Literature DB >> 29224641

Design of a bilevel clinical trial targeting adherence in heart failure patients and their providers: The Congestive Heart Failure Adherence Redesign Trial (CHART).

Ashvarya Mangla1, Rami Doukky2, DeJuran Richardson3, Elizabeth F Avery4, Rebecca Dawar4, James E Calvin5, Lynda H Powell4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomically disadvantaged patients are at an increased risk for adverse heart failure (HF) outcomes based upon nonadherence to medications and diet. Physicians are also suboptimally adherent to prescribing evidence-based therapy for HF.
METHODS: Congestive Heart Failure Adherence Redesign Trial (CHART) (NCT01698242) is a multicenter, bilevel, cluster randomized behavioral efficacy trial designed to assess the impact of intervening simultaneously on physicians and their socioeconomically disadvantaged patients (annual income <$30,000) having HF with reduced ejection fraction. Treatment arm physicians received individualized feedback on their adherence to prescribing evidence-based therapy. Their patients received weekly home visits from community health workers aimed at promoting understanding of HF and integrating adherence into daily life. Control arm physicians received regular updates on advances in HF management, and patients received monthly HF educational tip sheets produced by the American Heart Association. The primary outcome was all-cause hospital days over 30 months.
RESULTS: A total of 72 physicians (treatment, 35; control, 37) and their 320 patients (treatment, 157; control, 163) were recruited within 2 years. Randomization of physicians with all of their patients being assigned to the same arm was feasible and did not compromise the comparability of patients by arm. Using 5 recruiting hospitals located within disadvantaged neighborhoods produced a cohort that was primarily African American and representative of low-income urban patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction.
CONCLUSION: CHART will determine the value of intervening on low adherence simultaneously in physicians and their socioeconomically disadvantaged patients in reducing all-cause hospitalization days.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29224641      PMCID: PMC5729928          DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  35 in total

1.  Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: best practices and recommendations from the NIH Behavior Change Consortium.

Authors:  Albert J Bellg; Belinda Borrelli; Barbara Resnick; Jacki Hecht; Daryl Sharp Minicucci; Marcia Ory; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Denise Orwig; Denise Ernst; Susan Czajkowski
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.267

2.  2009 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2005 Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in Adults A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Developed in Collaboration With the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.

Authors:  Sharon Ann Hunt; William T Abraham; Marshall H Chin; Arthur M Feldman; Gary S Francis; Theodore G Ganiats; Mariell Jessup; Marvin A Konstam; Donna M Mancini; Keith Michl; John A Oates; Peter S Rahko; Marc A Silver; Lynne Warner Stevenson; Clyde W Yancy
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Prevention of relapse in patients with congestive heart failure: the role of precipitating factors.

Authors:  J Feenstra; D E Grobbee; F A Jonkman; A W Hoes; B H Stricker
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Depression predicts repeated heart failure hospitalizations.

Authors:  Tricia J Johnson; Sanjib Basu; Barbara A Pisani; Elizabeth F Avery; Jose C Mendez; James E Calvin; Lynda H Powell
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 5.712

5.  Community health workers: integral members of the health care work force.

Authors:  A Witmer; S D Seifer; L Finocchio; J Leslie; E H O'Neil
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Adherence to guidelines is a predictor of outcome in chronic heart failure: the MAHLER survey.

Authors:  Michel Komajda; Pablo Lapuerta; Nancy Hermans; José Ramon Gonzalez-Juanatey; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Erland Erdmann; Luigi Tavazzi; Philip Poole-Wilson; Claude Le Pen
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-04-12       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Relation between volume of exercise and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Steven J Keteyian; Eric S Leifer; Nancy Houston-Miller; William E Kraus; Clinton A Brawner; Christopher M O'Connor; David J Whellan; Lawton S Cooper; Jerome L Fleg; Dalane W Kitzman; Alain Cohen-Solal; James A Blumenthal; David S Rendall; Ileana L Piña
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 8.  Heart failure and socioeconomic status: accumulating evidence of inequality.

Authors:  Nathaniel M Hawkins; Pardeep S Jhund; John J V McMurray; Simon Capewell
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 15.534

9.  Congestive heart failure adherence redesign trial: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ashvarya Mangla; Rami Doukky; Lynda H Powell; Elizabeth Avery; DeJuran Richardson; James E Calvin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  Heart failure in North America.

Authors:  John E A Blair; Mark Huffman; Sanjiv J Shah
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2013-05
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Bias in natriuretic peptide-guided heart failure trials: time to improve guideline adherence using alternative approaches.

Authors:  Susan Stienen; Ankeet Bhatt; João Pedro Ferreira; Muthiah Vaduganathan; James Januzzi; Kirkwood Adams; Jean-Claude Tardif; Patrick Rossignol; Faiez Zannad
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 4.214

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.