Literature DB >> 29223667

Selective versus routine patch metal allergy testing to select bar material for the Nuss procedure in 932 patients over 10years.

Robert J Obermeyer1, Sheema Gaffar2, Robert E Kelly3, M Ann Kuhn3, Frazier W Frantz3, Margaret M McGuire3, James F Paulson4, Cynthia S Kelly3.   

Abstract

AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of the study was to determine the role of patch metal allergy testing to select bar material for the Nuss procedure.
METHODS: An IRB-approved (11-04-WC-0098) single institution retrospective, cohort study comparing selective versus routine patch metal allergy testing to select stainless steel or titanium bars for Nuss repair was performed. In Cohort A (9/2004-1/2011), selective patch testing was performed based on clinical risk factors. In Cohort B (2/2011-9/2014), all patients were patch tested. The cohorts were compared for incidence of bar allergy and resultant premature bar loss. Risk factors for stainless steel allergy or positive patch test were evaluated. MAIN
RESULTS: Cohort A had 628 patients with 63 (10.0%) selected for patch testing, while all 304 patients in Cohort B were tested. Over 10years, 15 (1.8%) of the 842 stainless steel Nuss repairs resulted in a bar allergy, and 5 had a negative preoperative patch test. The incidence of stainless steel bar allergy (1.8% vs 1.7%, p=0.57) and resultant bar loss (0.5% vs 1.3%, p=0.23) was not statistically different between cohorts. An allergic reaction to a stainless steel bar or a positive patch test was more common in females (OR=2.3, p<0.001) and patients with a personal (OR=24.8, p<0.001) or family history (OR=3.1, p<0.001) of metal sensitivity.
CONCLUSION: Stainless steel bar allergies occur at a low incidence with either routine or selective patch metal allergy testing. If selective testing is performed, it is advisable in females and patients with a personal or family history of metal sensitivity. A negative preoperative patch metal allergy test does not preclude the possibility of a postoperative stainless steel bar allergy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Treatment Study and Study of Diagnostic Test.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dermatitis; Metal allergy; Nickel; Nuss procedure; Patch; Pectus excavatum; Titanium

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29223667     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.11.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  4 in total

1.  Current Development of Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum (MIRPE).

Authors:  Frank-Martin Haecker; Thomas Franz Krebs; Kai-Uwe Kleitsch
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-31

Review 2.  Metal allergy after the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum: a review.

Authors:  Przemysław Gałązka; Kamil Leis; Kacper Kroczek; Aleksandra Baska; Jakub Kazik; Rafał Czajkowski
Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Nickel contamination after minimally-invasive repair of pectus excavatum persists after bar removal.

Authors:  Caroline Fortmann; Thomas Goeen; Norman Zinne; Soeren Wiesner; Benno M Ure; Claus Petersen; Joachim F Kuebler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Blood metal levels after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum.

Authors:  Michele Torre; Luca Genova Gaia; Maria Grazia Calevo; Michela Wong; Maria Raso; Sebastiano Barco; Francesca Di Gaudio; Giuliana Cangemi
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-06-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.