ***p<0.0001; compared to AcnWT/GMR-Htt.Q120. (M) Quantification of dot blots measuring aggregated polyQ protein in fly heads expressing GMR-Htt.Q120 and the indicated genomic Acn transgenes or in a p35 mutant background. Control OreR flies (+/+) indicate background level of dot blot measurements (n = 3 biological repeats). The scatter plot shows mean and standard deviation from three separate experiments. Detailed genotypes are listed in Supplementary file 3. To examine the consequence of Acn activation for polyQ accumulation, we stained eye discs for polyQ proteins. GMR-Htt.Q120 expression resulted in its accumulation a few rows posterior to the furrow in eye discs expressing AcnWT or AcnS437A under control of the acn promoter (Figure 8G–I,L). By contrast, expression of the stabilized phospho-mimetic AcnS437D protein yielded an initial reduction in polyQ accumulation just posterior to the furrow (Figure 8J,L). This is consistent with the data above that show elevated autophagy in AcnS437D eye discs (Figure 2A,C) and with the known role of autophagy in the clearance of protein aggregates (Menzies et al., 2017). In p35 mutant eye discs, polyQ protein levels were further elevated (Figure 8K,L), which resulted in the accumulation polyQ aggregates in adults as detected by a filter retardation assay (Figure 8M). Acn activation was not specific for Htt-polyQ peptides, as overexpression of other neurodegeneration linked polyQ proteins, specifically SCA3.Q78 (Figure 9B,G) and ATX1.Q82 (Figure 9C,G) yielded similar increases in Acn-S437 phosphorylation. Furthermore, expression of human Aβ42 peptide resulted in elevated levels of S437 phosphorylated Acn (Figure 9D,G). By contrast, overexpression of Parkinson’s disease-linked alpha-Synuclein (Figure 9E,G) or Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)-linked human SOD1 (Figure 9F,G) in larval eye disc failed to elevate Acn S437 phosphorylation compared to wild type (Figure 9A).
Figure 9.

Increased Acn-S437 phosphorylation is specific for a subset of neurodegeneration models.

Projections of confocal micrographs of eye discs stained for pS437-Acn (A–F) or DNA (A’–F’). Compared to GMR-Gal4 controls (A), eye discs with GMR-Gal4-driven UAS-SCA3.Q78 (B) or UAS-ATX1.Q82 (C) or UAS-Aβ42 (D) display elevated levels of pS437-Acn staining in a subset of cells, in contrast to UAS-alpha-Synuclein (E) or UAS-hSOD1 (F) which appear unaltered compared to controls. GMR-directed expression of transgenes initiates at the furrow (arrowhead) and extends toward the posterior (left). Scale bar in A is 40 µm in A-N. Detailed genotypes are listed in Supplementary file 3. (G) Quantifications of S437 phosphorylation averaged constant areas containing about 50 ommatidial clusters located at least 6–8 rows posterior to the furrow. Bar graphs show mean ±SD of integrated densities of pS437 staining normalized to GMR-Gal4 controls. ns, not significant; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ***p<0.0001; compared to GMR-Gal4/+.

Increased Acn-S437 phosphorylation is specific for a subset of neurodegeneration models.

Projections of confocal micrographs of eye discs stained for pS437-Acn (A–F) or DNA (A’–F’). Compared to GMR-Gal4 controls (A), eye discs with GMR-Gal4-driven UAS-SCA3.Q78 (B) or UAS-ATX1.Q82 (C) or UAS-Aβ42 (D) display elevated levels of pS437-Acn staining in a subset of cells, in contrast to UAS-alpha-Synuclein (E) or UAS-hSOD1 (F) which appear unaltered compared to controls. GMR-directed expression of transgenes initiates at the furrow (arrowhead) and extends toward the posterior (left). Scale bar in A is 40 µm in A-N. Detailed genotypes are listed in Supplementary file 3. (G) Quantifications of S437 phosphorylation averaged constant areas containing about 50 ommatidial clusters located at least 6–8 rows posterior to the furrow. Bar graphs show mean ±SD of integrated densities of pS437 staining normalized to GMR-Gal4 controls. ns, not significant; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ***p<0.0001; compared to GMR-Gal4/+.

Discussion

Numerous studies have implicated dysregulation of Cdk5 activity in neurodegenerative diseases due to its role in regulating cytoarchitecture, axonal transport, and synaptic activity (Su and Tsai, 2011; Cheung and Ip, 2012; Shah and Lahiri, 2017). Here, we show that reduced Cdk5 activity can also reduce neuronal fitness by compromising basal autophagy. We find that the effect of the Cdk5/p35 complex on autophagy depends on its role in phosphorylating the conserved S437 in Acn. Interfering with Acn-S437 phosphorylation, either by loss of Cdk5/p35 function, or by mutation of its target site in Acinus, reduces the level of basal, starvation-independent autophagy and shortens life span. Importantly, these phenotypes were reversed by the phospho-mimetic AcnS437D mutation. The beneficial outcomes that result from Acinus stabilization, including the extended lifespan and suppression of polyQ protein accumulation (our data and Nandi et al., 2014), argue that increases in autophagic flux and autolysosome size in stabilized phospho-mimetic AcnS437D mutants are not a response to a proteotoxic stress or reflective of a defect in lysosomal function due to AcnS437D expression, but reflect a beneficial activation of autophagy as previously observed in multiple systems (e.g. Sarkar et al., 2007; Simonsen et al., 2008; Menzies et al., 2015; Gelino et al., 2016). Therefore, these findings indicate the importance of Cdk5-mediated Acn-S437 phosphorylation for maintaining neuronal health. How does phosphorylation of S437 stabilize Acinus and boost its function? One possibility is a reduction in caspase-mediated cleavage of Acinus (Sahara et al., 1999). Inhibition of this cleavage has previously been shown as a consequence of Akt1-mediated Acinus phosphorylation in apoptotic (Hu et al., 2005) and also in non-apoptotic cells (Nandi et al., 2014) and furthermore, upon binding of the anti-apoptotic protein AAC11 (Rigou et al., 2009). Our data, however, argue against this possibility. We have previously shown that preventing its caspase-mediated cleavage in the AcnD527A mutant stabilized Acn only in a subset of photoreceptor cells (predominantly R3 and R4, Nandi et al., 2014). By contrast, S437 phosphorylation elevates Acinus levels in the majority of photoreceptor cells (Figure 1). We thus favor the notion of a different Acn cleavage, closer to the S437 residue. Such a cleavage has been reported for mammalian Acinus (Sahara et al., 1999) at a residue corresponding to A423 in Drosophila Acn. It will be important to identify the protease responsible for this cleavage and test its impact on Acn function. In the context of neurodegenerative diseases, much interest has been focused on the aberrant activation of Cdk5. Elevated Cdk5 activity can be induced by multiple stressors such as inflammation, ischemia, or mitochondrial dysfunction (Su and Tsai, 2011). These stressors can trigger pathological activation of Cdk5 by calpain-mediated cleavage of its p35 or p39 co-activators (Lee et al., 2000). The cleavage product p25 lacks the myristoylation-tag that anchors activated Cdk5 in complexes with p35 or p39 to membranes and escapes the inhibitory auto-phosphorylation of p35/39 that limits their life time in active complexes (Patrick et al., 1999). The resulting unrestrained phosphorylation of proteins involved in microtubule-based axonal transport and synaptic proteins contributes to the progression of ALS, Alzheimer’s diseases and other neurological diseases (McLinden et al., 2012; Klinman and Holzbaur, 2015). In Drosophila, we observe Cdk5-depedent elevated Acn-S437 phosphorylation in response to the expression of polyQ proteins, but we do not know yet whether this increase reflects elevated Cdk5/p35 activity or pathological Cdk5/p25 activity following calpain-mediated cleavage of p35. Alternatively, the phosphatases that remove the phosphate group from pS437- Acn may be inhibited. Acn-S437 phosphorylation is highly dynamic in developing eyes (Figure 1), but phosphatases acting on pS437-Acn have not yet been identified. Interestingly, in addition to multiple polyQ proteins, Aβ42 expression is another Drosophila neurodegenerative disease model that triggered elevated phosphorylation of Acn-S437. This is consistent with increased Cdk5 activity reported for multiple Alzheimer’s disease models (Otth et al., 2002; Shah and Lahiri, 2017) which in turn may contribute to the Cdk5-dependent phosphorylation of Tau as a possible contribution to the progression of Alzheimer’s disease (Cruz et al., 2003). Not all neurodegeneration models induced Cdk5 activity as visualized by Acn-S437 phosphorylation. Pathological Cdk5 activation is believed to contribute to Parkinson’s disease (Smith et al., 2006). Nevertheless, overexpression of alpha-Synuclein, which mimics some aspects of Parkinson’s disease in Drosophila (Kontopoulos et al., 2006), is not sufficient to increase pS437-Acn levels. Similarly, Acn phosphorylation was unchanged in response to hSOD1 over-expression in a Drosophila model of ALS (Watson et al., 2008). Both of these models trigger substantial cellular stress and rapid neurodegeneration (Jaiswal et al., 2012), indicating that Acn phosphorylation is not a generic response to cellular stress, but more likely involves specific activation of Cdk5. An example of such a specific interaction was recently elucidated in the context of polyQ proteins. Ashkenazi et al. (2017) showed that the levels of the autophagy regulator Beclin1 are maintained by its Ataxin3-mediated de-ubiquitination. Their interaction is mediated by the polyQ tract in wild-type Ataxin3 and inhibited by the presence of pathological polyQ tracts known to trigger Huntington’s disease or SCA3 (Ashkenazi et al., 2017). Furthermore, an increasing number of autophagy receptors are being identified that drive selective autophagy of specific cargoes (Rogov et al., 2014; Khaminets et al., 2016). Interestingly, several of these receptors are activated by modifications such as phosphorylation or ubiquitination in response to specific stressors, such as polyQ proteins (Deng et al., 2017). To which extend such modifications of autophagy receptors contribute to the induction of basal autophagy by Acn remains to be tested. Intriguingly, Cdk5-mediated phosphorylation stabilizes Huntingtin (Luo et al., 2005) and thereby may promote its function as a scaffold for selective autophagy (Ochaba et al., 2014; Rui et al., 2015). Cdk5 may thus act through different effectors in different diseases. Endophilin B1 was identified as a Cdk5 substrate, the phosphorylation of which is required for starvation-induced autophagy (Wong et al., 2011). Importantly, Cdk5-mediated phosphorylation of Endophilin B1 appeared necessary for the elimination of dopaminergic neurons in an MPTP mouse model of Parkinson's disease (Wong et al., 2011). Furthermore, MEKK1 is a key target for Cdk5 in a Drosophila model of retinitis pigmentosa (Kang et al., 2012). Such diversity of targets may not only apply to different diseases, but also to different stages of a given disease. Although the pathological activation of Cdk5 activity appears to be a contributing factor to the progression of some neurodegenerative diseases, we show that wild-type levels of Cdk5/p35 activity are necessary to support basal autophagy in the clearance of protein aggregates. We show that this effect, at least in part, is due to Cdk5-mediated phosphorylation of Acn as phospho-mimetic AcnS437D reverses the reduced basal autophagy and the shortened life span observed in p35 mutants due their adult-onset, progressive neurodegeneration (Connell-Crowley et al., 2007; Trunova and Giniger, 2012). How does the Cdk5-mediated phosphorylation of Acn-S437 elevate the level of basal autophagy? We previously have shown that levels of Acn are critical for regulating basal autophagy in an Atg1-dependent manner (Nandi et al., 2014). High Acn levels can drive excessive autophagy, even in the presence of activated mTor, and cause autophagy-dependent lethality (Haberman et al., 2010). More subtle effects resulted when inhibiting caspase-mediated cleavage or phospho-mimetic mutations elevated levels of Acinus expressed from its own promoter (Nandi et al., 2014, Figure 1). For example, the phosphorylation of two conserved Akt1-target sites has been shown to elevate Acn levels (Hu et al., 2005; Nandi et al., 2014). In Drosophila, this stabilized Acn promotes starvation-independent basal autophagy (Nandi et al., 2014). Similarly, we find that Cdk5-mediated phosphorylation stabilizes Acn protein and promotes autophagy (Figure 7), as does the phospho-mimetic AcnS437D mutation (Figure 2). Nevertheless, stabilized Acinus proteins do not reach the levels necessary to cause the developmental defects that can be triggered by overexpression through the Gal4/UAS system (Haberman et al., 2010; Nandi et al., 2014). Nuclear localization of Acn as a Cdk5 substrate seems to be in conflict with the localization of the activated Cdk5/p35 complex to the plasma membrane due the myristoylation of p35 (Patrick et al., 1999). However, non-myristoylated p35 and p39 preferentially accumulate in the nucleus and can bind and activate nuclear Cdk5 (Asada et al., 2008). How nuclear or possibly cytoplasmic Acn induces autophagy remains unclear. Phosphorylated and unphosphorylated Acn proteins are primarily nuclear and neither phosphorylation at S437 nor the two Akt1 target sites S641 and S731 are necessary for starvation-induced autophagy, although they enhance basal autophagy (Figure 2 and Nandi et al., 2014). Acn is a required component of the nuclear ASAP complex (Schwerk et al., 2003; Murachelli et al., 2012) which participates in the regulation of alternative splicing (Hayashi et al., 2014; Malone et al., 2014). Future work will therefore focus on attempts to identify specific Acn-dependent transcripts that may play a role in the regulation of autophagy or identifying alternative mechanisms for its role in the regulation of basal, starvation-independent autophagy.

Materials and methods

A key resources table can be found in Supplementary file 4.

