Literature DB >> 29224818

Reconstruction after salvage laryngectomy.

David H Yeh1, Axel Sahovaler1, Kevin Fung2.   

Abstract

Both early and advanced stage laryngeal cancers are treated with organ-preserving strategies including radiation alone or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. While organ-preserving modalities have proven effective in eradicating cancer while also preserving laryngeal function, there remains a proportion of cases where residual or recurrent cancer prevails, or conversely, where radiotherapy renders a larynx dysfunctional. In these circumstances, salvage total laryngectomy is often the surgical treatment. The effects of radiotherapy to the neck, amplified by chemotherapy, can create an inhospitable surgical environment, making the salvage laryngectomy an operation fraught with the potential for major complications such as the dreaded pharyngocutaneous fistula. The introduction of vascularized tissue from outside the irradiated field decreases the risk of major wound complications. Free tissue transfer, with a variety of donor sites available, is commonly employed to reconstruct either a patch or a circumferential segment of the pharynx. When there is enough pharyngeal mucosa for primary closure, a vascularized onlay graft or a pharyngeal interposition graft can be used to reinforce the closure. This has been demonstrated to both reduce the severity of pharyngocutaneous fistula and decrease the risk of developing a pharyngocutaneous fistula compared to primary closure alone. Beyond mitigating the risk for perioperative complications, flap selection may have implications on the long-term outcomes after salvage total laryngectomy and these must be considered preoperatively. The purpose of this review is to examine the various options for reconstruction after salvage total laryngectomy and to examine some of their advantages and disadvantages in the short and long-term.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Free flaps; Head and neck cancer; Head and neck reconstruction; Laryngeal cancer; Laryngectomy; Reconstructive surgery; Salvage therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29224818     DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Oncol        ISSN: 1368-8375            Impact factor:   5.337


  3 in total

1.  Using the DASH Questionnaire to Evaluate Donor Site Morbidity of the Serratus Anterior Free Flap in Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Stefan Janik; Julian Pyka; Muhammad Faisal; Stefan Grasl; Pawel Golusinski; Blažen Marijić; Rudolf Seemann; Boban M Erovic
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Comprehensive Evaluation of Vocal Outcomes and Quality of Life after Total Laryngectomy and Voice Restoration with J-Flap and Tracheoesophageal Puncture.

Authors:  Chung-Kan Tsao; Filippo Marchi; Chung-Jan Kang; Claudio Sampieri; Yi-An Lu; Shiang-Fu Huang; Yu-Ting Chen; Giorgio Giordano; Giorgio Peretti; Giampiero Parrinello; Andrea Iandelli; Tuan-Jen Fang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 6.639

3.  Prevention of fistulas after salvage laryngectomy using temporoparietal fascia free flap.

Authors:  Raul Pellini; Jacopo Zocchi; Barbara Pichi; Valentina Manciocco; Paolo Marchesi; Isabella Sperduti; Giuseppe Mercante; Gabriele Molteni; Oreste Iocca; Pasquale Di Maio; Armando De Virgilio; Antonello Vidiri; Giuseppe Sanguineti; Giuseppe Spriano
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.124

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.