Claire E Witherel1, Tony Yu1, Mark Concannon1, Will Dampier2, Kara L Spiller1. 1. School of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Health Systems, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. 2. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Chronic wounds remain a major clinical challenge. Human cryopreserved viable amniotic membrane (hCVAM) is among the most successful therapies, but the mechanisms of action remain loosely defined. Because proper regulation of macrophage behavior is critical for wound healing with biomaterial therapies, we hypothesized that hCVAM would positively regulate macrophage behavior in vitro, and that soluble factors released from the hCVAM would be important for this effect. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Primary human pro-inflammatory (M1) macrophages were seeded directly onto intact hCVAM or cultured in separation via transwell inserts (Soluble Factors) in the presence of pro-inflammatory stimuli (interferon-γ and lipopolysaccharide) to simulate the chronic wound environment. Macrophages were characterized after 1 and 6 days using multiplex gene expression analysis of 37 macrophage phenotype- and angiogenesis-related genes via NanoString™, and protein content from conditioned media collected at days 1, 3 and 6 was analyzed via enzyme linked immunosorbent assays. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Gene expression analysis showed that Soluble Factors promoted significant upregulation of pro-inflammatory marker IL1B on day 1 yet downregulation of TNF on day 6 compared to the M1 macrophage control. In contrast, intact hCVAM, which includes both extracellular matrix, viable cells, and soluble factors, promoted downregulation of pro-inflammatory markers TNF, CCL5 and CCR7 on day 1 and endothelial receptor TIE1 on day 6, and upregulation of the anti-inflammatory marker IL10 on day 6 compared to the M1 Control. Other genes related to inflammation and angiogenesis (MMP9, VEGF, SPP1, TGFB1, etc.) were differentially regulated between the Soluble Factors and intact hCVAM groups at both time points, though they were not expressed at significantly different levels compared to the M1 Control. Interestingly, Soluble Factors promoted increased secretion of the proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), while direct contact with hCVAM inhibited secretion of TNF, relative to the M1 Control. Both Soluble Factors and intact hCVAM inhibited secretion of MMP9 and VEGF, pro-inflammatory proteins that are critical for angiogenesis and remodeling, compared to the M1 Control, with intact hCVAM having a stronger effect. CONCLUSIONS: In a simulated pro-inflammatory environment, intact hCVAM has distinct anti-inflammatory effects on primary human macrophages, and direct macrophage contact with intact hCVAM is required for these effects. These findings are important for the design of next generation immunomodulatory biomaterials for wound repair and regenerative medicine that may include living cells, soluble factors, or a controlled drug delivery system.
INTRODUCTION: Chronic wounds remain a major clinical challenge. Human cryopreserved viable amniotic membrane (hCVAM) is among the most successful therapies, but the mechanisms of action remain loosely defined. Because proper regulation of macrophage behavior is critical for wound healing with biomaterial therapies, we hypothesized that hCVAM would positively regulate macrophage behavior in vitro, and that soluble factors released from the hCVAM would be important for this effect. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Primary human pro-inflammatory (M1) macrophages were seeded directly onto intact hCVAM or cultured in separation via transwell inserts (Soluble Factors) in the presence of pro-inflammatory stimuli (interferon-γ and lipopolysaccharide) to simulate the chronic wound environment. Macrophages were characterized after 1 and 6 days using multiplex gene expression analysis of 37 macrophage phenotype- and angiogenesis-related genes via NanoString™, and protein content from conditioned media collected at days 1, 3 and 6 was analyzed via enzyme linked immunosorbent assays. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Gene expression analysis showed that Soluble Factors promoted significant upregulation of pro-inflammatory marker IL1B on day 1 yet downregulation of TNF on day 6 compared to the M1 macrophage control. In contrast, intact hCVAM, which includes both extracellular matrix, viable cells, and soluble factors, promoted downregulation of pro-inflammatory markers TNF, CCL5 and CCR7 on day 1 and endothelial receptor TIE1 on day 6, and upregulation of the anti-inflammatory marker IL10 on day 6 compared to the M1 Control. Other genes related to inflammation and angiogenesis (MMP9, VEGF, SPP1, TGFB1, etc.) were differentially regulated between the Soluble Factors and intact hCVAM groups at both time points, though they were not expressed at significantly different levels compared to the M1 Control. Interestingly, Soluble Factors promoted increased secretion of the proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), while direct contact with hCVAM inhibited secretion of TNF, relative to the M1 Control. Both Soluble Factors and intact hCVAM inhibited secretion of MMP9 and VEGF, pro-inflammatory proteins that are critical for angiogenesis and remodeling, compared to the M1 Control, with intact hCVAM having a stronger effect. CONCLUSIONS: In a simulated pro-inflammatory environment, intact hCVAM has distinct anti-inflammatory effects on primary human macrophages, and direct macrophage contact with intact hCVAM is required for these effects. These findings are important for the design of next generation immunomodulatory biomaterials for wound repair and regenerative medicine that may include living cells, soluble factors, or a controlled drug delivery system.
Authors: Stephen F Badylak; Jolene E Valentin; Anjani K Ravindra; George P McCabe; Ann M Stewart-Akers Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Jason D Roh; Rajendra Sawh-Martinez; Matthew P Brennan; Steven M Jay; Lesley Devine; Deepak A Rao; Tai Yi; Tamar L Mirensky; Ani Nalbandian; Brooks Udelsman; Narutoshi Hibino; Toshiharu Shinoka; W Mark Saltzman; Edward Snyder; Themis R Kyriakides; Jordan S Pober; Christopher K Breuer Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-03-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Chandan K Sen; Gayle M Gordillo; Sashwati Roy; Robert Kirsner; Lynn Lambert; Thomas K Hunt; Finn Gottrup; Geoffrey C Gurtner; Michael T Longaker Journal: Wound Repair Regen Date: 2009 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.617
Authors: Yi Duan-Arnold; Alexandra Gyurdieva; Amy Johnson; Thomas E Uveges; Douglas A Jacobstein; Alla Danilkovitch Journal: Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Rodrigo N Riedel; Antonio Pérez-Pérez; Víctor Sánchez-Margalet; Cecilia L Varone; Julieta L Maymó Journal: Stem Cell Res Ther Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 6.832
Authors: Alfredo Domínguez-López; Fátima Sofía Magaña-Guerrero; Beatriz Buentello-Volante; Luis Antonio Bautista-Hernández; Juan Pablo Reyes-Grajeda; Víctor Manuel Bautista-de Lucio; Yonathan Garfias Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 2.367
Authors: Sandeep Dhall; Malathi Sathyamoorthy; Jin-Qiang Kuang; Tyler Hoffman; Matthew Moorman; Anne Lerch; Vimal Jacob; Steven Michael Sinclair; Alla Danilkovitch Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-10-02 Impact factor: 3.240