Fly work

Flies were maintained using standard conditions. Bloomington Stock Center provided Da-Gal4, Arm-Gal4, GMR-Gal4 driver lines, w1118, the RNAi lines and human neurodegenerative disease model lines (BS lines: 33769, 8141, 33818, 51376, 33606, 8534). Other fly strains used were p38b, a null generated by transposon excision and removing most of the p38b coding region, UAS-p38b, UAS-p38bK53R (Vrailas-Mortimer et al., 2011); p35, which deletes ~90% of the p35 coding region, including all sequences required for binding to and activating Cdk5; (Connell-Crowley et al., 2007), UAS-p35, UAS-Cdk5, UAS-Cdk5K33A; (Connell-Crowley et al., 2000). A Cdk5 null allele and genomic rescue transgene (Kissler et al., 2009) were gifts from Edward Giniger, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, Maryland. UAS-Htt-exon1-Q93, (Steffan et al., 2001), abbreviated UAS-Htt.Q93, was a gift from Robin Hiesinger, Free University Berlin, Berlin, Germany. Transgenic flies were generated by BestGene, Inc. DNA constructs related to genomic acn were generated by standard mutagenesis of a 4 kb Acn DNA fragment sufficient for genomic rescue (Haberman et al., 2010), confirmed by sequencing, cloned into an Attb vector, and inserted into the 96F3 AttP landing site (Venken et al., 2006). Similarly, UAS-controlled wild-type and mutant Acn transgenes were generated by standard mutagenesis from full-length Acn cDNA, confirmed by sequencing, and inserted into pUAS vectors modified by addition of an AttB site (Nandi et al., 2014). Experiments with UAS-RNAi transgenes were performed at 28°C to maximize knockdown efficiency. Starvation resistance and life span were analyzed as described previously (Nandi et al., 2014). Briefly, for starvation resistance 4- to 5-day-old virgins were kept in vials containing 1% agarose in 1X PBS at 25°C and dead flies are counted every 6 hr intervals. To measure life spans, males that emerged within a 2-day period were aged for an additional 3 days, kept in demographic cages and their survival at 25°C was recorded every other day.

Biochemistry

Antibodies against pS437-Acn was raised in rabbits by Genemed Synthesis against the Acn peptide H I V R D P- S(p)-P A R N R A S and double-affinity purified. For Western blots, five 96 hr larvae were crushed in 300 µl lysis buffer (10% SDS, 6 M urea, and 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8) at 95°C, boiled for 2 min, and spun for 10 min at 20,000xg. 20 µl lysate from larvae were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, blocked in 3% non-fat dried milk and probed with mouse antibodies against Actin (JLA20) or Myc (9E10; both at 1:2,000; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank), guinea pig anti-Acn (aa 423–599, 1:3,000, Haberman et al., 2010). For Western blots with pS437-Acn antibodies, 1% BSA was used as blocking reagent. Using IR-dye labeled secondary antibodies and the Odyssey scanner (LI-COR Biosciences) bound antibodies were detected and quantified by comparison to Actin. Prestained molecular weight markers (HX Stable) were obtained from UBP-Bio. Non-radioactive Cdk5 in vitro kinase assays were performed essentially as described (Hong and Guan, 2017). In brief, GST-Acn402-527 fusion proteins (WT or S437A mutant) were expressed in a 30-ml culture of BL21 bacteria and immobilized and purified on 10 µl glutathione sepharose beads using standard procedures (Hong and Guan, 2017). Alternatively, Streptag-2xMyc-tagged full-length Acinus proteins (WT or S437A) were expressed in S2 cells as described (Stenesen et al., 2015), immobilized and purified on Strep-Tactin magnetic beads (IBA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Immobilized GST-Acn fusion proteins or Streptag-Myc-tagged Acn proteins were exposed to 10 or 30 ng Cdk5/p35 complex (Upstate (Sigma) 14–477) in 30 µl kinase assay buffer (25 mM MOPS, pH 7.2, 12. 5 mM glycerol 2-phos-phate, 25 mM MgCl2, 5 mM EGTA, 2 mM EDTA, 0.25 mM DTT, and 0.5 mM ATP) for 20 min at 30°C. Immobilized Acn proteins were washed twice with PBS containing 0.1% Triton-X100, eluted with 20 mM glutathione and analyzed by western blots using antibodies against Acinus (1:2000, Haberman et al., 2010) or pS437-Acn (1:2000). Quantitative RT-PCR was used to measure transcript levels of Myc-tagged Acn transgenes and knockdown efficiencies as previously described (Akbar et al., 2011). In short, RNA was isolated using TRIZOL (Ambion) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 2 µg RNA was reverse transcribed using High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems) using random hexamer primers. Quantitative PCR was performed using the Fast SYBR Green Master Mix in a real-time PCR system (Fast 7500; Applied Biosystems). Each data point was repeated three times and normalized for the message for ribosomal protein 49 (RP49). Primers were: Myc-left, 5′-CTGGAGGAGCAGAAGCTGAT-3′, within the Myc and Acn_right, 5′-GGAGTCTCGACCTCGGTCTT-3′, within the Acn coding regions, and RP49_left, 5′-ATCGGTTACGGATCGAACAA-3′, and RP49_right, 5′-GACAATCTCCTTGCGCTTCT-3′. Cdk5_left: 5’-AATGGAGAAGATCGGGGAGG-3’ Cdk5_right: 5’-GGGAGATCTGCC TGCTGA-3’ p38b_left: 5’-GACGCCGATCTGAACAACAT-3’ p38b_right: 5’-ATCCTGGATTTCGGTTTGGC-3’ p35_left: 5’-TGTTCTTGCACTGTCGTTGT-3’ p35_right: 5’-TCAGCGGAGAAGAGAGCAAG-3’

Histology

SEMs of fly eyes were obtained as previously described (Wolff, 2011). Briefly, eyes were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde, 2% glutaraldehyde, 0.2% Tween 20, and 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4, for 2 hr. Fixed samples were washed for 12 hr each in a series of four washes with increasing ethanol (25–100%). This is followed by a series of hexamethyldisilazane washes (25–100% in ethanol) for 1 hr each. Flies air dried overnight were mounted on SEM stubs and coated in fast-drying silver paint on their bodies only. Flies were sputter coated with a gold/pallidum mixture for 90 s and imaged at 1000 × magnification, with extra high tension set at 3.0 kV on a scanning electron microscope (SIGMA; Carl Zeiss). The microscope was equipped with the InLens detector (Carl Zeiss). For TEM, size-matched 96 hr fed larvae were dissected and processed as described earlier in Nandi et al. (2014). In short, dissected larvae were fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.2 and postfixed with 2% OsO4 and 1.5% KFeCN in the same buffer. Samples were embedded in epoxy resin, sectioned. Sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate to enhance contrast, examined with a transmission electron microscope (120 kV; Tecnai G2 Spirit BioTWIN; FEI), and images were captured with an 11-megapixel camera (Morada; Olympus). From TEMs, measurements of autolysosomal diameters and areas were obtained using Macnification software (Orbicule).

Immunofluorescence

Whole-mount tissues were prepared for immunofluorescence staining as previously described (Akbar et al., 2011). Briefly, dissected samples were fixed in periodate-lysine-paraformaldehyde, washed in PBS, permeabilized with 0.3% saponin in PBS (PBSS), blocked with 5% goat serum in PBSS, and stained with the indicated primary antibodies: guinea pig anti-Acn (1:1000, Haberman et al., 2010), mouse anti-Myc (9E10, 1:1000), mouse anti-FLAG (1:1000; Sigma), rabbit anti-p62 (1:2000, Pircs et al., 2012), a gift from G. Juhàsz (Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary), rabbit anti-GABARAP (1:200; Abcam, ab109364), which detects endogenous Atg8a (Kim et al., 2015), mouse-anti 1C2 (1:1,000; MAB1574; EMD Millipore), rabbit anti-Boss (1:2000, Krämer et al., 1991), and secondary antibodies were labeled with Alexa Fluor 488, 568, or 647 (1:500; Molecular Probes) and mounted in Vectashield containing DAPI (Vector Laboratories). Fluorescence images were captured with 63×, NA 1.4 or 40×, NA1.3 Plan Apochromat lenses on an inverted confocal microscope (LSM 510 Meta or LSM 710; Carl Zeiss Jena). Confocal Z-stacks of eye discs were obtained at 1 µm step size. For phosphatase treatment, dissected third instar larval carcasses were fixed in periodate-lysine-paraformaldehyde and treated with 130 U/ml Calf Intestinal Phosphatase (New England Biolabs, Inc.) for 3 hr at 37°C with 1X protease inhibitor tablet (Roche) dissolved in 1X PBS, pH 7.5. Subsequently, tissues were processed and stained, and eye disc mounted as described above. For autophagy flux experiments, 72-hr-old larvae were transferred to fresh medium containing 3 mg/ml chloroquine (Sigma) as described (Lőw et al., 2013). LysoTracker staining (GFP-Certified Lyso-ID red lysosomal detection kit; Enzo Life Sciences) of size-matched 90–96 hr fat bodies from fed and starved larvae was performed as previously described (Rusten et al., 2004; Scott et al., 2004). In brief, larvae were dissected in Schneider’s Drosophila media (Gibco), inverted to expose fat bodies, and incubated in 100 µM LysoTracker Red DND-99 for 1 min. Inverted carcasses were then washed in 1X PBS and fat bodies were mounted onto a droplet of Vectashield (Vector Laboratories). Samples were imaged immediately on an inverted confocal microscope (LSM 510 Meta using 63×, NA 1.4 Plan Apochromat lens). Z-projections of three optical sections of fat body tissue, each 1 µm apart were used to quantify LysoTracker and Atg8a punctae in fat bodies using Imaris software (Bitplane). The number of punctate was quantified per fat body cell. Digital images for display were imported into Photoshop (Adobe) and adjusted for gain, contrast, and gamma settings. Integrated intensities of Atg8a punctae in fat bodies were determined using Image J and normalized to AcnWT. Integrated densities for pS437-Acinus and polyQ in eye discs were quantified using Image J software. Identical areas posterior to the morphogenetic furrow were quantified, thereby excluding dividing cells close to the furrow that were strongly stained for pS437-Acinus. All immunofluorescence experiments were repeated at least three times with at least three samples each.

Poly-Q dot blot filter retardation assay

Polyglutamine aggregates were detected with a modified filter assay (Scherzinger et al., 1997). Briefly, 25 heads from 2 week-old flies were homogenized in 200 µl Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagent I buffer and fractionated using NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents following the manufacturer’s protocol (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cytosolic fractions were adjusted to 1% SDS, incubated at room temperature for 15 min, denatured at 95°C for 5 min, and filtered through a 0.2 µm cellulose acetate membrane (Sterlitech Corporation) preequilibrated with 1% SDS. Membrane was washed twice with 0.2% SDS and blocked in TBS (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, and 150 mM NaCl) containing 3% nonfat dried milk and probed with a mouse anti-Htt antibody (1:1,000; MAB5490; EMD Millipore). The bound antibodies are detected and quantified using anti-IR dye conjugated secondary antibodies and Odyssey scanner and software (LI-COR Biosciences).

