Jennifer Anne Doherty1, Lauren Cole Peres2, Chen Wang3, Gregory P Way4, Casey S Greene4, Joellen M Schildkraut2. 1. Department of Population Health Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope, Rm 4125, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112. 2. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 800765, Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903. 3. Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 4. Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Only recently has it become clear that epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is comprised of such distinct histotypes--with different cells of origin, morphology, molecular features, epidemiologic factors, clinical features, and survival patterns-that they can be thought of as different diseases sharing an anatomical location. Herein, we review opportunities and challenges in studying EOC heterogeneity. RECENT FINDINGS: The 2014 World Health Organization diagnostic guidelines incorporate accumulated evidence that high- and low-grade serous tumors have different underlying pathogenesis, and that, on the basis of shared molecular features, most high grade tumors, including some previously classified as endometrioid, are now considered to be high-grade serous. At the same time, several studies have reported that high-grade serous EOC, which is the most common histotype, is itself made up of reproducible subtypes discernable by gene expression patterns. SUMMARY: These major advances in understanding set the stage for a new era of research on EOC risk and clinical outcomes with the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality. We highlight the need for multidisciplinary studies with pathology review using the current guidelines, further molecular characterization of the histotypes and subtypes, inclusion of women of diverse racial/ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds, and updated epidemiologic and clinical data relevant to current generations of women at risk of EOC.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Only recently has it become clear that epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is comprised of such distinct histotypes--with different cells of origin, morphology, molecular features, epidemiologic factors, clinical features, and survival patterns-that they can be thought of as different diseases sharing an anatomical location. Herein, we review opportunities and challenges in studying EOC heterogeneity. RECENT FINDINGS: The 2014 World Health Organization diagnostic guidelines incorporate accumulated evidence that high- and low-grade serous tumors have different underlying pathogenesis, and that, on the basis of shared molecular features, most high grade tumors, including some previously classified as endometrioid, are now considered to be high-grade serous. At the same time, several studies have reported that high-grade serous EOC, which is the most common histotype, is itself made up of reproducible subtypes discernable by gene expression patterns. SUMMARY: These major advances in understanding set the stage for a new era of research on EOC risk and clinical outcomes with the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality. We highlight the need for multidisciplinary studies with pathology review using the current guidelines, further molecular characterization of the histotypes and subtypes, inclusion of women of diverse racial/ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds, and updated epidemiologic and clinical data relevant to current generations of women at risk of EOC.
Authors: Roman Rouzier; Charles M Perou; W Fraser Symmans; Nuhad Ibrahim; Massimo Cristofanilli; Keith Anderson; Kenneth R Hess; James Stec; Mark Ayers; Peter Wagner; Paolo Morandi; Chang Fan; Islam Rabiul; Jeffrey S Ross; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Lajos Pusztai Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-08-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Christopher P Crum; Ronny Drapkin; Alexander Miron; Tan A Ince; Michael Muto; David W Kindelberger; Yonghee Lee Journal: Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 1.927
Authors: Xiaohong R Yang; Mark E Sherman; David L Rimm; Jolanta Lissowska; Louise A Brinton; Beata Peplonska; Stephen M Hewitt; William F Anderson; Neonila Szeszenia-Dabrowska; Alicja Bardin-Mikolajczak; Witold Zatonski; Richard Cartun; Daniza Mandich; Grzegorz Rymkiewicz; Marcin Ligaj; Stanislaw Lukaszek; Radzisaw Kordek; Montserrat García-Closas Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: J M Piek; P J van Diest; R P Zweemer; J W Jansen; R J Poort-Keesom; F H Menko; J J Gille; A P Jongsma; G Pals; P Kenemans; R H Verheijen Journal: J Pathol Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Lisa A Carey; E Claire Dees; Lynda Sawyer; Lisa Gatti; Dominic T Moore; Frances Collichio; David W Ollila; Carolyn I Sartor; Mark L Graham; Charles M Perou Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-04-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: William E Winter; G Larry Maxwell; Chunqiao Tian; Jay W Carlson; Robert F Ozols; Peter G Rose; Maurie Markman; Deborah K Armstrong; Franco Muggia; William P McGuire Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-08-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Viviane Hess; Roger A'Hern; Nazar Nasiri; D Michael King; Peter R Blake; Desmond P J Barton; John H Shepherd; T Ind; J Bridges; K Harrington; Stanley B Kaye; Martin E Gore Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Joellen M Schildkraut; Lauren C Peres; Traci N Bethea; Fabian Camacho; Deanna Chyn; Emily K Cloyd; Elisa V Bandera; Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel; Loren Lipworth; Charlotte E Joslin; Faith G Davis; Patricia G Moorman; Evan Myers; Heather M Ochs-Balcom; Veronica Wendy Setiawan; Malcolm C Pike; Anna H Wu; Lynn Rosenberg Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2019-06-24 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Lauren C Peres; Kara L Cushing-Haugen; Michael Anglesio; Kristine Wicklund; Rex Bentley; Andrew Berchuck; Linda E Kelemen; Tayyebeh M Nazeran; C Blake Gilks; Holly R Harris; David G Huntsman; Joellen M Schildkraut; Mary Anne Rossing; Martin Köbel; Jennifer A Doherty Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2018-08-16 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Jennifer A Doherty; Allan Jensen; Linda E Kelemen; Celeste L Pearce; Elizabeth Poole; Joellen M Schildkraut; Kathryn L Terry; Shelley S Tworoger; Penelope M Webb; Nicolas Wentzensen Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 13.506