Semiconductor nanowires[1] (NWs) have received
considerable attention as
candidates in a wide variety of applications, such as in optoelectronics,[2−4] photovoltaics,[5] thermoelectrics,[6] and sensing.[7] Several
studies have addressed the fabrication of strongly quantum confined
NWs, for example made of SnO2[8] or cadmium chalcogenides.[9] The rapid
emergence of lead halideperovskites as promising materials in photovoltaics
and optoelectronics[10,11] has recently placed NWs under
the spotlight again. For example, NWs based on methylammonium lead
halideperovskites (CH3NH3PbX3),
prepared by a surface-initiated solution growth,[12] were reported to have low lasing thresholds and high quality
factors, PLQYs close to 100% and broad tunability through the whole
visible range. Similar results have been obtained also with fully
inorganic CsPbX3 NWs.[13] Colloidal
approaches have been proposed for both hybrid[14] and fully inorganic[15,16] perovskite NWs. For hybrid lead
halideperovskites, CH3NH3PbBr3 NWs
could be grown up to 900 nm in length and their width could be tuned
by varying the reaction time, such that blue emitting NWs (hence strongly
confined) were formed at short reaction times, and green emitting
ones (not-confined) at longer times. Fully inorganic Cs-based perovskites
are less susceptible to hydrolysis from moisture than their hybrid
counterparts,[17] and therefore are preferable
for applications. However, protocols developed to date could deliver
wires of up to 5 μm length, but not with width in the strong
quantum confinement regime.Here, we report a colloidal synthesis
of CsPbBr3 NWs
with width that is tunable down to the quantum confinement regime
(few-unit-cell thick), using a mixture of alkyl amines and a short
alkyl carboxylic acid as growth medium, following standard air-free
techniques (for details see Figure S1 and Table S1 of the Supporting Information, SI). In our initial scheme
(similar to that of Zhang et al.[16]), we
could synthesize NWs with 10–20 nm width (hence nonconfined)
by regulating the ratio of octylamine (OctAm) to oleylamine (OlAm)
and by varying the reaction time (from 30 to 50 min), see Figures S1a, S2 and S3. The addition of an acid
with a long alkyl chain (oleic acid) combined with short and long
chain amines led instead to the formation of nanosheets (Figure S4), as recently shown by us.[18] If, in lieu of oleic acid,
a shorter alkyl chain carboxylic acid (octanoic acid—OctAc,
or hexanoic acid—HexAc) was used, thinner NWs could be prepared
(Figure S5). By increasing the concentration
of the short acid over that of the amine ligands (OctAm and OlAm),
the width of nanowires could be tuned from 10 ± 1 to 3.4 ±
0.5 nm, that is, down to the strong quantum confinement regime (Table S1 and Figure S6). We could even grow NWs
that were around 2.8 nm thick (see Table S1 and Figure S6f), but they were too unstable over time and were
not considered further. Other parameters that were found critical
to control the width of the NWs were the temperature and the reaction
time. For nonconfined nanowires (width ≥ 10 nm), 120–130
°C was the optimal temperature range for growth. For the growth
of confined NWs (width ≤ 10 nm), the same temperature range
(or higher temperature) yielded various byproducts (including cubes)
in addition to wires, whereas below 70 °C the NW growth was much
slower, which helped to improve the size mono dispersity and led essentially
to NWs free of byproducts (see Figure S7). The optimal time of growth was 50 min for both nonconfined and
confined NWs. Increasing the reaction time resulted in aggregation
of the NWs.Bright field transmission electron microscopy (BF-TEM)
images are
reported in Figure a–c, along with high-angle angular dark field scanning TEM
(HAADF-STEM) images (d,f,g) and histograms of width distributions
(e,g,i), for NW samples prepared under different conditions (see Figure S6 and Table S1 for details). High resolution
TEM (HRTEM) analyses revealed the single-crystal nature of the NWs,
compatible with the orthorhombic structure (ICSD #97851) already reported
by us for CsPbBr3 nanosheets[18] and by Zhang et al.[15] for NWs. Due to
the well-known electron-beam-irradiation sensitivity of lead halideperovskite NCs in general (both the hybrid[19] and the fully inorganic[20] ones), and
to the extremely small size of the most confined NWs reported here,
HRTEM analyses of these few-nm wide nanocrystals were challenging.