Statistical methods

Statistical significance was determined in Prism using log-rank for survival assays, chi square analysis for eye roughness frequencies, and one-way analysis of variance for multiple comparisons, followed by Tukey’s test. To separate effects of treatment and genetic background we used two-way analysis of variance for multiple comparisons, followed by Bonferroni’s test for individual comparisons. All bar graphs resulting from these analysis show means ±SD. For quantifications of fluorescence images and Western blots, at least three independent experiments were used. P values smaller than 0.05 are considered significant, and values are indicated with one (<0.05), two (<0.01), three (<0.001), or four (<0.0001) asterisks. In the interests of transparency, eLife includes the editorial decision letter and accompanying author responses. A lightly edited version of the letter sent to the authors after peer review is shown, indicating the most substantive concerns; minor comments are not usually included. Thank you for submitting your article "Stress-Induced Cdk5 Activity Enhances Cytoprotective Basal Autophagy by Phosphorylating Acinus at Serine437" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been favorably evaluated by Ivan Dikic (Senior Editor) and three reviewers, one of whom is a member of our Board of Reviewing Editors. The reviewers have opted to remain anonymous. The reviewers have discussed the reviews with one another and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this decision to help you prepare a revised submission. Autophagy is a critical mediator of neuronal cell health. Ongoing basal clearance of aggregated or damaged proteins is associated with protection from neurodegeneration in both flies and humans. Previous studies from the authors identified a role for the Acinus (Acn) protein in promoting basal autophagy. In this manuscript, you provide evidence that Cdk5 genetically interacts with Acn to regulate basal level of autophagy, and that Cdk5 phosphorylates Acn at S437 to modulate its stability. The phospho-mimetic AcnS437D promotes basal autophagy and rescues defects (e.g. reduced basal autophagy and shortened life span) of p35 mutants. You further demonstrate enhancement of the Cdk5/Acn-pS437 pathway in response to polyQ protein accumulation. Cdk5 was previously implicated in maintenance of neuronal health. This study identifies Acinus as a relevant target of Cdk5 activity as a compelling basis for this role. Overall, the findings are interesting and potentially important. The experiments are well executed and most conclusions are well supported by the data presented in this work. This manuscript will be suitable for publication in eLife after appropriate revisions. Essential revisions: 1) In vitro kinase assays with purified proteins to show that Cdk5 kinase can directly phosphorylate Acinus. 2) The current data does not sufficiently support the conclusion that autophagy activity is induced by S437-Acn. The authors showed that the number of Atg8a puncta and LysoTracker-positive structures is increased in AcnS437D larval fat bodies. The autolysosomes in AcnS437D larval fat bodies are much larger and more abundant compared to AcnWT. The mean diameter of lysosomal/autolysosome structures is even increased more than 8-fold! Inhibition of autophagy at the step of autophagosome maturation and/or degradation results in the same phenotype. Does starvation-induced autophagy also cause accumulation of enlarged autolysosomes in fat bodies? Additional characterization of autophagy flux would strengthen the interpretations of autophagy induction induced by Acn-pS437. This could be achieved with assays using the tandem fluorescent Atg8 reporter and/or Atg8-II levels in animals fed BafilomycinA. Essential revisions: 1) in vitro kinase assays with purified proteins to show that Cdk5 kinase can directly phosphorylate Acinus. We performed two sets of experiments to address this concern. First, we prepared GST proteins fused to Acn402-527 (WT or S437A) and exposed them to phosphorylation with commercially available Cdk5/p35 complexes (Σ; 14-477). We observed Cdk5/p35-dependent S437-phosphorylation, that was not present in S437A controls (new Figure 6J). Of note, we tried several other GST-Acn fusions for these experiments, but none was more stable against degradation than the GST-Acn-402-527 fusions. Second, we over-expressed Strep-tag and Myc-tagged full-length Acinus proteins (WT or S437A) in S2 cells, immobilized and purified the proteins on Strep-Tactin beads before incubation with commercial Cdk5/p35. These experiments also showed Cdk5/p35-dependent S437-Acn phosphorylation (new Figure 6K). In combination, we believe these experiments convincingly address the reviewers’ concerns to show that Cdk5 kinase can directly phosphorylate Acinus at S437. 2) The current data does not sufficiently support the conclusion that autophagy activity is induced by S437-Acn. The authors showed that the number of Atg8a puncta and LysoTracker-positive structures is increased in AcnS437D larval fat bodies. The autolysosomes in AcnS437D larval fat bodies are much larger and more abundant compared to AcnWT. The mean diameter of lysosomal/autolysosome structures is even increased more than 8-fold! Inhibition of autophagy at the step of autophagosome maturation and/or degradation results in the same phenotype. Does starvation-induced autophagy also cause accumulation of enlarged autolysosomes in fat bodies? Starvation-induced autophagy in fat bodies has been extensively studied by multiple labs. Examples include: (Scott et al., 2004) (Takats et al., 2014) (Takats et al., 2013). Neither of these papers quantified the changes in size from basal to starvations-induced autolysosomes. Importantly, however, all of these papers showed examples of electron micrographs from starved tissues containing large autolysosomes exceeding 1 µm or even 2 µm (e.g. Figure 2B-D in (Scott et al., 2004); Figure 2I in (Takats et al., 2013); or Figure 4A,B in (Takats et al., 2014). Additional characterization of autophagy flux would strengthen the interpretations of autophagy induction induced by Acn-pS437. This could be achieved with assays using the tandem fluorescent Atg8 reporter and/or Atg8-II levels in animals fed BafilomycinA. To address this concern, we performed experiments in which we blocked lysosomal acidification and degradation in larval fat bodies by feeding chloroquine to larvae following a well-established protocol to measure autophagic flux in larval fat bodies (Low et al., 2013; Mauvezin et al., 2014; Lorincz et al., 2017). When staining these chloroquine-treated fat bodies for endogenous ATG8, we observed significant increases in ATG8a punctae and ATG8a signal intensity for wild-type starved or for fed S437D phospho-mimetic mutants consistent with increased autophagic flux (new Figure 2E-L and Figure 2—figure supplement 1). To keep this figure manageable, we have split the previous Figure 2 and separated the analysis of the effects of S437A and S437D mutants on starvation-resistance and longevity into the new Figure 3. In addition, we like to point out that the beneficial effects endowed by the S437D phospho-mimetic mutation on starvation-resistance (new Figure 3A), longevity (new Figures 3B, 7M), and suppression of polyQ protein accumulation (new Figure 8) would be hard to explain as a consequence of defects in lysosomal degradation or reduced autophagosome maturation. By contrast, these effects are entirely consistent with beneficial effects of increased autophagy in the context of longevity and proteinopathies previously reported by several labs (some of many examples: (Sarkar et al., 2007; Simonsen et al., 2008; Nandi et al., 2014; Menzies et al., 2015; Gelino et al., 2016). We have now addressed this issue in the first paragraph of the Discussion.
  93 in total

1.  Role and regulation of starvation-induced autophagy in the Drosophila fat body.

Authors:  Ryan C Scott; Oren Schuldiner; Thomas P Neufeld
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.270

2.  Drosophila acinus encodes a novel regulator of endocytic and autophagic trafficking.

Authors:  Adam S Haberman; Mohammed Ali Akbar; Sanchali Ray; Helmut Krämer
Journal:  Development       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.868

3.  An isoform of the neuronal cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (Cdk5) activator.

Authors:  D Tang; J Yeung; K Y Lee; M Matsushita; H Matsui; K Tomizawa; O Hatase; J H Wang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-11-10       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Stress-Induced CDK5 Activation Disrupts Axonal Transport via Lis1/Ndel1/Dynein.

Authors:  Eva Klinman; Erika L F Holzbaur
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 9.423

5.  Phosphorylation of DARPP-32 by Cdk5 modulates dopamine signalling in neurons.

Authors:  J A Bibb; G L Snyder; A Nishi; Z Yan; L Meijer; A A Fienberg; L H Tsai; Y T Kwon; J A Girault; A J Czernik; R L Huganir; H C Hemmings; A C Nairn; P Greengard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Drosophila Gyf/GRB10 interacting GYF protein is an autophagy regulator that controls neuron and muscle homeostasis.

Authors:  Myungjin Kim; Ian Semple; Boyoung Kim; Alexandra Kiers; Samuel Nam; Hwan-Woo Park; Haeli Park; Seung-Hyun Ro; Jeong-Sig Kim; Gábor Juhász; Jun Hee Lee
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 16.016

7.  Histone deacetylase inhibitors arrest polyglutamine-dependent neurodegeneration in Drosophila.

Authors:  J S Steffan; L Bodai; J Pallos; M Poelman; A McCampbell; B L Apostol; A Kazantsev; E Schmidt; Y Z Zhu; M Greenwald; R Kurokawa; D E Housman; G R Jackson; J L Marsh; L M Thompson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-10-18       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  A Tale of the Good and Bad: Remodeling of the Microtubule Network in the Brain by Cdk5.

Authors:  Kavita Shah; Debomoy K Lahiri
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 5.590

9.  GPS 2.0, a tool to predict kinase-specific phosphorylation sites in hierarchy.

Authors:  Yu Xue; Jian Ren; Xinjiao Gao; Changjiang Jin; Longping Wen; Xuebiao Yao
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 5.911

10.  Huntingtin functions as a scaffold for selective macroautophagy.

Authors:  Yan-Ning Rui; Zhen Xu; Bindi Patel; Zhihua Chen; Dongsheng Chen; Antonio Tito; Gabriela David; Yamin Sun; Erin F Stimming; Hugo J Bellen; Ana Maria Cuervo; Sheng Zhang
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 28.824

View more
  10 in total

1.  Yorkie Growth-Promoting Activity Is Limited by Atg1-Mediated Phosphorylation.

Authors:  Lauren K Tyra; Nilay Nandi; Charles Tracy; Helmut Krämer
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 12.270

2.  STING controls energy stress-induced autophagy and energy metabolism via STX17.

Authors:  Yueguang Rong; Shen Zhang; Nilay Nandi; Zhe Wu; Linsen Li; Yang Liu; Yuehan Wei; Yuan Zhao; Weigang Yuan; Chuchu Zhou; Guanghua Xiao; Beth Levine; Nan Yan; Shan Mou; Liufu Deng; Zaiming Tang; Xiaoxia Liu; Helmut Kramer; Qing Zhong
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 8.077

3.  Odor-Specific Deactivation Defects in a Drosophila Odorant-Binding Protein Mutant.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Scheuermann; Dean P Smith
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)1.

