| Literature DB >> 29225763 |
Helena J R Einzmann1, Gerhard Zotz1,2.
Abstract
The ongoing destruction of old-growth forests puts tropical forest species under great pressure because of the resulting habitat loss. A pre-requisite for the maintenance of a viable metacommunity in a fragmented landscape is the connectivity between habitable patches. We experimentally studied four vital steps of epiphyte dispersal in different habitat types in western Panama. (i) Seed falling velocity (Vterm) is known to correlate with long-distance dispersal via convective updraft. All measured Vterm of bromeliad and orchid seeds fell into a range of velocities with a high chance of long-distance dispersal. (ii) We quantified attachment success of bromeliad seeds as a function of bark rugosity with >30 common tree species in the region. Even fine bark structure allowed effective attachment. (iii and iv) Successful establishment is achieved when a seed germinates and a plantlet grows and survives. Germination success and early establishment of four bromeliad species did not differ between isolated trees, teak plantations or secondary forest patches. Microclimatic differences between habitat types were marginal and neither germination nor establishment correlated significantly with annual precipitation. The findings suggest a large capacity for dispersal and successful early establishment for these anemochorous species. A potentially regenerating forest may receive considerable input from sources such as pasture trees and in this way gain structural complexity, which also greatly enhances its value for other forest organisms.Entities:
Keywords: Fragmentation; land-use change; microclimate; seed dispersal; tropics
Year: 2017 PMID: 29225763 PMCID: PMC5714248 DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plx052
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AoB Plants Impact factor: 3.276
Distribution and number of experimental sites of the germination and establishment experiments.
| Habitat/host tree | Precipitation level (mm a−1) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ≤1480 | 1520–3000 | >3200 | |
| Isolated trees | |||
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Plantation trees | |||
|
| 2 | 3 | 1 |
| Undetermined forest species | 3 | 2 | 2 |
Colonization success and falling velocity of seeds of five orchid and eight bromeliad species. For calculation of colonization success see Methods section. For Orchidaceae Vterm are derived from the regression equation of the respective power function solved for a single seed ([see , n = number of data points). For Bromeliaceae Vterm are means ± SD, n = sample size.
| Taxon | Colonization success (%) |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Orchidaceae | |||
|
| 68 | 0.13 | 40 |
|
| 188 | 0.22 | 30 |
|
| 52 | 0.17 | 20 |
|
| 90 | 0.20 | 40 |
|
| 48 | 0.08 | 40 |
| Bromeliaceae | |||
|
| 288 | 0.16 ± 0.03 | 30 |
|
| 29 | 0.21 ± 0.03 | 10 |
|
| 68 | 0.27 ± 0.05 | 10 |
|
| 45 | 0.22 ± 0.05 | 30 |
|
| 32 | 0.29 ± 0.07 | 20 |
|
| 50 | 0.22 ± 0.06 | 10 |
|
| 53 | 0.25 ± 0.06 | 30 |
|
| 35 | 0.31 ± 0.05 | 20 |
Figure 1.Daily precipitation during the study period for five cities within the study region. Extreme rainfall events (marked with an asterisk) in Santiago (360 mm on 12 December 2013) and Tonosí (almost 180 mm on 24 October 2012) are not fully displayed for better comparability of the plots. For Tonosí no data are available for almost the whole rainy season 2013. Figures within graph indicate annual precipitation of the respective years.
Microclimate within tree crowns of three different habitat types. Measurements were conducted in isolated trees, teak plantations, and secondary forest patches. Data from months of transition from dry to rainy seasons and vice versa were excluded. Data are means ± SD. Sample size is given as the number of days (No. days) separated for light and temperature and relative humidity (T-RH). For statistical treatment (see Supporting Information Fig. S7).
| No. days light | Light (klx) | No. days T-RH | Temp. (°C) | Relative humidity (%) | Minimum RH (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Isolated trees | ||||||
| | 588 | 13.4 ± 6.2 | 688 | 26.8 ± 1.0 | 77.3 ± 8.5 | 54.2 ± 8.4 |
| | 19 | 12.6 ± 3.3 | 21 | 26.6 ± 0.6 | 72.3 ± 9.1 | 53.9 ± 5.7 |
| | 21 | n.a. | 40 | 26.3 ± 0.4 | 82.3 ± 2.9 | 56.1 ± 5.5 |
| Plantation trees | ||||||
| | 245 | 32.4 ± 8.8 | 259 | 27.0 ± 1.3 | 76.4 ± 8.6 | 47.6 ± 10.6 |
| Undetermined forest trees | 259 | 15.6 ± 6.4 | 307 | 26.1 ± 1.0 | 79.6 ± 6.5 | 59.3 ± 6.2 |
|
| ||||||
| Isolated trees | ||||||
| | 2299 | 8.5 ± 5.5 | 2715 | 25.5 ± 0.9 | 92.7 ± 11.4 | 70.9 ± 19.8 |
| | 183 | 4.3 ± 1.5 | 176 | 25.2 ± 0.7 | 97.0 ± 3.7 | 79.5 ± 7.4 |
| | 359 | 9.5 ± 4.5 | 359 | 25.8 ± 0.8 | 94.2 ± 3.3 | 71.6 ± 7.4 |
| Plantation trees | ||||||
| | 1415 | 9.3 ± 5.6 | 1415 | 25.5 ± 0.9 | 91.3 ± 16.5 | 71.1 ± 24.4 |
| Undetermined forest trees | 1291 | 6.6 ± 3.4 | 1479 | 25.1 ± 1.1 | 95.6 ± 3.7 | 78.1 ± 8.6 |
Figure 2.Segmented regression of mean seed adherence and bark rugosity of 33 tree species. Within the first segment there was a significant increase of mean seed adherence with rugosity. Data are means (n = 5). For error terms [see .