Literature DB >> 29223550

Comparative Risks of Ischemic Stroke in Atrial Flutter versus Atrial Fibrillation.

Mais Al-Kawaz1, Setareh S Omran2, Neal S Parikh2, Mitchell S V Elkind3, Elsayed Z Soliman4, Hooman Kamel2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the risk of ischemic stroke in patients who have atrial fibrillation and patients who have atrial flutter.
METHODS: Using inpatient and outpatient Medicare claims data from 2008 to 2014 for a 5% sample of all beneficiaries 66 years of age or older, we identified patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation and those diagnosed with atrial flutter. The primary outcome was ischemic stroke. In the primary analysis, patients with atrial flutter were censored upon converting to fibrillation; in a secondary analysis, they were not. Survival statistics were used to compare incidence of stroke in patients with flutter and patients with fibrillation. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to compare the associations of flutter and fibrillation with ischemic stroke after adjustment for demographics and risk factors.
RESULTS: We identified 14,953 patients with flutter and 318,138 with fibrillation. During a mean follow-up period of 2.8 (±2.3) years, we identified 18,900 ischemic strokes. The annual incidence of ischemic stroke in patients with flutter was 1.38% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22%-1.57%) compared with 2.02% (95% CI 1.99%-2.05%) in patients with fibrillation. After adjustment for demographics and stroke risk factors, flutter was associated with a lower risk of stroke compared with fibrillation (hazard ratio .69; 95% CI .60-.79, P < .05). Within 1 year, 65.7% (95% CI 64.9%-66.4%) of patients with flutter converted to fibrillation but remained at a lower risk of ischemic stroke (hazard ratio .85; 95% CI .78-.92).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with atrial flutter faced a lower risk of ischemic stroke than patients with atrial fibrillation. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Stroke; arrhythmia; atrial fibrillation; atrial flutter

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29223550     DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.10.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis        ISSN: 1052-3057            Impact factor:   2.136


  5 in total

1.  Differences in Stroke or Systemic Thromboembolism Readmission Risk After Hospitalization for Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter.

Authors:  Harshith S Thyagaturu; Alexander Bolton; Sittinun Thangjui; Kashyap Shah; Bishesh Shrestha; Dinesh Voruganti; Daniel Katz
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-05

2.  Risk of Atrial Fibrillation in Black Versus White Medicare Beneficiaries With Implanted Cardiac Devices.

Authors:  Monica L Chen; Neal S Parikh; Alexander E Merkler; Dawn O Kleindorfer; Prashant D Bhave; Emily B Levitan; Elsayed Z Soliman; Hooman Kamel
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 5.501

3.  Cerebrovascular accidents differ between patients with atrial flutter and patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Jacek Staszewski; Anna Bilbin-Bukowska; Wojciech Szypowski; Marcin Mejer-Zahorowski; Adam Stępień
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.318

4.  Differential Risk of Dementia Between Patients With Atrial Flutter and Atrial Fibrillation: A National Cohort Study.

Authors:  Hui-Ting Wang; Yung-Lung Chen; Yu-Sheng Lin; Huang-Chung Chen; Shaur-Zheng Chong; Shukai Hsueh; Chang-Ming Chung; Mien-Cheng Chen
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-11-18

5.  Evaluating Effectiveness and Safety in Chronic Kidney Disease with Atrial Flutter Using an Anticoagulation Strategy.

Authors:  Ying-Ting Wang; Chung-Yu Chen; Ming-Jong Bair
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.