Authors:  Daniel J Klionsky; Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz; Sara Abdelfatah; Mahmoud Abdellatif; Asghar Abdoli; Steffen Abel; Hagai Abeliovich; Marie H Abildgaard; Yakubu Princely Abudu; Abraham Acevedo-Arozena; Iannis E Adamopoulos; Khosrow Adeli; Timon E Adolph; Annagrazia Adornetto; Elma Aflaki; Galila Agam; Anupam Agarwal; Bharat B Aggarwal; Maria Agnello; Patrizia Agostinis; Javed N Agrewala; Alexander Agrotis; Patricia V Aguilar; S Tariq Ahmad; Zubair M Ahmed; Ulises Ahumada-Castro; Sonja Aits; Shu Aizawa; Yunus Akkoc; Tonia Akoumianaki; Hafize Aysin Akpinar; Ahmed M Al-Abd; Lina Al-Akra; Abeer Al-Gharaibeh; Moulay A Alaoui-Jamali; Simon Alberti; Elísabet Alcocer-Gómez; Cristiano Alessandri; Muhammad Ali; M Abdul Alim Al-Bari; Saeb Aliwaini; Javad Alizadeh; Eugènia Almacellas; Alexandru Almasan; Alicia Alonso; Guillermo D Alonso; Nihal Altan-Bonnet; Dario C Altieri; Élida M C Álvarez; Sara Alves; Cristine Alves da Costa; Mazen M Alzaharna; Marialaura Amadio; Consuelo Amantini; Cristina Amaral; Susanna Ambrosio; Amal O Amer; Veena Ammanathan; Zhenyi An; Stig U Andersen; Shaida A Andrabi; Magaiver Andrade-Silva; Allen M Andres; Sabrina Angelini; David Ann; Uche C Anozie; Mohammad Y Ansari; Pedro Antas; Adam Antebi; Zuriñe Antón; Tahira Anwar; Lionel Apetoh; Nadezda Apostolova; Toshiyuki Araki; Yasuhiro Araki; Kohei Arasaki; Wagner L Araújo; Jun Araya; Catherine Arden; Maria-Angeles Arévalo; Sandro Arguelles; Esperanza Arias; Jyothi Arikkath; Hirokazu Arimoto; Aileen R Ariosa; Darius Armstrong-James; Laetitia Arnauné-Pelloquin; Angeles Aroca; Daniela S Arroyo; Ivica Arsov; Rubén Artero; Dalia Maria Lucia Asaro; Michael Aschner; Milad Ashrafizadeh; Osnat Ashur-Fabian; Atanas G Atanasov; Alicia K Au; Patrick Auberger; Holger W Auner; Laure Aurelian; Riccardo Autelli; Laura Avagliano; Yenniffer Ávalos; Sanja Aveic; Célia Alexandra Aveleira; Tamar Avin-Wittenberg; Yucel Aydin; Scott Ayton; Srinivas Ayyadevara; Maria Azzopardi; Misuzu Baba; Jonathan M Backer; Steven K Backues; Dong-Hun Bae; Ok-Nam Bae; Soo Han Bae; Eric H Baehrecke; Ahruem Baek; Seung-Hoon Baek; Sung Hee Baek; Giacinto Bagetta; Agnieszka Bagniewska-Zadworna; Hua Bai; Jie Bai; Xiyuan Bai; Yidong Bai; Nandadulal Bairagi; Shounak Baksi; Teresa Balbi; Cosima T Baldari; Walter Balduini; Andrea Ballabio; Maria Ballester; Salma Balazadeh; Rena Balzan; Rina Bandopadhyay; Sreeparna Banerjee; Sulagna Banerjee; Ágnes Bánréti; Yan Bao; Mauricio S Baptista; Alessandra Baracca; Cristiana Barbati; Ariadna Bargiela; Daniela Barilà; Peter G Barlow; Sami J Barmada; Esther Barreiro; George E Barreto; Jiri Bartek; Bonnie Bartel; Alberto Bartolome; Gaurav R Barve; Suresh H Basagoudanavar; Diane C Bassham; Robert C Bast; Alakananda Basu; Henri Batoko; Isabella Batten; Etienne E Baulieu; Bradley L Baumgarner; Jagadeesh Bayry; Rupert Beale; Isabelle Beau; Florian Beaumatin; Luiz R G Bechara; George R Beck; Michael F Beers; Jakob Begun; Christian Behrends; Georg M N Behrens; Roberto Bei; Eloy Bejarano; Shai Bel; Christian Behl; Amine Belaid; Naïma Belgareh-Touzé; Cristina Bellarosa; Francesca Belleudi; Melissa Belló Pérez; Raquel Bello-Morales; Jackeline Soares de Oliveira Beltran; Sebastián Beltran; Doris Mangiaracina Benbrook; Mykolas Bendorius; Bruno A Benitez; Irene Benito-Cuesta; Julien Bensalem; Martin W Berchtold; Sabina Berezowska; Daniele Bergamaschi; Matteo Bergami; Andreas Bergmann; Laura Berliocchi; Clarisse Berlioz-Torrent; Amélie Bernard; Lionel Berthoux; Cagri G Besirli; Sebastien Besteiro; Virginie M Betin; Rudi Beyaert; Jelena S Bezbradica; Kiran Bhaskar; Ingrid Bhatia-Kissova; Resham Bhattacharya; Sujoy Bhattacharya; Shalmoli Bhattacharyya; Md Shenuarin Bhuiyan; Sujit Kumar Bhutia; Lanrong Bi; Xiaolin Bi; Trevor J Biden; Krikor Bijian; Viktor A Billes; Nadine Binart; Claudia Bincoletto; Asa B Birgisdottir; Geir Bjorkoy; Gonzalo Blanco; Ana Blas-Garcia; Janusz Blasiak; Robert Blomgran; Klas Blomgren; Janice S Blum; Emilio Boada-Romero; Mirta Boban; Kathleen Boesze-Battaglia; Philippe Boeuf; Barry Boland; Pascale Bomont; Paolo Bonaldo; Srinivasa Reddy Bonam; Laura Bonfili; Juan S Bonifacino; Brian A Boone; Martin D Bootman; Matteo Bordi; Christoph Borner; Beat C Bornhauser; Gautam Borthakur; Jürgen Bosch; Santanu Bose; Luis M Botana; Juan Botas; Chantal M Boulanger; Michael E Boulton; Mathieu Bourdenx; Benjamin Bourgeois; Nollaig M Bourke; Guilhem Bousquet; Patricia Boya; Peter V Bozhkov; Luiz H M Bozi; Tolga O Bozkurt; Doug E Brackney; Christian H Brandts; Ralf J Braun; Gerhard H Braus; Roberto Bravo-Sagua; José M Bravo-San Pedro; Patrick Brest; Marie-Agnès Bringer; Alfredo Briones-Herrera; V Courtney Broaddus; Peter Brodersen; Jeffrey L Brodsky; Steven L Brody; Paola G Bronson; Jeff M Bronstein; Carolyn N Brown; Rhoderick E Brown; Patricia C Brum; John H Brumell; Nicola Brunetti-Pierri; Daniele Bruno; Robert J Bryson-Richardson; Cecilia Bucci; Carmen Buchrieser; Marta Bueno; Laura Elisa Buitrago-Molina; Simone Buraschi; Shilpa Buch; J Ross Buchan; Erin M Buckingham; Hikmet Budak; Mauricio Budini; Geert Bultynck; Florin Burada; Joseph R Burgoyne; M Isabel Burón; Victor Bustos; Sabrina Büttner; Elena Butturini; Aaron Byrd; Isabel Cabas; Sandra Cabrera-Benitez; Ken Cadwell; Jingjing Cai; Lu Cai; Qian Cai; Montserrat Cairó; Jose A Calbet; Guy A Caldwell; Kim A Caldwell; Jarrod A Call; Riccardo Calvani; Ana C Calvo; Miguel Calvo-Rubio Barrera; Niels Os Camara; Jacques H Camonis; Nadine Camougrand; Michelangelo Campanella; Edward M Campbell; François-Xavier Campbell-Valois; Silvia Campello; Ilaria Campesi; Juliane C Campos; Olivier Camuzard; Jorge Cancino; Danilo Candido de Almeida; Laura Canesi; Isabella Caniggia; Barbara Canonico; Carles Cantí; Bin Cao; Michele Caraglia; Beatriz Caramés; Evie H Carchman; Elena Cardenal-Muñoz; Cesar Cardenas; Luis Cardenas; Sandra M Cardoso; Jennifer S Carew; Georges F Carle; Gillian Carleton; Silvia Carloni; Didac Carmona-Gutierrez; Leticia A Carneiro; Oliana Carnevali; Julian M Carosi; Serena Carra; Alice Carrier; Lucie Carrier; Bernadette Carroll; A Brent Carter; Andreia Neves Carvalho; Magali Casanova; Caty Casas; Josefina Casas; Chiara Cassioli; Eliseo F Castillo; Karen Castillo; Sonia Castillo-Lluva; Francesca Castoldi; Marco Castori; Ariel F Castro; Margarida Castro-Caldas; Javier Castro-Hernandez; Susana Castro-Obregon; Sergio D Catz; Claudia Cavadas; Federica Cavaliere; Gabriella Cavallini; Maria Cavinato; Maria L Cayuela; Paula Cebollada Rica; Valentina Cecarini; Francesco Cecconi; Marzanna Cechowska-Pasko; Simone Cenci; Victòria Ceperuelo-Mallafré; João J Cerqueira; Janete M Cerutti; Davide Cervia; Vildan Bozok Cetintas; Silvia Cetrullo; Han-Jung Chae; Andrei S Chagin; Chee-Yin Chai; Gopal Chakrabarti; Oishee Chakrabarti; Tapas Chakraborty; Trinad Chakraborty; Mounia Chami; Georgios Chamilos; David W Chan; Edmond Y W Chan; Edward D Chan; H Y Edwin Chan; Helen H Chan; Hung Chan; Matthew T V Chan; Yau Sang Chan; Partha K Chandra; Chih-Peng Chang; Chunmei Chang; Hao-Chun Chang; Kai Chang; Jie Chao; Tracey Chapman; Nicolas Charlet-Berguerand; Samrat Chatterjee; Shail K Chaube; Anu Chaudhary; Santosh Chauhan; Edward Chaum; Frédéric Checler; Michael E Cheetham; Chang-Shi Chen; Guang-Chao Chen; Jian-Fu Chen; Liam L Chen; Leilei Chen; Lin Chen; Mingliang Chen; Mu-Kuan Chen; Ning Chen; Quan Chen; Ruey-Hwa Chen; Shi Chen; Wei Chen; Weiqiang Chen; Xin-Ming Chen; Xiong-Wen Chen; Xu Chen; Yan Chen; Ye-Guang Chen; Yingyu Chen; Yongqiang Chen; Yu-Jen Chen; Yue-Qin Chen; Zhefan Stephen Chen; Zhi Chen; Zhi-Hua Chen; Zhijian J Chen; Zhixiang Chen; Hanhua Cheng; Jun Cheng; Shi-Yuan Cheng; Wei Cheng; Xiaodong Cheng; Xiu-Tang Cheng; Yiyun Cheng; Zhiyong Cheng; Zhong Chen; Heesun Cheong; Jit Kong Cheong; Boris V Chernyak; Sara Cherry; Chi Fai Randy Cheung; Chun Hei Antonio Cheung; King-Ho Cheung; Eric Chevet; Richard J Chi; Alan Kwok Shing Chiang; Ferdinando Chiaradonna; Roberto Chiarelli; Mario Chiariello; Nathalia Chica; Susanna Chiocca; Mario Chiong; Shih-Hwa Chiou; Abhilash I Chiramel; Valerio Chiurchiù; Dong-Hyung Cho; Seong-Kyu Choe; Augustine M K Choi; Mary E Choi; Kamalika Roy Choudhury; Norman S Chow; Charleen T Chu; Jason P Chua; John Jia En Chua; Hyewon Chung; Kin Pan Chung; Seockhoon Chung; So-Hyang Chung; Yuen-Li Chung; Valentina Cianfanelli; Iwona A Ciechomska; Mariana Cifuentes; Laura Cinque; Sebahattin Cirak; Mara Cirone; Michael J Clague; Robert Clarke; Emilio Clementi; Eliana M Coccia; Patrice Codogno; Ehud Cohen; Mickael M Cohen; Tania Colasanti; Fiorella Colasuonno; Robert A Colbert; Anna Colell; Miodrag Čolić; Nuria S Coll; Mark O Collins; María I Colombo; Daniel A Colón-Ramos; Lydie Combaret; Sergio Comincini; Márcia R Cominetti; Antonella Consiglio; Andrea Conte; Fabrizio Conti; Viorica Raluca Contu; Mark R Cookson; Kevin M Coombs; Isabelle Coppens; Maria Tiziana Corasaniti; Dale P Corkery; Nils Cordes; Katia Cortese; Maria do Carmo Costa; Sarah Costantino; Paola Costelli; Ana Coto-Montes; Peter J Crack; Jose L Crespo; Alfredo Criollo; Valeria Crippa; Riccardo Cristofani; Tamas Csizmadia; Antonio Cuadrado; Bing Cui; Jun Cui; Yixian Cui; Yong Cui; Emmanuel Culetto; Andrea C Cumino; Andrey V Cybulsky; Mark J Czaja; Stanislaw J Czuczwar; Stefania D'Adamo; Marcello D'Amelio; Daniela D'Arcangelo; Andrew C D'Lugos; Gabriella D'Orazi; James A da Silva; Hormos Salimi Dafsari; Ruben K Dagda; Yasin Dagdas; Maria Daglia; Xiaoxia Dai; Yun Dai; Yuyuan Dai; Jessica Dal Col; Paul Dalhaimer; Luisa Dalla Valle; Tobias Dallenga; Guillaume Dalmasso; Markus Damme; Ilaria Dando; Nico P Dantuma; April L Darling; Hiranmoy Das; Srinivasan Dasarathy; Santosh K Dasari; Srikanta Dash; Oliver Daumke; Adrian N Dauphinee; Jeffrey S Davies; Valeria A Dávila; Roger J Davis; Tanja Davis; Sharadha Dayalan Naidu; Francesca De Amicis; Karolien De Bosscher; Francesca De Felice; Lucia De Franceschi; Chiara De Leonibus; Mayara G de Mattos Barbosa; Guido R Y De Meyer; Angelo De Milito; Cosimo De Nunzio; Clara De Palma; Mauro De Santi; Claudio De Virgilio; Daniela De Zio; Jayanta Debnath; Brian J DeBosch; Jean-Paul Decuypere; Mark A Deehan; Gianluca Deflorian; James DeGregori; Benjamin Dehay; Gabriel Del Rio; Joe R Delaney; Lea M D Delbridge; Elizabeth Delorme-Axford; M Victoria Delpino; Francesca Demarchi; Vilma Dembitz; Nicholas D Demers; Hongbin Deng; Zhiqiang Deng; Joern Dengjel; Paul Dent; Donna Denton; Melvin L DePamphilis; Channing J Der; Vojo Deretic; Albert Descoteaux; Laura Devis; Sushil Devkota; Olivier Devuyst; Grant Dewson; Mahendiran Dharmasivam; Rohan Dhiman; Diego di Bernardo; Manlio Di Cristina; Fabio Di Domenico; Pietro Di Fazio; Alessio Di Fonzo; Giovanni Di Guardo; Gianni M Di Guglielmo; Luca Di Leo; Chiara Di Malta; Alessia Di Nardo; Martina Di Rienzo; Federica Di Sano; George Diallinas; Jiajie Diao; Guillermo Diaz-Araya; Inés Díaz-Laviada; Jared M Dickinson; Marc Diederich; Mélanie Dieudé; Ivan Dikic; Shiping Ding; Wen-Xing Ding; Luciana Dini; Jelena Dinić; Miroslav Dinic; Albena T Dinkova-Kostova; Marc S Dionne; Jörg H W Distler; Abhinav Diwan; Ian M C Dixon; Mojgan Djavaheri-Mergny; Ina Dobrinski; Oxana Dobrovinskaya; Radek Dobrowolski; Renwick C J Dobson; Jelena Đokić; Serap Dokmeci Emre; Massimo Donadelli; Bo Dong; Xiaonan Dong; Zhiwu Dong; Gerald W Dorn Ii; Volker Dotsch; Huan Dou; Juan Dou; Moataz Dowaidar; Sami Dridi; Liat Drucker; Ailian Du; Caigan Du; Guangwei Du; Hai-Ning Du; Li-Lin Du; André du Toit; Shao-Bin Duan; Xiaoqiong Duan; Sónia P Duarte; Anna Dubrovska; Elaine A Dunlop; Nicolas Dupont; Raúl V Durán; Bilikere S Dwarakanath; Sergey A Dyshlovoy; Darius Ebrahimi-Fakhari; Leopold Eckhart; Charles L Edelstein; Thomas Efferth; Eftekhar Eftekharpour; Ludwig Eichinger; Nabil Eid; Tobias Eisenberg; N Tony Eissa; Sanaa Eissa; Miriam Ejarque; Abdeljabar El Andaloussi; Nazira El-Hage; Shahenda El-Naggar; Anna Maria Eleuteri; Eman S El-Shafey; Mohamed Elgendy; Aristides G Eliopoulos; María M Elizalde; Philip M Elks; Hans-Peter Elsasser; Eslam S Elsherbiny; Brooke M Emerling; N C Tolga Emre; Christina H Eng; Nikolai Engedal; Anna-Mart