Literature DB >> 29224981

Visuomotor mental rotation of a saccade: The contingent negative variation scales to the angle of rotation.

Matthew Heath1, Francisco L Colino2, Jillian Chan3, Olave E Krigolson2.   

Abstract

The visuomotor mental rotation (VMR) of a saccade requires a response to a region of space that is dissociated from a stimulus by a pre-specified angle, and work has shown a monotonic increase in reaction times as a function of increasing oblique angles of rotation. These results have been taken as evidence of a continuous process of rotation and have generated competing hypotheses. One hypothesis asserts that rotation is mediated via frontoparietal structures, whereas a second states that a continuous shift in the activity of direction-specific neurons in the superior colliculus (SC) supports rotation. Research to date, however, has not examined the neural mechanisms underlying VMR saccades and both hypotheses therefore remain untested. The present study measured the behavioural data and event-related brain potentials (ERP) of standard (i.e., 0° of rotation) and VMR saccades involving 35°, 70° and 105° of rotation. Behavioural results showed that participants adhered to task-based rotation demands and ERP findings showed that the amplitude of the contingent negative variation (CNV) linearly decreased with increasing angle of rotation. The cortical generators of the CNV are linked to frontoparietal structures supporting movement preparation. Although our ERP design does not allow us to exclude a possible role of the SC in the rotation of a VMR saccade, they do demonstrate that such actions are supported by a continuous and cortically based rotation process.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action; Contingent negative variation; Event-related brain potential; Saccades; Visuomotor mental rotation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29224981     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  1 in total

1.  Pro- and antisaccade task-switching: response suppression-and not vector inversion-contributes to a task-set inertia.

Authors:  Benjamin Tari; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.