Literature DB >> 29226368

Applicability of the fish embryo acute toxicity (FET) test (OECD 236) in the regulatory context of Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation, and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH).

Marta Sobanska1, Stefan Scholz2, Anna-Maija Nyman1, Romanas Cesnaitis1, Simon Gutierrez Alonso1, Nils Klüver3, Ralph Kühne4, Henrik Tyle5, Joop de Knecht6, Zhichao Dang6, Ivar Lundbergh7, Claudio Carlon1, Wim De Coen1.   

Abstract

In 2013 the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) test guideline (236) for fish embryo acute toxicity (FET) was adopted. It determines the acute toxicity of chemicals to embryonic fish. Previous studies show a good correlation of FET with the standard acute fish toxicity (AFT) test; however, the potential of the FET test to predict AFT, which is required by the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation, and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) regulation (EC 1907/2006) and the Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation (EC 1272/2008), has not yet been fully clarified. In 2015 the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) requested that a consultant perform a scientific analysis of the applicability of FET to predict AFT. The purpose was to compare the toxicity of substances to fish embryos and to adult fish, and to investigate whether certain factors (e.g., physicochemical properties, modes of action, or chemical structures) could be used to define the applicability boundaries of the FET test. Given the limited data availability, the analysis focused on organic substances. The present critical review summarizes the main findings and discusses regulatory application of the FET test under REACH. Given some limitations (e.g., neurotoxic mode of action) and/or remaining uncertainties (e.g., deviation of some narcotic substances), it has been found that the FET test alone is currently not sufficient to meet the essential information on AFT as required by the REACH regulation. However, the test may be used within weight-of-evidence approaches together with other independent, relevant, and reliable sources of information. The present review also discusses further research needs that may overcome the remaining uncertainties and help to increase acceptance of FET as a replacement for AFT in the future. For example, an increase in the availability of data generated according to OECD test guideline 236 may provide evidence of a higher predictive power of the test. Environ Toxicol Chem 2018;37:657-670.
© 2017 SETAC. © 2017 SETAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alternative methods; Aquatic toxicology; Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals; Evaluation; Fish embryo toxicity; Hazard/risk assessment; Predictive toxicology; REACH regulation; Registration

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29226368     DOI: 10.1002/etc.4055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  12 in total

1.  Toward an AOP Network-Based Tiered Testing Strategy for the Assessment of Thyroid Hormone Disruption.

Authors:  Dries Knapen; Evelyn Stinckens; Jenna E Cavallin; Gerald T Ankley; Henrik Holbech; Daniel L Villeneuve; Lucia Vergauwen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 2.  Zebrafish Behavioral Assays in Toxicology.

Authors:  Subham Dasgupta; Michael T Simonich; Robyn L Tanguay
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

3.  Sensitivity of zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos to hospital effluent compared to Daphnia magna and Aliivibrio fischeri.

Authors:  M Wittlerová; G Jírová; A Vlková; K Kejlová; M Malý; T Heinonen; Zdeňka Wittlingerová; M Zimová
Journal:  Physiol Res       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 1.881

4.  Embryonic Zebrafish Model - A Well-Established Method for Rapidly Assessing the Toxicity of Homeopathic Drugs: - Toxicity Evaluation of Homeopathic Drugs Using Zebrafish Embryo Model.

Authors:  Himanshu R Gupta; Yogesh Patil; Dipty Singh; Mansee Thakur
Journal:  J Pharmacopuncture       Date:  2016-12

5.  A Critical Review of Organic Ultraviolet Filter Exposure, Hazard, and Risk to Corals.

Authors:  Carys L Mitchelmore; Emily E Burns; Annaleise Conway; Andrew Heyes; Iain A Davies
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.742

6.  Garvicin KS, a Broad-Spectrum Bacteriocin Protects Zebrafish Larvae against Lactococcus garvieae Infection.

Authors:  Saurabh Dubey; Dzung B Diep; Øystein Evensen; Hetron M Munang'andu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Toxicity testing of pesticides in zebrafish-a systematic review on chemicals and associated toxicological endpoints.

Authors:  Íris Flávia Sousa Gonçalves; Terezinha Maria Souza; Leonardo Rogério Vieira; Filipi Calbaizer Marchi; Adailton Pascoal Nascimento; Davi Felipe Farias
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  A metal-free blue chromophore derived from plant pigments.

Authors:  B C Freitas-Dörr; C O Machado; A C Pinheiro; A B Fernandes; F A Dörr; E Pinto; M Lopes-Ferreira; M Abdellah; J Sá; L C Russo; F L Forti; L C P Gonçalves; E L Bastos
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  Enhancement of oral bioavailability and anti-Parkinsonian efficacy of resveratrol through a nanocrystal formulation.

Authors:  Sha Xiong; Wei Liu; Yile Zhou; Yousheng Mo; Yao Liu; Xiaojia Chen; Huafeng Pan; Dongsheng Yuan; Qi Wang; Tongkai Chen
Journal:  Asian J Pharm Sci       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 6.598

Review 10.  Cytochrome P450-dependent biotransformation capacities in embryonic, juvenile and adult stages of zebrafish (Danio rerio)-a state-of-the-art review.

Authors:  Ann-Kathrin Loerracher; Thomas Braunbeck
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-06-20       Impact factor: 5.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.