Engelbrecht; Agnete S T Engelsen; Jorrit M Enserink; Ricardo Escalante; Audrey Esclatine; Mafalda Escobar-Henriques; Eeva-Liisa Eskelinen; Lucile Espert; Makandjou-Ola Eusebio; Gemma Fabrias; Cinzia Fabrizi; Antonio Facchiano; Francesco Facchiano; Bengt Fadeel; Claudio Fader; Alex C Faesen; W Douglas Fairlie; Alberto Falcó; Bjorn H Falkenburger; Daping Fan; Jie Fan; Yanbo Fan; Evandro F Fang; Yanshan Fang; Yognqi Fang; Manolis Fanto; Tamar Farfel-Becker; Mathias Faure; Gholamreza Fazeli; Anthony O Fedele; Arthur M Feldman; Du Feng; Jiachun Feng; Lifeng Feng; Yibin Feng; Yuchen Feng; Wei Feng; Thais Fenz Araujo; Thomas A Ferguson; Álvaro F Fernández; Jose C Fernandez-Checa; Sonia Fernández-Veledo; Alisdair R Fernie; Anthony W Ferrante; Alessandra Ferraresi; Merari F Ferrari; Julio C B Ferreira; Susan Ferro-Novick; Antonio Figueras; Riccardo Filadi; Nicoletta Filigheddu; Eduardo Filippi-Chiela; Giuseppe Filomeni; Gian Maria Fimia; Vittorio Fineschi; Francesca Finetti; Steven Finkbeiner; Edward A Fisher; Paul B Fisher; Flavio Flamigni; Steven J Fliesler; Trude H Flo; Ida Florance; Oliver Florey; Tullio Florio; Erika Fodor; Carlo Follo; Edward A Fon; Antonella Forlino; Francesco Fornai; Paola Fortini; Anna Fracassi; Alessandro Fraldi; Brunella Franco; Rodrigo Franco; Flavia Franconi; Lisa B Frankel; Scott L Friedman; Leopold F Fröhlich; Gema Frühbeck; Jose M Fuentes; Yukio Fujiki; Naonobu Fujita; Yuuki Fujiwara; Mitsunori Fukuda; Simone Fulda; Luc Furic; Norihiko Furuya; Carmela Fusco; Michaela U Gack; Lidia Gaffke; Sehamuddin Galadari; Alessia Galasso; Maria F Galindo; Sachith Gallolu Kankanamalage; Lorenzo Galluzzi; Vincent Galy; Noor Gammoh; Boyi Gan; Ian G Ganley; Feng Gao; Hui Gao; Minghui Gao; Ping Gao; Shou-Jiang Gao; Wentao Gao; Xiaobo Gao; Ana Garcera; Maria Noé Garcia; Verónica E Garcia; Francisco García-Del Portillo; Vega Garcia-Escudero; Aracely Garcia-Garcia; Marina Garcia-Macia; Diana García-Moreno; Carmen Garcia-Ruiz; Patricia García-Sanz; Abhishek D Garg; Ricardo Gargini; Tina Garofalo; Robert F Garry; Nils C Gassen; Damian Gatica; Liang Ge; Wanzhong Ge; Ruth Geiss-Friedlander; Cecilia Gelfi; Pascal Genschik; Ian E Gentle; Valeria Gerbino; Christoph Gerhardt; Kyla Germain; Marc Germain; David A Gewirtz; Elham Ghasemipour Afshar; Saeid Ghavami; Alessandra Ghigo; Manosij Ghosh; Georgios Giamas; Claudia Giampietri; Alexandra Giatromanolaki; Gary E Gibson; Spencer B Gibson; Vanessa Ginet; Edward Giniger; Carlotta Giorgi; Henrique Girao; Stephen E Girardin; Mridhula Giridharan; Sandy Giuliano; Cecilia Giulivi; Sylvie Giuriato; Julien Giustiniani; Alexander Gluschko; Veit Goder; Alexander Goginashvili; Jakub Golab; David C Goldstone; Anna Golebiewska; Luciana R Gomes; Rodrigo Gomez; Rubén Gómez-Sánchez; Maria Catalina Gomez-Puerto; Raquel Gomez-Sintes; Qingqiu Gong; Felix M Goni; Javier González-Gallego; Tomas Gonzalez-Hernandez; Rosa A Gonzalez-Polo; Jose A Gonzalez-Reyes; Patricia González-Rodríguez; Ing Swie Goping; Marina S Gorbatyuk; Nikolai V Gorbunov; Kıvanç Görgülü; Roxana M Gorojod; Sharon M Gorski; Sandro Goruppi; Cecilia Gotor; Roberta A Gottlieb; Illana Gozes; Devrim Gozuacik; Martin Graef; Markus H Gräler; Veronica Granatiero; Daniel Grasso; Joshua P Gray; Douglas R Green; Alexander Greenhough; Stephen L Gregory; Edward F Griffin; Mark W Grinstaff; Frederic Gros; Charles Grose; Angelina S Gross; Florian Gruber; Paolo Grumati; Tilman Grune; Xueyan Gu; Jun-Lin Guan; Carlos M Guardia; Kishore Guda; Flora Guerra; Consuelo Guerri; Prasun Guha; Carlos Guillén; Shashi Gujar; Anna Gukovskaya; Ilya Gukovsky; Jan Gunst; Andreas Günther; Anyonya R Guntur; Chuanyong Guo; Chun Guo; Hongqing Guo; Lian-Wang Guo; Ming Guo; Pawan Gupta; Shashi Kumar Gupta; Swapnil Gupta; Veer Bala Gupta; Vivek Gupta; Asa B Gustafsson; David D Gutterman; Ranjitha H B; Annakaisa Haapasalo; James E Haber; Aleksandra Hać; Shinji Hadano; Anders J Hafrén; Mansour Haidar; Belinda S Hall; Gunnel Halldén; Anne Hamacher-Brady; Andrea Hamann; Maho Hamasaki; Weidong Han; Malene Hansen; Phyllis I Hanson; Zijian Hao; Masaru Harada; Ljubica Harhaji-Trajkovic; Nirmala Hariharan; Nigil Haroon; James Harris; Takafumi Hasegawa; Noor Hasima Nagoor; Jeffrey A Haspel; Volker Haucke; Wayne D Hawkins; Bruce A Hay; Cole M Haynes; Soren B Hayrabedyan; Thomas S Hays; Congcong He; Qin He; Rong-Rong He; You-Wen He; Yu-Ying He; Yasser Heakal; Alexander M Heberle; J Fielding Hejtmancik; Gudmundur Vignir Helgason; Vanessa Henkel; Marc Herb; Alexander Hergovich; Anna Herman-Antosiewicz; Agustín Hernández; Carlos Hernandez; Sergio Hernandez-Diaz; Virginia Hernandez-Gea; Amaury Herpin; Judit Herreros; Javier H Hervás; Daniel Hesselson; Claudio Hetz; Volker T Heussler; Yujiro Higuchi; Sabine Hilfiker; Joseph A Hill; William S Hlavacek; Emmanuel A Ho; Idy H T Ho; Philip Wing-Lok Ho; Shu-Leong Ho; Wan Yun Ho; G Aaron Hobbs; Mark Hochstrasser; Peter H M Hoet; Daniel Hofius; Paul Hofman; Annika Höhn; Carina I Holmberg; Jose R Hombrebueno; Chang-Won Hong Yi-Ren Hong; Lora V Hooper; Thorsten Hoppe; Rastislav Horos; Yujin Hoshida; I-Lun Hsin; Hsin-Yun Hsu; Bing Hu; Dong Hu; Li-Fang Hu; Ming Chang Hu; Ronggui Hu; Wei Hu; Yu-Chen Hu; Zhuo-Wei Hu; Fang Hua; Jinlian Hua; Yingqi Hua; Chongmin Huan; Canhua Huang; Chuanshu Huang; Chuanxin Huang; Chunling Huang; Haishan Huang; Kun Huang; Michael L H Huang; Rui Huang; Shan Huang; Tianzhi Huang; Xing Huang; Yuxiang Jack Huang; Tobias B Huber; Virginie Hubert; Christian A Hubner; Stephanie M Hughes; William E Hughes; Magali Humbert; Gerhard Hummer; James H Hurley; Sabah Hussain; Salik Hussain; Patrick J Hussey; Martina Hutabarat; Hui-Yun Hwang; Seungmin Hwang; Antonio Ieni; Fumiyo Ikeda; Yusuke Imagawa; Yuzuru Imai; Carol Imbriano; Masaya Imoto; Denise M Inman; Ken Inoki; Juan Iovanna; Renato V Iozzo; Giuseppe Ippolito; Javier E Irazoqui; Pablo Iribarren; Mohd Ishaq; Makoto Ishikawa; Nestor Ishimwe; Ciro Isidoro; Nahed Ismail; Shohreh Issazadeh-Navikas; Eisuke Itakura; Daisuke Ito; Davor Ivankovic; Saška Ivanova; Anand Krishnan V Iyer; José M Izquierdo; Masanori Izumi; Marja Jäättelä; Majid Sakhi Jabir; William T Jackson; Nadia Jacobo-Herrera; Anne-Claire Jacomin; Elise Jacquin; Pooja Jadiya; Hartmut Jaeschke; Chinnaswamy Jagannath; Arjen J Jakobi; Johan Jakobsson; Bassam Janji; Pidder Jansen-Dürr; Patric J Jansson; Jonathan Jantsch; Sławomir Januszewski; Alagie Jassey; Steve Jean; Hélène Jeltsch-David; Pavla Jendelova; Andreas Jenny; Thomas E Jensen; Niels Jessen; Jenna L Jewell; Jing Ji; Lijun Jia; Rui Jia; Liwen Jiang; Qing Jiang; Richeng Jiang; Teng Jiang; Xuejun Jiang; Yu Jiang; Maria Jimenez-Sanchez; Eun-Jung Jin; Fengyan Jin; Hongchuan Jin; Li Jin; Luqi Jin; Meiyan Jin; Si Jin; Eun-Kyeong Jo; Carine Joffre; Terje Johansen; Gail V W Johnson; Simon A Johnston; Eija Jokitalo; Mohit Kumar Jolly; Leo A B Joosten; Joaquin Jordan; Bertrand Joseph; Dianwen Ju; Jeong-Sun Ju; Jingfang Ju; Esmeralda Juárez; Delphine Judith; Gábor Juhász; Youngsoo Jun; Chang Hwa Jung; Sung-Chul Jung; Yong Keun Jung; Heinz Jungbluth; Johannes Jungverdorben; Steffen Just; Kai Kaarniranta; Allen Kaasik; Tomohiro Kabuta; Daniel Kaganovich; Alon Kahana; Renate Kain; Shinjo Kajimura; Maria Kalamvoki; Manjula Kalia; Danuta S Kalinowski; Nina Kaludercic; Ioanna Kalvari; Joanna Kaminska; Vitaliy O Kaminskyy; Hiromitsu Kanamori; Keizo Kanasaki; Chanhee Kang; Rui Kang; Sang Sun Kang; Senthilvelrajan Kaniyappan; Tomotake Kanki; Thirumala-Devi Kanneganti; Anumantha G Kanthasamy; Arthi Kanthasamy; Marc Kantorow; Orsolya Kapuy; Michalis V Karamouzis; Md Razaul Karim; Parimal Karmakar; Rajesh G Katare; Masaru Kato; Stefan H E Kaufmann; Anu Kauppinen; Gur P Kaushal; Susmita Kaushik; Kiyoshi Kawasaki; Kemal Kazan; Po-Yuan Ke; Damien J Keating; Ursula Keber; John H Kehrl; Kate E Keller; Christian W Keller; Jongsook Kim Kemper; Candia M Kenific; Oliver Kepp; Stephanie Kermorgant; Andreas Kern; Robin Ketteler; Tom G Keulers; Boris Khalfin; Hany Khalil; Bilon Khambu; Shahid Y Khan; Vinoth Kumar Megraj Khandelwal; Rekha Khandia; Widuri Kho; Noopur V Khobrekar; Sataree Khuansuwan; Mukhran Khundadze; Samuel A Killackey; Dasol Kim; Deok Ryong Kim; Do-Hyung Kim; Dong-Eun Kim; Eun Young Kim; Eun-Kyoung Kim; Hak-Rim Kim; Hee-Sik Kim; Jeong Hun Kim; Jin Kyung Kim; Jin-Hoi Kim; Joungmok Kim; Ju Hwan Kim; Keun Il Kim; Peter K Kim; Seong-Jun Kim; Scot R Kimball; Adi Kimchi; Alec C Kimmelman; Tomonori Kimura; Matthew A King; Kerri J Kinghorn; Conan G Kinsey; Vladimir Kirkin; Lorrie A Kirshenbaum; Sergey L Kiselev; Shuji Kishi; Katsuhiko Kitamoto; Yasushi Kitaoka; Kaio Kitazato; Richard N Kitsis; Josef T Kittler; Ole Kjaerulff; Peter S Klein; Thomas Klopstock; Jochen Klucken; Helene Knævelsrud; Roland L Knorr; Ben C B Ko; Fred Ko; Jiunn-Liang Ko; Hotaka Kobayashi; Satoru Kobayashi; Ina Koch; Jan C Koch; Ulrich Koenig; Donat Kögel; Young Ho Koh; Masato Koike; Sepp D Kohlwein; Nur M Kocaturk; Masaaki Komatsu; Jeannette König; Toru Kono; Benjamin T Kopp; Tamas Korcsmaros; Gözde Korkmaz; Viktor I Korolchuk; Mónica Suárez Korsnes; Ali Koskela; Janaiah Kota; Yaichiro Kotake; Monica L Kotler; Yanjun Kou; Michael I Koukourakis; Evangelos Koustas; Attila L Kovacs; Tibor Kovács; Daisuke Koya; Tomohiro Kozako; Claudine Kraft; Dimitri Krainc; Helmut Krämer; Anna D Krasnodembskaya; Carole Kretz-Remy; Guido Kroemer; Nicholas T Ktistakis; Kazuyuki Kuchitsu; Sabine Kuenen; Lars Kuerschner; Thomas Kukar; Ajay Kumar; Ashok Kumar; Deepak Kumar; Dhiraj Kumar; Sharad Kumar; Shinji Kume; Caroline Kumsta; Chanakya N Kundu; Mondira Kundu; Ajaikumar B Kunnumakkara; Lukasz Kurgan; Tatiana G Kutateladze; Ozlem Kutlu; SeongAe Kwak; Ho Jeong Kwon; Taeg Kyu Kwon; Yong Tae Kwon; Irene Kyrmizi; Albert La Spada; Patrick Labonté; Sylvain Ladoire; Ilaria Laface; Frank Lafont; Diane C Lagace; Vikramjit Lahiri; Zhibing Lai; Angela S Laird; Aparna Lakkaraju; Trond Lamark; Sheng-Hui Lan; Ane Landajuela; Darius J R Lane; Jon D Lane; Charles H Lang; Carsten Lange; Ülo Langel; Rupert Langer; Pierre Lapaquette; Jocelyn Laporte; Nicholas F LaRusso; Isabel Lastres-Becker; Wilson Chun Yu Lau; Gordon W Laurie; Sergio Lavandero; Betty Yuen Kwan Law; Helen Ka-Wai Law; Rob Layfield; Weidong Le; Herve Le Stunff; Alexandre Y Leary; Jean-Jacques Lebrun; Lionel Y W Leck; Jean-Philippe Leduc-Gaudet; Changwook Lee; Chung-Pei Lee; Da-Hye Lee; Edward B Lee; Erinna F Lee; Gyun Min Lee; He-Jin Lee; Heung Kyu Lee; Jae Man Lee; Jason S Lee; Jin-A Lee; Joo-Yong Lee; Jun Hee Lee; Michael Lee; Min Goo Lee; Min Jae Lee; Myung-Shik Lee; Sang Yoon Lee; Seung-Jae Lee; Stella Y Lee; Sung Bae Lee; Won Hee Lee; Ying-Ray Lee; Yong-Ho Lee; Youngil Lee; Christophe Lefebvre; Renaud Legouis; Yu L Lei; Yuchen Lei; Sergey Leikin; Gerd Leitinger; Leticia Lemus; Shuilong Leng; Olivia Lenoir; Guido Lenz; Heinz Josef Lenz; Paola Lenzi; Yolanda León; Andréia M Leopoldino; Christoph Leschczyk; Stina Leskelä; Elisabeth Letellier; Chi-Ting Leung; Po Sing Leung; Jeremy S Leventhal; Beth Levine; Patrick A Lewis; Klaus Ley; Bin Li; Da-Qiang Li; Jianming Li; Jing Li; Jiong Li; Ke Li; Liwu Li; Mei Li; Min Li; Min Li; Ming Li; Mingchuan Li; Pin-Lan Li; Ming-Qing Li; Qing Li; Sheng Li; Tiangang Li; Wei Li; Wenming Li; Xue Li; Yi-Ping Li; Yuan Li; Zhiqiang Li; Zhiyong Li; Zhiyuan Li; Jiqin Lian; Chengyu Liang; Qiangrong Liang; Weicheng Liang; Yongheng Liang; YongTian Liang; Guanghong Liao; Lujian Liao; Mingzhi Liao; Yung-Feng Liao; Mariangela Librizzi; Pearl P Y Lie; Mary A Lilly; Hyunjung J Lim; Thania R R Lima; Federica Limana; Chao Lin; Chih-Wen Lin; Dar-Shong Lin; Fu-Cheng Lin; Jiandie D Lin; Kurt M Lin; Kwang-Huei Lin; Liang-Tzung Lin; Pei-Hui Lin; Qiong Lin; Shaofeng Lin; Su-Ju Lin; Wenyu Lin; Xueying Lin; Yao-Xin Lin; Yee-Shin Lin; Rafael Linden; Paula Lindner; Shuo-Chien Ling; Paul Lingor; Amelia K Linnemann; Yih-Cherng Liou; Marta M Lipinski; Saška Lipovšek; Vitor A Lira; Natalia Lisiak; Paloma B Liton; Chao Liu; Ching-Hsuan Liu; Chun-Feng Liu; Cui Hua Liu; Fang Liu; Hao Liu; Hsiao-Sheng Liu; Hua-Feng Liu; Huifang Liu; Jia Liu; Jing Liu; Julia Liu; Leyuan Liu; Longhua Liu; Meilian Liu; Qin Liu; Wei Liu; Wende