Literature DB >> 29226857

Prostate cancer detection using machine learning techniques by employing combination of features extracting strategies.

Lal Hussain1,2, Adeel Ahmed2, Sharjil Saeed2, Saima Rathore3, Imtiaz Ahmed Awan2, Saeed Arif Shah2, Abdul Majid2, Adnan Idris4, Anees Ahmed Awan2.   

Abstract

Prostate is a second leading causes of cancer deaths among men. Early detection of cancer can effectively reduce the rate of mortality caused by Prostate cancer. Due to high and multiresolution of MRIs from prostate cancer require a proper diagnostic systems and tools. In the past researchers developed Computer aided diagnosis (CAD) systems that help the radiologist to detect the abnormalities. In this research paper, we have employed novel Machine learning techniques such as Bayesian approach, Support vector machine (SVM) kernels: polynomial, radial base function (RBF) and Gaussian and Decision Tree for detecting prostate cancer. Moreover, different features extracting strategies are proposed to improve the detection performance. The features extracting strategies are based on texture, morphological, scale invariant feature transform (SIFT), and elliptic Fourier descriptors (EFDs) features. The performance was evaluated based on single as well as combination of features using Machine Learning Classification techniques. The Cross validation (Jack-knife k-fold) was performed and performance was evaluated in term of receiver operating curve (ROC) and specificity, sensitivity, Positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), false positive rate (FPR). Based on single features extracting strategies, SVM Gaussian Kernel gives the highest accuracy of 98.34% with AUC of 0.999. While, using combination of features extracting strategies, SVM Gaussian kernel with texture + morphological, and EFDs + morphological features give the highest accuracy of 99.71% and AUC of 1.00.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian approach; Prostate cancer; and elliptic fourier descriptors (EFDs); decision tree; morphological; scale invariant feature transform (SIFT); support vector machine (SVM); texture

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29226857     DOI: 10.3233/CBM-170643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Biomark        ISSN: 1574-0153            Impact factor:   4.388


  9 in total

1.  Detecting prostate cancer using deep learning convolution neural network with transfer learning approach.

Authors:  Adeel Ahmed Abbasi; Lal Hussain; Imtiaz Ahmed Awan; Imran Abbasi; Abdul Majid; Malik Sajjad Ahmed Nadeem; Quratul-Ain Chaudhary
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  Classify multicategory outcome in patients with lung adenocarcinoma using clinical, transcriptomic and clinico-transcriptomic data: machine learning versus multinomial models.

Authors:  Fei Deng; Lanlan Shen; He Wang; Lanjing Zhang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 6.166

3.  Different models for prediction of radical cystectomy postoperative complications and care pathways.

Authors:  Jacob Taylor; Xiaosong Meng; Audrey Renson; Angela B Smith; James S Wysock; Samir S Taneja; William C Huang; Marc A Bjurlin
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2019-09-19

4.  Detection of Dominant Intra-prostatic Lesions in Patients With Prostate Cancer Using an Artificial Neural Network and MR Multi-modal Radiomics Analysis.

Authors:  Hassan Bagher-Ebadian; Branislava Janic; Chang Liu; Milan Pantelic; David Hearshen; Mohamed Elshaikh; Benjamin Movsas; Indrin J Chetty; Ning Wen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Machine-learning classification of texture features of portable chest X-ray accurately classifies COVID-19 lung infection.

Authors:  Lal Hussain; Tony Nguyen; Haifang Li; Adeel A Abbasi; Kashif J Lone; Zirun Zhao; Mahnoor Zaib; Anne Chen; Tim Q Duong
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  Bayesian dynamic profiling and optimization of important ranked energy from gray level co-occurrence (GLCM) features for empirical analysis of brain MRI.

Authors:  Lal Hussain; Areej A Malibari; Jaber S Alzahrani; Mohamed Alamgeer; Marwa Obayya; Fahd N Al-Wesabi; Heba Mohsen; Manar Ahmed Hamza
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Machine learning classification of texture features of MRI breast tumor and peri-tumor of combined pre- and early treatment predicts pathologic complete response.

Authors:  Lal Hussain; Pauline Huang; Tony Nguyen; Kashif J Lone; Amjad Ali; Muhammad Salman Khan; Haifang Li; Doug Young Suh; Tim Q Duong
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Comparing different supervised machine learning algorithms for disease prediction.

Authors:  Shahadat Uddin; Arif Khan; Md Ekramul Hossain; Mohammad Ali Moni
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  A New Framework for Precise Identification of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Sarah M Ayyad; Mohamed A Badawy; Mohamed Shehata; Ahmed Alksas; Ali Mahmoud; Mohamed Abou El-Ghar; Mohammed Ghazal; Moumen El-Melegy; Nahla B Abdel-Hamid; Labib M Labib; H Arafat Ali; Ayman El-Baz
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 3.576

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.