Jeroen Kregel1,2,3, Charline Schumacher1, Mieke Dolphens1, Anneleen Malfliet1,2,3, Dorien Goubert1,2,3, Dorine Lenoir1, Barbara Cagnie1, Mira Meeus1,2,4, Iris Coppieters1,2. 1. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. 2. Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium. 3. Departments of Human Physiology and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Free University Brussels, Brussels, Belgium. 4. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Symptoms of central sensitization (CS) have been described in patients with chronic spinal pain (CSP). Although a gold standard to diagnose CS is lacking, psychophysical pain measures are often used. The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) is proposed as an alternative method and indirect tool for the evaluation of CS symptomatology. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the convergent validity of the CSI by investigating the association with psychophysical pain measures and self-reported measures of current pain intensity, quality of life, disability, and catastrophizing in CSP patients. METHODS: One hundred sixteen patients with nonspecific CSP were included in the present study. Patients completed the CSI, were subjected to pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) and a conditioned pain modulation (CPM) paradigm, and completed questionnaires for current pain intensity, quality of life, pain disability, and pain catastrophizing. RESULTS: Higher CSI scores were weakly correlated with lower PPTs (-0.276 ≤ r ≤ -0.237; all P ≤ 0.01) and not with CPM efficacy (r = 0.017; P = 0.858). Higher CSI scores were moderately correlated with higher current pain intensity (r = 0.320; P < 0.001), strongly correlated with lower physical (r = -0.617; P < 0.001) and emotional (r = -0.635; P < 0.001) quality of life, and moderately correlated with higher pain disability (r = 0.472; P < 0.001) and higher pain catastrophizing (r = 0.464; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The CSI was weakly associated with PPTs and not with CPM efficacy in CSP patients. Moderate to strong associations were found with current pain intensity, quality of life, disability, and catastrophizing. The current results illustrate that the CSI does not reflect a direct measure of CS, yet is a representation of general distress, possible originating from CS symptoms.
OBJECTIVE: Symptoms of central sensitization (CS) have been described in patients with chronic spinal pain (CSP). Although a gold standard to diagnose CS is lacking, psychophysical pain measures are often used. The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) is proposed as an alternative method and indirect tool for the evaluation of CS symptomatology. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the convergent validity of the CSI by investigating the association with psychophysical pain measures and self-reported measures of current pain intensity, quality of life, disability, and catastrophizing in CSP patients. METHODS: One hundred sixteen patients with nonspecific CSP were included in the present study. Patients completed the CSI, were subjected to pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) and a conditioned pain modulation (CPM) paradigm, and completed questionnaires for current pain intensity, quality of life, pain disability, and pain catastrophizing. RESULTS: Higher CSI scores were weakly correlated with lower PPTs (-0.276 ≤ r ≤ -0.237; all P ≤ 0.01) and not with CPM efficacy (r = 0.017; P = 0.858). Higher CSI scores were moderately correlated with higher current pain intensity (r = 0.320; P < 0.001), strongly correlated with lower physical (r = -0.617; P < 0.001) and emotional (r = -0.635; P < 0.001) quality of life, and moderately correlated with higher pain disability (r = 0.472; P < 0.001) and higher pain catastrophizing (r = 0.464; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The CSI was weakly associated with PPTs and not with CPM efficacy in CSP patients. Moderate to strong associations were found with current pain intensity, quality of life, disability, and catastrophizing. The current results illustrate that the CSI does not reflect a direct measure of CS, yet is a representation of general distress, possible originating from CS symptoms.
Authors: Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas; Randy Neblett; Robert J Gatchel; Cristina Roldán-Jiménez Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2020-02-27 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Juliana Valentim Bittencourt; Márcia Cliton Bezerra; Mônica Rotondo Pina; Felipe José Jandre Reis; Arthur de Sá Ferreira; Leandro Alberto Calazans Nogueira Journal: Arch Physiother Date: 2022-02-17
Authors: Luis Matesanz-García; Ferran Cuenca-Martínez; Ana Isabel Simón; David Cecilia; Carlos Goicoechea-García; Josué Fernández-Carnero; Annina B Schmid Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-02-18 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Wouter Van Bogaert; Koen Putman; Iris Coppieters; Lisa Goudman; Jo Nijs; Maarten Moens; Ronald Buyl; Kelly Ickmans; Eva Huysmans Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2021-08-03 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Jone Ansuategui Echeita; Henrica R Schiphorst Preuper; Rienk Dekker; Ilse Stuive; Hans Timmerman; Andre P Wolff; Michiel F Reneman Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-03-08 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Ingrid Schuttert; Hans Timmerman; Kristian K Petersen; Megan E McPhee; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Michiel F Reneman; André P Wolff Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-12-17 Impact factor: 4.241