Sophie Shay1, Nina L Shapiro2, Neil Bhattacharyya3. 1. Department of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 200 Medical Plaza, Suite 550, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Electronic address: sshay@luriechildrens.org. 2. Department of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 200 Medical Plaza, Suite 550, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Electronic address: nshapiro@ucla.edu. 3. Department of Otology & Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, 45 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: neiloy@massmed.org.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Investigate the epidemiological characteristics of pediatric epistaxis in the emergency department setting. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using national databases. METHODS: Children (age <18 years) presenting with a diagnosis of epistaxis were extracted from the State Emergency Department Databases for New York, Florida, Iowa, and California for the calendar year 2010. Associated diagnoses, procedures, encounter characteristics, and demographic data were examined. RESULTS: There were 18,745 cases of pediatric epistaxis (mean age 7.54 years, 57.4% male). Overall, 6.9% of patients underwent procedures to control epistaxis, of which 93.5% had simple anterior epistaxis control. The distribution of pediatric epistaxis was highest in spring and summer months (p < 0.001). Children from the lowest income quartile comprised a higher proportion of epistaxis presentations (38.8%, p < 0.001), yet were least likely to have an epistaxis control procedure performed (p < 0.001). Most patients had either Medicaid (43.8%) or private insurance (41.3%). Patients with Medicaid and those without healthcare coverage were least likely to undergo an epistaxis control procedure (p < 0.001). White children were more likely to undergo an epistaxis control procedure compared to those of minority backgrounds (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Most emergency department presentations of pediatric epistaxis are uninvolved cases that do not require procedural intervention. The overrepresentation of low socioeconomic status patients may suggest an overutilization of emergency services for minor cases of epistaxis, and perhaps a lack of access to primary care providers. This is the first study to evaluate racial and socioeconomic factors in relationship to pediatric epistaxis. Further investigation is needed to better elucidate these potential disparities.
OBJECTIVE: Investigate the epidemiological characteristics of pediatric epistaxis in the emergency department setting. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using national databases. METHODS:Children (age <18 years) presenting with a diagnosis of epistaxis were extracted from the State Emergency Department Databases for New York, Florida, Iowa, and California for the calendar year 2010. Associated diagnoses, procedures, encounter characteristics, and demographic data were examined. RESULTS: There were 18,745 cases of pediatric epistaxis (mean age 7.54 years, 57.4% male). Overall, 6.9% of patients underwent procedures to control epistaxis, of which 93.5% had simple anterior epistaxis control. The distribution of pediatric epistaxis was highest in spring and summer months (p < 0.001). Children from the lowest income quartile comprised a higher proportion of epistaxis presentations (38.8%, p < 0.001), yet were least likely to have an epistaxis control procedure performed (p < 0.001). Most patients had either Medicaid (43.8%) or private insurance (41.3%). Patients with Medicaid and those without healthcare coverage were least likely to undergo an epistaxis control procedure (p < 0.001). White children were more likely to undergo an epistaxis control procedure compared to those of minority backgrounds (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Most emergency department presentations of pediatric epistaxis are uninvolved cases that do not require procedural intervention. The overrepresentation of low socioeconomic status patients may suggest an overutilization of emergency services for minor cases of epistaxis, and perhaps a lack of access to primary care providers. This is the first study to evaluate racial and socioeconomic factors in relationship to pediatric epistaxis. Further investigation is needed to better elucidate these potential disparities.