Literature DB >> 29222939

Which outcomes are reported in cellulitis trials? Results of a review of outcomes included in cellulitis trials and a patient priority setting survey.

E Smith1, M Patel2, K S Thomas1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is an emerging need to develop consistent outcomes in clinical trials to allow effective comparison of treatment effects. No systematic review has previously looked at the reporting of outcome measures used in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment and prevention of cellulitis (erysipelas).
OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this review was to describe the breadth of outcomes reported from RCTs on cellulitis treatment and prevention. The secondary aim was to identify outcome themes from patients' and healthcare professionals' feedback from a cellulitis Priority Setting Partnership (PSP).
METHODS: We conducted a review of all outcome measures used in RCTs from two recent Cochrane reviews. Free-text responses from a cellulitis priority setting survey were used to understand the perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals.
RESULTS: Outcomes from 42 RCTs on treatment of cellulitis and six RCTs on prevention of cellulitis were reviewed. Only 28 trials stated their primary outcome. For trials assessing treatment of cellulitis, clinical response to treatment was categorized in 25 different ways. Five of these trials used an outcome that was in accordance with FDA guidance and only four trials incorporated either quality of life or patient satisfaction. For trials assessing prevention of cellulitis, recurrence was the key outcome measure. From the cellulitis PSP, prevention of recurrence, clinical features and long-term disease impact were the most important outcome themes for patients.
CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that in cellulitis treatment and prevention research, there is significant heterogeneity in clinical outcomes, inadequate focus on patient-reported outcomes, and a disparity between what is currently measured and what patients and healthcare professionals feel is important. We recommend that future cellulitis treatment trials consider the use of longer-term outcomes to capture recurrence and long-term morbidity, as well as short-term resolution of acute infection.
© 2017 British Association of Dermatologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29222939     DOI: 10.1111/bjd.16235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


  3 in total

1.  Treatment failure definitions for non-purulent skin and soft tissue infections: a systematic review.

Authors:  Krishan Yadav; Avik Nath; Kathryn N Suh; Lindsey Sikora; Debra Eagles
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  Evaluation of Linezolid Pharmacokinetics in Critically Ill Obese Patients with Severe Skin and Soft Tissue Infections.

Authors:  Alison L Blackman; Praneeth Jarugula; David P Nicolau; Sai Ho Chui; Manjari Joshi; Emily L Heil; Mathangi Gopalakrishnan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Standardization of Epidemiological Surveillance of Group A Streptococcal Cellulitis.

Authors:  Kate M Miller; Theresa Lamagni; Roderick Hay; Jeffrey W Cannon; Michael Marks; Asha C Bowen; David C Kaslow; Thomas Cherian; Anna C Seale; Janessa Pickering; Jessica N Daw; Hannah C Moore; Chris Van Beneden; Jonathan R Carapetis; Laurens Manning
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 4.423

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.