Liu; Xiao-Hong Liu; Xiaodong Liu; Xingguo Liu; Xu Liu; Xuedong Liu; Yanfen Liu; Yang Liu; Yang Liu; Yueyang Liu; Yule Liu; J Andrew Livingston; Gerard Lizard; Jose M Lizcano; Senka Ljubojevic-Holzer; Matilde E LLeonart; David Llobet-Navàs; Alicia Llorente; Chih Hung Lo; Damián Lobato-Márquez; Qi Long; Yun Chau Long; Ben Loos; Julia A Loos; Manuela G López; Guillermo López-Doménech; José Antonio López-Guerrero; Ana T López-Jiménez; Óscar López-Pérez; Israel López-Valero; Magdalena J Lorenowicz; Mar Lorente; Peter Lorincz; Laura Lossi; Sophie Lotersztajn; Penny E Lovat; Jonathan F Lovell; Alenka Lovy; Péter Lőw; Guang Lu; Haocheng Lu; Jia-Hong Lu; Jin-Jian Lu; Mengji Lu; Shuyan Lu; Alessandro Luciani; John M Lucocq; Paula Ludovico; Micah A Luftig; Morten Luhr; Diego Luis-Ravelo; Julian J Lum; Liany Luna-Dulcey; Anders H Lund; Viktor K Lund; Jan D Lünemann; Patrick Lüningschrör; Honglin Luo; Rongcan Luo; Shouqing Luo; Zhi Luo; Claudio Luparello; Bernhard Lüscher; Luan Luu; Alex Lyakhovich; Konstantin G Lyamzaev; Alf Håkon Lystad; Lyubomyr Lytvynchuk; Alvin C Ma; Changle Ma; Mengxiao Ma; Ning-Fang Ma; Quan-Hong Ma; Xinliang Ma; Yueyun Ma; Zhenyi Ma; Ormond A MacDougald; Fernando Macian; Gustavo C MacIntosh; Jeffrey P MacKeigan; Kay F Macleod; Sandra Maday; Frank Madeo; Muniswamy Madesh; Tobias Madl; Julio Madrigal-Matute; Akiko Maeda; Yasuhiro Maejima; Marta Magarinos; Poornima Mahavadi; Emiliano Maiani; Kenneth Maiese; Panchanan Maiti; Maria Chiara Maiuri; Barbara Majello; Michael B Major; Elena Makareeva; Fayaz Malik; Karthik Mallilankaraman; Walter Malorni; Alina Maloyan; Najiba Mammadova; Gene Chi Wai Man; Federico Manai; Joseph D Mancias; Eva-Maria Mandelkow; Michael A Mandell; Angelo A Manfredi; Masoud H Manjili; Ravi Manjithaya; Patricio Manque; Bella B Manshian; Raquel Manzano; Claudia Manzoni; Kai Mao; Cinzia Marchese; Sandrine Marchetti; Anna Maria Marconi; Fabrizio Marcucci; Stefania Mardente; Olga A Mareninova; Marta Margeta; Muriel Mari; Sara Marinelli; Oliviero Marinelli; Guillermo Mariño; Sofia Mariotto; Richard S Marshall; Mark R Marten; Sascha Martens; Alexandre P J Martin; Katie R Martin; Sara Martin; Shaun Martin; Adrián Martín-Segura; Miguel A Martín-Acebes; Inmaculada Martin-Burriel; Marcos Martin-Rincon; Paloma Martin-Sanz; José A Martina; Wim Martinet; Aitor Martinez; Ana Martinez; Jennifer Martinez; Moises Martinez Velazquez; Nuria Martinez-Lopez; Marta Martinez-Vicente; Daniel O Martins; Joilson O Martins; Waleska K Martins; Tania Martins-Marques; Emanuele Marzetti; Shashank Masaldan; Celine Masclaux-Daubresse; Douglas G Mashek; Valentina Massa; Lourdes Massieu; Glenn R Masson; Laura Masuelli; Anatoliy I Masyuk; Tetyana V Masyuk; Paola Matarrese; Ander Matheu; Satoaki Matoba; Sachiko Matsuzaki; Pamela Mattar; Alessandro Matte; Domenico Mattoscio; José L Mauriz; Mario Mauthe; Caroline Mauvezin; Emanual Maverakis; Paola Maycotte; Johanna Mayer; Gianluigi Mazzoccoli; Cristina Mazzoni; Joseph R Mazzulli; Nami McCarty; Christine McDonald; Mitchell R McGill; Sharon L McKenna; BethAnn McLaughlin; Fionn McLoughlin; Mark A McNiven; Thomas G McWilliams; Fatima Mechta-Grigoriou; Tania Catarina Medeiros; Diego L Medina; Lynn A Megeney; Klara Megyeri; Maryam Mehrpour; Jawahar L Mehta; Alfred J Meijer; Annemarie H Meijer; Jakob Mejlvang; Alicia Meléndez; Annette Melk; Gonen Memisoglu; Alexandrina F Mendes; Delong Meng; Fei Meng; Tian Meng; Rubem Menna-Barreto; Manoj B Menon; Carol Mercer; Anne E Mercier; Jean-Louis Mergny; Adalberto Merighi; Seth D Merkley; Giuseppe Merla; Volker Meske; Ana Cecilia Mestre; Shree Padma Metur; Christian Meyer; Hemmo Meyer; Wenyi Mi; Jeanne Mialet-Perez; Junying Miao; Lucia Micale; Yasuo Miki; Enrico Milan; Małgorzata Milczarek; Dana L Miller; Samuel I Miller; Silke Miller; Steven W Millward; Ira Milosevic; Elena A Minina; Hamed Mirzaei; Hamid Reza Mirzaei; Mehdi Mirzaei; Amit Mishra; Nandita Mishra; Paras Kumar Mishra; Maja Misirkic Marjanovic; Roberta Misasi; Amit Misra; Gabriella Misso; Claire Mitchell; Geraldine Mitou; Tetsuji Miura; Shigeki Miyamoto; Makoto Miyazaki; Mitsunori Miyazaki; Taiga Miyazaki; Keisuke Miyazawa; Noboru Mizushima; Trine H Mogensen; Baharia Mograbi; Reza Mohammadinejad; Yasir Mohamud; Abhishek Mohanty; Sipra Mohapatra; Torsten Möhlmann; Asif Mohmmed; Anna Moles; Kelle H Moley; Maurizio Molinari; Vincenzo Mollace; Andreas Buch Møller; Bertrand Mollereau; Faustino Mollinedo; Costanza Montagna; Mervyn J Monteiro; Andrea Montella; L Ruth Montes; Barbara Montico; Vinod K Mony; Giacomo Monzio Compagnoni; Michael N Moore; Mohammad A Moosavi; Ana L Mora; Marina Mora; David Morales-Alamo; Rosario Moratalla; Paula I Moreira; Elena Morelli; Sandra Moreno; Daniel Moreno-Blas; Viviana Moresi; Benjamin Morga; Alwena H Morgan; Fabrice Morin; Hideaki Morishita; Orson L Moritz; Mariko Moriyama; Yuji Moriyasu; Manuela Morleo; Eugenia Morselli; Jose F Moruno-Manchon; Jorge Moscat; Serge Mostowy; Elisa Motori; Andrea Felinto Moura; Naima Moustaid-Moussa; Maria Mrakovcic; Gabriel Muciño-Hernández; Anupam Mukherjee; Subhadip Mukhopadhyay; Jean M Mulcahy Levy; Victoriano Mulero; Sylviane Muller; Christian Münch; Ashok Munjal; Pura Munoz-Canoves; Teresa Muñoz-Galdeano; Christian Münz; Tomokazu Murakawa; Claudia Muratori; Brona M Murphy; J Patrick Murphy; Aditya Murthy; Timo T Myöhänen; Indira U Mysorekar; Jennifer Mytych; Seyed Mohammad Nabavi; Massimo Nabissi; Péter Nagy; Jihoon Nah; Aimable Nahimana; Ichiro Nakagawa; Ken Nakamura; Hitoshi Nakatogawa; Shyam S Nandi; Meera Nanjundan; Monica Nanni; Gennaro Napolitano; Roberta Nardacci; Masashi Narita; Melissa Nassif; Ilana Nathan; Manabu Natsumeda; Ryno J Naude; Christin Naumann; Olaia Naveiras; Fatemeh Navid; Steffan T Nawrocki; Taras Y Nazarko; Francesca Nazio; Florentina Negoita; Thomas Neill; Amanda L Neisch; Luca M Neri; Mihai G Netea; Patrick Neubert; Thomas P Neufeld; Dietbert Neumann; Albert Neutzner; Phillip T Newton; Paul A Ney; Ioannis P Nezis; Charlene C W Ng; Tzi Bun Ng; Hang T T Nguyen; Long T Nguyen; Hong-Min Ni; Clíona Ní Cheallaigh; Zhenhong Ni; M Celeste Nicolao; Francesco Nicoli; Manuel Nieto-Diaz; Per Nilsson; Shunbin Ning; Rituraj Niranjan; Hiroshi Nishimune; Mireia Niso-Santano; Ralph A Nixon; Annalisa Nobili; Clevio Nobrega; Takeshi Noda; Uxía Nogueira-Recalde; Trevor M Nolan; Ivan Nombela; Ivana Novak; Beatriz Novoa; Takashi Nozawa; Nobuyuki Nukina; Carmen Nussbaum-Krammer; Jesper Nylandsted; Tracey R O'Donovan; Seónadh M O'Leary; Eyleen J O'Rourke; Mary P O'Sullivan; Timothy E O'Sullivan; Salvatore Oddo; Ina Oehme; Michinaga Ogawa; Eric Ogier-Denis; Margret H Ogmundsdottir; Besim Ogretmen; Goo Taeg Oh; Seon-Hee Oh; Young J Oh; Takashi Ohama; Yohei Ohashi; Masaki Ohmuraya; Vasileios Oikonomou; Rani Ojha; Koji Okamoto; Hitoshi Okazawa; Masahide Oku; Sara Oliván; Jorge M A Oliveira; Michael Ollmann; James A Olzmann; Shakib Omari; M Bishr Omary; Gizem Önal; Martin Ondrej; Sang-Bing Ong; Sang-Ging Ong; Anna Onnis; Juan A Orellana; Sara Orellana-Muñoz; Maria Del Mar Ortega-Villaizan; Xilma R Ortiz-Gonzalez; Elena Ortona; Heinz D Osiewacz; Abdel-Hamid K Osman; Rosario Osta; Marisa S Otegui; Kinya Otsu; Christiane Ott; Luisa Ottobrini; Jing-Hsiung James Ou; Tiago F Outeiro; Inger Oynebraten; Melek Ozturk; Gilles Pagès; Susanta Pahari; Marta Pajares; Utpal B Pajvani; Rituraj Pal; Simona Paladino; Nicolas Pallet; Michela Palmieri; Giuseppe Palmisano; Camilla Palumbo; Francesco Pampaloni; Lifeng Pan; Qingjun Pan; Wenliang Pan; Xin Pan; Ganna Panasyuk; Rahul Pandey; Udai B Pandey; Vrajesh Pandya; Francesco Paneni; Shirley Y Pang; Elisa Panzarini; Daniela L Papademetrio; Elena Papaleo; Daniel Papinski; Diana Papp; Eun Chan Park; Hwan Tae Park; Ji-Man Park; Jong-In Park; Joon Tae Park; Junsoo Park; Sang Chul Park; Sang-Youel Park; Abraham H Parola; Jan B Parys; Adrien Pasquier; Benoit Pasquier; João F Passos; Nunzia Pastore; Hemal H Patel; Daniel Patschan; Sophie Pattingre; Gustavo Pedraza-Alva; Jose Pedraza-Chaverri; Zully Pedrozo; Gang Pei; Jianming Pei; Hadas Peled-Zehavi; Joaquín M Pellegrini; Joffrey Pelletier; Miguel A Peñalva; Di Peng; Ying Peng; Fabio Penna; Maria Pennuto; Francesca Pentimalli; Cláudia Mf Pereira; Gustavo J S Pereira; Lilian C Pereira; Luis Pereira de Almeida; Nirma D Perera; Ángel Pérez-Lara; Ana B Perez-Oliva; María Esther Pérez-Pérez; Palsamy Periyasamy; Andras Perl; Cristiana Perrotta; Ida Perrotta; Richard G Pestell; Morten Petersen; Irina Petrache; Goran Petrovski; Thorsten Pfirrmann; Astrid S Pfister; Jennifer A Philips; Huifeng Pi; Anna Picca; Alicia M Pickrell; Sandy Picot; Giovanna M Pierantoni; Marina Pierdominici; Philippe Pierre; Valérie Pierrefite-Carle; Karolina Pierzynowska; Federico Pietrocola; Miroslawa Pietruczuk; Claudio Pignata; Felipe X Pimentel-Muiños; Mario Pinar; Roberta O Pinheiro; Ronit Pinkas-Kramarski; Paolo Pinton; Karolina Pircs; Sujan Piya; Paola Pizzo; Theo S Plantinga; Harald W Platta; Ainhoa Plaza-Zabala; Markus Plomann; Egor Y Plotnikov; Helene Plun-Favreau; Ryszard Pluta; Roger Pocock; Stefanie Pöggeler; Christian Pohl; Marc Poirot; Angelo Poletti; Marisa Ponpuak; Hana Popelka; Blagovesta Popova; Helena Porta; Soledad Porte Alcon; Eliana Portilla-Fernandez; Martin Post; Malia B Potts; Joanna Poulton; Ted Powers; Veena Prahlad; Tomasz K Prajsnar; Domenico Praticò; Rosaria Prencipe; Muriel Priault; Tassula Proikas-Cezanne; Vasilis J Promponas; Christopher G Proud; Rosa Puertollano; Luigi Puglielli; Thomas Pulinilkunnil; Deepika Puri; Rajat Puri; Julien Puyal; Xiaopeng Qi; Yongmei Qi; Wenbin Qian; Lei Qiang; Yu Qiu; Joe Quadrilatero; Jorge Quarleri; Nina Raben; Hannah Rabinowich; Debora Ragona; Michael J Ragusa; Nader Rahimi; Marveh Rahmati; Valeria Raia; Nuno Raimundo; Namakkal-Soorappan Rajasekaran; Sriganesh Ramachandra Rao; Abdelhaq Rami; Ignacio Ramírez-Pardo; David B Ramsden; Felix Randow; Pundi N Rangarajan; Danilo Ranieri; Hai Rao; Lang Rao; Rekha Rao; Sumit Rathore; J Arjuna Ratnayaka; Edward A Ratovitski; Palaniyandi Ravanan; Gloria Ravegnini; Swapan K Ray; Babak Razani; Vito Rebecca; Fulvio Reggiori; Anne Régnier-Vigouroux; Andreas S Reichert; David Reigada; Jan H Reiling; Theo Rein; Siegfried Reipert; Rokeya Sultana Rekha; Hongmei Ren; Jun Ren; Weichao Ren; Tristan Renault; Giorgia Renga; Karen Reue; Kim Rewitz; Bruna Ribeiro de Andrade Ramos; S Amer Riazuddin; Teresa M Ribeiro-Rodrigues; Jean-Ehrland Ricci; Romeo Ricci; Victoria Riccio; Des R Richardson; Yasuko Rikihisa; Makarand V Risbud; Ruth M Risueño; Konstantinos Ritis; Salvatore Rizza; Rosario Rizzuto; Helen C Roberts; Luke D Roberts; Katherine J Robinson; Maria Carmela Roccheri; Stephane Rocchi; George G Rodney; Tiago Rodrigues; Vagner Ramon Rodrigues Silva; Amaia Rodriguez; Ruth Rodriguez-Barrueco; Nieves Rodriguez-Henche; Humberto Rodriguez-Rocha; Jeroen Roelofs; Robert S Rogers; Vladimir V Rogov; Ana I Rojo; Krzysztof Rolka; Vanina Romanello; Luigina Romani; Alessandra Romano; Patricia S Romano; David Romeo-Guitart; Luis C Romero; Montserrat Romero; Joseph C Roney; Christopher Rongo; Sante Roperto; Mathias T Rosenfeldt; Philip Rosenstiel; Anne G Rosenwald; Kevin A Roth; Lynn Roth; Steven Roth; Kasper M A Rouschop; Benoit D Roussel; Sophie Roux; Patrizia Rovere-Querini; Ajit Roy; Aurore Rozieres; Diego Ruano; David C Rubinsztein; Maria P Rubtsova; Klaus Ruckdeschel; Christoph Ruckenstuhl; Emil Rudolf; Rüdiger Rudolf; Alessandra Ruggieri; Avnika Ashok Ruparelia; Paola Rusmini; Ryan R Russell; Gian Luigi Russo; Maria Russo; Rossella Russo; Oxana O Ryabaya; Kevin M Ryan; Kwon-Yul Ryu; Maria Sabater-Arcis; Ulka Sachdev; Michael Sacher; Carsten Sachse; Abhishek Sadhu; Junichi Sadoshima; Nathaniel Safren; Paul Saftig; Antonia P Sagona; Gaurav Sahay; Amirhossein Sahebkar; Mustafa Sahin; Ozgur Sahin; Sumit Sahni; Nayuta Saito; Shigeru Saito; Tsunenori Saito; Ryohei Sakai; Yasuyoshi Sakai; Jun-Ichi Sakamaki; Kalle Saksela; Gloria Salazar; Anna Salazar-Degracia; Ghasem H Salekdeh; Ashok K Saluja; Belém Sampaio-Marques; Maria Cecilia Sanchez; Jose A Sanchez-Alcazar; Victoria Sanchez-Vera; Vanessa Sancho-Shimizu; J Thomas Sanderson; Marco