Literature DB >> 29225016

Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries of the Knee at the National Football League Combine: An Imaging and Epidemiology Study.

Catherine A Logan1, Brendin R Beaulieu-Jones2, George Sanchez2, Jorge Chahla3, Nicholas I Kennedy3, Mark E Cinque3, Robert F LaPrade4, James M Whalen5, Bryan G Vopat6, Mark D Price7, Matthew T Provencher8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the epidemiology by player position, examination, imaging findings, and associated injuries of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries in players participating in the National Football League (NFL) Combine.
METHODS: All PCL injuries identified at the NFL Combine (2009-2015) were reviewed. Data were obtained from the database organized by the NFL medical personnel for the compilation of the medical and physical performance examination results of NFL Draftees participating in the NFL Combine from 2009 to 2015. Inclusion criteria were any player with clinical findings or a previous surgery consistent with a PCL injury who participated in the NFL Combine.
RESULTS: Of the 2,285 players who participated in the NFL Combine between 2009 and 2015, 69 (3%) had evidence of a PCL injury, of which 11 players (15.9%) were managed surgically. On physical examination, 35 players (52%) had a grade II or III posterior drawer. Concomitant injuries were present frequently and included medial collateral ligament (MCL; 42%), anterior cruciate ligament (ACL; 11.6%), and chondral injuries (31.8%), especially in the lateral tibiofemoral compartment.
CONCLUSIONS: Three percent of the players at the NFL Combine presented with a PCL injury, with a significant amount being either running backs (14/69, 20.2%) or offensive linemen (14/69, 20.2%). Approximately half of the players with a PCL tear had a residual grade II or III posterior drawer after sustaining a PCL injury. Concomitant injuries were present frequently and included MCL (42%), ACL (11.6%), and chondral injuries (31.8%), especially in the lateral tibiofemoral compartment. For those players with clinical concern for PCL ligamentous laxity, there should be a complete comprehensive workup that includes plain and PCL stress view radiographs, and magnetic resonance imaging. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29225016     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  4 in total

Review 1.  Single Versus Double-Bundle PCL Reconstruction: Scientific Rationale and Clinical Evidence.

Authors:  Christopher J Tucker; Patrick W Joyner; Nathan K Endres
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-06

2.  Athletes With Musculoskeletal Injuries Identified at the NFL Scouting Combine and Prediction of Outcomes in the NFL: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Dean Wang; Leigh J Weiss; Madeline Abrams; Ronnie P Barnes; Russell F Warren; Scott A Rodeo; Samuel A Taylor
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-12-12

3.  Decreased lateral posterior tibial slope and medial tibial depth are underlying anatomic risk factors for posterior cruciate ligament injury: a case-control study.

Authors:  Baoshan Yin; Pei Zhao; Jiaxing Chen; Wenlong Yan; Hua Zhang; Jian Zhang; Aiguo Zhou
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 2.562

4.  Patients with isolated posterior cruciate ligament rupture had a higher posterior intercondylar eminence.

Authors:  Shi Weili; Meng Qingyang; Chen Nayun; Ma Yong; Yang Yuping; Liu Ping; Ao Yingfang; Gong Xi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.