For this reason, HRTEM images shown in the current work were collected
using a direct-electron detection camera instead of the more conventional
CCD camera, by which we could obtain, while using short acquisition
times, high resolution images at relatively low electron dose and
wide field of view (FOV). A careful look at these results revealed
that the NWs do not have a circular but rather a rectangular cross
section, as each sample was made of bundles of NWs exhibiting identical
orientation (i.e., zone axis), as can be seen in the wide FOV HRTEM
images in Figure a,e,i
and their respective FFTs (panels b,f,j). In particular, all the NWs
were enclosed by {110}, {1-10} and {001} facets and all of them were
confined along the ⟨110⟩ direction. However, the 10
nm thick NWs on the carbon support film were ⟨1-10⟩-oriented
and elongated along the ⟨001⟩ direction, while thinner
ones (both 5.1 and 3.4 nm) were ⟨001⟩-oriented and elongated
along the ⟨1-10⟩ direction. This difference can be ascribed
to the addition of short chain acids in the synthesis, which clearly
favor the growth along ⟨1-10⟩ while inhibiting the growth
along the ⟨001⟩ direction.[15,16] An additional indication of the rectangular cross section of the
NWs, in the particular case of the 10 nm wide NW sample, comes from
the two different values measured for the size along the transverse
direction, which can be interpreted as width and thickness of the
NWs (see Figure S8 and related discussion
in the SI).
Figure 1
Effect of increasing
the ratio of short chain carboxylic acid to
amine ligands on controlling the width of the CsPbBr3 NWs.
Representative BF-TEM and HAADF-STEM images for 10 nm (a,d), 5.1 nm
(b,e) and 3.4 nm (c,f) width NWs and (e,g,i) their respective size
distributions. Short chain carboxylic acid to alkyl amines volume
ratios respectively: 0 (a), 0.1 (b), 0.3 (c) (see Table S1). Scale bars are 200 nm in all images.
Figure 2
Structural analyses of (a–d) 10 nm, (e–h)
5.1 nm
and (i–l) 3.4 nm-wide NWs: (a,e,i) wide FOV HRTEM images of
the NWs, (b,f,j) corresponding FFTs and (c,g,k) magnified view of
respective portions; (d,h,l) schematic crystallographic models of
the NWs, showing the orientation of the observed facet and the elongation
direction for the NWs.
Effect of increasing
the ratio of short chain carboxylic acid to
amine ligands on controlling the width of the CsPbBr3 NWs.
Representative BF-TEM and HAADF-STEM images for 10 nm (a,d), 5.1 nm
(b,e) and 3.4 nm (c,f) width NWs and (e,g,i) their respective size
distributions. Short chain carboxylic acid to alkyl amines volume
ratios respectively: 0 (a), 0.1 (b), 0.3 (c) (see Table S1). Scale bars are 200 nm in all images.Structural analyses of (a–d) 10 nm, (e–h)
5.1 nm
and (i–l) 3.4 nm-wide NWs: (a,e,i) wide FOV HRTEM images of
the NWs, (b,f,j) corresponding FFTs and (c,g,k) magnified view of
respective portions; (d,h,l) schematic crystallographic models of
the NWs, showing the orientation of the observed facet and the elongation
direction for the NWs.We conclude that the synthesis conditions inhibited the growth
of some crystallographic facets, while enhancing three sets of them,
namely the {110}, {1-10} and {001} ones, and the relative stability
of the facets was likely related to the concentration of the short
chain acids used. Also, epitaxially oriented Pb nanocrystals were
found along the NWs (see Figure a,b,e,f,i). Their formation was due to electron-beam
irradiation (despite the low dose), as previously reported for cesium
lead halide nanocrystals.[18,20] In accordance with
HRTEM analyses, SAED patterns and their azimuthally integrated profiles
(Figure S9) for the thick NWs exhibited
sharper Bragg peaks, due to larger size of the coherently scattering
domain. Although 10 and 5.1 nm-thick NWs featured the distinctive
peaks for the orthorhombic phase, the phase of 3.4 nm NWs could not
be undoubtedly stated based on SAED pattern taken from a bundle of
them, due to their smaller width.The shape of the NWs was also
verified by atomic force microscopy
(AFM). Figure a shows
the typical aspect of a single NW (width = 5.1 nm). A profile along
the white line traced in Figure a is shown in Figure b. According to AFM, the shape of the NW was not cylindrical,
corroborating what found by HRTEM: the cross section indicated that
the single wires presented a planar structure. The 3D representation
of the NWs (Figure c) evidences that the upper
surface of the NWs is flat. The average thickness of the NWs, derived
from the analysis of single line profiles obtained from 10 NWs from
3 different samples, was 8.1 ± 0.4 nm (n = 36),
whereas the lateral size of the upper face of the NWs was 5.5 ±
0.6 nm (n = 36), in agreement with the lateral size
determined by size statistics based on BF-TEM images. Note that, except
for the flat upper surface, the lateral size and shape of the NWs
is affected by tip enlargement effect.[21] Considering the nominal size of the AFM tip used in the experiments,
we estimated the size of the lower surface through the formula reported
in ref (22), and obtained
the same value as measured for the upper facet. Hence the NWs had
rectangular section.