Sandri; Stefano Santaguida; Laura Santambrogio; Magda M Santana; Giorgio Santoni; Alberto Sanz; Pascual Sanz; Shweta Saran; Marco Sardiello; Timothy J Sargeant; Apurva Sarin; Chinmoy Sarkar; Sovan Sarkar; Maria-Rosa Sarrias; Surajit Sarkar; Dipanka Tanu Sarmah; Jaakko Sarparanta; Aishwarya Sathyanarayan; Ranganayaki Sathyanarayanan; K Matthew Scaglione; Francesca Scatozza; Liliana Schaefer; Zachary T Schafer; Ulrich E Schaible; Anthony H V Schapira; Michael Scharl; Hermann M Schatzl; Catherine H Schein; Wiep Scheper; David Scheuring; Maria Vittoria Schiaffino; Monica Schiappacassi; Rainer Schindl; Uwe Schlattner; Oliver Schmidt; Roland Schmitt; Stephen D Schmidt; Ingo Schmitz; Eran Schmukler; Anja Schneider; Bianca E Schneider; Romana Schober; Alejandra C Schoijet; Micah B Schott; Michael Schramm; Bernd Schröder; Kai Schuh; Christoph Schüller; Ryan J Schulze; Lea Schürmanns; Jens C Schwamborn; Melanie Schwarten; Filippo Scialo; Sebastiano Sciarretta; Melanie J Scott; Kathleen W Scotto; A Ivana Scovassi; Andrea Scrima; Aurora Scrivo; David Sebastian; Salwa Sebti; Simon Sedej; Laura Segatori; Nava Segev; Per O Seglen; Iban Seiliez; Ekihiro Seki; Scott B Selleck; Frank W Sellke; Joshua T Selsby; Michael Sendtner; Serif Senturk; Elena Seranova; Consolato Sergi; Ruth Serra-Moreno; Hiromi Sesaki; Carmine Settembre; Subba Rao Gangi Setty; Gianluca Sgarbi; Ou Sha; John J Shacka; Javeed A Shah; Dantong Shang; Changshun Shao; Feng Shao; Soroush Sharbati; Lisa M Sharkey; Dipali Sharma; Gaurav Sharma; Kulbhushan Sharma; Pawan Sharma; Surendra Sharma; Han-Ming Shen; Hongtao Shen; Jiangang Shen; Ming Shen; Weili Shen; Zheni Shen; Rui Sheng; Zhi Sheng; Zu-Hang Sheng; Jianjian Shi; Xiaobing Shi; Ying-Hong Shi; Kahori Shiba-Fukushima; Jeng-Jer Shieh; Yohta Shimada; Shigeomi Shimizu; Makoto Shimozawa; Takahiro Shintani; Christopher J Shoemaker; Shahla Shojaei; Ikuo Shoji; Bhupendra V Shravage; Viji Shridhar; Chih-Wen Shu; Hong-Bing Shu; Ke Shui; Arvind K Shukla; Timothy E Shutt; Valentina Sica; Aleem Siddiqui; Amanda Sierra; Virginia Sierra-Torre; Santiago Signorelli; Payel Sil; Bruno J de Andrade Silva; Johnatas D Silva; Eduardo Silva-Pavez; Sandrine Silvente-Poirot; Rachel E Simmonds; Anna Katharina Simon; Hans-Uwe Simon; Matias Simons; Anurag Singh; Lalit P Singh; Rajat Singh; Shivendra V Singh; Shrawan K Singh; Sudha B Singh; Sunaina Singh; Surinder Pal Singh; Debasish Sinha; Rohit Anthony Sinha; Sangita Sinha; Agnieszka Sirko; Kapil Sirohi; Efthimios L Sivridis; Panagiotis Skendros; Aleksandra Skirycz; Iva Slaninová; Soraya S Smaili; Andrei Smertenko; Matthew D Smith; Stefaan J Soenen; Eun Jung Sohn; Sophia P M Sok; Giancarlo Solaini; Thierry Soldati; Scott A Soleimanpour; Rosa M Soler; Alexei Solovchenko; Jason A Somarelli; Avinash Sonawane; Fuyong Song; Hyun Kyu Song; Ju-Xian Song; Kunhua Song; Zhiyin Song; Leandro R Soria; Maurizio Sorice; Alexander A Soukas; Sandra-Fausia Soukup; Diana Sousa; Nadia Sousa; Paul A Spagnuolo; Stephen A Spector; M M Srinivas Bharath; Daret St Clair; Venturina Stagni; Leopoldo Staiano; Clint A Stalnecker; Metodi V Stankov; Peter B Stathopulos; Katja Stefan; Sven Marcel Stefan; Leonidas Stefanis; Joan S Steffan; Alexander Steinkasserer; Harald Stenmark; Jared Sterneckert; Craig Stevens; Veronika Stoka; Stephan Storch; Björn Stork; Flavie Strappazzon; Anne Marie Strohecker; Dwayne G Stupack; Huanxing Su; Ling-Yan Su; Longxiang Su; Ana M Suarez-Fontes; Carlos S Subauste; Selvakumar Subbian; Paula V Subirada; Ganapasam Sudhandiran; Carolyn M Sue; Xinbing Sui; Corey Summers; Guangchao Sun; Jun Sun; Kang Sun; Meng-Xiang Sun; Qiming Sun; Yi Sun; Zhongjie Sun; Karen K S Sunahara; Eva Sundberg; Katalin Susztak; Peter Sutovsky; Hidekazu Suzuki; Gary Sweeney; J David Symons; Stephen Cho Wing Sze; Nathaniel J Szewczyk; Anna Tabęcka-Łonczynska; Claudio Tabolacci; Frank Tacke; Heinrich Taegtmeyer; Marco Tafani; Mitsuo Tagaya; Haoran Tai; Stephen W G Tait; Yoshinori Takahashi; Szabolcs Takats; Priti Talwar; Chit Tam; Shing Yau Tam; Davide Tampellini; Atsushi Tamura; Chong Teik Tan; Eng-King Tan; Ya-Qin Tan; Masaki Tanaka; Motomasa Tanaka; Daolin Tang; Jingfeng Tang; Tie-Shan Tang; Isei Tanida; Zhipeng Tao; Mohammed Taouis; Lars Tatenhorst; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Allen Taylor; Gregory A Taylor; Joan M Taylor; Elena Tchetina; Andrew R Tee; Irmgard Tegeder; David Teis; Natercia Teixeira; Fatima Teixeira-Clerc; Kumsal A Tekirdag; Tewin Tencomnao; Sandra Tenreiro; Alexei V Tepikin; Pilar S Testillano; Gianluca Tettamanti; Pierre-Louis Tharaux; Kathrin Thedieck; Arvind A Thekkinghat; Stefano Thellung; Josephine W Thinwa; V P Thirumalaikumar; Sufi Mary Thomas; Paul G Thomes; Andrew Thorburn; Lipi Thukral; Thomas Thum; Michael Thumm; Ling Tian; Ales Tichy; Andreas Till; Vincent Timmerman; Vladimir I Titorenko; Sokol V Todi; Krassimira Todorova; Janne M Toivonen; Luana Tomaipitinca; Dhanendra Tomar; Cristina Tomas-Zapico; Sergej Tomić; Benjamin Chun-Kit Tong; Chao Tong; Xin Tong; Sharon A Tooze; Maria L Torgersen; Satoru Torii; Liliana Torres-López; Alicia Torriglia; Christina G Towers; Roberto Towns; Shinya Toyokuni; Vladimir Trajkovic; Donatella Tramontano; Quynh-Giao Tran; Leonardo H Travassos; Charles B Trelford; Shirley Tremel; Ioannis P Trougakos; Betty P Tsao; Mario P Tschan; Hung-Fat Tse; Tak Fu Tse; Hitoshi Tsugawa; Andrey S Tsvetkov; David A Tumbarello; Yasin Tumtas; María J Tuñón; Sandra Turcotte; Boris Turk; Vito Turk; Bradley J Turner; Richard I Tuxworth; Jessica K Tyler; Elena V Tyutereva; Yasuo Uchiyama; Aslihan Ugun-Klusek; Holm H Uhlig; Marzena Ułamek-Kozioł; Ilya V Ulasov; Midori Umekawa; Christian Ungermann; Rei Unno; Sylvie Urbe; Elisabet Uribe-Carretero; Suayib Üstün; Vladimir N Uversky; Thomas Vaccari; Maria I Vaccaro; Björn F Vahsen; Helin Vakifahmetoglu-Norberg; Rut Valdor; Maria J Valente; Ayelén Valko; Richard B Vallee; Angela M Valverde; Greet Van den Berghe; Stijn van der Veen; Luc Van Kaer; Jorg van Loosdregt; Sjoerd J L van Wijk; Wim Vandenberghe; Ilse Vanhorebeek; Marcos A Vannier-Santos; Nicola Vannini; M Cristina Vanrell; Chiara Vantaggiato; Gabriele Varano; Isabel Varela-Nieto; Máté Varga; M Helena Vasconcelos; Somya Vats; Demetrios G Vavvas; Ignacio Vega-Naredo; Silvia Vega-Rubin-de-Celis; Guillermo Velasco; Ariadna P Velázquez; Tibor Vellai; Edo Vellenga; Francesca Velotti; Mireille Verdier; Panayotis Verginis; Isabelle Vergne; Paul Verkade; Manish Verma; Patrik Verstreken; Tim Vervliet; Jörg Vervoorts; Alexandre T Vessoni; Victor M Victor; Michel Vidal; Chiara Vidoni; Otilia V Vieira; Richard D Vierstra; Sonia Viganó; Helena Vihinen; Vinoy Vijayan; Miquel Vila; Marçal Vilar; José M Villalba; Antonio Villalobo; Beatriz Villarejo-Zori; Francesc Villarroya; Joan Villarroya; Olivier Vincent; Cecile Vindis; Christophe Viret; Maria Teresa Viscomi; Dora Visnjic; Ilio Vitale; David J Vocadlo; Olga V Voitsekhovskaja; Cinzia Volonté; Mattia Volta; Marta Vomero; Clarissa Von Haefen; Marc A Vooijs; Wolfgang Voos; Ljubica Vucicevic; Richard Wade-Martins; Satoshi Waguri; Kenrick A Waite; Shuji Wakatsuki; David W Walker; Mark J Walker; Simon A Walker; Jochen Walter; Francisco G Wandosell; Bo Wang; Chao-Yung Wang; Chen Wang; Chenran Wang; Chenwei Wang; Cun-Yu Wang; Dong Wang; Fangyang Wang; Feng Wang; Fengming Wang; Guansong Wang; Han Wang; Hao Wang; Hexiang Wang; Hong-Gang Wang; Jianrong Wang; Jigang Wang; Jiou Wang; Jundong Wang; Kui Wang; Lianrong Wang; Liming Wang; Maggie Haitian Wang; Meiqing Wang; Nanbu Wang; Pengwei Wang; Peipei Wang; Ping Wang; Ping Wang; Qing Jun Wang; Qing Wang; Qing Kenneth Wang; Qiong A Wang; Wen-Tao Wang; Wuyang Wang; Xinnan Wang; Xuejun Wang; Yan Wang; Yanchang Wang; Yanzhuang Wang; Yen-Yun Wang; Yihua Wang; Yipeng Wang; Yu Wang; Yuqi Wang; Zhe Wang; Zhenyu Wang; Zhouguang Wang; Gary Warnes; Verena Warnsmann; Hirotaka Watada; Eizo Watanabe; Maxinne Watchon; Anna Wawrzyńska; Timothy E Weaver; Grzegorz Wegrzyn; Ann M Wehman; Huafeng Wei; Lei Wei; Taotao Wei; Yongjie Wei; Oliver H Weiergräber; Conrad C Weihl; Günther Weindl; Ralf Weiskirchen; Alan Wells; Runxia H Wen; Xin Wen; Antonia Werner; Beatrice Weykopf; Sally P Wheatley; J Lindsay Whitton; Alexander J Whitworth; Katarzyna Wiktorska; Manon E Wildenberg; Tom Wileman; Simon Wilkinson; Dieter Willbold; Brett Williams; Robin S B Williams; Roger L Williams; Peter R Williamson; Richard A Wilson; Beate Winner; Nathaniel J Winsor; Steven S Witkin; Harald Wodrich; Ute Woehlbier; Thomas Wollert; Esther Wong; Jack Ho Wong; Richard W Wong; Vincent Kam Wai Wong; W Wei-Lynn Wong; An-Guo Wu; Chengbiao Wu; Jian Wu; Junfang Wu; Kenneth K Wu; Min Wu; Shan-Ying Wu; Shengzhou Wu; Shu-Yan Wu; Shufang Wu; William K K Wu; Xiaohong Wu; Xiaoqing Wu; Yao-Wen Wu; Yihua Wu; Ramnik J Xavier; Hongguang Xia; Lixin Xia; Zhengyuan Xia; Ge Xiang; Jin Xiang; Mingliang Xiang; Wei Xiang; Bin Xiao; Guozhi Xiao; Hengyi Xiao; Hong-Tao Xiao; Jian Xiao; Lan Xiao; Shi Xiao; Yin Xiao; Baoming Xie; Chuan-Ming Xie; Min Xie; Yuxiang Xie; Zhiping Xie; Zhonglin Xie; Maria Xilouri; Congfeng Xu; En Xu; Haoxing Xu; Jing Xu; JinRong Xu; Liang Xu; Wen Wen Xu; Xiulong Xu; Yu Xue; Sokhna M S Yakhine-Diop; Masamitsu Yamaguchi; Osamu Yamaguchi; Ai Yamamoto; Shunhei Yamashina; Shengmin Yan; Shian-Jang Yan; Zhen Yan; Yasuo Yanagi; Chuanbin Yang; Dun-Sheng Yang; Huan Yang; Huang-Tian Yang; Hui Yang; Jin-Ming Yang; Jing Yang; Jingyu Yang; Ling Yang; Liu Yang; Ming Yang; Pei-Ming Yang; Qian Yang; Seungwon Yang; Shu Yang; Shun-Fa Yang; Wannian Yang; Wei Yuan Yang; Xiaoyong Yang; Xuesong Yang; Yi Yang; Ying Yang; Honghong Yao; Shenggen Yao; Xiaoqiang Yao; Yong-Gang Yao; Yong-Ming Yao; Takahiro Yasui; Meysam Yazdankhah; Paul M Yen; Cong Yi; Xiao-Ming Yin; Yanhai Yin; Zhangyuan Yin; Ziyi Yin; Meidan Ying; Zheng Ying; Calvin K Yip; Stephanie Pei Tung Yiu; Young H Yoo; Kiyotsugu Yoshida; Saori R Yoshii; Tamotsu Yoshimori; Bahman Yousefi; Boxuan Yu; Haiyang Yu; Jun Yu; Jun Yu; Li Yu; Ming-Lung Yu; Seong-Woon Yu; Victor C Yu; W Haung Yu; Zhengping Yu; Zhou Yu; Junying Yuan; Ling-Qing Yuan; Shilin Yuan; Shyng-Shiou F Yuan; Yanggang Yuan; Zengqiang Yuan; Jianbo Yue; Zhenyu Yue; Jeanho Yun; Raymond L Yung; David N Zacks; Gabriele Zaffagnini; Vanessa O Zambelli; Isabella Zanella; Qun S Zang; Sara Zanivan; Silvia Zappavigna; Pilar Zaragoza; Konstantinos S Zarbalis; Amir Zarebkohan; Amira Zarrouk; Scott O Zeitlin; Jialiu Zeng; Ju-Deng Zeng; Eva Žerovnik; Lixuan Zhan; Bin Zhang; Donna D Zhang; Hanlin Zhang; Hong Zhang; Hong Zhang; Honghe Zhang; Huafeng Zhang; Huaye Zhang; Hui Zhang; Hui-Ling Zhang; Jianbin Zhang; Jianhua Zhang; Jing-Pu Zhang; Kalin Y B Zhang; Leshuai W Zhang; Lin Zhang; Lisheng Zhang; Lu Zhang; Luoying Zhang; Menghuan Zhang; Peng Zhang; Sheng Zhang; Wei Zhang; Xiangnan Zhang; Xiao-Wei Zhang; Xiaolei Zhang; Xiaoyan Zhang; Xin Zhang; Xinxin Zhang; Xu Dong Zhang; Yang Zhang; Yanjin Zhang; Yi Zhang; Ying-Dong Zhang; Yingmei Zhang; Yuan-Yuan Zhang; Yuchen Zhang; Zhe Zhang; Zhengguang Zhang; Zhibing Zhang; Zhihai Zhang; Zhiyong Zhang; Zili Zhang; Haobin Zhao; Lei Zhao; Shuang Zhao; Tongbiao Zhao; Xiao-Fan Zhao; Ying Zhao; Yongchao Zhao; Yongliang Zhao; Yuting Zhao; Guoping Zheng; Kai Zheng; Ling Zheng; Shizhong Zheng; Xi-Long Zheng; Yi Zheng; Zu-Guo Zheng; Boris Zhivotovsky; Qing Zhong; Ao Zhou; Ben Zhou; Cefan Zhou; Gang Zhou; Hao Zhou; Hong Zhou; Hongbo Zhou; Jie Zhou; Jing Zhou; Jing Zhou; Jiyong Zhou; Kailiang Zhou; Rongjia Zhou; Xu-Jie Zhou; Yanshuang Zhou; Yinghong Zhou; Yubin Zhou; Zheng-Yu Zhou; Zhou Zhou; Binglin Zhu; Changlian Zhu; Guo-Qing Zhu; Haining Zhu; Hongxin Zhu; Hua Zhu; Wei-Guo Zhu; Yanping Zhu; Yushan Zhu; Haixia Zhuang; Xiaohong Zhuang; Katarzyna Zientara-Rytter; Christine M Zimmermann; Elena Ziviani; Teresa Zoladek; Wei-Xing Zong; Dmitry B Zorov; Antonio Zorzano; Weiping Zou; Zhen Zou; Zhengzhi Zou; Steven Zuryn; Werner Zwerschke; Beate Brand-Saberi; X Charlie Dong; Chandra Shekar Kenchappa; Zuguo Li; Yong Lin; Shigeru Oshima; Yueguang Rong; Judith C Sluimer; Christina L Stallings; Chun-Kit Tong
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 13.391

