Literature DB >> 29225780

The decision to delivery interval in emergency caesarean sections: Impact of anaesthetic technique and work shift.

Anette Hein1, David Thalen1, Ylva Eriksson1, Jan G Jakobsson1.   

Abstract

Background: One important task of the emergency anaesthesia service is to provide rapid, safe and effective anaesthesia for emergency caesarean sections (ECS). A Decision to Delivery Interval (DDI) <30 minutes for ECS is a quality indicator for this service. The aim of this study was to assess the DDI and the impact of chosen anaesthetic technique (general anaesthesia (GA), spinal anaesthesia (SPA) with opioid supplementation, or "top-up" of labour epidural analgesia (tEDA) with local anaesthesia and fentanyl mixture) and work shift for ECS at Danderyds Hospital, Sweden.
Methods: A retrospective chart review of ECS at Danderyds Hospital was performed between January and October 2016. Time between decision for CS, start of anaesthesia, time for incision and delivery, type of anaesthetic technique, and time of day, working hours or on call and day of week, Monday - Friday, and weekend was compiled and analysed. Time events are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Non-parametric tests were used.
Results: In total, 135 ECS were analysed: 92% of the cases were delivered within 30 minutes and mean DDI for all cases was 17.3±8.1 minutes. GA shortened the DDI by 10 and 13 minutes compared to SPA and tEDA (p<0.0005). DDI for SPA and tEDA did not differ. There was no difference in DDI regarding time of day or weekday. Apgar <7 at 5' was more commonly seen in ECS having GA (11 out of 64) compared to SPA (2/30) and tEDA (1/41) (p<0.05).
Conclusion: GA shortens the DDI for ECS, but the use of SPA as well as tEDA with opioid supplementation maintains a short DDI and should be considered when time allows. Top-up epidural did not prolong the DDI compared to SPA. The day of week or time of ECS had no influence on the anaesthesia service as measured by the DDI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caesarean section; anaesthesia; time factors

Year:  2017        PMID: 29225780     DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.13058.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  F1000Res        ISSN: 2046-1402


  5 in total

Review 1.  Review of evidences for management of rapid sequence spinal anesthesia for category one cesarean section, in resource limiting setting.

Authors:  Abatneh Feleke Agegnehu; Amare Hailekiros Gebregzi; Nigussie Simeneh Endalew
Journal:  Int J Surg Open       Date:  2020-09-03

2.  Evaluating the Decision-to-Delivery Interval in Emergency Cesarean Sections and its Impact on Neonatal Outcome.

Authors:  Janna-Alica Brandt; Bernd Morgenstern; Fabinshy Thangarajah; Berthold GrÜttner; Sebastian Ludwig; Christian Eichler; Jessika Ratiu; Peter Mallmann; Dominik Ratiu
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Decision to Delivery Interval, Fetal Outcomes and Its Factors Among Emergency Caesarean Section Deliveries at South Gondar Zone Hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study, 2020.

Authors:  Alemu Degu Ayele; Bekalu Getnet Kassa; Gedefaye Nibret Mihretie; Fentahun Yenealem Beyene
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2021-04-28

4.  General Versus Regional Anesthesia for Emergency Cesarean Delivery in a High-volume High-resource Referral Center: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kenas Wiskott; Raed Jebrin; Daniel Ioscovich; Sorina Grisaru-Granovsky; Aharon Tevet; Daniel Shatalin; Alexander Ioscovich
Journal:  Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2020-12-31

5.  Evaluation of decision to delivery time interval and its effect on feto-maternal outcomes and associated factors in category-1 emergency caesarean section deliveries: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Mamaru Mollalign Temesgen; Amare Hailekirose Gebregzi; Habtamu Getinet Kasahun; Seid Adem Ahmed; Yophtahe Berhe Woldegerima
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 3.007

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.