Figure 3
(a) Tapping mode AFM height image of a single NW. (b)
Cross section
along the profile defined by the white line reported in panel a. The
flat upper part of a NW is clearly visible in the three-dimensional
reconstruction of the NW topography reported in panel c.
(a) Tapping mode AFM height image of a single NW. (b)
Cross section
along the profile defined by the white line reported in panel a. The
flat upper part of a NW is clearly visible in the three-dimensional
reconstruction of the NW topography reported in panel c.We recorded UV–visible absorption and PL
spectra and measured
PLQY and PL lifetime of the various NW samples. The relevant parameters
are summarized in Table . The presence of strong quantum confinement in the NWs is demonstrated
by the optical absorption and PL spectra of Figure a (note that the exciton Bohr diameter for
CsPbBr3 is around 7 nm[23]): by
shrinking the NWs width, the main excitonic absorption peak shifted
from 511 nm (for a width W of 10 nm) to 455 nm (W = 3.4 nm), accompanied by a PL peak blue shift from 524
to 473 nm (see Table , the full width at half-maximum, fwhm, ranged from 16 to 33 nm).
Such tunability in the PL peak position is similar to what observed
for CsPbBr3 quantum dots,[24] nanoplatelets[20] and hybrid organolead halide NWs[14] exhibiting different degrees of quantum confinement.
Here, both NW samples with 4.1 ± 0.7 and 3.4 ± 0.5 nm width
evidenced a secondary PL peak (at around 483 and 491 nm, respectively),
and a second absorption peak at 467 nm was seen for the W = 3.4 nm sample. These additional spectral features are not seen
immediately after the synthesis. In Figure S10, we report for example the PL spectrum from the 4.1 ± 0.7 nm
NWs directly after the final washing step and immediately after resuspension
in toluene. This was characterized by a single emission peak at 473
nm (fwhm 33 nm). However, less than 15 min later, a second PL peak
was observed at longer wavelengths. This additional PL peaks is likely
due to aggregation of the NWs, which reduces the quantum confinement
by allowing delocalization of the holes/electrons on neighboring NWs.
Hence the thinnest NWs had limited stability over time.
Table 1
Comparison of the Absorption and Photoluminescence
Peak Position, PL FWHM, PLQY and PL Lifetime for CsPbBr3 NWs with Different Widths
width (nm)
abs. max (nm)
PL max (nm)
PL fwhm (nm)
PLQY
(%)
average PL lifetime (ns)
20 ± 3
511
524
18
12 ± 2
20.6
10 ± 1
504
517
16
38 ± 4
16.4
5.1 ± 0.5
484
496
16
77 ± 8
4.9
4.1 ± 0.7
472
481, 491
18
40 ± 4
2.8
3.4 ± 0.5
455, 467
473, 483
33
30 ± 3
2.5
Figure 4
(a) Optical absorption (solid line) and PL spectra (dashed
line,
λexc = 400 nm) of the NWs in toluene solutions. (b)
Time-resolved PL, (λexc = 405 nm) measured at the
PL peak for the CsPbBr3 NWs in toluene solution. Color
coding is the same in panels a and b.