5.  A phosphoswitch at acinus-serine437 controls autophagic responses to cadmium exposure and neurodegenerative stress.

Authors:  Nilay Nandi; Zuhair Zaidi; Charles Tracy; Helmut Krämer
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 6.  The Intricate Interplay between Cell Cycle Regulators and Autophagy in Cancer.

Authors:  Dorian V Ziegler; Katharina Huber; Lluis Fajas
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  BmCDK5 Affects Cell Proliferation and Cytoskeleton Morphology by Interacting with BmCNN in Bombyx mori.

Authors:  Yi Wei; Xiaolin Zhou; Peng Chen; Xia Jiang; Ziyi Jiang; Zhanqi Dong; Minhui Pan; Cheng Lu
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Decreased MEF2A Expression Regulated by Its Enhancer Methylation Inhibits Autophagy and May Play an Important Role in the Progression of Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Hui Li; Feng Wang; Xuqi Guo; Yugang Jiang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Hyperactive Innate Immunity Causes Degeneration of Dopamine Neurons upon Altering Activity of Cdk5.

Authors:  Arvind Kumar Shukla; Joshua Spurrier; Irina Kuzina; Edward Giniger
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 10.  Selective Autophagy Regulates Cell Cycle in Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Kai Zheng; Zhendan He; Kaio Kitazato; Yifei Wang
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 11.556

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.