| Literature DB >> 29225428 |
Naresh Kumar Manda1, Venkata Bala Sai Chaitanya Thunuguntla1, Chandrasekhar Bokka1, Bondili Jayakumar Singh1.
Abstract
Ymr210w was identified as a MAG (Monoacylglycerol) lipase. The accumulation of the phospholipids in the ymr210wΔ was not clearly understood. It was expressed in S. cerevisiae using pYES2/CT vector and His-tag purified recombinant protein confirmed TAG lipase activity. To further evaluate the role of YMR210w, ester hydrolase activity was also confirmed with pNP-acetate, pNP-butyrate and pNP - palmitate. GC-MS lipid profiling of ymr210wΔ showed an increase in the 15:0 Pentadecanoic acid by 76% among the total lipids. Phospholipid, Erucic acid 22:1 (Δ13) showed 43% increase while steryl esters showed significant changes with 16:0 hexadecanoic acid augmentations by 80% and 18:0 Octadecanoic acid by 165% when compared to wild type (WT). Increase in the steryl ester and TAG content supports the accumulation of lipid bodies in ymr210wΔ strain when compared with WT cells.Entities:
Keywords: Ester Hydrolase; Lipid droplets; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Steryl esters; TAG Lipase; Triacylglycerols
Year: 2017 PMID: 29225428 PMCID: PMC5712780 DOI: 10.6026/97320630013360
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioinformation ISSN: 0973-2063
Figure 1pH and Temperature optimum: (A) Represnts pH optimum and (B) Temperature optimum for Ester hydrolase activity of ymr210wp with pNPA, pNPB and pNPP substrates. The ymr210wp has optimum activity with pH 7.5 and temperature 30°C for the substrates pNPA and pNPB. Whereas, with pNPP ymr210wp showed maximum activity at pH 8.5 and temperature 45°C.
Kinetic parameters of YMR210wp
| Substrate | Km (mM) | Vmax (s-1) | kcat/Km (mM-1s-1) |
| pNPA | 11.51±1.09 | 0.26±0.03 | 117 |
| pNPB | 7.28±1.61 | 0.18±0.03 | 128 |
| pNPP | 13.19±1.03 | 0.33±0.05 | 130 |
Figure 2TAG and SE lipid profiles showing variations: GC-MS analysis of FAMEs was performed on Agilent 6890N gas chromatography instrument. Lipid profiles of WT and ymr210wΔ are depicted. (A) The TAG profile shows a significant increase of 14:0, 14:1(11) lipid classes in ymr210wΔ strain compared to WT. (B) The steryl esters 16:0 and 18:0 of ymr210wΔ increased compared to WT. Whereas, 12:0, 14:1(11) and 16:1(9) lipid classes were decreased ('*' represents significant difference).
Figure 3Lipid profiles estimated with GC-MS: Lipid profiles of WT and ymr210wΔ are depicted. (A) Total lipids 12:0 class significantly decreased and 16:1(9) significantly increased compare to WT. (B) Phospholipid profile of ymr210wΔ strain shows 22:1(13) increased significantly compare to WT and (C) Depicts free fatty acids of 16:1(9) significantly increased. Significance represented as '*'.