(a) Optical absorption (solid line) and PL spectra (dashed
line,
λexc = 400 nm) of the NWs in toluene solutions. (b)
Time-resolved PL, (λexc = 405 nm) measured at the
PL peak for the CsPbBr3 NWs in toluene solution. Color
coding is the same in panels a and b.The PLQY measured in solution (Table ) increased from 12% to 77% when the width
was reduced from 20 ± 3 to 5.1 ± 0.5 nm. By further reducing
the NW width, the PLQY dropped to 30%. The reduction in PLQY was accompanied
by the appearance of a second PL peak in the thinnest NWs. This suggests
that the red-shifted secondary PL peak has a detrimental effect on
the PLQY. Time-resolved PL measurements (Figure b) evidenced on the other hand a continuous
decrease in PL lifetime, from the green to blue emitting NW samples,
from 20.6 ns for 20 nm width to 2.5 ns for 3.4 nm width (Table ). The NWs with 5.1
nm width, which had the highest PLQY (77%), exhibited a substantially
short PL lifetime of 4.9 ns that is in line with that of other CsPbBr3
NCs of different shapes.[20,25,26] The increase in PLQY from the thickest (20 nm) to the 5.1 nm NWs,
accompanied by a shortening of the PL lifetime, indicates a continuous
increase in the radiative rate. Considering that the various samples
here reported were prepared under different syntheses conditions,
we cannot ascribe the variation in PLQY only to the effect of quantum
confinement. It is indeed possible that each sample was characterized
by a different number of trap states (hence overall material quality).
For the NW samples with width smaller than 5.1 nm (last two rows of Table ), the decrease in
PLQY and the further shortening of the PL lifetime indicate an increase
in nonradiative decay rate that can again be tentatively ascribed
to the appearance of the secondary PL arising from either NWs aggregation
or trap-emission.In summary, we have reported the colloidal
synthesis of CsPbBr3 perovskite NWs with tunable width,
from the nonconfined regime
to strong quantum-confinement regime, by introducing carboxylic acids
with short aliphatic chains (octanoic acid or hexanoic acid). The
NWs had photoluminescence quantum yield that could be as high as 77%,
with PL spectral position that could be varied from green to blue.
NWs with a width below ∼5 nm show a reduced stability with
the appearance of additional PL and absorption peaks and a reduction
in PLQY. Future progress in this direction will require the stabilization
of the thinnest wires. Another challenge will reside in understanding
and modeling the growth kinetics and thermodynamics of these nanostructures.
Also, as syntheses protocols to CsPbBr3 perovskite nanostructures
of various shapes have reached maturity, interesting developments
can be the study of the effect of shape/dimensionality on quantum
confinement and on the rate and extent of anion exchange.
Authors: Letian Dou; Andrew B Wong; Yi Yu; Minliang Lai; Nikolay Kornienko; Samuel W Eaton; Anthony Fu; Connor G Bischak; Jie Ma; Tina Ding; Naomi S Ginsberg; Lin-Wang Wang; A Paul Alivisatos; Peidong Yang Journal: Science Date: 2015-09-25 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Neil P Dasgupta; Jianwei Sun; Chong Liu; Sarah Brittman; Sean C Andrews; Jongwoo Lim; Hanwei Gao; Ruoxue Yan; Peidong Yang Journal: Adv Mater Date: 2014-03-06 Impact factor: 30.849
Authors: Dandan Zhang; Yiming Yang; Yehonadav Bekenstein; Yi Yu; Natalie A Gibson; Andrew B Wong; Samuel W Eaton; Nikolay Kornienko; Qiao Kong; Minliang Lai; A Paul Alivisatos; Stephen R Leone; Peidong Yang Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2016-06-06 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Verena A Hintermayr; Carola Lampe; Maximilian Löw; Janina Roemer; Willem Vanderlinden; Moritz Gramlich; Anton X Böhm; Cornelia Sattler; Bert Nickel; Theobald Lohmüller; Alexander S Urban Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2019-07-30 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Francisco Palazon; Guilherme Almeida; Quinten A Akkerman; Luca De Trizio; Zhiya Dang; Mirko Prato; Liberato Manna Journal: Chem Mater Date: 2017-04-04 Impact factor: 9.811
Authors: Muhammad Imran; Palvasha Ijaz; Dmitry Baranov; Luca Goldoni; Urko Petralanda; Quinten Akkerman; Ahmed L Abdelhady; Mirko Prato; Paolo Bianchini; Ivan Infante; Liberato Manna Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2018-11-12 Impact factor: 11.189