Masaya Akashi1, Satoshi Wanifuchi2, Eiji Iwata2, Daisuke Takeda2, Junya Kusumoto2, Shungo Furudoi2, Takahide Komori2. 1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kusunoki-cho 7-5-2, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan. akashim@med.kobe-u.ac.jp. 2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kusunoki-cho 7-5-2, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The appearance of osteoradionecrosis (ORN) and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is similar, but clinically important differences between ORN and MRONJ exist. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical data between ORN and MRONJ and to reveal the critical differences between these diseases. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the epidemiological data, clinical findings, and treatment in 27 ORN and 61 MRONJ patients. Radiographic signs before the initiation of treatment were also assessed. RESULTS: The median age (P = 0.0474) and the ratio of female to male patients (P < 0.0001) were significantly higher in MRONJ patients. There were significantly more MRONJ patients who reported a history of pain when compared with ORN patients (P = 0.0263). As an aetiological factor, tooth extraction was significantly more relevant to MRONJ than ORN (P = 0.0352). When assessing the radiographic signs on computed tomographic images, periosteal reaction was found only in MRONJ patients (P = 0.0158). Minimal debridement was performed significantly more frequently for MRONJ (P = 0.0093), and by contrast, surgical resection was performed more frequently for ORN (P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the clinical and underlying pathological differences between ORN and MRONJ probably contributes to the selection of appropriate treatment for each patient.
PURPOSE: The appearance of osteoradionecrosis (ORN) and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is similar, but clinically important differences between ORN and MRONJ exist. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical data between ORN and MRONJ and to reveal the critical differences between these diseases. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the epidemiological data, clinical findings, and treatment in 27 ORN and 61 MRONJ patients. Radiographic signs before the initiation of treatment were also assessed. RESULTS: The median age (P = 0.0474) and the ratio of female to male patients (P < 0.0001) were significantly higher in MRONJ patients. There were significantly more MRONJ patients who reported a history of pain when compared with ORN patients (P = 0.0263). As an aetiological factor, tooth extraction was significantly more relevant to MRONJ than ORN (P = 0.0352). When assessing the radiographic signs on computed tomographic images, periosteal reaction was found only in MRONJ patients (P = 0.0158). Minimal debridement was performed significantly more frequently for MRONJ (P = 0.0093), and by contrast, surgical resection was performed more frequently for ORN (P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the clinical and underlying pathological differences between ORN and MRONJ probably contributes to the selection of appropriate treatment for each patient.
Entities:
Keywords:
Computed tomography; Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw; Osteoradionecrosis of the jaw; Surgery
Authors: M Nisi; F La Ferla; D Karapetsa; S Gennai; L Ramaglia; F Graziani; M Gabriele Journal: Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 1.651
Authors: Jose V Bagan; Yolanda Jiménez; Sergio Hernández; Judith Murillo; Jose M Díaz; Rafael Poveda; Enrique Carbonell; Jose M Sanchis; Carmen Gavaldá; Crispian Scully Journal: Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Date: 2009-12-01
Authors: Aliya A Khan; Archie Morrison; David A Hanley; Dieter Felsenberg; Laurie K McCauley; Felice O'Ryan; Ian R Reid; Salvatore L Ruggiero; Akira Taguchi; Sotirios Tetradis; Nelson B Watts; Maria Luisa Brandi; Edmund Peters; Teresa Guise; Richard Eastell; Angela M Cheung; Suzanne N Morin; Basel Masri; Cyrus Cooper; Sarah L Morgan; Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch; Bente L Langdahl; Rana Al Dabagh; K Shawn Davison; David L Kendler; George K Sándor; Robert G Josse; Mohit Bhandari; Mohamed El Rabbany; Dominique D Pierroz; Riad Sulimani; Deborah P Saunders; Jacques P Brown; Juliet Compston Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Suad Aljohani; Riham Fliefel; Teresa Franziska Brunner; Aristeidis Chronopoulos; Nada Binmadi; Sven Otto Journal: J Int Med Res Date: 2022-06 Impact factor: 1.573